"Conspiracy theory" vindicated
We are not all crazy, the 2016 primaries WERE stolen:
The gist of the report is this: normally, small samples (small, quickly reporting presincts) give wild results, but that all evens out after a time. This did not happen in 2016. In every state once the early results started to even out they suddenly skewed wildly, and always in 1 direction - guess how? Right. The larger the presinct the greater Hillary outperformed.
Also, we were right, when ballots were hand filled and/or hand counted Bernie won, but when machines were involved Hillary won by upwards of 34%, just as we thought.
The Russians did not hack the election, Hillary did.
Amazingly, the Republican primary showed the same thing, but with less successful results - that's right, the Republican establishment tried to steal the primary from Trump; but they only rigged the resultss by 17% rather than Hillary's 34% and it wasn't enough.
Also, buried in the discussion, the greater Hillary "outperformed" the greater lesser candidates "underperformed".
This report aparently only covered the primary,not the general, but does lead one to think that Hillary's "65 million votes" claim might really be fishy.
(not sure the link works, but I'll try it anyway)