Shawn Henry of Crowdstrike Was Fingered as Guccifer 2.0's Puppeteer Within a Week of G2.0's Appearance
Check this out:
I found this in a Twitter thread from Adam Carter:
And "Studio Dongo" later posted this:
That was written a day after G2.0's appearance, so perhaps my title should have read "within a day"!
Also pertinent is this essay by Adam:
While FBI counterintelligence was under Shawn Henry's direction, the FBI illegally colluded in the hacking of the Stratfor intelligence firm - putting personal info of thousands of people at risk - so that the FBI could nail hacker Jeremy Hammond, and possibly achieve grounds for an indictment of Assange. Shawn Henry has zero ethics.
And this story, contemporaneous with Henry's tenure at the FBI - during which he served under Director Robert Mueller! - may also be pertinent:
Ögmundur Jonasson, Icelandic Interior Minister in 2011, had this to say:
What happened was that in June 2011, US authorities made some approaches to us indicating they had knowledge of hackers wanting to destroy software systems in Iceland. I was a minister at the time. They offered help. I was suspicious, well aware that a helping hand might easily become a manipulating hand!
Later in the summer, in August, they sent a planeload of FBI agents to Iceland seeking our cooperation in what I understood as an operation set up to frame Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.
Since they had not been authorised by the Icelandic authorities to carry out police work in Iceland and since a crack-down on WikiLeaks was not on my agenda, to say the least, I ordered that all cooperation with them be promptly terminated and I also made it clear that they should cease all activities in Iceland immediately.
It was also made clear to them that they were to leave the country. They were unable to get permission to operate in Iceland as police agents, but I believe they went to other countries, at least to Denmark. I also made it clear at the time that if I had to take sides with either WikiLeaks or the FBI or CIA, I would have no difficulty in choosing: I would be on the side of WikiLeaks.
If Henry is indeed behind G2.0, it seems that with this hoax he has finally achieved his ambition of destroying Assange's reputation. Dems who once praised Julian now consider him to be the puppet of the Great Satan Putin.
You will have noticed that Mueller's report made a point of sustaining this (evidence free) narrative.
The people behind the Guccifer 2.0 hoax would have had the clearest motive to dispose of Seth, as he could have blown their hoax - which Hillary was betting her candidacy on - sky high. I'll let you guess who my chief suspect is.