Democratic Party Warmonger Seeks War with Iran
I didn't catch this at the time but thought it was important to alert concerned citizens.
Rep. Alcee Hastings, a 13 term Democratic party congressional representative from Florida, at 80 years old and one of the poorest (relatively speaking) members of Congress and a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, has sponsored a bill to authorize President Trump to attack Iran. Hastings reintroduced H J Res 10, the “Authorization of Use of Force Against Iran Resolution” on Jan. 3, the first day of the new Congress after President Trump’s election.
Now why would an 80 year old, black, democratic party congressman do that?
Trump has made Iran the centerpiece of his war plans, hiring anti-Iran warmongers up and down his staff. Of course it doesn't really mean anything yet. But the fact that a democratic congressman introduced this the first day of Trump's Republican controlled Congress when Trump and his staff are all hot to trot to go after Iran is significant. What was that song, "the symmetry is too much"?
REFORM THAT!
This has to be taken within the context that Iran has not nor has ever tried to develop a nuclear weapon, there is no evidence for that, our own intelligence agencies agree, and the entire thing (the Iran nuclear "deal") is a charade meant to enable proceeding to the next step, war, which is now in the cards.
IOW, it's all bullshit meant to keep Iran in the "Axis of Evil" as an enemy of the United States and Israel and to prepare the way for more war.
ANY politician that supports the Iran "deal" or believes the Iran deal doesn't go far enough is a big fat liar because there should have been no deal in the first place.
http://www.mintpressnews.com/democrat-ex-dove-alcee-hastings-is-proposin...
Text: H.J.Res.10 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)All Bill Information (Except Text)
There is one version of the bill.
Introduced in House (01/03/2017)
115th CONGRESS, 1st Session
H. J. RES. 10To authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces to achieve the goal of preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJanuary 3, 2017
Mr. Hastings submitted the following joint resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs
JOINT RESOLUTIONTo authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces to achieve the goal of preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. Short title.
This joint resolution may be cited as the “Authorization of Use of Force Against Iran Resolution”.
SEC. 2. Findings.
Congress finds the following:
(1) On July 14, 2015, a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action designed to ensure that Iran’s nuclear program is used solely for peaceful purposes was finalized.
(2) Pursuant to the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, signed into law on May 22, 2015, the United States Congress is tasked with reviewing this plan of action to make certain the terms of the agreement will unequivocally prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear weapons state.
(3) The United States must do all that is necessary to ensure that all of Iran’s pathways to obtaining a nuclear weapon are blocked.
(4) Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon has and will continue to destabilize the region.
(5) Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon is a threat not only to the United States but also to our allies in the region.
(6) Iran’s sincerity in forgoing the procurement of a nuclear weapon has created legitimate cause for concern.
SEC. 3. Authorization for use of United States Armed Forces to achieve the goal of preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.(a) In general.—The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as the President determines necessary and appropriate in order to achieve the goal of preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
(b) War powers resolution requirements.—
(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION.—Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS.—Nothing in this joint resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.
SEC. 4. Report.
Not later than 60 days after the date on which the President exercises the authority described in section 3, and every 60 days thereafter, the President shall submit to Congress a report on the specific actions taken pursuant to such authority.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/10/text
Comments
Alcee Hastings is
very ethically challenged. He gets re-elected because his district was gerrymandered to include mostly black areas in the Ft. Lauderdale area. Read his Wikipedia entry. The guy cannot stay straight if he wanted to. Here is an excerpt about his impeachment.
Notice his ties to the Clintons.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Hastings is, and has been, a public embarrassment to all.
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
If one looks at a map of US military bases, a person
would see a dozen or so bases on two of Iran's borders. The other two are the sea and the mountains of the republic to the north. Iran is hemmed in already. Why war?
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
To paraphrase from a Harry Potter novel...
‘Leave Iran alone,’ Lily repeated. She was looking at James with every sign of great dislike. ‘What’ve they done to you?’
‘Well,’ said James, appearing to deliberate the point, ‘it’s more the fact that they exist, if you know what I mean ...’
I agree. It's like hiking in the desert & you see some nice
Then there's the fact of 1953 which Irani's remember very well.
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
"the fact of 1953"
http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/biography/
The U.N., not stopping wars since forever. Meh. It could be worse I guess. Peace.
Thanks for filling in the background on capitalist attacks
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
Iran is the only Muslim country in the MENA that has yet
to have their government, military, economy, civilian infrastructure and even their centuries old heritage completely shattered by the American war machine implementing The Long War.
Thanks for the information; it had not occurred to me.
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
Made Man of the ruling Crime family.
And the Family wants to loot Persia.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeldwfOwuL8]
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
Ironic
that war would be the way
War is Peace.
@Big Al Big Al,
If it`s war they want, it`s war they`ll get.
Here in Malibu I have my little piggy posse that can kick Ass.
I`m cutting in to say "Hi", since I`ve been a stranger of late. Thank you for your posts & have a great weekend, a hard thing to achieve these days.
I`m already against the next war
Hey Knucklehead,
@Big Al Big Al, I always
As a matter of fact I posted that quite a few years ago.
Open House. Dinner when you show up. The table is set out on my deck.
I`m already against the next war
On this morning's news shows there was a big
Obama publicity blitz. It included an "isn't Dubya adorable" section with Michelle fawning over him. It looks like the status quo factions are closing ranks. Their interests are not ours. They serve the Vampire Squid that feeds them.
"The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?" ~Orwell, "1984"
War criminals can be so cuddly,
once you get to know them.
native
At least to other war criminals. They're all one big, happy
plutocracy.
"The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?" ~Orwell, "1984"
They've always used this BS ploy to get the plebs to fawn
and slobber over him. He's being marketed now like he was before his first election, this dreamy good looking black man who everybody loves and who's America's dreamboat. Sentimental fluff to use on those that read things like People Magazine and Huffington Post and watch KUWTK.
I'm just waiting for them to crank out another picture of him running down the beach in his bathing trunks. (Obama eats it up. He sure is a camera whore.)
During the healthcare hearings I got into it with some of his more 'zealous' supporters who were telling me how racist I was for criticizing this guy. You know who I mean. They said I had no right to criticize him because I was white and any criticism RACIST!!! I told them I sure as hell did have that right because he was plastered all over the media with those 'sexy' pictures and he was sold to all women like movie stars are sold in tabloids and gossip magazines. Since he was supposedly the new heartthrob of the left and he was sold that way, they were full of shit saying white women had no reason right to criticize him. Plus he was half white. THE HOWLS OF OUTRAGE WERE HILARIOUS.
Is there a way to go back and find that stuff? Are comments saved or just OPs? I would love to go re-read that shit again. Even Meteor Blades said that he 'gave me credit' for what I was trying to say, but it probably wasn't going to go over with the in-crowd. It didn't. But it was fun.
I was always destined for a short shelf life on TOP. And I made the most of it.
I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks
Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa
Where's his horse?
Can Trump be worse than FDR?
Probably. Ignore the inflammatory click bait subject. Thanks.
The Tokyo Fire Raids, 1945
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/firebombing-of-tokyo
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-firebombing-of-tokyo-continues
The world is not my enemy, includes Iran. Peace.
Historians seem to agree that the war could have been
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
Japan had lost the war and was searching for an avenue to
capitulate. The bombs were dropped solely for US dominance over the Soviet Union and the new world order that was unfolding at the end of the war.
Within 2 years after WW2 ended, 4 major newspapers
This backs up what you just said - I agree, there's a connection and a message sent and that message said "we're starting thee Cold War and it's aimed at you."
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
@eyo Absolutely horrific. Man
I don`t like having to thank you for some of these insights into history, but if not for those like you, historians all, the truth remains hidden, so, Thank you.
And please, do read my sigline.
I`m already against the next war
While America fills coffins, China fills coffers.
And this has been true for two decades. The US has been so intent on spending its treasure on wars and military interventions, both overt and covert, it failed to notice it was badly losing an economic/demographic war across Eurasia. China and its partners will most likely have a 7,500 mile HSR right across Eurasia well before the US finishes the 520 mile California HSR (scheduled to be completed in 2029).
Trump is a businessman. Do you think he will notice what is going on? Or has the war mongering Deep State finally managed to get a ring firmly attached to his snout?
Well said!
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
It is a shell game.
Same people who own the US own China and Russia. When you lay down with dogs, everyone gets fleas.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
Maybe same 'family' but not the same people.
I think there is considerable sibling rivalry as well as jealousy between the members of the 'family'. It is not a homogeneous entity and shifts with time. WWII was an excellent example of how these 'brotherly' allegiances formed, shifted and reformed.
I think all this talk of having a war with Iran
is just political posturing. It's crazy-talk. There is no way the USA could possibly attack Iran without incurring serious damage to itself, its global influence, its economy, its oil industry, and god knows what else. To do so would be a potentially suicidal blunder. I find it hard to believe that America's ruling elite, greedy and obstreperous and Zionist though it often seems to be, would ever resort to something quite that bat-shit crazy.
native
Never stopped em before.
Essentially they're holding a gun to the US and smiling as we pray they won't pull the trigger.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9mJ82x_l-E]
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
@detroitmechworks I'm not nearly high
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
@detroitmechworks Thanks for the video -
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
Agree. The US cannot go to war with Iran, Russia or China.
The costs would be much too great for America. But the US Deep State is very adept at creating proxy wars as a means to its ends if it is unable to involve itself militarily with complete impunity.
Unfortunately, as we have recently witnessed, even low level proxy wars combined with sanctions can destroy countries as much as, if not greater, as an all out war.
Fortunately for Iran, internal sectarian divisions cannot be used as a fulcrum because the country is 90-95% Shia. The only proxy war the US can foment against Iran would be to get Saudi Arabia involved, possibly using Yemen as a casus belli. We can see this now taking place with the seemingly schizophrenic US policies and actions in that region. They have been playing both ends of the field for over a decade.
Conventional war like they did with Iraq,
It all sounds crazy but we're dealing with crazy people.
The Iranian people are still standing with their government
despite many failed US attempts to foment internal strife since the US installed Shaw and the brutal CIA trained SAVAK were given the boot by the Iranian people.
Iranian Public Opinion on the Nuclear Negotiations
Iranians, unlike their counterparts in the US, know their history quite well (as do the majority of the people in the nations that the US intervenes in). US propaganda mainly brainwashes Americans. Unfortunately, it works exceptionally well.
The Saudi army can't even defeat the Houthis,
never mind the Iranians. I don't see it as posing any threat to Iran's very capable military forces. Any war with Iran would surely prove disastrous for the Kingdom. And what other proxies could the US possibly use? We've done run out of proxies in that neck of the woods. Regardless of all the bluster we're hearing from various war hawks, America doesn't have the stomach to send large numbers of its own troops into battle, yet again. I don't think that's a politically feasible option, no matter what Trump says.
native
I agree. But the US can't seem to stop meddling in the region.
It has been addicted to the pursuit of world hegemony since the end of WWII.
McMaster as National Security Advisor is going to be especially troublesome in this respect.
Edit to add "coincidence".
Hah, some coincidence.
We're just having a friendly little get-together, that's all...in Iran's back yard.
It's true, the MIC establishment likes and trusts McMaster. It's probably why Trump chose him.
native
@CB
It seems apparent that, first, the US PTB wanted to support the Nazis, then they wanted to be the Nazis. And so far, they seem to have been doing even more damage than the Nazis succeeded in doing and are ready to enact the Final Solution to life on the planet.
Why can't these lunatics commit their own unwitting suicides first?
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
@native
Yes, but the crazies are ravingly eager to use those stock-piled nukes on a range of countries strong enough to withstand conventional invasion and attacks. Even if they themselves wind up huddled in luxury bunkers until the power fails and the oxygen runs out, as the last life in the world to die - but to die 'king'. Queen, in the case of already-Zombie Hillary, of course.
Edit to add the extrapolated disastrous global results of '... A limited, regional nuclear war between India and Pakistan ...': which must in turn be extrapolated to the US PTB setting off Mutual Assured Destruction among multiple countries, with the reality-deficient ignoramuses of the Parasite Class foolishly thinking that they could somehow survive comfortably, and maybe even have a special country with magically retained oxygen to move to.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EF000205/full
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
@CB But some of the people
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
I agree with detroitmechworks.
Assuming something suicidal for the United States would not be part of the agenda of the CIA/PNAC is short-sighted. They are in the business of expanding company power, not national power. Clearly they are opposed to democracy in any form, including especially the false kinds in Syria and Iran, where women vote, where there is (was) healthcare, education, and small business. That is what they are working to eradicate. And they'll stop at nothing.
And if war with Iran
becomes war with Russia overnight, so be it. If that means the destruction of American cities, so be it. It will make the case for the usefulness of nuclear weapons, no matter how much of the United States is no longer liveable. These people are psychopaths. Psychopathology is what it takes to be successful in this business.
*shakes head* sadly
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
@native There's a division within
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
@native
There are those among the Parasite Class who believe that if they only clap hard enough for themselves, they can create any 'reality' they want reality to really be and have it somehow made real. These are crazy-people. Unfortunately, they're taking the rest of us with them, because we are letting the few destroy all democracy, civilization, life on the planet...
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
I prefer the deal to shooting down Iranian and Russian
planes and moving NATO troops into Tehran and, probably shortly thereafter, Simferopol.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
He's senile on top of being an ethical embarrassment
to Floridians like me. But the real showstopper down here in O-ville is the trio of vomit: tRump, Bitch DeVos, and Retch Scott meeting at a Catholic school today to push taxpayer money into funding ONLY private schools. According to tRump, the future of American education has to be profit driven. This bozo makes Rayguns look like Einstein. Hastings is not even a blip on the screen. Rec'd!!
Inner and Outer Space: the Final Frontiers.
Cassandra keeps trying
War with Iran will lead to war with China - before the Chinese are ready. The Chinese ecological meltdown will occur in about five years, and China will have to go to war or starve and drown in a flood of cholera epidemics and COPD. They will need oil for that war - middle eastern oil. That is why W started the whole damn process, and why Obama escalated it.
Interesting: China's ICBMs cannot be fired fast enough for a retaliatory strike, while America's can, meaning that if the US fires first we win, but if China fires first we all die. Enter Russia.
If China can convince (or if the US proves) that Russian survival requires a first strike, then Russia will provide enough nukes to strike "successfully" (China also probably doesn't have enough nukes to "succeed" alone) while also bleeding off enough of the US retaliatory strike to give China a chance to "survive". Enter the Ukraine.
If Russian/EU tensions continue, Russia will have to target most of its nukes against the EU. Thus Obama's strategy - "let's you and him fight". (and if the "Russian Spies!" story is real then it makes sense)
Then all we have to do is wait until China gives us justification for a first strike.
How's that for cynicism?
On to Biden since 1973
@doh1304
Well, in that case, the cream of the joke will be on the instigators, huddled in their quake-wracked bunkers, having made Earth inimical to life and, however dressed up they may be, having left themselves absolutely nowhere to go when the power dies and their oxygen - the last breathable air on Earth - is gone... That's assuming that the globe remains in roughly the same shape, of course.
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
It's no secret to world history buffs that Iran
wants to be Persia again and respected. Iranians/Persians are very intelligent people. USA! USA! messes with them, and it will wish it hadn't.
Inner and Outer Space: the Final Frontiers.
Can American citizens place
Can American citizens place sanctions on corrupt politicians/parties?
Failing this, why aren't massive sanctions being placed by the American public, in the form of mass boycotts, on all corrupt corporate/billionaire funders dependent upon consumer support, as a start?
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.