But they teach it at university!

If you had asked me a year ago about geoengineering, I would not have known what it was. If you had asked me about chemtrails, I could've told you what they were but I would not have been convinced that they were really a thing. They seemed like one of those conspiracy theory subjects that were a vague cause for worry but not yet a proven problem.

Geoengineering sounds scientific. It sounds positive, using engineering to fix problems on earth. If you look at a university webpage, geoengineering is touted as having a syllabus to teach students how to solve problems like global warming.

Chemtrails, or for the more erudite, stratospheric aerosols of heavy metals are supposed to help deflect the sun's radiation to reduce the effects of global warming. They have been in use for 65 years!

I saw a documentary about them a few months ago. I wish I could find it again now because it really explained the whole picture from proof for chemtrails, environmental studies of massively elevated levels of heavy metals in soil and plants to weather warfare to the financial benefits of climate manipulation.

Some of points made in the video that really struck me:

  • They showed the testing for heavy metals in soil and plants and debunked any arguments that might try to explain it as a natural phenomenon.
  • Native wild plant species dying off. As a gardener this is unheard of to me. Native plants can tolerate periods of drought under normal conditions.
  • Fortunes are being made as a result of weather manipulation. If you knew that a crop would fail because of drought, you could make the appropriate bets on the futures market.
  • Weather warfare is a way to achieve foreign policy goals without any evidence of overt aggression.
  • Monsanto is cashing in on chemtrails by selling seeds that are resistant to drought and heavy metals. Regular strains of seeds just don't stand a chance any more.

Today I tried to find articles that would provide references for the points above but it was really difficult. Most of the information about geoengineering that I could find related to one guy, Dane Wigington, and his website GeoEngineering Watch. Wigington is a passionate critic of geoengineering and I highly recommend him. I linked to a video of one of his presentations.

Near the end of the video (a presentation from 2015), Wigington highlights the huge increase in forest fires occurring all over the world and shows a map of temperature changes. While most of world, including western and northern Canada, is getting hotter and having lots of forest fires (Fort McMurray, hello!), there is a huge area of cooling over eastern North America. He explains that the people behind weather manipulation are trying to keep the most populous area of the United States ignorant of the warming that is occurring everywhere else. A lightbulb went off for me because I really couldn't understand how chilly northern Alberta could have experienced such high temperatures while we were having such a long, cool spring in Ontario.

Geoengineering for Financial Gain: A History of Weather Derivatives: This article doesn't precisely cover all of the stock market information that was covered in the video I saw last year. However it lays out how Enron got into the weather derivatives market, the connection with the Bush's and with the military-industrial complex (Carlyle Group anyone?). And many of the Enron executives involved in this are friends and supporters of the Clintons.

I am including this article about whistleblowers more as a bookmark than anything else. Former Prominent CIA Officer Shares Details Of The Government’s All Out War Against Whistleblowers With GeoengineeringWatch.org "Over the last fifty years US government intelligence agencies have perfected a complex, sequential system to systematically silence or destroy any employee, including his or her family, who attempts to reveal illegal or unconstitutional activities conducted as part of secret government operations."

Not only does this system apply to government employees and military personnel but the agencies have figured out how to apply it to contractors and their employees as well. "Using attractive awards of multi-million dollar contracts, the US government military industrial complex convinces private corporations that their employees must be cleared and sign secrecy agreements. This includes employees at all levels, from secretaries to CEOs. Once they have signed the secrecy agreement, they are bound to keep all information, including potentially illegal information, quiet, being threatened with the same penalties."

I expect and hope that I am preaching to the choir here. In contrast, I tried talking to my co-workers at the hospital about chemtrails and their effects on us and one of my colleagues outright ridiculed me as a conspiracy nut. There is good scientific proof for what is going on with stratospheric aerosols, weather manipulation and manipulation of the financial markets. The only reason we are not hearing more about it is that government agencies have a stranglehold on whistleblowers.

We need to get the message out.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

tapu dali's picture

Read. This.

I thank you.

up
0 users have voted.

There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.

Please watch the video I linked. Please consider the bigger picture.

Your link tries to debunk levels of heavy metals because of pollution. Well the heavy metals were also measured in isolated areas where the native plants are dying off, far away from factories and traffic.

Your link tries to convince us that chemtrails are really contrails. Watch the video and you will see unmistakable evidence.

Your link appears to me to be the product of the sort of government agency that has muzzled the whistleblowers. Nothing to see here, move along.

up
0 users have voted.

Ugh, double post.

up
0 users have voted.
Bisbonian's picture

But I would like to add one. In the stratosphere (where I have personally spent over two cumulative years, btw) the average wind over the US is about 50 knots, west to east. Pick two routes...say San Diego to Las Vegas, and LAX to Phoenix. Send numerous airplanes on those same routes, say 20 minutes apart. The first two airplanes will make an X with contrails. 20 minutes later, that X will be about 17 miles "downstream", when the next X is made. 20 minutes later, both Xs are now 17 more miles downstream, when another X is formed...you get the picture. You now have a very regular grid. Speaking of pictures:

Contrails 2.jpg

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

lunachickie's picture

and whether I believe it or not seems almost beside the point. If it's been going on for that long without being stopped, I have to wonder who has enough power to try now?

up
0 users have voted.

All of us must have the power to stop this -- or at least be willing to try. 65 years ago, 30 years ago, even 20 years ago, we didn't have the ability to get connected with information, sharing videos and science and conclusions drawn from factual evidence.

Now that the damage is getting more severe, we must put a stop to this.

up
0 users have voted.
lunachickie's picture

You can't stop something which people aren't convinced is an issue. Which really sucks, but there it is.

It's easy to get lost in a bunch of noise, too. It might not be a bad idea to prioritize for action's sake...

up
0 users have voted.

CT is still CT, no matter where it's published. The good news is that this place is a lot more civilized than some others and nobody will be banned for it, but there's no sense in encouraging it.

up
0 users have voted.
lunachickie's picture

Civilized is the operative word. "Encouragement" is in the eye of the beholder, obviously.

up
0 users have voted.

The same thing happened to me last week.
I read and reread, and watched videos.
Not that I am sane, but I don't think you are a conspiracy nut.

up
0 users have voted.

'Well, I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years, Doctor, and I’m happy to state I finally won out over it." Elwood P. Dowd "

up
0 users have voted.

This speaker's experience ties in very closely with the whistleblower article I cited above.

She describes her experience uncovering evidence of geoengineering when she was in the airforce. She comments on the disinformation online trolls who debunk chemtrails. Worth a listen.

up
0 users have voted.

I was a real admirer of your work in keeping BookWorld safe and in helping the Neanderthals regain their ability to procreate.

That said: not sure what you are doing now, with this -- the chemtrail business being obvious CT, as you yourself positively take pains to point out, when you write of being able to find only a single source on it that you consider worth citing. It looks to me like you are purposely throwing out a big flag: CT here, folks! Then you use that CT as a frame around something completely different: a piece about methodology used to discourage whistleblowers: something that is prima facie much more credible than the concept of successful systematic weather engineering from aeroplanes.

Thursday, why bury this among the chemtrails? Surely you are more than aware how this placement tends to discredit the whistleblower story. ARE you Thursday? Which Thursday? Or, uh, Aornis, is that you? Wink

up
0 users have voted.

Euterpe2

tapu dali's picture

Nice: A Muse, Euterpe, "rejoicing well", from eu= well, happily, + terpein = to rejoice.

Thx

up
0 users have voted.

There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.

I guess I did a really shitty job of explicating the important points to this issue. It's not just about the release of stratospheric aerosols and what they are doing to the environment and to our climate.

It's about the connection with stock market, allowing insiders to make even more money on things like agricultural futures, insurance and the success or failure of weather-dependent ventures.

It's about weather warfare. Diaries about Syria have commented on how climate change may have created more refugees than actual fighting. Does it matter if powerful nations can break weaker nations without firing a shot?

How could this possibly be kept secret from the public? Because things are set up so that government agencies can destroy the life of anyone who dares to speak out. In the ex-military whistleblower vid I added below, the speaker describes a lot of the same actions being taken against her as were listed in the article.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

Experience from the JFK assassination down through 9/11 shows that it’s all too easy for the Powers That Be to stymie efforts to discover the truth, having at their disposal the tools of secrecy, misdirection, disinformation, intimidation, ridicule, snares (e.g. Dan Rather and the Texas ANG story), and noise (poisoning the well with bogus “exposés” of one’s own).

As with so many things, it’s too soon to tell with certainty. All anyone can do is look at what’s out there, take their best guess, and go with their gut instinct.

Chemtrails is one story I personally am not going to follow up, because my time, attention, and energy are limited, and I need to concentrate on other things I think are more important.

The whistleblower angle, as another commenter pointed out, may actually trump the chemtrails angle.

up
0 users have voted.

who are great believers in chemtrails are Republicans/Christians/End Times Preppers.
I will look at your research, but with a particularly jaundiced eye.

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.