And why not? She has said that she is going to continue Obama's legacy and he has been continuing PNAC's goals in the Middle East.

Here we go again. Earlier this year, some were surprised to see Project For The New American Century (PNAC) co-founder and longtime DC fixture Robert Kagan endorse former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for president.

They shouldn’t have been. As is now clear from a policy paper [PDF] published last month, the neoconservatives are going all-in on Hillary Clinton being the best vessel for American power in the years ahead.

For the neocons and liberal interventionists at the Center for a New American Security, the United States has always acted for the benefit of all. The paper primarily focuses on the economy and defense budget, and American security interests in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Supporting the Trans-pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) are considered the highest priority, as they will bind the main drivers of the US-led “liberal world order”—the US and Europe—closer together.
According to the paper, “Even in a world of shifting economic and political power, the transatlantic community remains both the foundation and the core of the liberal world order.” In other words, the West must maintain control of the planet, for the good of all, of course.

The goal for decades has been for a new world order where there are no national boundaries or regulations that would get in the way of the corporation's profits.
Bush Sr. even said "new world order" in one of his state of the union addresses.
First Clinton helped set the stage for the global economic crisis that happened during Bush' term.
Bush then released the start of PNAC's goals and Obama's job was to continue it and then create the TPP and the other non trade agreements that have nothing to do with trade but set the stage for removing national sovereignty under the TPP. And it's not just for our country, but other countries won't be able to continue providing the social contracts that they have. Like medical care because of some of the pharmaceutical rules . I will try to find the article that backs this up.
Also under the TPP, the US can decide if another country's election is valid. There's a lot more information regarding how bad the TPP is. And IMO, it's treasonous what our government officials are going to be allowing the corporations to do.
And then Hillary's job will be to make sure that the TPP and the other agreements are fulfilled.
And remember that NATO has begun war games in 20 countries surrounding Russia and the US has ships patrolling off China's coastal areas .
Imagine if either of those countries were in Canada, Mexico or off of our coastal areas.
And that is why our elections have been stolen from us. Hillary's was done so blatantly, I don't understand how so many people can be blind to it.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clintons-project-for-a-new-american...

Where have you been? T-Rump is a professional con man. Anything he says has a purely coincidental relationship to reality. He is full of outspoken contempt for others. He encourages his followers to brutalize anyone who speaks up against him, or who excites their prejudices. Racism and promises of personal dictatorship are part of his stock in trade (and the marks love it). So is fraud. He will partner with anyone to achieve his personal goals; at the moment, loves him some evangelicals. He is a crappy capitalist who has extracted millions from failing businesses for personal use while he ruined others, including customers and small business owners. In terms of public affairs experience, he makes W look like an intellectual. If T-Rump is "a bit of a loose cannon," then the Titanic hit "a bit of frozen water."

Yes, Hillary Clinton is the next iteration of the March of the Neocons. Her administration would be a continuing nightmare abroad and military-expenditure bloodletting at home. T-Rump's would likely be be a further personal nightmare for American people of color, women, the LGBTQ community, Muslims, dissidents, anyone struggling financially, and do not forget, the environment.

His foreign/military policy? Anyone's guess, but is it likely that all by himself, he will turn that container ship around? President Obama not even having manage to close Guantanamo? Or that T-Rump even would want to go up against the military-industrial-surveillance-security complex? It's not like the people of color who represent the majority of victims of Neocon policy are even human to T-Rump, whether at home or abroad. He will say whatever sells to someone. For actual performance, see his business history.

Hillary and T-Rump do agree on a few things though, including hatred of public information, free speech and whatever remains of truth-telling by the media.

Yup, looks like we may be f****d before one ballot is cast in the general. Yup, wouldn't it be satisfying to scream in their faces, "We're not fooled this time!" Because we aren't.

And how do you make Sophie's Choice, if it comes to that? Choose whether to be shot or hung?

Take your pick of sociopathies as best you can, if it comes to that. Throw the I Ching. Flip a coin if that's not practical. Keep hoping we can still get Bernie. Stay home from the polls if you really feel that the choice is meaningless.

But don't understate the walking disaster that is T-Rump.