But first, in remembrance of the Humpty Dumpty magazine for children (back in the lighter years):

Can you spot the differences?

Now for my questions.

IF the accusations against Kavanaugh are false:
* Why does he not call for an FBI investigation?
* Why did he do an interview on Fox (no other SCOTUS nominee has ever done an interview show)?
* Why are Republicans trying to rush the vote (they have until Nov. 6 at least to confirm a nominee)? Note: They have called for a vote this Friday.

IF the accusations against Kavanaugh are deemed true:
* Does anyone think the Republicans will not confirm him anyway?

General questions:
* If true, why exactly was Judge also in the room during the assault? Most rapes are not committed with an audience. Did Judge jump on the bed thinking K was taking too long and it was his "turn"?

* Does K's conflicting stories of his high school and early college years regarding his drinking further prove a tendency for lying?

* Why is K in so much debt? If reports are correct, he has been living well over his means for years. How does this reflect on his judgment? Do you suppose that being a corporation is a person ideologist may help him out of his financial troubles?

* There have been numerous remarks about this incident happened 36 years ago to undermine its validity, but somehow K conveniently still has a calendar of some of his activities from that same time period and no one blinks an eye (lots of winks though). Has this calendar been vetted?

* It has been shown that K lied under oath on two separate issues in his 2004, 2006 and current testimony under oath (the documents that were stolen from Sen Leahy and the issue of the judge who was sending out inappropriate emails and later fired for sexual harassment.). Yet, not a peep from Dems. Why?

* Does being a virgin somehow eliminate the possibility that a person could or would sexually assault someone? After all, Catholic priests take a vow of celibacy.

* Did anyone else notice that during the hearings that K drank excessive amounts of water when being questioned by Democrats yet very little when Republicans had the floor? Did anyone notice that K said that he is going to over turn Roe v Wade (that is what he meant by not citing the precedents that would keep it law, but instead referring to a precedent that could lead to overturning the current law)? (Not: Trump said he would appoint judges to overturn Roe.)

Other questions:

* When will Democrats grow a backbone? Kamala Harris at the original hearings said she had a reliable witness that K DID talk to someone at Trump's law firm about the Mueller investigation after having grilled K extensively on whether he had or not with him avoiding answering the questions. Then crickets.

* Why didn't the Democrats on the committee take legal actions (or find a Wikileaks-type source) to obtain the documents on K that have been hidden from them and the public? For that matter, those documents came from Bush's library which is supposed to be for the public. Why didn't one of them send someone to get a library card?

* Do Republicans think they were too tough on K when they asked him why he uses a Sharpie to write his notes?

Finally:

* Exactly what case is coming in front of the Supreme Court in October that the Republicans feel they need K in there to swing the vote?

Wrapping up: If by some miracle (and I do mean a miracle just short of the Second Coming), they don't confirm K, the Republicans have a long list of judges who would do their will in a SCOTUS position with the probable exception of not having written that a president cannot be prosecuted.

What is left then is for the American people to find a way to get Congress to do its job as Sen. Sasse (an R) pointed out during the hearings. LAWS need to be passed to stop the most egregious sins of the one percent.

Thank you for listening to me blow off steam. These questions and more have been rattling around and my head for days now and I was looking for a good place to drop them off. = )