Breaking story from hearing on emails retrieved by FBI
There is an essay with the outcome here: http://caucus99percent.com/content/and-yet-more-abedin-pay-play-emails-e...
This is the result of the hearing this morning:
From The Hill
FBI uncovers 15K undisclosed emails in Clinton probe
The agency has pledged to release the approximately 14,900 documents and State Department lawyers told District Judge James E. Boasberg on Monday that the agency is “prioritizing” the appraisal of the new emails.
But it remains unsettled whether the full set will be out before the presidential election on Nov. 8 and lawyers for the conservative watchdog group that has demanded the release have accused the agency of slow-walking the production.
The agency is currently assessing whether any of the new documents — which the FBI turned over to State following the close of its investigation — are of a personal nature or duplicates of previously-released emails. Following that assessment, it is reviewing on a rolling basis whether the pages are subject to federal records laws.
Boasberg on Monday morning ordered the agency to provide a status update on Sept. 22 on how many of the documents it has reviewed to determine whether they may be produced under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
Drip, drip, drip.
Comments
The MSM is still trying to play Frank Drebin here...
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NNOrp_83RU]
Yes Hillary, there is a conspiracy. The one that you set up to protect you from your misdeeds.
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
Colin Powell not interested in being HRC's fall guy
http://www.people.com/article/colin-powell-hillary-clinton-pinning-email...
Clinton told that to the FBI? Does she think the FBI doesn't know the difference between a "personal email account"
and a private SERVER?
Clinton lying again??
Say it ain't so.
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
WOW! That is MUCH more pointed than he was earlier
Good for him to calling it like it went!
'What we are left with is an agency mandated to ensure transparency and disclosure that is actually working to keep the public in the dark' - Ann M. Ravel, former FEC member
And it's in People magazine
where people might actually see it - even better!
I think it was the WaPost article on this
That pointed out that Hillary turned over 30,000 work related emails.
These ~15,000 additional emails increases that by ~50%. Or in other words, she omitted 1/3 of her work related emails.
BINGO!
n/t
C99, my refuge from an insane world. #ForceTheVote
Remember, this is all the FBI was able to scrounge up...
these were just the emails which somehow did not get sufficiently scrubbed by her legal team (and goodness know they would have used high-price techs to do the electronic shredding...). WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW MANY OF THESE EMAILS THERE WERE and we never, ever, ever will...
'What we are left with is an agency mandated to ensure transparency and disclosure that is actually working to keep the public in the dark' - Ann M. Ravel, former FEC member
This is what Hillary was saying nlt March 15
As reported by The Atlantic:
You will no doubt remember that in his 14 minute rundown of Hillary's email sins, he told us that the lawyers did Key word searches and did not read the body of each & every email.
Hard to square what she said with what they did. You'd kind of think that a smart lawyer like Hillary (/s), who is described as a policy wonk, would have assured herself of the process her lawyers used before making the statement she made in the press conference.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/hillary-clintons-lau...
Why isn't
someone hammering home the point that clinton gave her emails to her attorneys that have no security clearances to decide if they were State or personal? It seems to have been swept under the rug. I mean, this is something she has admitted to doing. Gowdy brought it up to comey at his hearing but it seems to have fizzled out...
YES!
This makes me furious - I hope it gets into the interrogatories!
(But the ruling wouldn't allow for that)
'What we are left with is an agency mandated to ensure transparency and disclosure that is actually working to keep the public in the dark' - Ann M. Ravel, former FEC member
Also, her website claims
that her emails were closely scrutinized to make sure that everything even remotely work-related would be turned over. But Comey said that her attorneys didn't read the emails and just did a search for work-related terms. More lies. I was shocked when I heard Comey describe that process, along with the destruction of the remaining emails, followed by, nope, no evidence of intentional wrongdoing here!
I wonder what they've got on him... n/t
'What we are left with is an agency mandated to ensure transparency and disclosure that is actually working to keep the public in the dark' - Ann M. Ravel, former FEC member
The release of the newly-released emails may be a boon
to Judicial Watch--especially if any of those previously hidden documents were subject to any of their 30 FOIA law suits--then Hillary is under oath to explain the discrepancy between her public pronouncements of turning over "everything" related to DOS business to Congress and/or FBI.