Hillary Clinton is dropping in the polls. The Democrats are beginning to worry.
The time has come to point fingers!

Host Chris Cuomo asked Pelosi why she thought Clinton’s poll numbers were tightening with her Republican opponent, Donald Trump, and why voters are more enthusiastic to vote for him.
“First of all, I think that polls are a reflection of some voters going to the third-party. The third and fourth party. The tightening that some of these undecideds have gone to that place. Some of the millennials,” Pelosi said.

Ah yes. It couldn't possibly be the fault of the DNC and Democratic establishment for rigging the nomination and forcing a flawed candidate down our throats.
Nope. It must be the fault of those voters who want to vote for someone that shares their own values.

Pelosi also blamed “fear” on why the poll numbers were tightening, as she called Trump a “fear monger” for his immigration stance.

What hurbis. What irony. As if the Dems haven't been fearmongering for a year now.
In case you aren't getting the message, the Clinton campaign is about to spell it out in bold letters.

The principal “super PAC” supporting Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy, Priorities USA Action, has concluded from its polling and other research that the reluctance to embrace the Democratic nominee among those who intensely dislike Mr. Trump is not going away and must be confronted.
“We’ll be launching a multimillion-dollar digital campaign that talks about what’s at stake and how a vote for a third-party candidate is a vote for Donald Trump, who is against everything these voters stand for,” said Justin Barasky, a strategist for Priorities USA.

Wait for it.
Wait. . . for . . . it

Mrs. Clinton’s backers are troubled enough by the resilience of the third-party candidates that they have started invoking a name that triggers painful memories: Ralph Nader.
“You’re going to end up with Nader electing Bush again if they vote that way,” warned Mr. Daley, who was the campaign chairman for Mr. Gore in 2000 when he lost Florida, and the presidency, in part because liberals supported Mr. Nader, the Green Party nominee that year.

You knew that was coming, didn't you?
The terrible specter of The Nader. Dems having been laying this groundwork for 15 years.

Meanwhile, the evil of two lessers is dropping in the polls.

Trump has pulled into the lead in Florida and Ohio, two crucial states where he has trailed Clinton for most of the race, and several states that once looked out of reach for Trump — Colorado and Virginia, among them — suddenly appear competitive.
One survey showed Trump swinging to a lead in Nevada, a state that President Obama carried with ease during both of his presidential campaigns. And a poll of Iowa, which has only gone for the GOP nominee once in the last seven elections, found Trump ahead by 8 points.
...
A CBS News-New York Times poll released Thursday found Trump and Clinton locked at 42 percent support nationally.

Only 43 percent of Clinton’s supporters say they’re excited about casting a ballot for her, compared to 50 percent of Trump’s supporters who are excited to vote for him. More than a third of young voters — a diverse group that leans left and formed a key part of the Obama coalition — are supporting a third-party alternative over Clinton.