So, while Trump is ushering in World Peace, he’s shutting down the federal government

I know everyone is happy about trump announcing that u.s. troops based in Syria will be leaving. I noticed that a lot of people are editing his statement to say those troops are “coming home” — which, notably, he didn’t say. Rand Paul went on tv to say that the money saved from “coming home” from Syria could pay far all kinds of stuff here at home. Including roads and bridges and, yeah, walls. On the southern border. Not healthcare, of course. But he played the Syria withdrawal as “coming home” (which, again, trump never said where those troops are going) and that means we can focus now on our coming war with Mexico and Central America.

We can’t stay in the Middle East anymore... well, not quite as much anyway... because the “invasion” of our country from the southern border is the real national security threat.

So now there’s been a bunch of drama the past few days over a few billion dollars for The Wall.

Because The Wall has become the hill everyone in Washington is ready to die on. The government shutdown is on. Trump won’t budge on The Wall. Congress won’t give him the money. They left town. Game on. And about 800,000 people don’t get their paychecks, and trump could not possibly care less.

Where does it go from here? What a train wreck.

Trump is not bringing Peace. Whatever the hell he’s thinking, it’s twisted. Maybe he’s right about abandoning the middle east, but he’s still beating the war drums.

The border war has been going on mostly unnoticed for a long time. Maybe it’s time we start paying some attention to it.

This song isn’t necessarily relevant, but writing about The Wall got it stuck in my head.

Tags: 
Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

CS in AZ's picture

Read about it tonight from several sources, and neglected to save pertinent links and quotes.

Here is one.

Trump Vows Government Shutdown ‘for a Very Long Time’ if Senate Dems Don’t Back Wall

The president dedicated his morning to sending nine tweets on the matter. A shutdown would take effect at midnight. “The Democrats are trying to belittle the concept of a Wall, calling it old fashioned,” wrote the president. “The fact is there is nothing else’s that will work, and that has been true for thousands of years. It’s like the wheel, there is nothing better. I know tech better than anyone,” claimed the 72-year-old. He went on: “The Democrats, whose votes we need in the Senate, will probably vote against Border Security and the Wall even though they know it is DESPERATELY NEEDED. If the Dems vote no, there will be a shutdown that will last for a very long time.”

Seeing that the proverbial bully pulpit turns out to be Twitter... well, I didn’t see that coming. Is this pure political theater, or is trump truly sceeered to his bones of an invasion from Mexico?

Either way, he is more than willing to hurt Americans over what looks like political game playing combined with childish ignorance.

Or he is just trying to make Ann Coulter happy. Who knows? That’s what scares me about trump.

up
0 users have voted.

@CS in AZ hurt by the shutdown get back pay for the time they are off.

up
0 users have voted.

dfarrah

Big Al's picture

@dfarrah which causes 800K people and their families some anxiety. Additionally it costs over 30 million in lost productivity per day as well as lost services to US citizens. I was a fed employee for 30 years and went thru this many times.
It's bullshit and should be illegal for our so called representatives, including the office of the president, to use this tactic in their political theater.

up
0 users have voted.
SnappleBC's picture

Honestly, the line of reasoning is very TOP-esque.

Yeah, whatever happens from here, Trump is no doubt gonna do a lot of shitty things. I'm STILL happy if he pulls troops out of Syria and/or Afghanistan. I think you were trying to make some sort of point about the wall. If so, you'd have done better just to make your point.

up
0 users have voted.

A lot of wanderers in the U.S. political desert recognize that all the duopoly has to offer is a choice of mirages. Come, let us trudge towards empty expanse of sand #1, littered with the bleached bones of Deaniacs and Hope and Changers.
-- lotlizard

CS in AZ's picture

@SnappleBC

I should have done better. Sorry about that.

Yes I did read quite a few posts and comments today from trump fans here like free society, and even quite a few who are not usually trump fans, celebrating his efforts to bring “peace” — and my point is, he’s not doing that. Or one of them anyway. His decision to shut down the government over the Wall is not a good thing.

About this:

Honestly, the line of reasoning is very TOP-esque.

I have absolutely no idea what you mean by that. I don’t even have a line of reasoning on this. Just some random thoughts. But that feels like an insult, although I don’t get why you think that. If anything I just hoped to start a discussion. Why is that bad?

up
0 users have voted.
Big Al's picture

@CS in AZ as coming strictly from the democratic party side, something I've ran into many times. I usually tried to say up front I said the same things about Obama so as to not give that impression.

Part of the issue for me is the crediting of Trump in any way for something that really is no different from Obama supposedly ending the Iraq war, which the people at TOP still laud as one of his great accomplishments to this day I'm sure. Also, the jumping to far fetched conclusions like he's bringing peace to Syria or other bullshit is pretty outrageous to me. I actually think it's dangerous for part of the left to buy into this bullshit and gives the wrong impression of the state of US imperialism, which is in a rabid end game stage.

But it doesn't surprise, that's what most people do. They jump at the day's news and proclaim their opinions and then, like with the recent crediting of Ocasio-Cortez with creating a world changing green plan which turned flat in two days, the truth comes out and we're in 2018 and the Iraq war never really ended.

up
0 users have voted.
CS in AZ's picture

@Big Al

I think I’ve made my “extreme” aversion to the democratic party and all that they stand for more than clear, so I forget about the need for such disclaimers. It’s really unfortunate that one cannot call out trump’s bullshit without being taken as pro democrat. I am most certainly not! Haha.

I also really do not like his rhetoric about an invasion from Mexico, proclaiming terrorists, criminals, and “drugs” are “pouring over the border” and pose a grave threat. Maybe it’s because I live here, but this seems like a dangerous escalation to me.

up
0 users have voted.
SnappleBC's picture

@CS in AZ

I can look at an individual decision of someone.... say... Putin. Or I can quote something he said in a speech and say I think that's smart/wise/whatever. Doing those things does not make me a Putin-lover or a Putin-bot or a Putin apologist. It just means I approve of whatever it is I was commenting on.

Insofar as Trump, the man is a loathsome worm by any reasonable measure. Yet I approve of the fact that TPP got scrubbed and I like it that Hillary's Mideast plans seem to be suffering an upset. There are other things I like about Trump too. Yet I am no fan and the only situation in which I'd even bother to comment on these "positives" is this one -- where everyone standing near Trump looks so much worse.

If you want to influence my opinions or spark my thoughts, you will leave out the ridiculous team sport concepts. This is not a team sport. It is global life and death. Let's stick to the issues/facts. Declaring that anyone who sees the whole picture is a "fan" is just another bullshit propaganda meme -- hence more suitable to TOP than here. Viva la #McResistance!

up
0 users have voted.

A lot of wanderers in the U.S. political desert recognize that all the duopoly has to offer is a choice of mirages. Come, let us trudge towards empty expanse of sand #1, littered with the bleached bones of Deaniacs and Hope and Changers.
-- lotlizard

CS in AZ's picture

@SnappleBC

But first and most important, this.

Declaring that anyone who sees the whole picture is a "fan" is just another bullshit propaganda meme -- hence more suitable to TOP than here.

.

If you could quote where I said this, that would be helpful. It’s nowhere in my post or comments that I can find.

Some people here are trump fans, and don’t hide it. Most high profile of those is free society. Who is quite free to post their pro trump spin as much as they like. I believe others are free to post other points of view. No? That doesn’t mean everyone who likes anything trump does is a fan.

I am happy he’s leaving Syria and pissing off the neocons/neoliberals. Does that help?

That doesn’t mean I’m going to proclaim him a savior or blow it out of proportion to say he’s bringing peace, there or anywhere.

People are free to agree or disagree or express their opinions. I am not telling anyone what to think or say.

Calling someone “TOP-esque” is an insult. And for the love of god I wish people would drop that “TOP” thing. I left Daily Kos because of the rules that everyone must fall in line or shut up. I don’t believe in that, and nothing I post here is about that.

If you didn’t have anything to say about my thoughts on trump, they fine, but why stop in just to insult me?

As for the team sports bullshit — the government shutdown is about dem/republican team sports. Read trump’s tweets, watch the recent Oval Office meeting. They are playing politics.

That is a fact. It’s reality.

up
0 users have voted.
Big Al's picture

@SnappleBC @SnappleBC that a lot of people were "happy" about Trump's announcement, which is exactly what you just said you are. I'm not seeing where she indicated that meant those people were Trump "fans". So ya, your TOP-esque accusation is off base imo.

Relative to the big picture, that also appears to me what CS is saying, that some people who are "happy" about Trump's announcement are not seeing the big picture. (I may be wrong which is why I'm saying "appears to me").

That's what I was arguing also, that the people declaring that "Trump has ended the war in Syria" and has brought stability to the middle east because HE defeated ISIS is a stance severely lacking an understanding of the big picture. But we all have our own ideas about that big picture don't we.

up
0 users have voted.
CS in AZ's picture

@Big Al

Relative to the big picture, that also appears to me what CS is saying, that some people who are "happy" about Trump's announcement are not seeing the big picture. (I may be wrong which is why I'm saying "appears to me").

That is precisely what it is about. Thank you for getting it (me). Smile

Now I gotta fly, late for an appointment...

up
0 users have voted.

@SnappleBC
nix the finger pointing. You could have made your point without the "TOP-esque." remark.

I submit you take your own advice:

If so, you'd have done better just to make your point.

I also submit that "TOP-esque" accusations are "TOP-esque" in and of themselves.

up
0 users have voted.

in 10 or 12 years Canadians are going to have to fortify a wall to keep out all the Americans fleeing global heat death.

up
0 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

CS in AZ's picture

@doh1304

I have friends in Canada who have offered a path to move there. But it’s so freakin ridiculously cold there, I can’t even. When is it time to flee? I do think about that. I love the Sonoran desert. I love warm sunny weather. I hate snow and ice. I guess I’ll probably hang on here to the bitter end.

On the other hand, being so close to the border that trump and his base wants to militarize and turn into a war zone ... moving away does have to be considered.

up
0 users have voted.
Centaurea's picture

@CS in AZ
There won't be snow and ice at the higher latitudes anymore.

I've seen graphics showing what will likely happen as climate change progresses. Much of the northern hemisphere below the 44th parallel will be uninhabitable. That includes most of the lower 48 states. The parts that don't go underwater will become desert, worse than Death Valley.

The fertile, habitable, farmable areas will be places like Siberia, Alaska, and northern Canada.

up
0 users have voted.

"Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep."
~Rumi

"If you want revolution, be it."
~Caitlin Johnstone

Bisbonian's picture

@CS in AZ , but where in AZ? Roughly, if you wish. I'm thinking it might be fun sometime to get together as a group; Azazello, edg and I are fairly close together (Tucson, Marana, and Bisbee, respectively), and I wonder if you might be, also.

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

CS in AZ's picture

@Bisbonian

Northeast side of town, out towards Catalina highway. Edg is way up northwest in Marana. I think Zello is relatively close to me, but not sure. You down in lovely Bisbee. So the Baja AZ gang is pretty spread out. Azazello has invited me to get togethers in the past, which I appreciate, but have so far chosen to retain my relative anonymity and so declined.

I might reconsider that, possibly. It could be interesting to argue about our very divergent views in person sometime. Smile

(not meaning you, by the way, as I don’t recall anything specific that we have disagreed on.)

Thank you!

up
0 users have voted.
Azazello's picture

@CS in AZ
right about the geographical center of Tucson. I'll do a meet-up whenever anybody wants to set one up. I hate to brag about our weather, but it was a lovely day today, no ?

up
0 users have voted.

We wanted decent healthcare, a living wage and free college.
The Democrats gave us Biden and war instead.

@CS in AZ I live in Denver, and to me, it is already too hot here. I've already been considering moving to a northern state that has water.

No snow for Christmas....just the sun drying everything out.

We don't even have snow in Oct, Nov, and December anymore (or very little). Maybe we'll get slammed in January; I think March usually has the most snow.

up
0 users have voted.

dfarrah

lotlizard's picture

@doh1304

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

The threatened shutdown is partial because 75% of government funding has already been approved for the budget year that started in October. That includes money for the military, which would be unaffected by a shutdown. It’s the other 25% of government spending that’s at issue, but a shutdown could cut off spending for nine of the 15 cabinet-level federal departments, including Homeland Security, Justice, Transportation, Interior, Agriculture and State.

If congress is going to play this game every year with people having to work without being paid then I propose a new rule. The government has to pay them double for the days that they work for free. How many of them don't have any cushion available to go without being paid and how many of them will have to use credit cards which will charge interest or might have checks bounced or might miss an important bill that has consequential consequences? Paying that amount will help them if they get dinged for anything while they aren't paid.

Another rule should be that funding the government is a stand alone bill. No sneaking other stuff in it like Ryan did with the farm bill. And why the hell can congress find $5.7 billion for the wall in a day, but can't find the money for essential things that would help Americans?

This kabuki bullshit happens every year and it's time for it to stop. If the $1.6 billion for the border that Schumer and Pelosi are agreeing to is extra then why didn't they get agreements for DACA? Interesting how the democrats aren't even talking about them anymore isn't it?

In answer to your question I'm thinking that Trump is listening to his buddies at Fox and Lush Limbaugh who thinks he's going soft on stopping immigration. My $.02.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

CS in AZ's picture

@snoopydawg

These ongoing funding fights and shutdowns are completely absurd and need to stop. I do not understand why they can’t just pass an annual budget, at least, if not 2 years or more, and that’s it. These regular political showdowns that put federal workers in a vise, and also people who need government services and, you know, for our government to be functional (i.e., all of us), this is just so stupid.

up
0 users have voted.
Bisbonian's picture

@snoopydawg , but funding the government with one might be a good starting point to get there.

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

@snoopydawg I don't think Homeland security is shut down.

up
0 users have voted.

dfarrah

snoopydawg's picture

Was it anywhere close to what this dude thought?

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

CS in AZ's picture

@snoopydawg

Interesting take in the article.

I don’t even want to see them stage a cozy scene with a fire in the hearth and wearing seasonal knitted caps or sweaters. Who could buy that scene with the trumps anyway? When I see staged pics like that now of the Obamas I just think, eff you, you phonies. Trump and Melania are rich, detached elites. Their picture shows that.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@CS in AZ

Two rich A-holes that don't give a rat's ass about anyone who isn't in their orbit. Not that wishy washy emo that dude thought. And yeah, the photos of Barry and 'Chelle being cutesy and 'charming' are now nauseating to look at.

Bad

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

mimi's picture

@snoopydawg
and Michelle's book stared at me four-fold at the cashier. It gave me stomach cramps. She looked like a cheap hollywood celebrity and reminded me of Oprah. I can't believe I liked her and Obama when they started out. I fell completely for them and feel utterly betrayed and disgusted about what they became. How on earth did I fell for them during their first campaign? How could they sell themselves so completely and fall soo deep?

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@mimi

IMG_2979.JPG

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

@snoopydawg people have wasted so many words about a standard x-mas photo.

up
0 users have voted.

dfarrah

snoopydawg's picture

Mattis' nickname is Mad Dawg who once said that “it’s fun to shoot some people. You know, it’s a hell of a hoot,” and, “Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.”

But more importantly, he is clearly responsible for carrying out and/or aiding and abetting in several war crimes.

In November 2005 US marines in Iraq committed a massacre of 24 unarmed Iraqi civilians. The slaughtering of unarmed men, women, children and elderly people, shot multiple times at close range, was retribution for a roadside bomb attack on a convoy of marines. The war crimes were extremely well documented and the atrocity garnered international attention.

When it came time to bring the marines responsible for the massacre to justice, Mattis was the convening authority over the eight charged with crimes at Haditha.

Mattis went on to dismiss all of the charges leveled against the marines who had been accused of killing the civilians and of the eight originally charged, only one still faces possible prosecution, but one can guess how that will end up.

No wonder we weren't seen as the great liberators of Iraqis who brought them freedoms and democracy. Oh well. Seemed like a good idea at the time, right?

BTW. Mattis was fired from the Obama administration because he was too hawkish. Congress though decided that he'd be great in Trump's because they had to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law stating that it has to have been seven years since defense secretaries have been on active duty. Congress has only bypassed that law once in US history, and that occurred over 50 years ago.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Big Al's picture

by Trump, like most things he does or says. I worked for the federal government for 30 years, in human resources, so I'm more attuned than most to how often this bullshit government shutdown talk has happened. In my job, we had to prepare for it and communicate the impacts to others.

I think the thing that strikes me most is the power we seem to have given one man, or one government position, in the office of the president. How that can be considered democracy in any manner is totally beyond rational thought.

Of course, then we can go directly to the duopoly political system and how fucked up that is. So I guess, it's not really Trump, it's this system that allows it. And we're fools to not see it and act to change it.

up
0 users have voted.
CS in AZ's picture

@Big Al

I think the thing that strikes me most is the power we seem to have given one man, or one government position, in the office of the president. How that can be considered democracy in any manner is totally beyond rational thought.

When I was telling my husband earlier that trump was shutting down several departments of the federal government because he’s demanding money for his wall, his immediate reaction was, and I quote, “why the fuck is he allowed to do that? That should be illegal!” He went on a little tirade about why it’s ridiculous that one person has that much power. I could only agree.

Searching for how to act to change it. That’s where we’re stuck, isn’t it? I am, anyway.

up
0 users have voted.

@CS in AZ
arrangement, that the office of the Presidency seems simultaneously to be too powerful, and not powerful enough.

One reason for this was the explicit objective of the Framers to try to head off the institutionalized factionalism that characterized the British parliamentary system. They failed.

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.

@CS in AZ waved his hand and shut down the government.

There is a bill he refuses to sign. The bill provides for the government funding.

I suppose Congress could, at some point, pass a bill that would provide for some funding in perpetuity, but some other Congress would likely revoke it. I don't know how government powers are divided when it comes to budgeting.

up
0 users have voted.

dfarrah

TheOtherMaven's picture

@dfarrah

at least in theory. Timing plays a crucial part in it, because if Congress is still in session at the end of the 10-day period, the bill becomes law with or without Presidential signature. On the other hand, if Congress is not in session for any reason the bill just dies and has to be reintroduced from the get-go. Both sides (President and Congress) are capable of playing, and have played, fast-and-loose with the rules.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

CS in AZ's picture

JtC,

I’ve been accused of bringing Daily Kos style divisiveness to your site with this essay.

I do not think I did that, and the accuser quotes things I didn’t say. But those comments are getting upvoted so I have to ask. Should I delete this? Was it wrong to post it?

I’m going out for a few hours, will check in when I get back. I appreciate your guidance on what is ok and not. If posting my late night ramblings about recent news is being Daily Kos-esque, I’ll remove the essay and apologize.

up
0 users have voted.

@CS in AZ IMHO. No, what you did is express cynicism and "negative" thoughts about this whole theater of political bullshit we currently live with. Apparently now those of us on the "negative" side of anything, including Trumps actions as well as those of "progressive" in name only Democrats, need to just shut the fuck up and go along to get along. If we interpret something in a negative way we are just being cynical, we are not providing an answer or solutions in our cynicism either and that now seems to be a no go since if we dare question we MUST come up with an answer to the problem.

It reminds me of my own Tea Party, Bible thumping step mother, who pushes that positivity gospel non stop and simply does not understand, nor does she care to understand, why I cant just be positive and am just being negative in seeing the ugliness that America really is as well as what's coming down the pike. The Disneyfication of American politics as Chris Hedges has stated in so many words, while the world burns we must be positive, pray to gawd, and for God's sake do not pick on people who are at least seeming to try to right the ship. DO NOT look behind that curtain, be a good American and believe the words at face value.

End rant.

up
0 users have voted.

Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur

divineorder's picture

@CS in AZ Am suprised jtc did not step in yet.
At any rate I think I agree with DF on this:

Impeachment hearings should begin so the mofo gets called out imo.

up
0 users have voted.

A truth of the nuclear age/climate change: we can no longer have endless war and survive on this planet. Oh sh*t.

TheOtherMaven's picture

@divineorder

Or just talk talk talk about Ugh!Trump?

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

@CS in AZ
no need to delete it. This is a non-partisan site where everyone is entitled to their opinions. What non-partisan means is this site neither adheres to nor promotes any particular ideology, there are no litmus tests, lines to toe, or edicts, although members are free to believe what they will.

Diversity and tolerance of opinions is what this site is about. In my humble opinion, I think some folks lose track of that at times and get upset that other folks see things differently. And I am not pointing fingers, just stating a fact as I see it, it's not hard to pick it out on many different subjects. It probably has a lot to do with human nature and it is hard to overcome, myself included.

This site is attempting to bring the 99% together, across the political spectrum, in large enough numbers to make a difference. Until we figure out how to do that there is no chance of making inroads through the firewall that the 1% have built around themselves. The difficulty of that aspiration is manifest in this site itself. The accusations of "Daily Kos style divisiveness" are divisive in and of themselves, as a case in point, whether true or not.

As the 99% fights among itself, the 1% tips their champagne glasses and gloat at how well the propaganda works. The struggle is vertical.

up
0 users have voted.
CS in AZ's picture

@JtC

I appreciate your response and insights, as always.

up
0 users have voted.
Big Al's picture

placing sanctions on other countries. The ploy in many cases is to make the common people suffer thru those sanctions, like what the Clinton admin did to Iraq in the 90's that killed half a million kids, and hope that puts pressure to take down the current government.

In this case, Trump is threatening to shutdown the government "for a very long time", which obviously would hurt a lot of people if done broadly (which apparently it won't be). So it's a threat that if Trump doesn't get his way, a lot of people are going to get hurt.

It's like using innocent civilians as human shields in war. Quite despicable and another reason why Trump shouldn't get credit for anything. I read an article earlier from the Black Alliance for Peace.

"We in the Black Alliance for Peace don’t praise a U.S. president for ending the illegal subversion, invasion and occupation of a sovereign state that should have never been allowed in the first place by the theoretical representatives of the people who now sit in the U.S. Congress. If the Trump administration is serious about the “full and rapid” withdrawal of U.S. forces from Syria, we say it’s about time. We demand a full withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Syria, including the mercenary components referred to as “contractors.” We also say troop reduction is not enough—end the war in Afghanistan with a complete and total withdrawal of U.S. forces."

https://www.globalresearch.ca/black-internationalists-its-about-time-for...

In effect, those praising Trump for this announcement (which is all it is so far), are praising a child killing war criminal who should be put on trial in an orange jumpsuit to match his hair, and then put away for the rest of his miserable life.

Kind of like praising Ted Bundy for helping an old lady across the street.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@Big Al

Why Trump’s peace signal in Syria could see US clash with Russia in Ukraine

Trump’s abrupt call for US troops to leave Syria is being lambasted by his domestic critics as “a gift to Russia.” The paradox is that peace signals on Syria could bode sharper conflict with Russia in Ukraine. Hardly a gift.

*

In any case, the notion that Trump’s military withdrawal, or “retreat” as some critics put it, is a signal for peace or “gift” to Russia is woefully misplaced.

Earlier this week, Kurt Volker, the Trump administration’s envoy to Ukraine, told a forum in Brussels that $250 million worth of military equipment was on its way to the US-backed regime in Kiev.

That latest installment is in addition to the $1 billion of military assistance Washington has provided the Kiev regime since it seized power in February 2014 with the US-backed coup. It was the Trump administration that broke new ground from former president Obama when it signed off on $47 million in “lethal military supply” to the Kiev regime this year in the form of anti-tank javelin missiles.

Also this week, some 41 US senators signed a resolution calling for “freedom of navigation” exercises in the Black Sea and for more lethal military assistance “to defend Ukraine from Russian aggression”. Among those senators is Tom Cotton (R-AR), one of the most hawkish anti-Russia lawmakers. Ominously for US-Russia relations, Cotton is tipped in media reports as taking over from Mattis as the next Secretary of Defense.

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has warned that the US and other NATO powers are coaching the Kiev regime to instigate provocations against Russia for the purpose of providing a pretext to hit Moscow with further sanctions. As with the incident on November 25 when three Ukrainian warships infringed Russia’s maritime borders, Moscow’s legitimate response of defending its territory is distorted by Western governments and media as “aggression.” This then allows anti-Russian politicians to call for more punitive sanctions on Moscow and to whip up more demonization of Putin and his government.

Lots more info here about how the neo Nazis are pushing for war with Russia. The Atlantic council is telling Ukraine's president to send more troops into the Kerch Strait. to provoke a response from Russia that would give NATO the excuse to come to his aid.

some other good articles about this over there.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Bisbonian's picture

@Big Al . It is, Al, but I will go one farther. The Army Field Manual used to say (they have watered it down, since) that the definition of terrorism is using fear and violence to influence and bring about political change. Pretty sure this qualifies.

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

@Bisbonian just like using Amendment 25.

up
0 users have voted.

dfarrah

edg's picture

I think Trump deserves a smidgen of credit for trying to end the debacle in Syria. Despite the institutional weight of the DC Establishment, he does appear to want to undo the Obama/Clinton regime change scheme we've been attempting. It may seem that praising Trump for a small thing is the same as praising Trump for everything, but that's hardly the case when people try to guide Trump into doing the right thing once in a while.

Regarding the border wall, I disagree that it's a bad thing. I now live in Arizona, where I've seen groups of illegals sneaking into the country. But I grew up in Detroit, where I saw the extreme poverty and hopelessness of many of our own black citizens. Knowing that illegals are filling some or many of the jobs they could perform troubles me. Knowing that many Democrats are happy to have blacks trapped into generational welfare troubles me. Until every American that wants a job has a job, I think it's unconscionable to bring in or allow workers from other countries than our own.

up
0 users have voted.
CS in AZ's picture

@edg

I’m running short on time, friends coming over soon, so can’t really respond in detail.

I don’t think praising trump for small things is praising him for everything. What I think is that some of the “praising” on this small thing is disproportionate, with him being painted as the light bringer who is going to save the world and bring about peace on earth.

The issue of “illegals” and whether immigration should be allowed or not while Americans are out of work is a complicated one, with many aspects. I agree it needs to be addressed. Building The Great Wall of Trump across thousands of miles is not necessary and he’s using it as a political ploy. He is greatly exaggerating the “threat” and avoiding any comprehensive, realistic approach.

I’m firmly against turning the border into a war zone, which is what trump is moving us toward.

up
0 users have voted.
edg's picture

@CS in AZ

But considering the hyperbole and vitriol of the Russiagate-NeverTrump-Resistance crowd, I'd say it's kinda "fair and balanced".

The border wall is just a gimmick, of course. If America truly wanted to stop illegal immigration, it would impose huge fines and jail time on those who hire illegal workers. But nobody wants to cut off the cheap labor supply.

up
0 users have voted.

@edg when I moved into the professional class,

I have always felt much more allied with them than to the elite class.

Tho I may disagree with Trump's tactics, I agree with the intent. Our factories are gone. Our jobs have disappeared. The rich people and Wall Street get million dollar Xmas bonuses. We get a $10 gift card to Kroger. And half the products in Kroger come from somewhere else.

I may disagree with the wall as a solution but we are in dire need for some relief from the downward push in our labor market.

Trump may not be the answer but we sure as hell can't look for a solution from the clowns being schmoozed by the lobbyists and waiting for a special envelop in their stocking.

up
0 users have voted.

@edg

Set the working class squabbling with each other for crumbs; that keeps labor costs down.

I don't personally believe that the rich actually want to stop "illegal" immigration. The Wall is a sham. They've relied on cheap immigrant labor all along -- in conjunction with enslaved labor. I suspect they want the undocumented workers, and they want them to be desperate and fearful, looking over their shoulders all the time, and willing to take whatever crap and abuse they get handed.

People say immigrants do the work that Americans don't want. I say they work for _pay_ that Americans don't want.

And yes, poor blacks feel cheated, because they _have_ been monstrously cheated. First enslavement, then Jim Crow, then redlining, then "welfare queens", then the Clintons... it keeps going on. Your perception of resentment is real, but let's think together.

What effect do you think it would have if, for instance, we stopped the war on drugs, which distorts the economy of the Americas so greatly? What would be the effect if we took some of that wall money, say $5.7 billion worth, and gave it to desperate, poor Central Americans to make up for all the damage we've done there over the last century? Or grant it to Mexico to house refugees? I'd be tempted to say we should just stop messing with our neighbors, but it's too late for that, the damage is done.

My main point: the real problem is class oppression, with a side of imperialism. But that's not going to change anytime soon, so the poor will keep fighting each other, rather than the owners. I wish it were otherwise.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@pindar's revenge

people's jobs, what kind of work are those unemployed peoples doing?

They've relied on cheap immigrant labor all along -- in conjunction with enslaved labor. I suspect they want the undocumented workers, and they want them to be desperate and fearful, looking over their shoulders all the time, and willing to take whatever crap and abuse they get handed.

This is what the actual problem is., rich people use undocumented workers for house keepers, nannies, gardeners, cooks ... even Trump has undocumented workers working at his Mr MaGoo golf club in Florida. There once was a time when people in high places were found to have undocumented workers working for them they faced consequences for it. The biggest way to stop undocumented workers from taking people's jobs is to go after the owners of 7-11's and many other type businesses. Instead they go after the people and might fine businesses who just take that as a cost of doing business. Start putting them in prison and we'd see that stop immediately.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

edg's picture

@snoopydawg

Not only do businesses enjoy the cheap labor of illegal immigrants, they love the depressive effect it has on wages for everyone else. That's also why they love H-1B visas -- it helps them keep other tech workers squished down.

up
0 users have voted.

@edg I'm against all of the immigration programs until the US population is served decently.

I have no idea why people think the border should be open. The current group at the border needs to go home and figure out how to fix their problems in their country. Plenty of countries have had huge internal problems that they eventually resolved.

Businesses just want cheap labor.

up
0 users have voted.

dfarrah

Anja Geitz's picture

@dfarrah @dfarrah

on this comment in context with the refugees fleeing their own countries after the foreign policies of the U.S. created the economic problems that are starving them:

Plenty of countries have had huge internal problems that they eventually resolved

up
0 users have voted.

There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier

@Anja Geitz @Anja Geitz @Anja Geitz

I answered the wrong question.

Are you aware of the millions of dollars of aid that the US provides to these countries?

What specific US policy are you talking about? Trade agreements? The monetary aid we give them? The corporations that take advantage of the countries?

I know these countries can have very corrupt governments - even caused by the US.

If you can locate the specific people, representatives, companies etc. in the US that have caused the problems, then they should be held accountable, rather than expecting the US worker and US taxpayer to suffer for them.

I would be willing to bet that many wealthy people here have offshore accounts that help fund the corruption in ours and other countries. This corruption needs to be ended one way or another.

up
0 users have voted.

dfarrah

Anja Geitz's picture

@dfarrah

You did not disappoint with that answer.

If you can locate the specific people, representatives, companies etc. in the US that have caused the problems, then they should be held accountable, rather than expecting the US worker and US taxpayer to suffer for them.

Yes, that's the problem alright. We, the tax paying people, NOT holding our government accountable for the corrupt regimes they finance and arm all over the globe.

How about you come up with a viable measure to change that, and then maybe I'll stop laughing.

up
0 users have voted.

There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier

The Liberal Moonbat's picture

I say that because, if nothing else, I very seldom can.

My grandfather was a borderline-stereotypical New York Jew lawyer, and
he once taught me the secret to haggling:

"You have to be willing to walk away."

up
0 users have voted.

In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.

Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!

especially coming on the heels of the big battle not so long ago about the massive increase in teh Pentagon budget and that bloody shutdown.

No wait....

Then there was the other shutdown over the banking bill that would give even more power to the monster already too big to fail banks. I recall the passionate speeches made by my Senator Donnelly against that fiasco and then standing there doing that physically demanding filibuster.

No wait....

Then there was the opposition to the ADM/ConAgra welfare farm bill and how we waited with bated breath to see when it would end.

No wait....

Sorry folks, this kabuki theater is just too stressful. Wake me for the New Year.

up
0 users have voted.
CS in AZ's picture

@exindy

the proper spelling of bated breath.

Smile

up
0 users have voted.

@CS in AZ

My bad.

Afterthought. There were no other shutdowns because there wasn't enough visibility on those topics. The dem "leaderships" just happily signed on to the continuing funneling of taxpayer money into the 1% money class. Eg, the Pentagon budget, the banking dereg, the farm bill. Cause they knew their "base" is clueless about economics and all agog over SJW issues.

So they jump all over the border issue and just let the stuff that really matters to the real people (ie, strugglers) just rush on by and count on their MSM outlets to make sure nobody sees it.

OMFG! They don't have enough bottled water in the desert of NM!!! Meanwhile, pay no attention to Detroit.

up
0 users have voted.

. . . and declare victory and get the hell out of Dodge. That's the only semi-viable option I see to the Mid-east (and other quagmires), unless of course that someone wants to be honest and admit "we've lost and it is time to cut our losses and get the hell out of Dodge."

I try to not get into the intentions of political actors too much as I'm not a mind-reader. Look at what they do (or don't) and accept that and move to the next issue.

It is quite possible to do "the right thing" on some issue with totally bad intentions (as in "doing the right thing now lets me get away with bad things in the future"). If Trump can actually reduce the US military presence in Ohellnotagainistan then I'm glad to see him do that, and he gets one check mark in the "did something good today, color me amazed" column. It doesn't mean that I presume he's doing this to further some lofty goal, or that he thinks it will make him look good, or any other goal that I can figure out (actually, I'm willing to go with most anything he does is a semi-random product from a person with a medical condition coupled with sociopathic tendencies).

Even stopped clocks can be right twice a day. it doesn't make them good timepieces.

up
0 users have voted.