A film and A Book
Recently I saw a film and read a book, one of which couldn’t have been more disturbing, and the other uncommonly comforting.
The disturbing documentary film is titled, Three Identical Strangers. The beautifully written and comforting book is titled, A Gentleman in Moscow, and was recommended by a friend.
I am neither a film nor a book reviewer, but I can confidently recommend both for their value in posing and partially answering questions of universal and current relevancy with regard to one’s ethics and humanity.
From Three Identical Strangers …
How much are we shaped by our genetic makeup, and how much does the environment in which we are raised contribute to our physical appearance, our personalities, and our preferences? The relative importance of nature versus nurture is a fundamental question in biology and is notably difficult to study in humans, due to ethical concerns.
In this film it is those ethical concerns that are approached, and in my mind should always take precedence over its scientific ‘value’.
Sentenced to house arrest in Moscow's Metropol Hotel by a Bolshevik tribunal for writing a poem deemed to encourage revolt, Count Alexander Rostov nonetheless lives the fullest of lives, discovering the depths of his humanity.
Inside the elegant Metropol, located near the Kremlin and the Bolshoi, the Count slowly adjusts to circumstances as a "Former Person." He makes do with the attic room, to which he is banished after residing for years in a posh third-floor suite. A man of refined taste in wine, food, and literature, he strives to maintain a daily routine, exploring the nooks and crannies of the hotel, bonding with staff, accepting the advances of attractive women, and forming what proves to be a deeply meaningful relationship with a spirited young girl, Nina. "We are bound to find comfort from the notion that it takes generations for a way of life to fade," says the companionable narrator. For the Count, that way of life ultimately becomes less about aristocratic airs and privilege than generosity and devotion. Spread across four decades, this is in all ways a great novel, a nonstop pleasure brimming with charm, personal wisdom, and philosophic insight. Though Stalin and Khrushchev make their presences felt, Towles largely treats politics as a dark, distant shadow. The chill of the political events occurring outside the Metropol is certainly felt, but for the Count and his friends, the passage of time is "like the turn of a kaleidoscope." Not for nothing is Casablanca his favorite film. This is a book in which the cruelties of the age can't begin to erase the glories of real human connection and the memories it leaves behind.
Rarely have I met more tender and enchanting characters in a book.

Comments
I saw AGIM in a bookstore...
but I just couldn't buy the premise. Obviously you had a diffferent takeaway.
A former aristocrat survives thirty years of Stalin? And lives in a hotel in Moscow (even in an attic room)? He "strives to maintain a daily routine"? According to the history I know, he would have some low paying job, he would get whatever food he could find, and he would consider himself lucky not to be denounced and shipped off to the Gulag - just so someone could have his room in the hotel.
In what alternative universe is this supposed to take place? What does this guy do to make a living - everyone had to have a job, ,and an identity card. Former aristos were surveilled like crazy by the NKVD (or whichever acronym the interior ministry's thugs were going under). And, the old, tiresome trope of the cultured older man and the high spirited young woman. Its a Harlequin Romance
I just could not get through the dust jacket, much less buy the book.
Since you read it, could you please tell me how this guy had all these freedoms inside the brutal Stalinist system.
Well,
The Count did consider himself lucky in having served (as a waiter) some very influential people in the administration, one of whom conferred some helpful advantages due to his guidance in furthering the understanding of American 'culture'.
This book is in the genre of fiction. It's value is found there, not in the more academic genre of non-fiction. Regardless, it offers insights of value to consider.
Thanks for your response.
I won't comment any further.
It's difficult to comment confidently
about a book without having read it. I understand though your disinterest. If you do happen to see the film Three Identical Strangers I would be interested in your perceptions.
Hi janis, busy day, but saw this and stopped in; happy to see
book, movie, art and theatre reviews on c99; big help in finding worthy ways to spend one's time. Just checked and Three Identical Strangers isn't available on my go to streaming site yet, but i have it booknoted.
The book joins a list and stack sitting a few feet away.
Thank you for bringing these works to our attention; looking forward to enjoying them later.
Got to run ... cheers
Hi and Bye smiley
I'd love to have a discussion here about the film, Three Identical Strangers in the future. It presents heaps to think about and discuss.
Count Alexander Rostov
Any relation to the Rostovs of War and Peace?
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
I wouldn't know Bollox,
but my guess is that you might, as historian and book lover.
Just wondering
With the patronymic Ilyich, it reminded me of Count Ilya Rostov, the kind, decent, if a little wayward patriarch of the Rostov family of 1805 Moscow.
A good backstory perhaps.
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
That description fits closely
the character of Count Rostov in the novel. A kinder, more decent person would be hard to find.