Clinton and the Democratic Party are about to have a long-overdue day of reckoning.

Over at Politico, Yves Smith writes about a phenomenon which I am also seeing in my contacts. Progressives are saying 'enough is enough' and are saying that they will no longer be a party to the dismantling of our democracy. They have been used and abused and are no longer willing to vote between the lesser of two evils. After all, the lesser of two evils is subjective. How to quantify evil? Is it the methodical destruction of our planet and culture by the neo-lib and neo-con uber capitalist failure? Or the possibility of electing an unknown, undisciplined narcissist? The evil you know vs. the evil you don't know.

By contrast, the Democratic Party in the Clinton and Obama administrations has consistently embraced and implemented policies that strip workers of economic and legal rights to benefit investors and the elite professionals that serve them. Over time, the “neoliberal” economic order—which sees only good, never bad, in the relentless untrammeling of capital and the deregulation of markets—has created an unacceptable level of economic insecurity and distress for those outside the 1 percent and the elite professionals who serve them.

The result is that the U.S. economy is becoming lethal to the less fortunate, according to the New York Times, which reported this week that U.S. death rates have risen for the first time in a decade. The increase in death rates among less educated whites since 2001 is roughly the size of the AIDS epidemic. One cause, the opioid epidemic, resulted from Purdue Pharma overselling the effectiveness of reformulated OxyContin, then recommending higher dosages when it failed to work properly, which experts deemed a prescription for creating addicts, according to a number of lawsuits. This was permitted by the U.S. government, leading to thousands of unnecessary deaths. Despite President Barack Obama’s Panglossian claim that the economy is doing well, the spike in suicides to levels over those during the financial crisis belies that.

Yet the Clinton campaign is in such denial about this that it has become vitriolic in its verbal and tactical attacks on Sanders and his supporters—rather than recognizing that the stunning success of his campaign is proof of their abject policy failures. The message is clear: The Clintons believe, as Bill himself put it, that the true progressives have nowhere to go.

They are counting on us to follow the crumbs to the wicked witches house. I think this will be the year that progressives recognize that they have been enabling abusive treatment and will take their future into their own more capable hands.

I encourage you to read Ives Smith's entire piece. It is a brilliant analysis of where progressives are politically. A good description of between a rock and a hard place.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Solid content, on a wide range of issues.

up
0 users have voted.
lunachickie's picture

I guess this is Politico's idea of "opposing viewpoints", heh. They've always struck me as very neoliberal (at best).

Smith has her finger on the pulse, if nothing else. I can't even begin to find the words to describe my revulsion and that of others on my social media feeds--but damned if a lot of them don't feel exactly the way Smith lays it out. I was ok until it started looking like Trump has been snagged by the warmongering right. I started having flashbacks of the Cheney wing of the Bush Administration....

up
0 users have voted.

I used to rely on bobswern to alert me to the interesting things she wrote. BTW, her blog website is Naked Capitalism.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/

up
0 users have voted.

active.

up
0 users have voted.

And BOY did he take grief. All the "make sure you have your flak jacket on! Incoming!" stuff the Hillaryfolk would say every time there was a Hillary diary, so that they could pretend the world was quaking in fear of all us BernieBros and our Clockwork Orange-level ultraviolence, really applied to the mountain of crap bobswern would have to take.

up
0 users have voted.

"The suspense is terrible! I hope it continues!" - Wilde

kharma's picture

If they continue on they lose. The Democratic Party is going to have to hit rock bottom before they change their ways. One day they will get tired of being sick and tired and do something different.

up
0 users have voted.

There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties.. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.--John Adams

Shahryar's picture

it's what's needed.

up
0 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

Two thoughts:

1) No thoughts of voting for Jill Stein among these people? Did "Yves Smith" think of asking?

2) What's to be done about Trump's crew of violent white supremacist followers?

up
0 users have voted.

"The war on Gaza, backed by the West, is a demonstration that the West is willing to cross all lines. That it will discard any nuance of humanity. That it is willing to commit genocide" -- Moon of Alabama

Hawkfish's picture

Is getting the votes counted. Many states only count write in votes for candidates who has filed some paperwork. I'm compiling a list of deadlines and web links by state, but the candidates themselves have to file the forms.

up
0 users have voted.

We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg

a position you had no idea you were running, likely wouldn't want to serve in and probably not qualified for. Assuming that most candidates are actually qualified for the offices they run for.

up
0 users have voted.
OLinda's picture

so some can vote for her without needing to write in. Here in CO she is.

up
0 users have voted.
Alphalop's picture

Don't know if they have gotten on more recently.

up
0 users have voted.

"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me

to the Green Party's Ballot Access Committee; they're pretty close in several states, only about 6 states are in the unlikely column (and they're states that the GOP will likely take easily anyway). They're working on it, trust me.

up
0 users have voted.
Alphalop's picture

I am thinking that if Sanders does not get the Nominee and the Libertarian entering the race a 4 way race could result in a win for Sanders, he has probably the broadest cross party appeal of all 4 of the potential candidates.

I would love to know the inside talk in the Sanders camp about Stein's invite. That's gotta be some interesting conversation. Smile

up
0 users have voted.

"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me

Cassiodorus's picture

But I assume that with sufficient humanpower and effort they can all be overcome.

up
0 users have voted.

"The war on Gaza, backed by the West, is a demonstration that the West is willing to cross all lines. That it will discard any nuance of humanity. That it is willing to commit genocide" -- Moon of Alabama

WindDancer13's picture

On the second, I can see a number of possibilities. First though, I would like to thank Trump for bringing these people out into the open. The US has chosen to be blind and silent abut this ugly underbelly of our society. Making people aware of the problem is a step towards neutering it.

Thoughts:

1. Trump will distance himself from these people as fast as he can once they have served there purpose. (Because some people like to make the fascist argument, I will add this: even Hitler got rid of the Brown Shirts once they had served their purpose.) Remember that Trump has made two efforts in the past to run for the presidency. He knows marketing and figured the way to get where he wants to go which meant going for groups that largely remain hidden. Notice that since his "nomination" he has been doing some back tracking, not enough to lose those voters but enough to now appeal to a larger audience.

2. There have been acts of violence at both Trump and Clinton rallies (the ones at HRC rallies are not widely advertised.) Does Trump encourage this? In many ways, yes. He likes the carnival aspect of his rallies On the other hand, Bill Clinton has also promoted racism and intolerance at his rallies on the behalf of HRC (would he do this if they did not share a common ideology?). The racism that the Clintons promote is mostly silent, but can effectively be seen in their policies, words and actions. Is the hidden racism somehow better than the racism we can see? Is violence in words somehow worse than violence in policy?

3. Exactly what are we afraid that these "violent white supremacist followers" are going to do? I am pretty sure that the FBI has been able to expand their lists of people to watch based on participants at some Trump rallies (whereas, they will miss the ones attending Clinton rallies). Is this minority going to change laws that is is okay to be racist or discriminate against other groups? Occupy federal buildings? Conduct protests that turn into riots with police in military gear? If the answer is yes to those questions, then please explain how it is different from what is already happening.

4. Is it okay to be racist abroad as long as we make it look like we are not racist at home? Is bombing the hell out of other countries and peoples making us safer? In Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs being fed and having shelter comes before safety. We know that the Clinton policies will lead to more people looking to deal with how to survive physically, and that they will disproportionately affect minorities. Most US Americans are half a step away from a total survivability disaster now.

5. If you take a closer look at the HRC horde, you will find there are more people there who have a brown shirt attitude than you will find in the disparate groups that follow Trump. Most won't care or even notice as rights are stripped away. Listen to them holler now about "sore loser" Sanders as their voting rights are being diminished.

6. You know that "do-nothing" Congress we currently have. If Trump is elected, they will be very busy trying to stop whatever he may try to do (often things that are to the left of HRC) which may keep them from passing even more discriminatory legislation. If HRC is elected, that legislation will pass because it is Republican in nature as is she.

I think I wandered a bit there from my original intention to answer you second question. I do not care much at all for Trump, but if necessary I will vote for him over HRC.

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass

featheredsprite's picture

You gave words to a feeling that I've had for quite a while but could no clearly elucidate.

I don't believe that all Hillary supporters are brownshirts but I suspect about a third of them are. Nevada state convention is the most visible example of that philosophy but there's a lot of it out there.

Just because I'm paranoid, it doesn't mean that they aren't out to hurt me. A lot of Clintonistas truly want to hurt Bernicrats.

up
0 users have voted.

Life is strong. I'm weak, but Life is strong.

WindDancer13's picture

It is the other ones that scare me more though because they do not seem to be aware of what they are agreeing to by accepting HRC.

Nevada is a very, very good example. HRC people were aware that the news stories were propaganda designed to smear Sanders's supporters and by inference, if not right out, Sanders himself. How many chose to deny the lies? How many came forward to correct the record? Only one that I know of (from a TYT interview). One out of 1600 plus HRC supporters who were there just seems to show that truth is not something they are interested in. If they are not interested in truth, then they will follow blindly down whatever dark alley they are lead.

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass

I've said for years (decades?) now that Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same coin. The common cry from Democrats was "False equivalency!"

I've now realized where I was wrong though. Only a certain portion of the Democrats are no different than Republicans. Clinton supporters are indistinguishable from Republicans from where I stand. That portion is a hate group, with nothing but vile words for anyone who doesn't fall in lockstep with their marching.

On the flipside, I have newfound respect for the Sanders supporting "DINO" wing of the party, and hope that they either fix or leave it completely.

up
0 users have voted.

If I can't vote for Bernie, then Stein will prob get my vote.
I cannot vote for trump or any other republican, ever.

up
0 users have voted.

Being in California, I have that option. And Stein's views/Green platform matches up pretty well with both my own views and Bernie's policies -- there may be a hair's difference between the Greens and Bernie on Middle Eastern foreign policy, but that's about the only difference I had with Sanders as well.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

who are already in a position to hand down decisions that it’s appropriate to shoot up MSF hospitals or murder pregnant Afghan women?

A vote for Hillary is an endorsement of all the policies of the current administration.

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

Wink's picture

Nobody has ever heard of her. And by nobody I mean the 95% of voters that rarely (never) follows politics.

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

Not Henry Kissinger's picture

I liked this bit best:

Then there are questions of competence. Hillary has a résumé of glittering titles with disasters or at best thin accomplishments under each. Her vaunted co-presidency with Bill? After her first major project, health care reform, turned into such a debacle that it was impossible to broach the topic for a generation, she retreated into a more traditional first lady role. As New York senator, she accomplished less with a bigger name and from a more powerful state than Sanders did. As secretary of state, she participated and encouraged strategically pointless nation-breaking in Iraq and Syria. She bureaucratically outmaneuvered Obama, leading to U.S. intervention in Libya, which he has called the worst decision of his administration. And her plan to fob her domestic economic duties off on Bill comes off as an admission that she can’t handle being president on her own.

Hillary's record rises to Bushian levels of venal incompetence. As President, she could very well be an even worse disaster that W.

up
0 users have voted.

The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?

Ignore Bernie at your own peril.

Here it is clear as a bell, if you hacks at the DNC decide to push through Clinton or in any way try to supplant her with someone else other than Bernie then you are done. I will never,never,never,never,never,never,never,never,never,never vote for Clinton and the same holds true for millions

In a national election she could not get elected dog catcher and is not honest enough to do even that job

up
0 users have voted.

two words for the Dem. party, Bernie Sanders. if they leave me with no choice I might vote Stein or even Trump its on them if they want a Dem. to be POTUS.

up
0 users have voted.

I will very happily (and will be able to sleep at night) voting for Jill Stein.

To the DNC who's favorite comment is progressives, fuck them where are they going g to go.

Well Fuck You, to the Green Party

up
0 users have voted.

I don't yet know if I'd vote for HRC next, or vote/write-in Jill Stein or Gary Johnson, but in no way will I vote for Donald Trump.

up
0 users have voted.

I've been telling people to hold their noses and vote for Hilary if she becomes the candidate. I may be changing my stance on that but it definitely wouldn't be for Trump of all people. My best-case scenario at this point is if both conventions are split and result in either Bernie as the candidate or Bernie and someone else on the Con side as third-party candidates. I think a 4-way Dance for the US Title(sorry long-time wrestling fan) would result in a competitive race. Or it could be an epic disaster. Let's find out.

up
0 users have voted.

" "I chose to change facts, reality, and the meaning of words, in order to make a much larger point." - Paul Ryan John Oliver "

Cassiodorus's picture

of such a strategy as it has operated (with the consent of the vast majority of the nice liberals) over the past thirty-six years. at any rate, Gopal Balakrishnan:

On numerous occasions since the 90s the left has rallied to a center-right candidate to ward off the far-right and the results have been disastrous. Not only is the far right strengthened by bolstering its credentials as the only real opposition force to the establishment, the left is drastically weakened at the expense of the center-right.

Each time, the nice liberals tell us that we have to vote for a neoliberal conservaDem or it's OMIGOD THE END OF THE WORLD. The actual result in each case is that the world survives, but things get worse because either 1) the Republican wins and the nice liberals pine for those glorious days when a neoliberal conservaDem was in power and everything was "okay" or 2) the Democrat wins and the nice liberals cheer on the Democrat leader while he or she does all the bad things the Republican would have done except maybe sugarcoated with some nice small-time charitable donations here and there.

In this regard I do not recommend a vote for Clinton or for Trump. What has been lost with lesser-of-evils voting is the idea of fighting for one's own interests, and so that must be regained, election or no election.

up
0 users have voted.

"The war on Gaza, backed by the West, is a demonstration that the West is willing to cross all lines. That it will discard any nuance of humanity. That it is willing to commit genocide" -- Moon of Alabama

up
0 users have voted.

We have been voting for LOTE far too long which has resulted in more and more whacky Republicans as nominees. Voting for HRC (should she get the nomination) will only prolong the rightward drift of the political equation. I, for one, am not willing to continue this drift anymore.

up
0 users have voted.
JayRaye's picture

99% of the America people, And it hasn't been so great for people in other nations either.

No matter which evil we vote for as the "Lesser Evil" the ruling class wins and we loose.

When we finally cut loose from that strategy and free our minds from the false choice that they are forcing down our throats, they won't know what hit them.

They will raise a huge howl, and we should simply laugh at them.

up
0 users have voted.

Never be deceived that the rich will allow you to vote away their wealth.-Lucy Parsons

Each time, the nice liberals tell us that we have to vote for a neoliberal conservaDem or it's OMIGOD THE END OF THE WORLD. The actual result in each case is that the world survives, but things get worse

But let's say it's the 'end of the world' like they tell us.
Screw four or eight more years. Kickstart it now and let it burn.

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

What a terrific commentary by the always excellent Yves Smith. If Trump gets elected over Clinton, the Democratic party has only itself to blame for shoving this flawed and corrupt candidate upon the people. IMHO, the party deserves to die if they do and I will not be among the mourners.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

It looks like one of B.S. Bernie's acid head journalist, or maybe Sweet Jane herself. I haven't heard much about her lately with accounting majic, university real estate, and $400k private jets to get Italian fruit munchies.

They need to screen articles, especially based on extremely biased polls.

Uneffinbelievable.

They can have her.

up
0 users have voted.
Phoebe Loosinhouse's picture

it's not a question of simply having an animosity towards HRC's record and deciding that she is not representative of your views, what has happened in this election cycle is that more progressives became aware of the fact(s):

1. The Democratic Party doesn't CARE what the view of any individual voter is - they were perfectly happy to award the super delegates, debase themselves by publicly begging Hillary to run, clearing the field on her behalf, stacking the deck against the contender who did show up, and resort to the basest sort of racist and sexist smears against both the alternate candidate and his voters.

2. The Democratic Party is at least as morally bankrupt and corrupt as the Republicans if not more so and were and are perfectly willing to throw all concepts of government accountability, transparency and oversight by both the public and the Congress out with Hillary's bathwater.

Those observations are what's new on this go-round. The Democratic Party revealed itself in a very unflattering form and triggered a reaction of abhorrence and disgust that it's going to be difficult to recover from over the long haul. I think a lot of people feel like the core of the Party is so corrupt that it's impossible to save and that the future of the 99% most likely be better served with a completely new Party or possibly trying to re-vitalize and re-energize the Greens.

up
0 users have voted.

" “Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough.” FDR "

gulfgal98's picture

and by being the same Bernie over decades of public service, Bernie ripped back the curtain on the malignant corruption that infests the Democratic party. He did not have to say a word. He just let the establishment of the party and Hillary herself reveal themselves for what they are and that is hopelessly corrupt.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

Bisbonian's picture

"I don't care about her damn emails!" Meaning, I don't have to be the one to expose it to you, and take the blame for doing so. It will expose itself, and be more obvious that way.

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

ThoughtfulVoter's picture

The media always forgets the second part of his sentence..I'm sick of hearing about those damn e-mails, let's focus on the issues.

Bernie is right to let law enforcement take care of the wrong doing. He can call out her judgement, which he has done, and her wavering position on platform. But let the law take care of the crime. It also shows that Bernie supports the agency to do its job without political interference, which I think is an important quality in a President.

up
0 users have voted.

Hillary's recent 'Foreign Policy Speech' is a perfect example. She and her minions think it makes her 'appear' more muscular than Trump/Sanders, but that speech served instead to remind us of what a sociopath Clinton is in regard to the 'New World Order'... it was creepy.. and yet, the Democrats hailed it (via the MSM) as an accomplishment of great worth... Really?.. OMFG...
Earth to the DNC, you've got a problem!

up
0 users have voted.
whyvee's picture

He did not even pretend to value the progressive ideals of the Democratic Party once he was elected. After his first term hubby and I became (I)ndependent registered voters. Fool me once...

up
0 users have voted.
riverlover's picture

and then hoping some more. But the double balance scales tipped to the worse. Again. And then Bernie rose, and demonstrated the level of corruption within the Democratic (sic) Party.

I am still willing to help with a major course correction.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

Party to draw attention away from its own venality and perfidy.

up
0 users have voted.
Shahryar's picture

that is, his administration is now approved of by our leading Democrats, as in "Colin Powell did it so it's ok".

up
0 users have voted.
Damnit Janet's picture

I'm not even sure there is a division among the politicians (R&D) anymore.

I have said it before and I'll say it till they stick their boots on my throat, "HRC is worse than GWB."

She is every bit as bought off, she's corrupt, she's a liar, she's bungled everything she's ever laid her hands on. Tell me ONE damn thing she's ever accomplished politically and socially that has ever helped anyone but herself and her Bill and her fucking Wall Street Masters.

I won't vote for Trump. But I sure the fuck won't have anyone tell me who to vote for. And that goes for the evil DNC, too. I'm sick of Wyden and Brown sending me emails to give them money. They haven't even read my emails and letter to them about my registration fraud case.

Oh and there's no election guys. So many people, including me and my spouse, were not able to vote due to registration fraud. People can pretend there's still some election going on, but that's even turning into a peasant mentality. Oh, look the masters are letting us vote for the racist or the liar.

Yeah, that's some freedom and choice ya got that Murrica.

Election reform. Because until you have a voice, it doesn't matter a fuck about parties.

They are having a party. We are not invited.

Fuck Hillary/Trump. That's not a choice. They know it, we know it. But "we" just don't have any journalists, we don't have any rules or laws, we have nothing.

up
0 users have voted.

"Love One Another" ~ George Harrison

about Hillary vs Trump (and US policies in general are pilloried:
https://newmatilda.com/2016/03/23/john-pilger-why-hillary-clinton-is-mor...

up
0 users have voted.

agree with him. The war with Russia is the war Hillary's neo con endorsers are hoping for. Lots of money for the MIC.

up
0 users have voted.

Russia won't start it, but they will finish us if we attack them.

Hillary CANNOT be elected, even if Trump is the alternative.

Bernie or Bust!

up
0 users have voted.
Damnit Janet's picture

up
0 users have voted.

"Love One Another" ~ George Harrison

You can't keep holding everything in, Janet. Next time tell us how you really feel. Smile

up
0 users have voted.
jorogo's picture

That a progressive-minded person would vote for Trump; doing so simply constitutes automatic disqualification as a progressive. Same goes for voting for Hillary Clinton. People can call themselves what they choose; Trump calls himself amazing and awesome, and claims he has a "very good brain". Sayin' it don't make it so.

Voting for what you perceive as the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil - both a progressive failure and a moral cop-out. There will be no progressives voting for Trump.

up
0 users have voted.

"If I sit silently, I have sinned." - Mossadegh

Hillary did not win. And no, I won't be "disqualified" from anything.

That a progressive-minded person would vote for Trump; doing so simply constitutes automatic disqualification as a progressive

up
0 users have voted.
Wink's picture

but there will be a lot of Dems voting for the Trumpster.

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

shaharazade's picture

with Progressive in it's current usage. I never have. To me it was a Democratic pol cop- out from back in the bushie days when liberal was a dirty word. I would say there will be no true Scotsmen who are real 'progressives' voting for The Mad Bomber. My Democratic corrupt as hell state and city government all ran as Progressive Democrat's. I worked to help get them elected and now I'm trying to figure out how to get them gone daddy gone.

Vichy Demorat's are not progressive unless you think going back to the Gilded Age and heating up The Cold War is progress. I voted for Jill Stein in 2012 and she got less then 1% of the vote. I see no effort by the Greens to be a serious alternative to the duopoly. Why haven't they used this farce of a primary time to get out and make themselves known and joined in the fray? Their too much like the People Judean Front for me.

I don't know who I'm voting for but I could careless about not being a progressive. Hey I'm an 'ideological purist' far lefty. If I choose to use my vote to burn down the Dem. house of cards it's my choice. After decades of being a card carrying member of my county Democratic party it's time to call these rat bastards what they are and it's not progressive. I'm done. Senator Merkley who ironically was as a OR statehouse member a moderate will get my vote as he has actually worked for democratic principles. I'm no longer a partisan and I never was comfortable calling my self a progressive.

up
0 users have voted.
jorogo's picture

I've seen that twice now. Either George Metesky or Henry Kissinger....or Hillary?

I do get the People Judean Front though (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) but don't see any benefit in bashing Greens. How dare they not have saved us!

up
0 users have voted.

"If I sit silently, I have sinned." - Mossadegh

hecate's picture

the Great Infusion, some of us here came to refer to Clinton II as The Mad Bomber.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y]

up
0 users have voted.
jorogo's picture

I guess my confusion, sadly, is because it could fit so many.

Military madness is killing my country - Graham Nash

up
0 users have voted.

"If I sit silently, I have sinned." - Mossadegh

Jay Elliott's picture

I'm quoted in that piece. You can read the longer argument from Naked Capitalism that my quote is pulled from.

I am a long-term leftist, who moved "right" to the Democratic Party upon adulthood to vote for the lesser evil D in Reagan vs. Mondale, et al. I LOTE evil voted for Bill. I have voted for the Democrat in every Presidential election of my life.

My argument to the Greens voter is simple: voting Green won't change anything. I get the idea of giving some third party the 5% they need for Federal funding, and if you're in a state where either Trump or Clinton is guaranteed to get those electoral votes, then do it. But otherwise, this isn't a simple matter of LOTE. I think it's clear that Trump actually IS the lesser of two evils. But more than that, installing him potentially weakens the corporate hold over BOTH parties. Even if he governs as a bog standard Republican, at least we purge the Clintons from the Democratic Party and weaken it enough to make it feasible for progressives to either take it over or set up an alternative to take it out.

Clinton is more of a war monger. She's more personally corrupt. She's just as racist, but by being more polite about it, she's more dangerous. She has actually facilitated the deaths and torment of millions -- not just talked about it. She may even be less pro-choice, in belief and in practice. She's a member of Ted Cruz's prayer group, after all. AND if a Republican is president, it gives the corporatist Democrats less cover to do corporatist things. They are more likely to fight back against Social Security cuts if Trump proposes them than if Clinton does.

I was kicked out of Brownies for wearing a Eugene McCarthy button. I was investigated by the FBI in middle school for checking Das Capital out of the library. I lost the Telluride because when asked to choose between Ford and Carter (had I been old enough to vote) I said I'd make the anarchistic choice and pick Ford, the less competent choice, to bring the system down. (Hey, I was sixteen.) If the DNC and the corporate media rams Clinton into the nomination, the politically leftist tactic in response should be to vote for Trump. Because we need one of the two major parties to reflect non-1% voters. Breaking the Democratic Party, at that point, would be the most effective Greater Good possible.

I understand many people don't agree with me. But to claim I'm a secret Republican or something misses the point. There is a robust argument to vote for Trump against Clinton from the left. We're out there. Moreover, only if enough of us say this and are prepared to follow through is there any hope of getting the Democratic elite to back down and nominate Bernie. If they think the grift can can continue, they'll continue fleecing the rubes. They have to know that we will crush them, turn the party into dust, make it so weak that Goldman no longer needs to funds its candidates and pay former D pols to lobby current D pols, drown neoliberal, pseudo-Democratic think tanks in a bathtub. This is an actual war, and Clintonism is our enemy. We have to credibly threaten to smash all their corruption-filled rice bowls, before Hillary takes office, ends net neutrality, launches simultaneous land wars with Russia and Iran, and drafts our sons and daughters to fight in them. If you think I'm being hyperbolic, you haven't been paying attention. Listen to what she has been saying herself. Look at who is backing her.

Desperate times call for desperate measures. This is a desperate time.

up
0 users have voted.
WindDancer13's picture

significance of what will happen to the Internet under HRC. I will take a bet that the Internet is now number one on her infamous hit list. People need to remember that this is the person who voted for the Patriot Act, not once but twice.

And let's not forget the Gold Standard :

Under TPP, Internet Service Providers could be required to "police" user activity (i.e. police YOU), take down internet content, and cut people off from internet access for common user-generated content.Under TPP, Internet Service Providers could be required to "police" user activity (i.e. police YOU), take down internet content, and cut people off from internet access for common user-generated content.

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass

And the priority of multinational corporate "anticipated profits" will eliminate any Common Good efforts to protect the 99%.

up
0 users have voted.
WindDancer13's picture

IIRC, there are 12 countries involved with TPP. On top of the previous trade agreements, much of the world is going to be caught up in he corporate net. The other half we are bombing.

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass

It's a very sad and shameful state of affairs our "leaders" have gotten our country into.

up
0 users have voted.
Late Again's picture

but you make a fine argument, sir.

up
0 users have voted.

"When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained." - Mark Twain

jorogo's picture

LOTE? Might make sense if I knew.

Agreed on Clinton, and desperate times. Not into suicide pacts for progress though. I'll watch it all go down but won't be cheering anyone on. I'm more of a personal conscience person.

up
0 users have voted.

"If I sit silently, I have sinned." - Mossadegh

hecate's picture

LOTE thing means "lesser of two evils."

Acronyms are these days beyond all control, plunging the language ever deeper into the sewer.

up
0 users have voted.
jorogo's picture

Yeah, people are way too often caught up in their own bubbles & forget about diversity.

More of a fog than a sewer for me.

up
0 users have voted.

"If I sit silently, I have sinned." - Mossadegh

Big Al's picture

they're going to vote for Trump. Voting for Trump over Clinton, or vice versa, would be the mother of all lesser evil voting. The best choice, imo, is to reject both candidates. This is a game smart people should not be playing.

up
0 users have voted.
jorogo's picture

......or just too wrapped up in portraying themselves as deeply analytical to make morally rational choices?

Rationalize (use without object) -
to invent plausible explanations for acts, opinions, etc., that are actually based on other causes

up
0 users have voted.

"If I sit silently, I have sinned." - Mossadegh

hecate's picture

smart, 'cause, like, they sit around all day and talk about money 'n stuff. Which doesn't exist. Mad group agreement of gibbering primates.

They don't even communicate in English. To wit:

If China's very low level of social capital has long ago made its investment strategy obsolete, that suggests that China has overinvested beyond its capacity to utilize these investments economically. Thus there are hidden losses on bank balance sheets created by the failure to write down physical capital to its true value.

up
0 users have voted.
boriscleto's picture

Not very likely...

13310337_1184813118215817_7571530031103756411_n.jpg

up
0 users have voted.

" In the beginning, the universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry, and is generally considered to have been a bad move. -- Douglas Adams, The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy "

in the neighborhood. We need to start seeing more media about Jill Stein. The more I listen to her the more I like.

up
0 users have voted.

Beware the bullshit factories.

Lookout's picture

I like your neighborhood. Mr Rodgers knows best. I will not vote for either one.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

riverlover's picture

I will not vote for either one.

One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish. I will not vote for either one. Or four or five. None of the above?

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

hecate's picture

i would not like them
here or there.
i would not like them anywhere.

i do not like
Hairball and Hill.
i do not like them; i need a pill.

i do not like them
in a house.
i do not like them
with a mouse.

i do not like them
here or there.
i do not like them anywhere.
i do not like
Hairball and Hill.
i do not like them; give me a pill.

up
0 users have voted.

I tried them and they did not sit well
with them this country will go to hell

up
0 users have voted.

Beware the bullshit factories.

JayRaye's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Never be deceived that the rich will allow you to vote away their wealth.-Lucy Parsons

A little Godwin, but good term.

up
0 users have voted.

Beware the bullshit factories.

featheredsprite's picture

but it clearly defines a lot of Democrats.

up
0 users have voted.

Life is strong. I'm weak, but Life is strong.

hecate's picture

with a functioning cerebrum could even consider voting for Trump.

The highly educated, high-income, finance-literate readers of my website . . .

Its readership is disproportionately graduate school-educated, older, male and high income . . .

. . . their sophisticated understanding of the inequities of Wall Street . . .

What a load. Bunch of smug, self-important wankers. Onanism uber alles.

up
0 users have voted.

They will both destroy any remaining chance at DEmocracy: we might as well assert ourselves because after this, we won't have internet capacity for this kind of Sanders campaign, and as you may have noticed, everything will be shut down.

Anyone noticing that genocide is already happening? Poor people dying in massive numbers, children drinking lead laced water, whole communities with no water due to fracking?

Just what do YOU think their "climate change" plan is? Its becoming evident: HRC is allying with Henry "genocide is necessary" Kissinger: Trump is openly Nazi . . . and our media reports nothing. Yes, it can happen here:

So get your asses in gear and phonebank donate canvas your hearts out: and vote for anyone but these two, because either one means grim times ahead, and they are very skilled at this: they've been practicing elsewhere for year.

up
0 users have voted.
OLinda's picture

the article is more about progressives not voting for Hillary, and less about them voting for Trump. It's an option, but the article is not saying most will vote for him.

One reader puts it:

If Clinton is the nominee 9 out of 10 friends I polled will [do one of three things]:
A. Not vote for president in November.
B. Vote for Trump.
C. Write in Bernie as a protest vote.

...

To be sure, not all of my Sanders-supporting readers would vote for Trump. But only a minority would ever vote for Clinton, and I'd guess that a lot of them would just stay home if she were the nominee.

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

thank bejeebus we now know what 9 out of 10 of her friends think. To round out the ten, let's hear what another brainiac, Yosemite Sam, has to say:

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_Ua53PJlv8]

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

maybe if she'd read some film books, rather than plundering the people for Goldman Sachs, she would have understood the folly of projecting political realities based upon the opinions of one's own insulated white upper crust urbanoid friends and acquaintances. For Pauline Kael famously observed that she couldn't understand how Nixon won in 1972, because none of her friends voted for him.

up
0 users have voted.

Yves's blog is smart,and her readership includes lots of people from the US and abroad. I've read Naked Capitalism for years,and while I don't agree with every comment posted, I'm continually engaged by the high level of discourse. Most everyone there lately is a devoted Berner,and they approach his platform from the perspective of global economics, social justice, and the perils of the MIC.

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

is not whether she's smart, or her readership is smart, or whether there's "a high level of discourse" there. The issue is whether it's prudent to project her opinion and that of her friends to encompass some greater whole. It's not. It's folly. As the Kael experience demonstrates.

As an example, Webber's blog is currently running under 30k a day. Daily Kos is running at around 500k a day. Just sayin'. ; /

up
0 users have voted.

Yes, TOP has lots of clicks, but right now they're just as homogeneous as S. Webber's smaller enterprise. That's what has happened to public discourse. I would say that perhaps the NC readership has been surprisingly proBernie when I might have predicted a much greater Libetarian bias. Sampling sizes, small cohorts,large cohorts: not surprisingly, tribal members prefer talking among themselves.

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

that it is folly for Webber to cite to herself and her 10 best friends as indicative of some tsunami trend among "true progressives," when her wee little site is dwarfed by a behemoth containing folks who, rightly or wrongly, also consider themselves "true progressives," and who would rather eat broken glass, than vote for The Hairball.

up
0 users have voted.
Jay Elliott's picture

First of all, that Pauline Kael anecdote is spurious. It lingers in part because it feels so satisfying for certain kinds of people to make fun of those in the arts, and it does accurately reflect a mindset that misunderstands social self-selection, cognitive bias, and elite solipsism. People make that kind of mistake all the time. People like Nate Silver, for example, who is doing it right now. People like Paul Krugman. Both are trained in quantitative reasoning, mathematics and statistical analysis, both are allowing bias and self-interest to taint their perspective and analysis.

Yves (I will use her online name out of respect for her work; I assume your IRL name isn't "Hecate) isn't talking about her friends. She's talking about visitors to her site, which is not wee, by the way. More importantly, she is trying to explain to DC insiders why they should not assume progressives will plod to the polls for Hillary Clinton by talking about a particular demographic that DC insiders are most likely to assume WILL back Clinton in the end and best undermines Clinton's argument and assumptions about who is voting for Sanders and why. It sounds like you have never visited Naked Capitalism; perhaps try it sometime. It's got lots of great reporting. Her Politico piece does not reflect her friends, nor does it reflect everybody who comments at Naked Capitalism. She isn't claiming it's a scientifically validated poll. In fact, the polling backs her up, but that isn't penetrating the DC bubble. So she is trying to get through to these guys as best she can. As someone who was quoted in the article and does believe that Clinton is the greater evil who must be kept from power, even if it means voting for Trump, I felt my perspective was well-represented.

But more importantly, I DON'T WANT TO VOTE FOR TRUMP. The best way to get to vote for Bernie is to make it very, very clear to Politico types that if they insist on handing Clinton the nomination, she will lose in November and drag the rest of the party down with her. This is a negotiation, in a sense. Bernie got health centers for Vermont in the ACA negotiations because he could credibly represent to Obama that he might not vote for the bill otherwise. They needed his vote, so eventually they gave him something for his constituents to get his vote. People like me being willing to aggressively assert that we are white, middle-aged, elite educated women who will absolutely refuse to vote for Clinton are doing every other Bernie voter a service, frankly. Staking out a very vocal hard left position of people who are not perceived by DC insiders as "flakey Greens" will help move them to dump Clinton, more than either declaring for Stein or saying you'll hold your nose. They have Stein voters pictured in their heads and factored into their calculations -- I think they underestimate how many will move Green in the face of Trump v. Clinton, but still, it isn't going to scare them. The kinds of voters Yves was describing -- long term Democratic voters they have absolutely been counting on to "come home" -- NOT coming home, and not only not coming home but voting for Trump is a real threat, one which, again, is showing in the polling already. Painting these guys a picture that isn't some hipster dude in his parents' basement drinking cold brew coffee might help reach them.

That's what this is about.

up
0 users have voted.

Pages