Complete with dam to ensure it never overflows its banks.

I am unfriending, unliking, blocking, muting, deleting, and exterminating every Hillary supporter in my social media.

I hope that I can cross-post a cut and paste of one of Don midwest's posts from The Progressive Wing here without permission from him? But his intent is always to inform (this may very likely already be here) and my reply has been running endlessly without apparently posting there, and reading this, I thought people here might be interested.

http://theprogressivewing.com/democracy-lost-the-election-justice-report/

Don midwest
July 27, 2016 11:22 am

More on the election at Richard Charnin’s blog

This is a general link and it comes up with some data on Nevada, Iowa, etc.

https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/

The election was stolen. Bernie won it but because of the theft, the anointed one is now on stage

There will be many, many more articles to come out as these issues are written about and cases filed in court.

Amazing that the media took the bait of Russia hack of the DNC emails

Will they say that Russia hacked our election as well? Or do they have another excuse?

Wow, thanks for the link - spent last night and a chunk of today skimming through some posts as that blog provides an interesting historical record of previous elections as well, showing clearly that corporate/billionaire interests have been selecting their representatives throughout America for a VERY long time, building to this attempt at total global capture, using the already dispossessed, drained and industrially poisoned average American's tax-money and military. This last Dem primary and current election theft being set up must not be simply accepted by The People but repudiated en masse before any peaceful political revolution becomes impossible.

The analysis of the previous Clinton race between Hillary and Obama was a salutary demonstration of the need for immediate reform - he won what was really a far more epic victory than showed, despite the massive cheating on her side, explaining why the cheating this time against Bernie was so blatant - and why the outrage of PUMAs was so obsessive, rather like that famous televised Republican 'fixer' melt-down when the vote numbers didn't mysteriously 'flip' for Romney even later, 'before morning'. And why certain Hillary supporters are such 'sore winners', rubbing their victim's noses in their theft - in part to establish their 'win' as 'established' via the Big Lie in the face of endless evidence proving the opposite.

Putting this portion at top to post for anyone interested: https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/page/6/

Proving Election Fraud: Now an E-book

Richard Charnin
Feb. 12, 2016

Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll , published in 2010, has just been made available as a $3.99 E-book on Amazon (Kindle) and Barnes & Noble (Nook).

Its 456 pages contain a plethora of data tables and graphs as well as some of the most heated but instructive online debates which followed the 2004 election. Proving Election Fraud is a comprehensive resource for analyzing presidential elections from 1968 to 2008.

In 2012, I wrote Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-Election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts. I included the unadjusted state and national exit poll data for 1988-2008 and updated the election fraud probability analysis.

In the two books, readers have access to data and analysis that is comprehensive and unique. They both provide mathematical evidence of systemic election fraud.

Americans expect to have fair elections; many are unaware as to the extent of the fraud. I have been posting analysis of election fraud for the last 15 years. But things have only gotten worse since 2000.

And this:

Election Fraud: What the Media wants us to believe
23 Jan

Richard Charnin
Jan.23, 2016

Reclaiming Science: The JFK Conspiracy
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts

Election Fraud and the Media

The media wants you to ignore the Unadjusted exit polls because they claim that they do not represent the actual vote counts.

The media maintains that ADJUSTED exit polls will always converge to the recorded vote count which they want you to believe is always accurate.

The media claims that the unadjusted exit polls have been shown to be grossly inaccurate in all presidential elections since 1988. And the pattern has persisted in congressional and primary elections.

The media claims that the recorded votes are official and tell us how people really voted and that we should not believe the unadjusted exit polls. Systemic election fraud is a myth. If it were true, the media would have reported it, just like they reported on Acorn.

The National Election Pool claims that the number of states exit polled in 2012 was cut to 31 because of lack of funds and expect us to believe this canard.

The media lauds voting machines, claiming they are faster and more accurate than humans. But the media does not tell you that programmers know how to code 1+1 =3.

Even though we cannot view the proprietary software code, we should accept the Diebold machine counts as being accurate. The fact that the code is proprietary does not mean that there is something to hide.

Media pundits, pollsters and academics ignore election fraud, implicitly assuming that the Fraud Factor is ZERO – an unscientific, faith-based rationale for adjusting exit polls to match the recorded vote.

The media wants you to believe that the exit polls are always wrong:
Recorded Vote = Unadjusted Exit poll + Exit Poll error
Final Exit Poll = Recorded Vote

The media does not want you to know that the recorded vote is fraudulent:
Recorded Vote = Unadjusted Exit Poll + Fraud Factor

The corporate media says that in 2008, Obama won the recorded vote by 9.5 million with a 53% share. But the media never mentioned that the unadjusted state exit polls indicated that Obama won by 23 million votes with a 58.0% share. Or that he won the National Exit Poll of 17,836 respondents with 61% and a 30 million vote margin.

In 2004, the corporate media claimed that Bush was the winner by 3.0 million votes and that the exit polls “behaved badly” and misled us into believing that Kerry was the winner by at least 6 million votes (52-47%).

In 2000, the media failed to mention that the unadjusted state exit polls showed that Gore was a 50-46% winner by 5 million votes – not his 540,000 recorded margin. And that Gore had at least 70% of 175,000 uncounted, spoiled ballots in Florida.

These facts have NEVER been disclosed by the media:
1) In 1988-2008, 135 of 274 unadjusted state exit polls exceeded the margin of error, of which 131 red-shifted to the Republican. The joint probability of this occurrence is ONE in TRILLIONS. That’s ZERO.

2) The unadjusted 1988-2008 State and National exit polls showed the Democrats won by 52-42%. They won the recorded vote by just 48-46%. The probability is ZERO.

The media claims it is all just “voodoo math” by conspiracy theorists. But the media never did the math since it would reveal that state and national unadjusted exit poll discrepancies from the recorded vote results in ZERO probabilities – proving systemic election fraud.

The media would rather maintain the myth of fair elections than actually investigate..

And this is why it's always 'the voter's fault' or that of a 3rd-party runner, obsessively repeated, like the Big Lie propaganda it is.

Speaking as One Who Knows Nothing about stats, I feel that Richard Charnin's blog ought to be required reading for people like myself, as well as for those better versed in such things.

This has been going on forever, with destructive self-interests running America, Americans, victimized countries and the environment into the polluted ground - ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! BERN IT DOWN!

And Chris Hedges showed up in my newsfeed. Specifically his last column on Truthdig. 2 days ago...Hmmm...

I liked Chris a long time ago, why wasn't I seeing him...

The 1 Percent's Useful Idots

link at the end of most articles that goes back to the author of each story. All I plan on doing is asking why, since the entire media has been so corrupt up unto now, should I believe ANYTHING they have to write about. Even articles that aren't about HillBillary.

Just to remind them that we know what they did and DIDN'T do. They lied and they didn't perform their profession honestly.

"Why did the American media lie FOR the Clintons/DNC and lie TO the American public? Isn't that a complete betrayal of your profession? Or did ethics in journalism go out the window with each corporate buy-out?"

Just a cut and paste reminder. I'm trying to come up with one for Robert Reich. He really went off the rails.