Some patterns are starting to appear

I came across this series a couple of weeks ago and found it helpful to see some of the interconnected patterns of the information, thoughts and opinions being expressed by members of C99. A Century of War by Sean Stone covers a wide range of information and does not have the time to explore deeply into any one subject. Not everybody has two hours, so I summarized the information for each segment. I think the visual images add at least as much understanding as the dialog. If you have the time I am interested in your analysis and/or sources to delve into some of the ideas deeper.

Part I

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcx_NZh2MEw]

Summarizes our current economic status and changes in financing the US economy. Government had traditionally used investment in infrastructure to encourage markets to develop and thrive. Government infrastructure investments have been decreasing since WWII. This shift in infrastructure spending does not show up immediately.

National wealth was historically created by the transformation of low value physical material to high value physical material. Banks and financial institutions profits were primarily made on assisting individuals, communities and companies to create wealth. Percentage of profits have increasingly been made directly from extracting dollars directly via raiding, fees, speculation and ownership of assets.

Good video footage showing changes in manufacturing jobs, rural living standards, Detroit (manufacturing city) and Baltimore (port city) that have occurred since WWII.

Part II

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0bRq-262S4]

Second episode discusses debt slavery, death economy and planned depopulation. Shows how legal business can use the drug trade to extract wealth from a community and the government. Numerous lay person interviews focus on different types of personal responsibility.

Overview of changes to tariff policies after Abraham Lincoln’s presidency as the beginning of abandoning local manufacturing and protection of their markets. After WWII the Economic Elite believed war ended the depression and the US should continue a war footing for economic growth.

Policy worked until Vietnam. To stop wealth drain to other countries US changed the gold standard to an unofficial oil standard. Oil embargo in the 1970 cemented the deal with US banks and Saudis. Saudis would buy US treasury securities, government would invest in US corporations to develop the middle east. A primary condition was oil could only be traded in US dollars. Wall street brokers increasingly benefited from oil trade volatility. In 1981 crude oil futures volume was 15% oil companies and 85% to speculators. In 2010 it reversed to oil companies 15% and 85% speculators. US and banking policy became increasingly focused on controlling oil sources, markets and transportation.

War industry went on steroids after 9/11 and hints at a shadow government created as US was coming out of WWII.

Part III

[video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhrx8qG5EjQ]

Overview of our way of life and population changes. The driver of economy growth are new ideas and new energy. The first energy investment for individuals and governments should be conservation. It provides the biggest bang for the buck (return on investment).

Heavy focus on nuclear energy as the solution for the future. Many of the obstacles can be extrapolated to other renewable sources.

1980 Magnet Fusion Act signed by Carter to create a viable energy option was never implemented. Implied the major banks and oil companies told Hans Bethe they could not ever proceed on the project. Leadership changes to Reagen and Thatcher pushed privatizing of infrastructure and banks would not refinance new technologies.

Resistance to creating a closed loop economy - using recycled and renewable sources for all material and energy. We continue to use primary energies that are finite resources. Fusion will fracture the petrol economy. 1 drop of sea water has the equivalent energy as 300 gallons of gas.

Western countries have one hot fusion project, ITER in south of France. No energy production until at least the mid 2030's. Works on an economic model of a large centralized source and transmission infrastructure.

Cold fusion actually works and is not pseudo-science. Cold fusion may be nearing application for the general public. Product would focus on small personal use. Current experimental model, that is table top size, produces 30 Kw of power, enough to heat the average house. Projects are being funded by Silicon Valley and other private sources, and are more difficult to stop.

Then jumps to black budgets and shadow government.

Part IV

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRxqy-Cfw1M]

Brief mention of North Dakota oil as a tool to change energy narrative. The US as being dependent on foreign oil, to one of independence. US now has enough oil to export and use it as a diplomacy tool to improve standing in the world.

Discussion on decentralization of energy, coming water wars, changes in manufacturing with 3-D printing and history of infrastructure systems. Ends on a happy note we will no longer be employed for repetitive manual and mental tasks. All our jobs will be more creative, fun and rewarding.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

PriceRip's picture

          I would really like to know more about this. Actually we call this "bleeding edge" physics.

          Cold fusion actually works and is not pseudo-science. Cold fusion may be nearing application for the general public. Product would focus on small personal use. Current experimental model, that is table top size, produces 30 Kw of power, enough to heat the average house. Projects are being funded by Silicon Valley and other private sources, and are more difficult to stop.

up
0 users have voted.
PriceRip's picture

          I don't like to use "Snark" tags, and I am concerned that the five "Thumbs-Up" might suggest five people think Cold Fusion is a real thing and think that I also actually think it is a real thing. Sorry, if that is what you think.

          Let me provide you with a little perspective. I have recently taken possession of my home in Medford Oregon. It is an all electric house. During the months of AUG, SEP, OCT, and NOV the house "consumed" 612, 741, 175, and 1700 kWh of energy during those months. The quoted paragraph above states that there exists a functioning Cold Fusion device producing energy at the rate of 30 Kw. That means the device would have provided 23040, 21600, 23040, 23040 kWh during the months of AUG, SEP, OCT, and NOV respectively. That is bigger than my house's "consumption" by a factor of >37.6, >29.1, >131.6, and >13.5 during the months of AUG, SEP, OCT, and NOV respectively.

          If this device really performed as claimed you wouldn't have been reading this "news" via that above quoted material. The term "bleeding edge" is not just another way of saying "cutting edge", it is a way of saying they slit their own throats and died. That's what happened (metaphorically) to Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann.

up
0 users have voted.
studentofearth's picture

world example. I was hoping you would be able to place the information in better context for our community. My physics understanding is limited, so the video changed my perception from cold fusion as no possibility to might be possible for electrical production.

One more question: at 25 min 11 sec the speaker is talking about cold fusion appearing in nature. The random heat excursions in the fluidized oil fields of Russia. Do you know what he is talking about and are his assumptions possible?

up
0 users have voted.

Still yourself, deep water can absorb many disturbances with minimal reaction.
--When the opening appears release yourself.

PriceRip's picture

          My (experimental, not theoretical) dissertation was about characterizing fission fragments emitted from a sample of Cf-252. In this work I corrected some misconceptions about how to optimize getting data to characterize short lived isotopes in prepared samples as well as for isotopes "in the wild".

          The problem with the Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann debacle wasn't that their results could not be reproduced, the problem with the Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann debacle was that all they had was an unexplained temperature excursion and (this is the death blow) no particle "signal" that should have accompanied the supposed fusion events. This is significant, because in such experiments there are always extraneous "equipment" signals that could be attributed as characterizing a real (sought after) event. I see this all the time, literally, when running samples. The real challenge is to develop strategies to "trap errors", and tighten the constraints so as to not fool yourself. They didn't know enough about my field to even get the proper graduate student to help them.

          As for "random heat excursions in the fluidized oil fields", I would need to see a detailed analysis to say anymore than "what ?" random heat excursions should be the norm. If there are not random heat excursions you are not working in the "real world" and you had better inform the SysOp, the matrix has a glitch.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

I watched the first one am I'm appalled that people can be so callous in regards to human lives.
I can not wrap my mind around the people who can do these things.
I just can't.
They are hurting us on purpose just so they can get rich. That's it.
I knew that there was a shadow government, but now I understand their plans.
Die so that the special people can inherit the earth.
Looks like Jesus got that one wrong.
Not the meek.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Voting is like driving with a toy steering wheel.

Wink's picture

reasons there haen't been any new jobs since G. Dubya if not before. The Right (oligarchs, ubers, filthys, 1%) bellers the "economic environment" is not right for "job creation," but the Truth is they have zero intentions of creating jobs at $7.50 an hour when they can "create" them elsewhere (offshore) for $2.25 an hour. $2 an hour? Now That's the proper "economic environment!"

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

elenacarlena's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.

Wink's picture

now and then. But there is zero incentive to "create jobs" by the very same folks (in the lead article in this thread) that wish us all dead, sooner rather than later, so the planet is their playground. With 90% of the population gone in 25, 30 years, they don't worry about Global Warming - is why they won't pay a nickel to stop it. 10% of the current population won't affect global warming - the planet playground is theirs. Jobs? Puhleeze. The 99% don't need jobs, they soon dead.

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

sojourns's picture

I don't suppose there's anything new save for the "cold fusion" enterprise. I will look at that one with some skepticism.

Personally, I think nuclear power plants should be brought back into the grid along with all the other non-petrochemical sources. I believe that the salt reactor technology is immune to meltdowns.

up
0 users have voted.

"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage

Wink's picture

fan having worked at one for a couple years. Found them safe, then ('70s), expect the new tech nukes would be even safer yet. Three Mile Islands (and Fukushimas) almost have to have a zillion things go wrong simultaneously for them to manifest as they did. Bring back the nukes!

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

elenacarlena's picture

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/samuel-s-epstein/nuclear-power-causes-canc...

And completely unnecessary, we can switch to 100% renewables in a few years. We lack the will because our politicians are owned by oil and gas.

up
0 users have voted.

Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.

sojourns's picture

until you've read a little more than an article that is featuring the dangers old technologies. In fact some of the safe nuclear technologies were developed many decades ago but were passed over in favor of nuclear reactors that could produce weapons grade plutonium as a by-product. That's what causes the cancer. It wasn't that they couldn't be built to be safe, it's that the need for war prevails. In this case, the cold war.

A bit about molten-salt-reactors:
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-gene...

up
0 users have voted.

"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage

elenacarlena's picture

not going to take the time to link to them all. According to the article you link, molten-salt reactors are an old technology. If Oak Ridge found it so safe, why are the workers and neighbors of Oak Ridge facing increased risks of cancer? https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2013/10/18/no-safe-dose-of-ionizin... and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7928016 and https://nuclear-news.net/2015/12/30/thousands-of-usas-oak-ridge-nuclear-... and many others, just google oak ridge cancer.

Lower risk than the worst of nuclear technology is not the same as no risk.

Why not go with wind and solar when we know we can? We have all the technology we need to power the continent. I have read a lot in that arena too and will write it up when I have time. Renewable technology is ready for prime time, and it is cheap. I would like my utility bill to decrease, wouldn't you?

up
0 users have voted.

Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.

sojourns's picture

You point to the Oak Ridge facility. (Don't worry about links-- I'm not one of those that treat a comments section as though the commentator is writing an academic paper. If I strongly disagree or something doesn't pass the smell test, I'm not too lazy to find my own links.) Oak Ridge is a research facility that studies many different types of reactors. Oak Ridge is a bad example in my view. There are too many politics involved. At the time, it was more than convenient to have any reactor that is not a fast breeder reactor capable of producing weapons grade materials to appear to be less desirable for any reason, real or manufactured. I'm not not going to argue that bad implementation of nuclear technology does not cause cancer. It can and does when sloppily executed. Keeping the General Electric corporation out of it would be a great start. Additionally, new reactors can use the spent fuel that has been piling up as new fuel, eliminating storage problems. Some of those who are pro-nuke may surprise you, not the least of which, Ansel Adams (d. 1984) and Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace. .

We are in agreement when it comes to renewable resources, however, they also present health problems. Wind power in particular causes rather serious problems for those close to them, e.g. farmers leasing their land for windmill installations. The interruption of the rising and setting sun flickering through the blade can cause vertigo. More seriously is the low frequency generated by the 'swoop' of the blades. See here: http://oto2.wustl.edu/cochlea/wind.html

Solar may be the most hazard free, save for installation accidents, but we can't do solar alone. Realistically, I don't think any renewable at this time could be relied upon as a sole source or even in concert with each other without having a back up.

Geothermal, the most underfunded unfortunately, seems relatively hazard free but I don't think much is known or reported. Anytime deep drilling is done, there are potential environmental hazards.

The biggest problem is what Germany faces. Too much power resulting in conflicts on the grid. I wish we had those problems.

up
0 users have voted.

"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage

if they were constructed with nuclear fueled dump trucks and bull dozers. When you burn enough fossil fuel to run an existing plant running the expected life of the nuke plant just in construction and worker commutes, the main advantage is a few dollars in a few people''s pocket.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no such thing as TMI. It can always be held in reserve for extortion.

studentofearth's picture

gotten us to our current events and know the major players, nothing really new that has not been in the public press. Many of us simply see what is currently before us as the problem or cause.

I am rethinking the effectiveness of the environmental groups. I had included the non-expansion of nuclear facilities as one of their successes. It may have been the petrol lobby suppressing that energy source. Maybe the issue with Iran is not nuclear weapons, but efficiency of energy production they are developing. Simply more questions.

up
0 users have voted.

Still yourself, deep water can absorb many disturbances with minimal reaction.
--When the opening appears release yourself.

snoopydawg's picture

the big banks instead of local banks or credit unions?
I moved from BoA when they started charging me to put money in their bank.
F'ck that.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Voting is like driving with a toy steering wheel.

Wink's picture

and dime you without hesitation, then claim "bank policy" when you call them on it. "Don't like it, tough, we own your ass." And indeed they do. Took me less than ten mins. to pull the plug on Key Bank. They even asked if I wanted my balance transfered to my credit union! All $50.

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.