Comey scheduled to go before congress today to explain his decision and that may be a tough one...
This could end up being particularly troubling for him considering his statement that, "No reasonable prosecutor" would bring such a case to trial.
Well, turns out Comey may have "misspoken."
Seems like there were at least 4 so far that have been done, one of which was covered by TYT yesterday that was strikingly similar, but wait, there's more! If you act now you can get at least 3 more similar cases for free!
That's right, the Justice Department has prosecuted at least 4 cases similar in nature to Clinton's.
I guess he could always say, "Well, I am not a prosecutor, I guess it's a good thing we got the AG able to step in still and file those charges."
One has to wonder, was this his intent the entire time?
If so, this guy needs to give Obama eleventy-third dimensional chess lessons.
Comments
This question is one I can't wait to hear the answer to myself..
"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me
A distinction (or lack thereof) that I have tried
to point out several times.
"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X
This is going to be fun!
I know I have a bunch of questions I'd like to ask. Mine would mostly have to do with Bryan Pagliano.
First would be...
Followed by...
then...
and...
followed by...
That should be enough to keep Comey busy for a while!
“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”
George W. Bush
You should be a prosecutor
Please think up questions for Laughing Out Loud Loretta. I'd love to see them.
Haven't given that much thought, but...
the first one that comes to mind is...
“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”
George W. Bush
I'm curious about one thing that Comey did.
The investigation took an unusually long time. It was an FBI independent investigation and neither the White House nor the DOJ were briefed. They were in the dark for as long as the public was.
Meanwhile, 12 to 20 full time agents worked on the investigation for 8 solid months, after they finally received all of the email data. That's a lot of work hours, considering there's almost nothing to show for it.
So were Comey's own passions driving the investigation, even after nothing substantial or meaningful was emerging? Some inside the FBI were baffled by the lack of conclusions, as well. It is unthinkable that Comey was not aware that certain levels of government are never prosecuted, post 9/11, if for no other reason than to establish an always impenetrable wall between themselves and justice. It mattered not at all what the email investigation uncovered… because terrorism.
So what took so long?
A month or so ago, I quoted blogger Nina Illingworth, who wrote about this:
I'm going to assume yours is a rhetorical question
It seems pretty apparent the end result was predetermined. It also appears the timing of the announcement was also well orchestrated. Had they made this type of announcement before a majority of states had actually voted in the primaries, Bernie would be the presumptive nominee, not Hillary.
The dance move now, is to get this all wrapped up before the convention. Lynch's impromptu with Bill, the speedy scheduling of the short interview with Hillary, the almost instantaneous announcement of the verdict and now, the foot race to Congress to immediately answer any questions and quell any further inquiry?
With the recommendations from the FBI, why did they even bother interviewing Hillary? Does anyone think, for even a moment, there was something said in that interview that in any way affected their recommendations? This was just another in a long list of theatrical presentations made for the benefit of the wealthy and powerful at the expense of the rubes and taxpayers.
“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”
George W. Bush
And thanks for your concise
And thanks for your concise wrap-up - beautifully laid out!
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
... Regardless of whether he
...
...
That must form the much-vaunted experience she's revered for by some of her most strangely corporate-friendly, ethics-despising supporters... how Presidential, if you respected Nixon for his bald-faced lying and Constitution-trampling.
What people in which country will feel safe if she's President? Especially including Americans?
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
The geopolitical goal of the US is to make people feel UNSAFE.
The Neocon quest for global Empire Rulership — which is now being forced due to the competitive greed and neurological mutations inside their shadow government cartel — means the US must act the brutal weaponized psychopath of the world.
Hillary Clinton was born to play this role. She has demonstrated to the world that's she's "The One." The monsters among us — the Neocons embedded at strategic levels inside the Federal government and at their councils and think-tanks — now openly encircled Hillary in support. Dick Cheney, for example. Like marionettes held up by strings of fear, the American people are so easily manipulated. It is your fellow Americans who will directly determine your destiny, not the Neocons, who are here to establish a better race. One race to rule them all.
None, of course. Her only plan for US domestic issues is to step up the asset-stripping of Americans in order to fund the next thrust toward US Global Totalitarianism.
Who better?
Can you use your votes to ensure Hillary's defeat and the defeat of the Democratic Party Establishment? Can you convince other Americans to do so? It may be the last chance you have to take control.
The Interview with Hillary
I think they played cards for 3.5 hours just to make it look good
I think they talked grandkids and
home improvement projects.
"The “jumpers” reminded us that one day we will all face only one choice and that is how we will die, not how we will live." Chris Hedges on 9/11
I'm sure LL will have a win-fall in her future.
There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties.. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.--John Adams
I was thinking that they were having brunch
and sucking down mimosa's.
Oh, I'd love to see that transcript
because I bet she refused to answer any questions after "state your name for the record" on the basis of her Fifth Amendment rights.
Bet that transcript has about as much chance of seeing the light of day as her Goldman Sachs speeches, though.
Even the smallest person can change the course of the future
Comey/Congress, C-Span 3
C-Span
Will be on tv, but it doesn't look like they are streaming it. Bummer because I don't have C-Span3.
NYT says they will cover it, live.
An alternate spot?
Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.
NYT "covering" it
Thank you, rl, I don't think that is streaming it. Just reporting as it happens. I'll probably follow along, so thanks.
C-Span will eventually post a video.
Vote Conscience Not Party
If Bernie is on the Dem ballot, vote Bernie
If Bernie is on the Green Ballot, vote Bernie
If Bernie is not on any ballot Vote Jill Stein
I will not be party to using my precious vote for either of the sycophants from the two major parties
What baffles me
We know that Hillary was told that she couldn't use her Blackberry inside her offices at the State Department because it was not secure, could be hacked and used as a listening device. They made her put it in a secure box inside her offices.
Yet she nonetheless used it out in the hallway to access at least 100 emails classified top secret. And that is even setting aside the server in her basement, serviced by an aide without security clearance, hosted by companies without security clearance. Think of all the eyes she knew of that had access to this material without authorization, not even considering the possibility of hacking.
What am I missing here? That looks to me like gross negligence. Willfull indifference to security.
If she took a briefcase full of top secret papers and left it unlocked on a public street, how would that be any different?
The bombshell Comey dropped in his short statement was that marked, classified materials were on her server, materials that were not retroactively classified. That's the first time the public has had this information because Clinton all along claimed it was not the case. In other words, she's lied again.
Even the smallest person can change the course of the future
Just a couple weeks ago...
I had to visit the US Embassy in Malaysia to get some documents notarized. I was not allowed to bring my cell phone onto the grounds of the Embassy. I had to leave it at the guard station before I could go through the door. I believe they also locked it in a box. I'm not sure what threat I posed but my cellphone was allowed anywhere near the inside of a building. Yet Hillary can take her unsecured phone inside the Department of State? What am I missing here?
“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”
George W. Bush
But the rules/laws don't
But the rules/laws don't apply to the Clintons! Silly us!
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
I'm afraid its all theater
and the actors have rehearsed their lines. The question I want to hear is, "Is the investigation into the Clinton Foundation pay to play arms deals still on going, and if so can you she light on that investigation for us?"
This in your face corruption is amazing.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Did it start yet? Just managed to move enough to get to a PC...
Some days the body just doesn't work like it should, lol!
"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me
Here is a link to the full video of the Comey hearing...
Finally found one.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ai1Z8OtEjU]
"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me
Collusion? Influence? Send a message? Nah, not the Clintons.
I think his reaction is "aaahhhhaaaahhhh"
Life is good when you're a Clinton.
Prof: Nancy! I’m going to Greece!
Nancy: And swim the English Channel?
Prof: No. No. To ancient Greece where burning Sapho stood beside the wine dark sea. Wa de do da! Nancy, I’ve invented a time machine!
Firesign Theater
Stop the War!