Hillary's Lawyer Said She has no Obligation to Meet with FBI
This is breaking news by David Shuster:
Sources: @HillaryClinton lawyer D. Kendall has reminded @FBI Clinton is under NO legal obligation to give interview. #clintonemails
— David Shuster (@DavidShuster) May 31, 2016
If true (and Shuster is a reliable, well respected journalist, so I assume his source is a good one, probably someone in the DOJ or FBI) then the sheer audacity of this action, to tell the FBI, that no, I am Hillary Clinton, and I am too big to talk to the FBI even if you are investigating me, is astonishing. It also is, as they say. very bad optics.
Hopefully the mainstream media, including CNN picks this up. I'd love to hear the justification for why a private citizen, no matter how important she thinks she is, is above the law. In effect, she is exposing herself as a liar of the highest order. The FBI will now have to obtain a subpoena to force her to talk to them. And all after she promised this:
Clinton said recently that the FBI has not approached her for an interview, but that she would fully cooperate if they do.
Brian Fallon, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign, said she has offered to answer any FBI questions and remains confident that she and her aides acted appropriately.
"From the start, Hillary Clinton has offered to answer any questions that would help the Justice Department complete its review, and we hope and expect that anyone else who is asked would do the same," Fallon said in an email. "We are confident the review will conclude that nothing inappropriate took place."
Comments
Hubris
Thy name is Clinton!
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Ewe got dat rite.
Wow...just what Trump needs
This is un-fucking believable. It makes it so.oo.oo obvious that she has something to hide.
They won't blame Trump
They will find a way to blame Bernie.
There were problems with running a campaign of Joy while committing a genocide? Who could have guessed?
Harris is unburdened of speaking going forward.
Yep, that'll go down well with general electorate
'After another refusal to meet with the FBI over the ongoing investigation, nominee Clinton spoke with at least 45 people here in Stevens Point, Wisconsin, despite Trump's 15% point lead in this state, as these last weeks of October pass us by.'
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
nominee Clinton? this is so bad I can't
believe she is any competition to Bernie. She has stolen primaries all across the country. Interestingly, some of her biggest wins have been in states with closed primaries and those infernal voting machines that flip the vote. She has no issues to talk about because her attention is solely on fundraising and how to steal the next primary.
'Well, I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years, Doctor, and I’m happy to state I finally won out over it." Elwood P. Dowd "
This is a complete no-win for team Clinton
Per her previous comments: she has/will always be happy to discuss with anyone anywhere her blameless pre-approved nothing to see here use of a private server that she shared with her husband and his lackeys that she deleted emails from while they where under subpoena from the Congress and FOIA requests that her most intimately involved aides decline to discuss with anyone in authority under advice from their own (shared) attorney. You have a problem with that?
" “Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough.” FDR "
You funny. n/t
'What we are left with is an agency mandated to ensure transparency and disclosure that is actually working to keep the public in the dark' - Ann M. Ravel, former FEC member
Is that Hill-Speak for
"You have the right to remain silent"?
The people, united, will never be defeated.
'tis Called "Choosing a Running Mate"
... even if it's by default.
A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma
I was thinking the same thing...
The 5th Amendment says she should shut up...
And not say a damn thing...
I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."
~John F. Kennedy~
Economic: -9.13, Social: -7.28,
Liar in chief
She is a liar and a cheat. Whatever it takes!
And she... "will be the nominee."
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Microexpressions
Character "tells" frozen forever in pixels. So annoying to the subject.
T-Rump's got a great array of them too.
Euterpe2
One will remember
"Ask me no questions,
I'll tell ye no lies.".
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
Is Clinton trying to throw the nom?
It sounds like the walls are really closing in on her. This is the most amazingly bad decision by someone who may become the Democratic nominee for President. I am in disbelief that she would have the arrogance to do this. Trump will eat her alive. The Dems are fools to nominate her.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Arrogance thy name is Hillary
I am not shocked she is refusing. She knows what will be asked and doesn't want to answer. Problem is, not cooperating could mean the FBI gives a Recommendation to Indict so they can question her.
War, War Never Changes - Fallout Series
Correct
Enough said, I'm afraid.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
THE DNC APPEARS TO BE WORKING TO THROW THE ELECTION
They've been denying Climate Change since 1977: that means every administration has been in on this: The Clintons got media monopoly as well as the repeal of any financial oversight: so what does everyone think? My sense is that fascism will be fine: Both Trump and Hillary are down with genocide: Trump with Naziis; HRC with Kissinger "genocide is necessary" . . . she is funded by Monsanto. Pharma, and Fossil fuels: he will likely get similar funding from these groups ("broke") but lots of free air time. (nauseating) . . . so whether its her or Trump: we are f-----d. They are siphoning off U.S. assets: NOTHING that benefits the public is happening: and they are enacting things like there is no tommorrow that are devastating: because there is no tommorow for us as far as they are concerned.
The same tired talking heads are all millionaires many times over, and they serve the billionaires in their aspirational grab for the lifeboats: but its pretty grim for the rest of humanity.
Yes, I don't really think she's that motivated: the dullest, least inspired campaign in modern history, and perhaps ever.
Her main goal is money: for herself and her coterie: she doesn't appear, based on her "server" issue, to really care about anyone else. And she is massively dissmissive of the law. (reputed to be disagreeable in the extreme, even to those charged with protecting her life with their own . . . to them she is reported to say "f--k you", so its not much of a leap to believe most of us are completely expendable to her, and she has been a complete, unimaginative, unmotivated slug as a candidate:
So yes, she is a foil for Trump and fascism.
She is trying to throw the general...
The DNC and the Democratic establishment WILL NOT give the nomination to Bernie. Even if he fills the inside straight with two cards and ends up with more delegates and more votes, they will not give it to him. If an indictment comes down or an indictment recommendation, they *may* not nominate Hillary - but they will find some other establishment lackey to run. Their goal now is to lose and blame it on the hippies. Then, they can purge 'progressives' from the party while saying, "Where else are you gunna go?" A casual glimpse at GOS will tell you that.
Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?
I like to read news. Thank you.
She must know
from previous depositions, that if she gives a dep, they will catch her in a lie, and then her goose is cooked.
You just don't lie to the FBI. Ask Dennis Hastert. She is completely fucked.
Now you know why she wasn't campaigning over the weekend.
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye." de Saint-Exupery
Promises, promises
... why do we believe ????
.
.
.
... why do news shows ignore ????
Even with a subpoena they can't force
anyone to talk to them. Of course taking the Fifth can be kind of embarrassing.
Euterpe2
The FBI Cannot Indict Fast Enough
Obviously HRC has a long game plan here, other than refusing to perjure herself by lying about all the permission she had from State to use her own private e-mail server to conduct government business on her unsecure Blackberry.
This woman would be an absolute disaster as POTUS.
What's her long game plan in refusing to be questioned by the FBI? Besides avoiding prison. Surely she cannot think that she can still be elected.
Pardon Herself?
What's her long game plan in refusing to be questioned by the FBI?The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
Well, evil created himself
We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg
This article guesses at game plan
National Review
Replace her with: Biden, Warren.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when we are afraid of the light.
--Plato
Monetized Public Service
That phrase really sticks out to me as one of the roots of why the Clintons disturb me so much:
Disgusting. Monetized public service is dishonorable.
"There’s nothing revolutionary about a movement that retreats into an endorsement of the lesser of two evils." Scott McLarty @ CounterPunch
I cannot seem to find where Kendall
was asked a direct question in regard to an FBI interview. If he made this statement just to be making a statement, then he has stirred up trouble for the HRC campaign where there needn't have been. Sometimes, keeping one's mouth shut is the best policy. Maybe, he has been spending too much time around HRC. It is like "I dare you! Nyah nyah nyah."
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass
This whole thing is ridiculous.
The sheer amount of hubris coming from Clinton and her camp is...like, totally unbelievable. The Villagers, if they pick this up, will get all up in her business anyway. Trump will love this, because this diverts attention away from the Trump University debacle.
Maybe she's just trying to run out the clock until she reaches the White House. I don't know. This makes no sense.
Running the clock
is the only plausible explanation here. Otherwise, it is political suicide.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
To use a football term...
It's like trying to run out the clock in the middle of the third quarter when you are only up by a couple of points. Almost never works.
Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?
it's an old story...
but I just noticed a line of articles saying that the FBI has for some time been investigating whether Clinton made "materially false" statements, or coerced a third party (Pagliano?) to do such, in violation of US Code 18, Section 1001.
There were earlier reports that a company (Datto) backed up her server in the cloud and her crew requested (in 2013 I believe) that the backups be shortened to 30 days (presumably to cover up the mass deletions of so-called "personal" emails).
If the FBI recovered deleted emails that were highly classified, she is completely fucked.
How could anyone actually vote for her?
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye." de Saint-Exupery
Apparently, Dan Metcalfe is going to (see previous diary).
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
A recent poll suggests some 48% would vote for her
even under indictment. Our society is filled with really dumb and selfish people.
Even worse ...
that 48% is all voters. An astounding 77% of Democrats said they'd still vote for her.
their policy seems to be Loyalty Before Principles
Why else would you vote to nominate such a damaged candidate? I can understand voting for her in a swing state if it comes down to Hillary vs Trump, but isn't every frickin state going to become a Swing State in a contest between these two candidates?
Love is my religion.
The problem for her is that many now are (I)
and do not identify themselves as Democrats. The (I)ndependents vote is what will make or break her.
Datto question was put to Miller in depo
Cheryl Mills 5/27/16
(This is the civil matter with Judicial Watch. Not FBI probe)
It appears that JW is trying to pinpoint if Hillary was deliberately evading FOIA and who in the state department knew about it and when. This is just the portion with some of Platte and Datto mentions.
This is extremely difficult to follow in the format online. Appears to be rough transcription and not final one (just uploaded today online). I put in some breaks in q/a where I think they might go.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when we are afraid of the light.
--Plato
It's not the crime...
It's the cover-up. If her lackeys are facing jail time, I wonder if they will come clean...
Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?
The old Nixon stonewall
That always ends well...
Nixon...
was missing 18 minutes of tape time. Hillary is missing 30,000 e-mails. Except in this case, the e-mails may be recoverable.
Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?
And 18 emails from Obama aren't being released /eom
Sadly it's going to take an indictment before the convention
to make a difference in the opinion of the Suoerdelegates. And I doubt if anything can make a difference in the opinion of the Democratic base. Their brand loyalty is mighty deep.
"above the law"?
I'm glad to see someone with expensive lawyers tell the FBI to get a warrant or go pound sand. She doesn't have any obligation to be part of an "investigation".
She promised full cooperation
And that she would meet with the FBI. Pound sand? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
two things here
One is legal and one is political.
While she has every legal right to decline, the political backlash from declining to be interviewed after she has publicly stated on multiple occasions that she will be forthcoming is political suicide. It does two things. First, it reinforces the public's view that she is not to be trusted and second, it provides even more ammunition to the Republicans during the general election campaign.
The Democratic party will be truly foolish to nominate her from a politically partisan aspect. The Democrats need a national win. They have lost both the House and the Senate in the last six years and they need to win the White House. Clinton has been a very flawed candidate from the beginning and her ability to win is now seriously in jeopardy.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
She doesn't have a choice
She's already part of the investigation. The FBI made that choice. This has nothing to do with obligation. Now whether she cooperates or not, that's another issue.
Love is my religion.
Legally...
You may be right. It still makes her a Big Fat Liar.
Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?
Bernstein on Whitehouse's fear of Hillary's free fall campaign
Link to article on DownWithTyranny
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2016/05/bernstein-white-house-is-ter...
There is so much meat in this link
By that I mean, not only the video clip, but Gaius Publius' analysis and the comments that follow. Highly recommend everyone read this.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
The statement is correct; in fact a good lawyer would say no FBI
Just an FYI, the statement is correct, she is not under any obligation to speak with the FBI.
The FBI questioning in this sort of investigation is offered to the person being investigated as an opportunity to explain their side of the story and help the FBI put things in the correct context (ahem) and help clear up any questions or misconceptions that the FBI might have.
Most lawyers in this situation would advise her not to speak with the FBI; because while not under oath, any misstatements can be construed as 'an attempt to mislead and misdirect the investigators' and that is a felony.
That is how Comey sent Martha Stewart to jail after all. Not for what she did, but for misleading the government about it.
We all know, that HRC could not possibly do anything but misdirect and mislead the FBI; so no lawyer in their right mind would let her talk to them. She would be guaranteed to hang herself.
Even if they had not found any felonies before talking to her, they would have some after talking to her.
____________________________________________________________________________
"I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it. "
-Niccolo Machiavelli
"Sorry Hillary"
-TheJerry
Sure he is correct
But there's all those statements by Clinton she would meet with the FBI. It's a very bad look to say one thing and then force the FBI to issue a subpoena to interview her. There is the legal side to this and the political side and frankly this makes her look guilty in the court of public opinion. I can only see a justification for doing this if she knows that the DOJ will not authrorize the FBI to get a subpoena or she is concerned that they have something that would justify an indictment. Either way it is an incredibly bad look, especially after her aide Cheryl Mills refused to answer questions in her deposition in the Judicial Watch lawsuit Friday claiming attorney client privilege.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-aide-began-preparing-for-quest...
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
I think the only reason
I think the only reason Clinton publicly said she'd meet with the FBI was to make sure people would vote for her. She knew her lawyers would not agree to her being interviewed.. It was simply said to manipulate her own supporters and any potential primary voters.
If I've got this right,
neither Hillary nor her attorney has said she would not meet with the FBI, just that she's under no legal obligation to do so.
With that now on record, any meeting of Hillary with the FBI could then be characterized as some gracious favor she's granting the FBI to assist them in every way she possibly can....or whatever other self-serving garbage they can come up with.
"If I sit silently, I have sinned." - Mossadegh
She is essentially daring them to subpoena her
It sounds like they have requested an interview and she has put them off. While not a direct refusal, it means that she is delaying talking to them until she is ready - which could be never, unless they are willing to get a subpoena.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
Agreed
Of course we don't know for sure, but I can imagine she'll try to drag it out until she's won, been sworn in and can preemptively pardon herself.
Hopefully, the aren't relying on her tripping up to make charges stick. Hope they can just say "you have until this date, and then we announce you chose not to cooperate and we move on."
Hopefully that date is no later than Friday, so at least they can be on record as saying "she refused the interview" they can then indict her anytime before the convention.
I wish...hope...dream...
____________________________________________________________________________
"I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it. "
-Niccolo Machiavelli
"Sorry Hillary"
-TheJerry
Yes...
Good legal strategy. Horrible electoral strategy. But she has no choice. Also, it shows elitism. If your average Joe was called on to be deposed or questioned by the FBI, would they be able to afford a lawyer to tell the FBI 'No'?
Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?
I Thought This Video was Interesting
and can see why she wouldn't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
Why should she?
America is not (yet) a Police State where you can be dragged into an interrogation room and questioned repeatedly for hours underneath a bare lightbulb.
Even Hillary has the right to keep silent.
America is not the Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa.
I remember in 1977 when I was invited to lecture there, that the way from the terminal to the airline was lined with heavily armed Milicija Obywatelska.
Scary stuff, but I was a professor at Oxford, so I wasn't afraid, and flew Polish Airlines to Helsinki for my next "gig".
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
Odd how all of a sudden Clinton defenders appear
Out of the blue. And all this time she said she would fully cooperate with the investigation or as she wrongfully referred to it a "security inquiry." She, of course has the right to refuse to cooperate and plead the 5th amendment right against self incrimination. But to claim she did nothing wrong, which the OIG report concluded was false, and to say she would fully cooperate with the FBI when in fact it now appears she had no intention of ever doing so, well that is not the action of someone who has all along asserted she was innocent of any wrongdoing. This is an investigation by the FBI of her actions while Secreatry of State under a Democratic administration that to date has supported her candidacy (short of an outright endorsement by the President) and yet she now has her attorney tell the FBI to go eff themselves?
No other major party candidate would still be running for the nomination under similar circumstances. We have seen both Dem and GOP candidates be forced to suspend their campaigns for far less. What does that tell you about our democracy, much less the Democratic Party establishment? It is frankly an unprecedented campaign by Clinton in an unprecedented election cycle.
And your comparison of the FBI investigation of her to a police state intent on bringing her down is laughable. Not surprising, for someone who is wiling to unquestionably support her, but it is a prime facie ludicrous defense of her behavior as she proceeds toward a seemingly inevitable nomination by corrupt party leadership who apparently benefits from the same pay to play political system as the Clinton family has done over the last 16 years.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
Sorry, I was being just a little snarky
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
Ah my apologies
Snark detector not functioning well these days.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
I don't think any of us are
I don't think any of us are necessarily saying she 'should'. This is really about Clinton manipulating primary voters by saying she "would'.. knowing the whole time that it would never happen.. We knew that... but her supporters and those uninformed... did not... or if they did know (since it only takes common sense to know) they wanted her to pretend.... to make herself ... look good in the meantime. ... to me... the whole thing is rather pathetic.. actually.
Chelsea Manning
It doesn't have to be 24/7 police state. Only the critical points, activists and organizers, need to be attacked to prevent a movement.
I'm really excited by these comments...
It means we have not reached the "And then they fight you" stage. Congrats to all!
Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?
The Clintons usual methodology, they will have to be really
jammed into a corner with no escape possible. That is their right, but it does not have good optics especially when reading the conclusions of the initial investigation. Plus it will give the lawyers some extra time to fudge the issue further.
"I did not have sexual relations
with that server..."
pending...
Hillary's changing her middle name to Mllhouse
and buying a dog so she can name it "Checkers".
I can't wait to see her get a nose job and go to China.
On to Biden since 1973
A good lawyer shouldn't let white collar accused be interviewed
and here's why according to these two good but lengthy articles:
This one by Andrew Napolitano, March 31, 2016:
http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/31/clinton-investigation-dangerous-phase
This one by Charles Lipsonk, February 29, 2016:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/02/29/hillarys_victories_...!
The FBI, Clinton's dilemma
So now they are going to try and stop the FBI from interviewing her, she must have had lunch with Martha Stewart.
Hillary's diemmia, if she is interviewed and lies she can go to jail for that, if she tells the truth, she can go to jail for that
Poor Hillary
I'll shed a few tears for her, as long as she doesn't deliver the Presidency to Trump.
Love is my religion.
I Will Never Shed Tears For HRC
She built her world by pathologically lying and now she can go live in it. She's got war criminal Henry Fucking Kissinger to console her.
I have been amazed and disgusted by the careless manner in which she handled national security matters. It does not bode well for how she would conduct WH matters.
Shillary's mistakes and lies are all vast right wing conspiracy.
She started out as a Goldwater Girl…
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h15-tiVWk-0 width:420 height:350]
So she considers her politics that of the 'old school' Republicans. These moderate and Corporate/Blue Dog Republicans are the Clinton third way.
Considering her politics are right wing, then every damn thing she does is a right wing conspiracy.
She said it herself.
Two parties - Center right Democrats and Extreme Right Republicans - and they have all been playing for the same team and representing the same small group of people for decades.
"Representation' in this country is a sad pathetic joke.
I have a useful suggestion for Hillary
Start binge watching "Orange is The New Black"
The Clinton's Have Finally Reached The End of The Rope
The FBI interview or refusal to do it will be the last straw. Soon, very soon the Clinton's will be faced with a choice, withdraw from the race or face possible jail or even worse the destruction of The Clinton Foundation which will be thew next target of any investigation.
If they penetrate that vipers nest, well the Clinton's place in history will be something less than what they are seeking.
I actually doubt it...
If anything, it will make her MORE sympathetic to her supporters. She is a woman and is being wrongfully prosecuted. Just like Martha Stewart (who I actually have a lot more sympathy for).
Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?
But not to others
Yes, her diehard supporters will become more sympathetic to Hillary. The problem is, this reinforces the idea she is untrustworthy and hiding something to everyone outside her supporters.
War, War Never Changes - Fallout Series
Lie to FBI, a really big deal. Clintons lie all the time
Making False Statements to a government official a wiki page
Making false statements
I am sure that her attorneys know about legal services after making false statements
How to Avoid Jail Time for Lying to the Government
and another legal service
at
http://www.wisenberglaw.com/Articles/How-to-Avoid-Going-to-Jail-under-18...
Is Hillary going to jail? Going to the white house? Both? Neither?
Hillary's State Dept IT Hierarchy - resource for your reading
Lewis Lukens role - State Department Deputy Executive Secretary for Management Support
Lukens' Testimony
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-lukens-testimon...
John Bentel - Director of IRM State Department - Direct report to Lukens
Bentel refuses to testify
https://diplopundit.net/tag/john-bentel/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/hillary-clinton-emails-state-depar...
Hillary's IT guy Bryan Pagliano who set up email server refuses testimony even after being
granted immunity. Worked for State while being paid by Hillary for personal email services. Assume he reported to Bentel.
http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-computer-staffer-testify-congress...
Pagliano's background http://heavy.com/news/2016/03/bryan-pagliano-hillary-clinton-state-depar...
sorry about not creating named links for the rest of the URLs - I need to go now. Just click on links for some nice reads.
ALL VERY INTERESTING READING - ESPECIALLY FOR YOU COMPUTER GEEKS!!!
Cherlyl Mills testimony added: Hillary Clinton's chief of staff at Sate Dept.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-mills-depositio...
peace
FN
"Democracy is technique and the ability of power not to be understood as oppressor. Capitalism is the boss and democracy is its spokesperson." Peace - FN
Risky tactic.
The only thing riskier would be to lie to the FBI.
Lying - right, that's what baked Martha Stewart
Lying to the FBI during an investigation (not a security review...ha) will get you jail time just as Martha Stewart found out...
Lie Hillary, lie!!!
Peace
FN
"Democracy is technique and the ability of power not to be understood as oppressor. Capitalism is the boss and democracy is its spokesperson." Peace - FN