The 2016 GE should be an excellent chance to document voting fraud under a microscope, especially if it becomes Hillary vrs. Trump. Only if exit polling will be conducted in as many key precincts as possible.

Corporate oligarchy at this time (June 2016) appears to prefer Hillary. Hillary knows how everything is conducted behind the scenes from her experience in staging international coups. It's clear that many Sanders voters will refuse to support her. She will need the electronic machines to create as many fraudulent votes as possible. All the gears for a coup and election theft are in place here. At the same time, Trump appears to have no clue about the importance of testing for accurate vote counts. In November, he will likely be on the receiving end of massive “strip and flip” voting against Hillary but complaining about it after the fact will be too little, too late. He needs to start immediately funding exit polling if for his own good. If Trump really believed in democracy and had the brains to appreciate the idea, he could easily afford a privately-funded exit polling business himself.

If it becomes Sanders vrs. Trump, I would expect a clean election.

But since exit polling in the US is the monopoly of the Edison group, the “sole providers of the US election exit polls”, we are never going to have the ability to insure open and fair elections. The National Election Pool (NEP) is a group of six media organizations that includes Fox, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC and AP. It's perfectly feasible for each of those organizations to conduct their own exit polling separately without needing the NEP. As it exists today, exit polling is intentionally distorted by Edison after the fact, to match electronic machine results. This is in-your-face corruption. The machines are proprietary to avoid public scrutiny.

OTOH when the US is interested in monitoring international elections, exit polling is funded by the State Department. And countries will typically hand count on their own. In fact, Ireland previously disposed of its US electronic vote-counting machines as recycled scrap rather trust the machines in their national elections. Germany always uses paper ballots which are hand-counted within a few days and exit polls are known right after the polls close. Britain, Israel, India, Switzerland, and Canada also count their ballots by hand. Canada is able to hand-count 3 million ballots per hour, over 12 million in four hours.

Why doesn't the US government fund exit polling it in our own country first? Just for starters, absentee or mail-in paper ballots would be the easiest and cheapest way to sample for true vote counts. All the votes are collected and stored together, and you only have to randomly pick out minimally-sufficient samples to get a reasonably-accurate estimation of the election results. But that is no substitute for the normal paper ballots from local precincts and an open exit polling process, all of which the US seems to think it is only acceptable outside of the country but never officially permitted here.