Shawn Henry of Crowdstrike Was Fingered as Guccifer 2.0's Puppeteer Within a Week of G2.0's Appearance

Check this out:

I found this in a Twitter thread from Adam Carter:

And "Studio Dongo" later posted this:

That was written a day after G2.0's appearance, so perhaps my title should have read "within a day"!

Also pertinent is this essay by Adam:

While FBI counterintelligence was under Shawn Henry's direction, the FBI illegally colluded in the hacking of the Stratfor intelligence firm - putting personal info of thousands of people at risk - so that the FBI could nail hacker Jeremy Hammond, and possibly achieve grounds for an indictment of Assange. Shawn Henry has zero ethics.

And this story, contemporaneous with Henry's tenure at the FBI - during which he served under Director Robert Mueller! - may also be pertinent:

Ögmundur Jonasson, Icelandic Interior Minister in 2011, had this to say:

What happened was that in June 2011, US authorities made some approaches to us indicating they had knowledge of hackers wanting to destroy software systems in Iceland. I was a minister at the time. They offered help. I was suspicious, well aware that a helping hand might easily become a manipulating hand!

Later in the summer, in August, they sent a planeload of FBI agents to Iceland seeking our cooperation in what I understood as an operation set up to frame Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.

Since they had not been authorised by the Icelandic authorities to carry out police work in Iceland and since a crack-down on WikiLeaks was not on my agenda, to say the least, I ordered that all cooperation with them be promptly terminated and I also made it clear that they should cease all activities in Iceland immediately.

It was also made clear to them that they were to leave the country. They were unable to get permission to operate in Iceland as police agents, but I believe they went to other countries, at least to Denmark. I also made it clear at the time that if I had to take sides with either WikiLeaks or the FBI or CIA, I would have no difficulty in choosing: I would be on the side of WikiLeaks.

If Henry is indeed behind G2.0, it seems that with this hoax he has finally achieved his ambition of destroying Assange's reputation. Dems who once praised Julian now consider him to be the puppet of the Great Satan Putin.

You will have noticed that Mueller's report made a point of sustaining this (evidence free) narrative.

The people behind the Guccifer 2.0 hoax would have had the clearest motive to dispose of Seth, as he could have blown their hoax - which Hillary was betting her candidacy on - sky high. I'll let you guess who my chief suspect is.

0 users have voted.


Pricknick's picture

And those that don't can gladly remain democrats.
He's not the only reason I demexited but he's a powerful reason I will never return.

0 users have voted.

Regardless of the path in life I chose, I realize it's always forward, never straight.

Pluto's Republic's picture

This was the most essential evidence and analysis to come out of the entire election sabotage conspiracy. It's a natural pivot point in any serious investigation of this matter.

I've pointed my finger at CrowdStrike from day one, based on some coincidental research I happened into. What you've written here neatly ties up many of the loose ends that confirm how this hoax got started. It explains who the cover-up experts were that got involved in every phase of it, ending with Robert Mueller. Connecting Assange to the Russians was the cornerstone of their cover-up.

Moving to the present, I assume that the three investigators working under AG Barr are aware of roles that these and all the parties involved played and understand crimes they were covering up. However, most of these deep state cronies are friends and their relationships go back decades. Plus, all of them know where they buried each other's skeletons. Under normal circumstances, nothing serious would come of this. Dragging it out two-and-a-half years was supposed to push it down the memory hole.

Perhaps they've considered who should take the fall. Comey is likely to be the odd man out, which comes as no surprise. He seems to know there's a mark on his back, and his recent media blitz confirms his great insecurity about this. His preemptive behavior is matched by that of Brennan and Clapper, who continuously return to the scene of the crime to double-down on their already debunked assertions.

Naturally, these are not normal circumstances. There is a Black Swan in their midst — the De-classifier in Chief. He already possesses many of the damning documents and he seems to know exactly which key documents to request, when the time comes. I would imagine he intends to expose all evidence of wrongdoing in this matter that has been hidden behind a Top Secret stamp, in order to redeem himself. And unless he can be talked out of it, I believe he intends to reveal to the American People the crime of the century that was committed right under their noses. That means he would expose the foreign governments that were involved in overthrowing his election and/or undermining his administration.

I hope they have the sleuthing and analytical skills that you do.

0 users have voted.
Populations don’t like wars. They have to be lied into it.
That means we can be “truthed” into peace. — Julian Assange

@Pluto's Republic Thanks. My analytical skills consist of knowing how to use DuckDuckGo and add two and two without getting five. Though that might be too much to expect from our earnest public servants.

0 users have voted.

Mark F. McCarty

snoopydawg's picture

Dems who once praised Julian now consider him to be the puppet of the Great Satan Putin.

Throw out enough allegiance allegations on people who were once admired and gullible people will believe them. Many of them did the same thing with Greenwald. They loved their work when it was focused on what the Bush administration was doing, but once they turned their eyes toward Obama and Hillary they became their enemies.

The founding CEO of Crowdstrike is Shawn Henry, who previously headed up cybersecurity at the FBI, described by the Washington Post at the time as the FBI’s “chief cyber cop”.

Nope. This isn't suspicious at all. What makes the Russian scam even worse is that Mueller never believed that he would find anything on people in Trump's campaign because he knew that nothing had happened. He might have been trying to get Trump on obstruction charges, but he knew damn well that Russia did not interfere with the election. Plus everything he charged Manafort with was known by the Obama administration back in 2015, but they held on to the information for future use. BTW. Will Podesta ever be charged for doing the same things that Manafort did? Hmm?

Edited out auto correct's mistake. Throwing allegiances. Sheesh.

0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Voting is like driving with a toy steering wheel.

The sources you cite make a plausible case that Guccifer 2.0 was actually just another FBI managed front. Fly paper.

Indeed, G2 is one of several agent provocateur operations put together by US and British intelligence as a means to control the outcome of the 2016 Presidential Elections. An elaborate political dirty tricks campaign. Hardly the first time in the history of both countries.

0 users have voted.
EdMass's picture

So you're saying that CloudSrike which the DNC and Hill> hired and thus refused the FBIs offer to investigate the server and the phishing was actually the people/company that did the phishing?

This is gonna be all over, Front Pages/Lead Stories - NYT, WAPO, AP, CNN, MSLSD, et al tomorrow AM.

You can trust my prognostications, because I am an Internet contributor. Wink

Where the hell do I get some BleachBit?

0 users have voted.

Prof: Nancy! I’m going to Greece!
Nancy: And swim the English Channel?
Prof: No. No. To ancient Greece where burning Sapho stood beside the wine dark sea. Wa de do da! Nancy, I’ve invented a time machine!

Firesign Theater

Stop the War!