a Trump/Putin #TreasonSummit Helsinki 2.0 Trifecta
“It’s unthinkable an American president would work for Russia. So I’d like to believe him. But we’re going to try to find out.” @RepEliotEngel on the NYT reporting that the FBI began an investigation after Comey was fired into whether the pres was working on behalf of Russia. pic.twitter.com/zJx18ZpHfq
— Kate Bolduan (@KateBolduan) January 14, 2019
Trump has gone to extraordinary lengths to hide details of talks with Putin, such as taking interpreter’s notes, U.S. officials say https://t.co/TxIarXrLFX
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) January 12, 2019
President Trump has repeatedly withheld details of his conversations with Vladimir Putin, according to current and former American officials https://t.co/aZRRnYlunD
— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 14, 2019
Explaining the first Tweeted interview featuring Eliot Engel with Kate Boulduan: ‘Fixated on collusion, Dems seeking (again) to subpoena interpreter present at Trump-Putin meeting’, 14 January, 2019, RT
Stir in as well:
‘F.B.I. Opened [counterintelligence] Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia’, nytimes.com, Jan.9, 2019
“The criminal and counterintelligence elements were coupled together into one investigation, former law enforcement officials said in interviews in recent weeks, because if Mr. Trump had ousted the head of the F.B.I. to impede or even end the Russia investigation, that was both a possible crime and a national security concern. The F.B.I.’s counterintelligence division handles national security matters.
If the president had fired Mr. Comey to stop the Russia investigation, the action would have been a national security issue because it naturally would have hurt the bureau’s effort to learn how Moscow interfered in the 2016 election…”
Because it’s now been reified as fact for Democrats that Russians hacked the DNC emails, gave them to WikiLeaks, as a favor to Trump and to make sure he was elected rather than the female Clinton.
The Mueller investigation has its own reasons for being, but not for nothin’, it was also the D Team that shrieked the loudest over Trump’s June 2018 meeting attempting nuclear rapprochement with Kim Jong Un of the DPRK, wasn’t it?
And from July 19, 2018, ‘Who Heard What Trump Said to Putin? Only One Other American’, NYTimes as well, although with a bit different focus.
‘Absolutely not’: GOP says questioning Trump’s translator would end presidential diplomacy’, 19 July, 2018, RT
Heard on CNN & MSNDC:
‘Are you now or have you ever worked for the Russians, Mister President?’
“That’s the most insulting thing I’ve ever been asked”.
“But he didn’t say ‘NO’, did he?”
“We haven’t heard from Moscow yet about this issue, but hoom, hoom, we will!”
My guess is that Lavrov and Vlad would chuckle while their eyes twinkled.
“The Russian foreign minister offered an unexpected response to a reporter’s question about Moscow’s alleged attempts to “lure” farmers from South Africa to come to Russia.
Speaking to reporters at a press conference on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly on Friday, Lavrov was asked a question by a journalist from South Africa about Moscow’s plans vis-à-vis the minority white South African farmers amid fears of land expropriation without compensation.
“At this time, we are busy with meddling with Catalonia’s elections,” Lavrov replied, keeping a straight face, leading to an outburst of laughter in the room.”
As to ‘why again?’ for all of this, your guesses might be better than mine, but I reckon that if the Mueller investigations were indeed winding down, these items will surely crank them up again.
DSA’s favorite chauvinist blaming Russia for Trump https://t.co/05MUX4qi4L
— earwulf (@earwulf) January 13, 2019
#TreasonSummit on Twitter, and yes, it’s still booming, ‘Putin’s Puppet and more. How many reasons are there to loathe the man, and yet: this rubbish?
(cross-posted from Café Babylon)