We need an 1856 moment

Everyone,

If Senator Sanders decides to run as an independent (an unlikely but still possible thing), you will hear, from all quarters, the same old litany of arguments about how third parties never win in America. So I guess you might as well concede the argument and tell them that, yes, you're going to vote Democrat, because God forbid the Whigs should win the election.

The Whigs?

The Whig Party (in the United States, as opposed to the Whig Party in the UK) was started in 1833 in opposition to the policies of then-President Andrew Jackson. They put four Presidents in the White House, so, no, they weren't a minor party. The Whigs were America's second party in the mid-19th century. Anyway, some time later, after a rather severe defeat in the 1852 Presidential Election, in which the Whig candidate Winfield Scott only managed to carry four states, the Whig Party was collapsing. What arose in its place were two new parties, the Republican Party and the American (or "Know-Nothing") Party. Donald Trump is kind of like a Know-Nothing. The Whig Party had its last convention in 1856, and its remaining members unanimously endorsed the Know-Nothings and their Presidential candidate for that year, Millard Fillmore, who had earlier been a Whig.

The 1860 Presidential election featured four parties meriting electoral votes, none of which was the Whig Party, and two of which were the Democratic Party. Of course, after that election there was the US Civil War, and then after the war another two-party system solidified, with Democrats and Republicans.

My point here, I guess, is that even though there's a certain stability to the two-party system throughout US political history, it's not sacrosanct, and there's no guarantee the Democrat/ Republican combination is going to last forever. 1856, in this regard, is the shining example of America's biggest partisan realignment -- the disappearance of the Whig Party and the beginning of the Republican Party. As William E. Gienapp tells us in The Origins of the Republican Party 1852-1856, both parties of the two-party system (Democratic and Whig, just as a reminder) were badly divided at the beginning of then-President Franklin Pierce's term in office, and became even more so, given his proslavery actions. The Republican Party, in that context, became a party opposed to Pierce, to the extension of slavery into the territories, and to the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act. The Know-Nothings were an anti-immigrant party which didn't last long. The Democrats eventually split into southern and northern parties, which reunited after the war.

Of course, back then people didn't worry themselves sick about being "spoilers" or "splitting the vote." If you believed in something, you demanded that any government YOU supported should do what YOU wanted it to do. Very few people back then said, "gee we gotta have another four years of the Fugitive Slave Act because otherwise the other party might win." Nowadays we just say "Let's just accept rigged elections, narcissistic plutocracy, increasing poverty, and inaction on climate change in the face of certain death because Trump is Hitler y'know." Well, I hope not.

At any rate, this looks like a good year for a couple of divided conventions, and maybe the dim beginnings of a split within the two parties of America's third Two-Party System (the first being the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, the second being the Democrats and Whigs). My vote, of course, is that the divisive issue for this era, the one which will ultimately cause realignment, be the neoliberal program to save capitalism by impoverishing everyone and handing the fruits of our labor to a few rich people. Now, these new second parties take time, as the Republican Party took six and a half years before it won a Presidential election -- still a remarkable feat if you think about it -- and people are impatient these days. But it does seem to me that there's still an outside chance we could have an 1856 moment sometime soon.

PERSONAL DISCLOSURE: Yesterday I went down to the local Post Office with a filled-out form and reregistered as a Green Party member.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Bisbonian's picture

We do.

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

WindDancer13's picture

As much as many like to rant against the status quo, they are still afraid of change, and even more so of risk. We can keep feeding into those fears until what we fear actually comes true, or we can learn to stand up for ourselves and protect the rights of all. One of the greatest fears of the Founding Parents was a government entrenched in a two-party system.

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass

wilderness voice's picture

Before Bernie won his senate seat it had been held for 150 years or so by Republicans. Before that what party held the seat? The Whigs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Senators_from_Vermont

up
0 users have voted.
kharma's picture

Grayson might have problems but Murphy is the problem.

up
0 users have voted.

There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties.. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.--John Adams

Alphalop's picture

I constantly bring up this argument but have never gone into this detailed of an explanation

The parallels to our current situation are striking are they not?

I have been saying for I don't even know how long, "I have never seen the nation as divided as I do right now." and every year it just seems that the divisions keep getting worse.

My prediction that the U.S. will end up suffering a USSR style fragmentation/collapse seems less and less unlikely and more and more like it might even end up being a good thing in the long term.

It's either going to be that or another bloody civil war, because the corruption has gotten so entrenched and the corrupt so oblivious to how close they are driving the nation towards collapse for their own personal gain.

up
0 users have voted.

"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me

jamess's picture

Big Picture view. Thanks!

You mean we aren't stuck with
the heartless Republicans,
and the cowardly Dems,
for the foreseeable future ...

That would be a nice change of scenery.
I'd like to see something like
Teddy Roosevelt's Progressive party take off again.
Updated for the modern age of course.

It's time once again to bust-some-trusts.

up
0 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

are too corrupt to save. I'm going green too. Unless by some miracle Bernie gets the nomination.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

"Very few people back then said, 'gee we gotta have another four years of the Fugitive Slave Act because otherwise the other party might win.'" That really is the upshot of Hillary Clinton's incremental style pragmatism.

This is why I never vote against someone - only for someone.

up
0 users have voted.
Alligator Ed's picture

I have been thinking along the same lines b ut you wrote this much better than I could. My take on this situation recently is that there WILL be irreparable schism in the two-party system, cleaving each party in two (though not necessarily equal) parts. The necessary conditions would be:
1) an attempt to "broker" the Republican convention, thrusting a Republican Establishment shill upon the Trumpites
2) continued theft of the Democratic nomination from Bernie. My contention is that there are probably at least 40% NeverHillary Democrats now, but when the 50% mark is reached, the split is almost assured.
The current course is unsustainable.

up
0 users have voted.

Who holds their convention first? If it's the Republicans they could assume Hillary has the nomination in her pocket and that Ryan was therefore a lock in the general, so they go ahead and screw Trump, who carries out his threat and runs indie. This 3 way (Trump/Ryan/Gary Johnson) split allows Bernie to risk his own indie/Green run. The three headed monster splits the red states, while fear of impeachment convinces the Dems to abandon election fraud and Bernie sweeps the blue states. It probably goes to the House, but Trump and Ryan split the Rs and Hillary's abysmal showing in the election shame enough Dems to vote for Bernie.
To quote Theodoric of York, "Naaah!" but we can dream.

up
0 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973