Spitballing a New Left Politics
I've been somewhat out of pocket the past couple of months, avoiding politics and current events to a great degree. Have had a few changes in my work life as well, which will give me a little more time for my family and my thoughts. I've been doing some reading here at C99 and at a few other places, but mostly stepping back. As a result, I've found my political views evolving somewhat beyond the direction they were taking around the time of the November election. A little slow to the table, but this essay is an attempt to begin sorting my thoughts.
It's clear to most of us that the Democratic party has outlived its usefulness as a vehicle for our political aspirations. The Sanders campaign outed it as primarily a veal pen intended to catch and neuter the left, delivering it to the same oligarchic interests that run the Republican party and the corporate media. I've read some thinking lately that debates the virtues of this politician or that, or the pros and cons of founding a new political party vs. trying once again to reform the Democrats. This all misses the point, as I now see it.
One of my favorite political observations is the famous one from Frederick Douglass:
Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has and it never will.
An essay by the wonderful maggid today, Mom and Dad are getting divorced: A family dynamics analogy, provides another meaty quote, from Slavoj Zizek:
The marriage between democracy and capitalism is over.
Both of these quotes point toward a new direction in politics, it seems to me, away from a focus on electoral results and toward an issues-based, activist political era. The best result of the already-disastrous Trump presidency could be a new era of activism analogous to the 1960's, when millions demonstrated and held their politicians of both parties to account for their actions on the most burning issues of the day, civil rights and the Vietnam war. Today we have no-less burning issues, climate change and economic inequality. Neither political party has any significant interest in addressing either, so the people must make demands. What should those demands be?
Given the scale of our challenges, I'm currently thinking we need two central demands:
1. Removing carbon from the atmosphere.
2. Creating an economy that works for all of us, rather than one that we work for.
To create a carbon-negative human world, we need several uncompromising policies:
- Phase out the internal combustion engine.
- Phase out carbon fuels for electricity generation.
- Reduce beef and other livestock production, focusing on sustainable animal protein sources.
- Heavily tax fossil fuels commodities.
- Punitively tax corporations that extract fossil fuels.
- Invest in reforestation, soil and marine carbon sequestration, and combating desertification.
Reorienting our economy away from predatory capitalism to serving the people is even more complicated, and will be more heavily resisted in the US. I believe the most important steps in beginning this process would be to focus on one issue: a guaranteed living income for all Americans. Economic inequality has produced a profoundly cruel and unjust economy in America, in which some have wealth far in excess of any good it might do for themselves, and most have far too little to see to their needs in anything approaching a humane way. We have chosen to live in this kind of a country; we should strongly advocate a different choice.
A guaranteed annual income would insure food, shelter, health care, educational opportunity, and basic dignity to all. It has been proposed occasionally by Republicans and Democrats in recent decades, but never taken seriously. I believe it should be a bedrock principle for a new leftist politics, a non-negotiable demand.
Other issues which would help reorient our economy in a democratic direction:
- A guaranteed jobs program for those who can work, with income augmenting the basic income guarantee.
- A revised income tax exempting the guaranteed income, and starting with a low rate at the 50th income percentile. It should rise first gradually, then very steeply at high incomes, reaching perhaps 90% above $10 million.
- An annual wealth tax on the order of 1% of in-country or expatriated assets above $10 million, 3% above $100 million, 5% above $1 billion and 8% above $5 billion.
- Laws and tax policies that promote domestic employment and severely penalize offshoring to reduce labor costs or evade environmental regulation.
- Revision of corporation law to reorient corporate obligations: highest priorities to avoid adding carbon to the atmosphere or seas, and to bring economic benefit to communities in which they operate. Shareholder value would be statutorily secondary.
- Medicare for All healthcare program, providing comprehensive health and dental care for all citizens, including elder care expenses.
- Public financing of daycare, primary and secondary education, and college or technical school. Severe restrictions on for-profit educational alternatives.
Other issues are also vital to a new leftist politics, including public financing of campaigns, nonpartisan redistricting, universal voter registration, expanding anti-discrimination protections, making the criminal justice system accountable, etc. But any new politics must have a clear focus on one or two issues, ideally of greatest importance to young people.
Bernie Sanders' campaign gave us a peek at what might work. His campaign made the perhaps fatal error of joining the Democratic party, which made good tactical sense but was a poor strategic decision. Our new politics must follow the 1960's model, appealing directly to the people without the intermediation of politicians or parties. If we can create a strong movement, the political parties can either come to it or die and be replaced. That question is of secondary importance at this time. How to build the new movement, identifying who's already doing it, helping them build their strength and create interconnections are far more critical for us now.
Comments
Forgive the superficial outline
Not much original here, but I've put it down to begin organizing my thoughts. Many in this community have thought far more deeply than I have, and I will look forward to your critiques and suggestions.
Please help support caucus99percent!
So good to see you again.
And thanks for the organized outline. You sense, as many of us do, the current difficulty in herding the cats into a coherent movement. Yours could be the rallying cry we all need.
Nice to read you again, Doc.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage
Thanks, my friend
It sort of feels like I'm starting over, as so many of the contributions I've made in the past belong in a political world that feels dead. I don't know what comes next -- don't know if anybody does. But one great thing about this community is that it's interested in thinking and talking about such questions. It's nice to read and write here.
Please help support caucus99percent!
I feel that too.
A undeniable malaise has cursed the land! The result of untenable people in office. People that should be exiled to some barren isle in a cold climate.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage
If you mean Dante's Hell
where Satan is frozen in ice, then yes, you are correct.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
That'll work!
Now where is my copy of Tchaikovsky's rendering of Dante's Inferno? It has to be here somewhere.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage
Of course. Count me in--but
we're not facing a policy crisis, no matter how much it seems we are. We're facing a political crisis. I guess I'm going back to your first quotation: Power concedes nothing without a demand. For it to be a demand, rather than a request, there have to be some consequences if the answer is no.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
Spineless Democrats and MoveOn
Yesterday, Robert Reich, in the name of MoveOn said that we should pressure spineless Dems (i.e., almost the entire upper echelon) of course by mounting a campaign (please donate, please /s) to tell them to grow a spine. Bull. If the campaign doesn't involve primarying the bastards it will never work. If you wanna get better Dems, throw out the current lot. I don't think that will work but do support anyone willing to make the effort.
Robert Reich, yeah.
I guess he's running for the office of First Pleader Before the Emperor if the Dems ever win an election again.
"The future is inside us/ It's not somewhere else." -- Radiohead
@sojourns Frankly, I'd be OK
Frankly, I'd be OK with them just taking their blood money and retiring to some gorgeous tropical island they own, and leaving us to repair their fucking damage.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
@sojourns Not that I wouldn't
Not that I wouldn't like some just punishment for these bastards, but really, at this point, all I want is for them to get out of my fucking way.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
@Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal
Which would also take them out of their purportedly-feared pitchfork-range. Why the heck don't they go to those 'emergency escape' places in New Zealand now, rather than polishing off the rest of civilization and any chance of planetary life surviving first? Why are they so intent on draining everyone else of every last cent they have, to the point of globally placing everyone's money exclusively in the hands of financial institutions, via a 'cashless society' scheme rendering everyone penniless, starving and helpless at any major power-outage/hack/'lost electronic records' claim by banks/the US-'legalized' bank robbery of their own depositors money if they ever run short by recklessly crashing or whatever, as they're soon expected to do?
How much, I wonder, does it cost to buy into the 'immortality tech' which various billionaires have been suckered into investing in for some time, and which the White House-integrated Google is working on?
Apparently a few of the very wealthiest and would-be very wealthiest do-anything-for-money types want to live forever in the hell-on-Earth they're creating in the process, substituting 'Virtual Reality' for the reality they anyway refuse to accept, and I'm seriously wondering how much this has to do with the current lunacy.
Googled: Billionaires invest immortality research - maybe try it and see what you get?
If possible, these are best read in full at source, should whatever device used be able to manage it.
Please note names and occupations involved and especially the emphasis on surrendering life in order to 'live forever' as a machine/computer program with their characteristics realistically reproduced, apparently under the notion that they themselves will not still die with their bodies, even though a recording of their personalities may continue to play while power lasts.
Obama has suggested that he's interested in joining other politicians from the Bush Admin and elsewhere as a hedge fund manager in Silicone Valley, because this matches his interest in genome research and (magical) science.
But this does nothing to improve human life-spans, rather it's eliminating life to be replaced with 'better-than-life' robots/computers. The ultimate meritocracy, in which life simply does not deserve to exist because robots/computers 'can do anything better than humans can'.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/20/the-immortality-financi...
Why would anyone want to outlive their bodies by nano-teching their brains, experimentally messing with what makes each of us human individuals? Sponsoring the Zombie Revolution for real?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-12/billionaires-scramble-immortali...
A major problem with their theories is that - as is typical in the branch of the petrochemical/GMO/nanotech industry we term Big Pharma - they prefer to ignore biology. I've heard what we think of as aging described as being the result of insults which the body has been unable to heal - and 'cost-cutting' industrial pollution, inadequate nutrition (such as that supplied by profitable factory-farmed/GMO/petrochemically affected foods, such as with pesticides which prevent the uptake/function of essential dietary minerals) are indeed major impediments to optimized cellular-and-up biological function, to say the least. But these are so profitable to the few - the only thing to do is to ignore reality and create more 'virtual reality' to substitute for real reality and science, the latter involving the study of the former and how it works in reality. What could possibly go wrong?
Another is that these life-despising personalities are to be programmed into theoretically immortal machines forming the Singularity - what could possibly go wrong there, either? I suppose that 1984 wasn't enough of a text for them...
http://www.newsweek.com/2015/03/13/silicon-valley-trying-make-humans-imm...
Nah, that's not for the non-billionaire proles, or for those who love and do not fear life.
In this scenario, there will be nothing left on greed-destroyed Earth but a few programmed machines with the personality disorders of a few billionaires having the option of running endless virtual reality scenarios until the power runs out... and just maybe a few frantic trapped and disintegrating personalities in glitching nano-trapped artificial-brain-cages, possibly forever?
And I am seriously wondering if some form of nanotech experimentation may potentially have been responsible for Planned-President Hillary's
glitchinghealth issues, (with her daughter apparently having purchased an apartment in which she could recover, with a clinic inside the building?) after reading a reference to the new President Trump's claimed concern about ramps and stairs and his prompt vacation and Obama joining Bush Admin and other high public officials in Silicon Valley? Is the 'human' part of some high public officials now being 'nano-machined' out of existence? Since that's what Google's working on doing (having become so closely entwined with Obama's White House and all) and so many billionaire donors are pouring funds into?The only thing I'm sure about is that this transfer of the actual consciousness, rather than a personality record and characteristics, of people into machine form to let them specifically live forever cannot actually work - precisely because biology and machinery are not the same, any more than corporations or machines can ever be human.
Unless, of course, it was really true that the existence of photographic images actually can steal people's souls, as was once thought by comparable earlier magical thinkers, who in this case would probably have figured out the 'transfer' scam after realizing that they still remained in their own bodies, however many copies of their image were made.
And within the world such profiteers are so eager to pollute and destroy for literally insane profits, quite possibly to buy a postulated immortality within their very own created hell.
Explains a lot, doesn't it, if they think they'll no longer need human things?
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
Not superficial at all
and good to see you back.
This quote:
"It's clear to most of us that the Democratic party has outlived its usefulness as a vehicle for our political aspirations. The Sanders campaign outed it as primarily a veal pen intended to catch and neuter the left, delivering it to the same oligarchic interests that run the Republican party and the corporate media."
... accurately depicts my current sentiments. The Democrats meed to go the way of the Whigs. They serve no useful purpose other than as a foil for the GOP and a way to block progressive voices and policies. They even sold out cheap to the big money interests (other than the Clintons, of course, who are master grifters).
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
wow. No kidding--
I needed to look up the whigs to learn a more about them. They were exactly as you said. Much like the contemporary Democratic party. Farmers being the blue collar workers of the day, they were ignored by the Whigs -- and so on.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage
@sojourns Foundationalism
Here's an old idea that should be recycled.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundationalism
I'm a big believer in it. It would be a good start in the financial world, the medical world, the dietary world, the educational world, the arts, etc......
Doc, don't agree with you on live stock. Grass feed livestock as our main source of food would be 1000 times better for the planet and our health than the agricultural nightmare we have created. Just take a look at the palm oil disaster in Malayasia. Beef is now the liberal way of thinking. Vegetarian is almost Reaganesque it's so old and conservative.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." - Groucho
@the_poorly_educated
Grass feed livestock = cycle of life. When honestly and properly done, of course.
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
Excellent essay
Really happy to see you again and read your thoughts. Like many people, I too am searching for what to do, other than give up. I'm short on time now so will just say two quick thoughts for now.
First, I think the great contribution of Bernie's campaign was to finally and completely unmask the Democratic Party. I don't know if that was his intention or not, but he did. Many newly opened eyes now, and it won't be as easy for the party to keep pretending to be something they are not. And Bernie showed that millions of people do want something else, and will open their wallets to support a candidate who rejects corporate funding.
Second is that I fully and strongly agree with the guaranteed minimum income for all idea, and with the way you defined it. That is exactly what we need in order to get past the deadlock where capitalism = jobs and we can't scale back on anything that costs jobs, because people will die without those terrible jobs, and therefore will fight to the end for them, no matter how destructive in the big picture.
Thanks so much for writing today. I'm uplifted by your words.
I agree with you about Bernie's campaign
It performed two vital services: it showed the continuing power of the left in the public imagination, despite decades of both parties doing their best to smother it. And Bernie showed how corrupt, dishonest and anti-democratic the Democratic party is. Quite a few people knew these things before, but millions upon millions more know them now.
I hope the Left has the wit to go forward, not back, as it reforms and gathers strength. The wonderful young people drawn to Bernie's campaign encourage me that this will happen. I'm getting on in years, and the future is really in their hands. Between the Democratic party's recent performance, and the Trump Republican party's present and future performance, I have great hope that the young will rise again to stop the madness. I watched it happen before, and I know it can happen again.
Please help support caucus99percent!
"Second is that I fully and strongly agree with the guaranteed"
This must be done. If the captains of industry are going to continue to automate everything, then all working people are at risk. Not limited to blue collar workers either. Computers write better code than people.
I'm all for it, other than the scary AI skynet element that should not be dismissed as mere sci-fi folly. Look as what the NSA is already capable of doing. Why should people toil if machines can do the work -- on an elevated level? Guaranteed income or no, most people want to work at something.
This guy, Jacques Fresco has been envisioning this for decades. I keep plugging him because I think that not enough people know about him.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage
@sojourns That's what people used
That's what people used to say the age of automation was going to be. Everybody from the Jetsons to Gene Roddenberry. They didn't say the rise of technology was going to result in the owners basically setting up workers to die in extremely large numbers, because they didn't need us anymore.
I haven't forgotten the older idea either.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
It's just me but
I'm confused by what you are trying to say here?? Are you at all referring to the Luddites, who were really just in fear of losing their hard earned, polished craft and not necessarily anti-technology.
Elucidate! Please.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage
@sojourns No, I'm just saying
No, I'm just saying that I, too, remember the older idea that the age of automation was going to provide a kind of eudaimonia for the human race, in which everybody gets to pursue their highest self, while all the dirty work gets done by the machines.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
You are reminding me of something one of my
Music theory teachers wrote in his textbook. Something to the effect that when mankind advances enough to alleviate us from the toils of life, we should all be able to have the privilege to study music.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage
@sojourns I must study
I must study Politicks and War that my sons may have liberty to study Mathematicks and Philosophy. My sons ought to study Mathematicks and Philosophy, Geography, natural History, Naval Architecture, navigation, Commerce and Agriculture, in order to give their Children a right to study Painting, Poetry, Musick, Architecture, Statuary, Tapestry and Porcelaine.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
Great to hear from you, my friend!
I remember Barney Franks talking about OWS, how it was important but doomed to fail, since didn't call for a particular vote, or target a politician to bring something to a vote. Maybe on Maddow's show?
I hate to agree with him, but we have this horrid governmental system where redress and reform has to result in a vote by people who are adverse to everything your movements propose.
I said adverse. Perhaps averse?
I love movements. I love your pecking order.
Nobody in power will be pressured to go our way.
Why would they?
As long as my neighbor is not in congress, but his boss is, we are stalled out.
Revolution.
Let's do this this thing.
I don't agree with Barney at all
He was a creature of the system, and was blind to any value or virtue outside of it. OWS clearly didn't have the vision to build on their start in a politically potent way, and I suspect its successors will not make this mistake.
The anti-Vietnam and civil rights movements didn't start by lobbying politicians for particular bills. They got out in the streets, braved dogs and firehoses and bullets, and changed people's minds through direct action and a challenge to the status quo. Once the requisite power and attention were attained, the lobbying and horse-trading were possible. You don't start in the halls of Congress, you end up there. Barney forgot that.
Please help support caucus99percent!
Two things
First, it is great to see this essay from you, Doc. Your voice is always so lucid and pitch perfect on these issues. This essay is a great distillation of the issues that social movements must address to effect change.
Second, I have always believed that all meaningful change comes from the ground up via social movements. Politicians act as the gate keepers to the status quo and only react when a social movement becomes too large or too strong to ignore. This is why the government from the federal level on down worked so hard to crush Occupy. Occupy had the potential to become a social movement that could not be ignored. My own personal belief is that the next social movement may not be so easily crushed.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Geez, do we really have to
knock the desperate people who stared OWS?
The dems kneecapped them too.
dfarrah
Viet Nam and the Civil Rights Marches
occurred in a different time and under different circumstances. Unlike Iraq, every family in America ran the risk of losing a son or a brother or a classmate with the draft and the lottery. TPTB recognized that fatal flaw to their global plans and got rid of it. If the economy remains a wasteland for the 99%, they will always have a successful "economic draft" where people will enlist in order to get education and experience. (Hmm.. come to think of it, free university tuition might be a huge threat to maintaining a volunteer army in the future.)
Civil Rights was simply an undeniable moral imperative that could not be denied any longer and like Viet Nam, the lives of the participants were on the line as was society in general since at some point, if peaceful protest failed, we would experience the alternative.
Those two issues were crisis points, the likes of which we haven't seen in decades although we may not be far off. BLM shows that despite civil rights, massive suppression of a race continued apace, just quietly, one black man arrested and incarcerated at a time.
I also think at some point the economic despair caused by debt peonage, inadequate incomes, high costs of shelter, astronomic health costs, etc. if not stopped, should accelerate to the point of riots, but where and when and if, I cannot say. Currently the masses are expressing their despair through killing themselves with opioides or other forms of suicide or allowing poor health to carry them off.
This is one of our problems which OWS highlighted - it's much harder to agitate against these direct causes of middle-class mayhem which appear to be indirect simply because they are not as obvious as sending us to foreign countries to be shot at or shooting us themselves in the streets.
TPTB have successfully told Big Lies about how it's all so complex that the little people keep thinking people have done illegal things while screwing them over (which they have) but it's really only unseemly and immoral and unethical and reprehensible. Eric Holder himself defined the policy that economic crimes that are massive are not to be prosecuted because of the resultant economic fall-out and disruption - to TPTB, not to us, the victims. Thus, we ignore personnel at our peril. Since personnel IS policy, why should we rely ever on the wrong people to implement the right policy? And right now we have two houses of Congress and the Presidency filled with all the wrong people.
I agree completely that all the most effective and long-lasting change has percolated from the bottom-up, but we need to replace the people responsible for the implementation as well.
" “Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough.” FDR "
No question we need an inside and an outside game
I think our error in recent years, though, has been to work primarily on the inside-politics game, which is seriously gamed against us. Outside issues-based political efforts have generally taken a back seat, and this has proved to be a serious error.
For grassroots folks like us, I've come to believe that our efforts would be better leveraged by joining non-partisan (even anti-partisan) issues movements, and building coalitions between them outside party politics. The inside game isn't ours to win at this time. If we can build a critical mass of outside pressure, I suspect the inside game will become a lot more winnable. Right now, it's not. But once we have the power in the streets and in social media, politicians will find us.
Please help support caucus99percent!
Re: dkos and focus on elections
I joined dkos back in early to mid 2008 after watching and reading there for a while. One thing that always bothered me was the entire focus upon electoral politics. I can clearly remember that Markos did not believe in grass roots movements outside the Democratic party framework. I watched how he and most of the front pagers openly dissed the Occupy movement as being a waste of time. I was too naive to understand that was a purposeful decision. By keeping the framework focused upon the Democratic party, electoral politics, and other narrow social issues, any meaningful change was automatically precluded.
A couple of years ago, I sent Markos an email asking that the site spend more time on its front page focusing upon real issues such as income inequality, wars, and climate change. I laid out a compelling reason why I thought it was important. Markos completely ignored my email and that is when I decided that dkos was irrelevant to me. I also predicted that it would become irrelevant in 2016, based upon the assumption that Hillary Clinton would become elected President. Well, my basis for the irrelevance of dkos was wrong, but dkos has become irrelevant, not just to me or many members like me who have left, but also in having real effect in other media too.
People are desperate for real and meaningful change that will make their lives better. Identity politics can only go so far in a vacuum. It becomes simply a shiny object only when a person does not have a living wage job, or cannot put food on the table, or cannot afford an education for their children, or cannot afford clean drinking water and/or real health care.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
@Dallasdoc But in this case, you
But in this case, you're not going to end up in those halls unless most of the people currently there are gone. And, under current conditions, you're not gonna get them out. We have to change the conditions. Scary and challenging time.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
Tremendous video, CStS
one I desperately needed to hear, in part to understand better some of your recent posts - and I thought I had a solidly dark perspective. Genuinely looking forward now to the 'Deep State for Dummies' material she mentioned.
@Creosote. I know I've been
I know I've been more depressing than usual of late. Watching the establishment create puppet versions of real fights for social justice has gotten me down, and watching the people I care about buy into it is not only demoralizing, but also puts me in a really bad position. I'm the jerk who gets to tell them that their protest is actually serving the establishment and maintaining the status quo. Or, I can just talk less, which sometimes seems to be the right course, because there's no point in repeatedly telling people something that they don't want to hear. But if I fall silent in response to this psy-op, then the psy-op is successful. It's very much like what was done through Barack Obama. There's this category of people and actions that left-wingers have designated as sacred cows, and that sacred cow designation has gotten extra vehemence behind it because people are desperate for anything positive. I mean, the very fact that some people felt the need to rally behind Hillary Clinton because she doesn't believe in the state-sanctioned murder of Black children shows you where we are better than anything I could say. It's like me saying "I don't believe in killing babies with a shovel," and everybody on C99 saying "Wow, CSTS *doesn't* believe in killing babies with a shovel! Hail to the Chief! Get that girl into the Oval Office toute suite!" Although, really, it's not even that. If I were to make my allegory really accurate, CSTS would be against killing babies with a shovel stateside, but entirely OK with killing babies with a shovel in foreign countries.
The question is, how much do you have to ignore to support a given person, organization, or movement? And what, specifically, are you being asked to ignore? Sane Progressive has laid out what we have to ignore about Justice Democrats, and it's the same thing we're being asked to ignore about Brand New Congress and Our Revolution. There's a lot of things I've been asked to ignore about the Women's March, and even some things I've been asked to ignore about the immigration protests, which are admittedly better than the Women's March in that at least they have specific goals and DON'T have Debbie Wasserman-Schultz on the stage, but which are still based on a disingenuous double standard--and are being treated entirely differently by the corporate media than progressive protests usually are, which should be a red flag to any progressive or leftist.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
Yes, TY - threads running in all directions
One view Sane Progressive stated twice has to do with the present need for not-doing (my term) contra the pressure to "act now" or to know right away or align with what must be done, as if a recipe existed. Yet there she is, and in her shoes one can watch one fireman analyze how best to enter the burning building.
Nonsense.
If Bernie was (and is) about anything, he's about taking it to the streets. His campaign was all about bottom up politics and said so. "This ain't about me, it's about us."
the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.
Let me offer my view of OWS
OWS while not having an impact on this or that particular policy, did something amazing. It gave the American people a language on how to talk about class warfare and a rigged economic system that could not be dismissed with red baiting by both republicans and democrats. I would claim that Bernie's campaign is a descendant of OWS. Bernie was the electoral expression of OWS--economic populism. In fact, I would say OWS gave Obama the victory after the Rommey taped comments about 46% of democrats are like on welfare: OWS gave people a language to understand Rommey's comments. How much more odious was Hillary's obedience to Wall Street with OWS. OWS was the first crack in the cultural imperialism of crony capitalism.
Agree completely
OWS and their rallying cry of the 99% gave this community its name. It powerfully and universally placed economic inequality at the center stage of American political life, reversing decades of corporatist propaganda. It also invalidated the Obama administration's claims to be doing most Americans any good, because the gains remained concentrated at the top, and income inequality only continuously rose from the depths of the 2008 crash.
OWS changed the battleground on which politics will be fought. Hillary Clinton lost because she refused to recognize that, and dug in her heels when her challenger tried to bring the campaign where it needed to go. Everything we do going forward will owe a debt to OWS' contribution. I hope the near future will see an equally seminal moment for the climate change movement.
Please help support caucus99percent!
I don't think
Bernie's candidacy was a descendant of OWS. Though I don't think Bernie was a hippie, his political philosophy is archetypal Sixties moderate leftist. I don't think he inspired or gave birth to OWS or it to him. I think they developed in parallel lines, with OWS's "line" beginning much later than Bernie's. I totally agree that OWS created a way of thinking and speaking about financial policies that made Bernie's message easier to deliver and perhaps made it more resonant. However, I think Bernie could have run as successfully as he did, even if OWS had never happened for the simple reason that he was selling what Americans have been longing to be able to buy.
In my opinon, OWS was a rousing success, as the name of
this board shows. (the "99%" is from Orwell, but no one was using it before Boston Occupy.) Even though media tried to ignore OWS as long as possible--and dissed it when it finally began covering it-- Occupy changed the national conversation about money and jobs entirely in a matter of a few weeks, without buying TV ads or spending any money to speak of. Madison Avenue would give its eye teeth to know how to pull off something like that.
@on the cusp That was actually Frank
That was actually Frank complaining because OWS wasn't willingly trooping into the Democratic slaughterhouse along with all the other progressive movements.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
This is a very enlightening start
for a new direction. And it simply reinforces concepts which have already been stated elsewhere. You've compiled all the rational demands which need to be immediately addressed in the near future. It's not necessary to have a crystal ball to see this. It's all self-evident to any informed, reasonable and thinking citizen.
One thing I've learned in my profession
... is the difference between knowing something and needing to hear it anyway. Putting words on the page has a value, even when they seem self-evident. That's why I wrote this: to see how it looks and reads.
Please help support caucus99percent!
crystal ball
Or Krystal Marie Ball either, for that matter.
It's also not rocket surgery!
Which is why so many of TPTB are hell-bent on destroying everything which leads to the reation of just such people.....
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
My catch-all political term
is that we need to adapt to the 21st century. We need to go green, incorporating all your well laid-out plans/ideas. Leave the fossil fuels behind. Easily understood. And possible steamroll in the right direction(s).
The only thing I would add is the military. It seems to me that they have taken over what, 50% of our budget. And honestly, to me it's not the money. It's the murdering from Libya to Iraq and I pray not Iran. Obama's greatest achievement was the treaty with Iran. IMHO
Peace.
I left a lot out
I think a left agenda needs to be intellectually and ethically consistent, and it takes some real work to put all our problems in an easily understood framework.
De-globalization and local self-reliance may provide an organizing framework in a climate-change challenged world. We don't need to be shipping crap all over the world just so mindless consumerism can make profits for the way-too-rich. Devolution has already begun in the EU, and it may make sense for the US to embrace political devolution as well. But first we need to redefine the country as a compassionate one, in which we're all in this together even if we rely more on ourselves in some respects.
If we stop depending on Middle East oil and East Asian sweatshops, and focus more on making our own country better, I would expect what the international meddlers call "isolationism" to reassert itself. This is a strong traditional strain in American politics, and I think it's long overdue for a comeback. Pushing back on the national security state's endless domestic spying is a natural pairing for a de-militarization campaign.
Please help support caucus99percent!
@p cook @Dallasdoc I was in those anti
I was in those anti-Vietnam protests. I am lucky I didn't get kicked out of college or shot.
All I am saying is those people in power way back then did not have the lobbies and PACS and cush "member of the board" at Monsanto, etc...expectation that they do now. They just didn't.
Well, they do now.
Barney was right. Not that I admire him in any way, but it is what it is.
Basically, you want a movement to bring about change? About anything?
It will come to a vote.
I am very depressed that my heart, soul, my wishes and desires, are in the hands of Congress.
Great to read a Dallasdoc essay again.
I read C99% every day, but haven't commented too much in the past couple of weeks as things have been hectic for me lately. I second everything that you've written in your piece. As usual, your comments are insightful and would go a long way to turn this country in the direction that it needs to travel, if only they were followed.
My problem is that America may have already crossed the Rubicon, that even our institutions cannot save us. I am concerned that America is getting exactly what it wants.
Americans howled with laughter when Kim Jong-un announced that he went to an 18 hole golf course and carded an 18. Yet. Despite photographic evidence that would leave only one interpretation to a 1st grader, Trump supporters failed/refused to call him out on his insane claim that his inaugural crowd was bigger than PBO's. That silence extended to GOP elected officials, too. His spokespersons say he's entitled to his own interpretation. Alterative facts.
I am confident that I am on the right side of history, and so are you and about 99% of Caucus99%. I will fight. You will fight. C99% will fight. And if we "go down the shit chute" as a country, I will be thankful that we didn't abide its demise and that we did what we could.
"Just call me Hillbilly Dem(exit)."
-H/T to Wavey Davey
I'm still sort of optimistic about our prospects
We've seen some pretty horrible things in our history, and been in worse shape than we are now. We've managed to make things better despite those jams, though usually only through a lot of pain and desperation and sacrifice. It may come to that again, but I still hope we will see that sacrifice fall in a Kent State/Watts range rather than a Great Depression/Civil War range.
That said, my husband and I are still talking about visiting France to look for a retirement home/bolt hole. Don't want to stick around if it's looking too 1937-ish around here. I'm old, and have the means to contemplate an escape. It would be foolish not to check it out.
Please help support caucus99percent!
@Dallasdoc If you're on Netflix,
If you're on Netflix, check out Spiral, a Paris-based detective show. 4 seasons. It's informative about France in the same way American crime shows are about us. Word.
Another great European Netflix show is Merli, set in Barcelona. Really, check it out, he's a leftist High School teacher; delightful!
Thanks for the recommendation!
Netflix has a series called "Wild France," in which a pudgy British naturalist visits some French national parks. It's transfixing, and makes me want to live there even more. I'll check out your suggestions.
It's funny, I hardly speak any French, but I figure the only way to learn is to move there and have to. I figure I have one more transplantation in me, and I want to be mindful about where I want to spend my last years.
Please help support caucus99percent!
looking out for you...
Aging. I am a trained geologist; did it for 17 years. I quit and am now a happy cook. I know you're a MD but hear me out. To keep your mind clear use cooked cilantro to clean out the metals (Hg, Pb). Stir fry is great. Step two is nourish it with fish, coconut, and olive oil. My motto is, "Nothing with regard to the human body is irreversible." With all due respect...
Thank you for the suggestions
I eat quite a bit of fish, and living in New Mexico cilantro is pretty much a staple. Olive oil is all we have in the house. Can't abide coconut, but I do eat a bit of avocado.
Please help support caucus99percent!
@Dallasdoc coconut oil is
coconut oil is the great lubricant! and for the face/scalp! And dry hands. and any crepe skin... Word.
Love coconut oil
Slather on globs of it after I shower.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
@p cook
Yes! Thank you for bringing this up! Among other things, as my mother's caregiver, I gave her coconut oil and Chia seed in her then-predominately organic/range-raised diet every day. We had to be careful with supplements and at times certain nutrients due to medication issues, but good nutrition and the avoidance of any avoidable industrial toxins is obviously essential to cellular, etc., function/health.
We need to know this, especially in the face of Monsanto's (et al) disinformation; we are highly complex biological creatures and the body has an immense capacity for healing, given the right nutrients and other conditions.
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
For some cold Santa Fe nights we watched Spiral.
Whew, we have stopped in Paris on the way back from Paris each year for the last 4 and have taken a different view of walking around late at night after Spiral lol.
A truth of the nuclear age/climate change: we can no longer have endless war and survive on this planet. Oh sh*t.
Bolt holes ...
After decades of saying I'd do it, I just submitted my application for Ireland's "Registry of Foreign Births." At the very least, I can get an Irish (EU) passport. At the very best, I can move to Ireland or elsewhere in the EU and legally work. Not that I want to do this ... but contingencies are helpful.
Concurrently, I'm plotting out our new front-yard vegetable garden. Resilience.
@WaterLily What does it take? I
What does it take? I am more than 50% Irish.
A grandparent
Check this link. Pretty straightforward ... toughest part is hunting down the documentation.
Already in France, sold up and moved.
The exchange rate is good right now and houses can be very reasonable compared to the US if you stay outside of Paris, Toulouse, Lyon, Strasbourg. There are some active and lively villages with access via rail, autoroute, to the cities. It does take some staying in likely locations before deciding where feels right. Things can be quite different department or village next over.
PM me if you have questions.
You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again you did not know. ~ William Wiberforce
If you can donate, please! POP Money is available for bank-to-bank transfers. Email JtC to make a monthly donation.
Duplicate: deleted....
You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again you did not know. ~ William Wiberforce
If you can donate, please! POP Money is available for bank-to-bank transfers. Email JtC to make a monthly donation.
It's good to see you writing again!
You were always one of my favorites at Little Orange Footballs...
I want my two dollars!
Somebody recently wrote here
... that looking back over there, they were kind of embarrassed that they'd been a part of it for so long. Definitely felt as though they'd outgrown the place. That observation summed up my feelings very well.
Please help support caucus99percent!
Wow, thanks, DD, I'm honored
I'm honored to get a shout-out. That was also my first post in a while after a hiatus of several months. For a while I felt like I just didn't have anything to contribute that wasn't already being said. I also felt like my thoughts weren't very well formulated, and that the discussions going on, while casting light on events, were largely reactive.
The marriage between capitalism