have a poor retention of facts.

This interview is one unrelenting insult:
Hillary Clinton Doubles Down on Email Scandal Saying "It was Allowed"

Clinton explained why she did not cooperate with State Department investigators, despite repeatedly saying she would talk to anyone, anytime about her emails.

"I have talked about this for many, many months," she said. "I testified for 11 hours before the Benghazi committee. I have answered numerous questions. We have posted information on our website and the information that we had is out there. It’s been clearly public and my email use was widely known throughout the department, throughout the government, and I have provided all of my work related emails, and I’ve asked that they be made public."

She hasn't talked about this for many, many months - she has catapulted the same self-serving talking points propaganda that refuse to confront any salient fact: No one before her ever in a Cabinet position (as far as we know) subverted Congressional oversight, the FOIA, and the Federal Records Act by deploying a private server in the basement of their own home on which server they retained messages pertinent to National Security, which server was never reported to those responsible for DOS Security, which server had hacking attempts that were never reported, which server was then stored and maintained by an unvetted and approved outside vendor, etc. etc.

She testified for 11 hours before the Benghazi Committee and not one question was asked about her email, so that becomes completely irrelevant to this matter except for the fact that the Benghazi committee was disemboweled by the idiotic Kevin McCarthy in advance of their hearings as to why she (HRC) had completely ignored their legitimate requests for her relevant emails and pretended they didn't exist.

So, you didn't co-operate with the the IG because . . . . no good reason. Except the obvious one. People who hide things have things to hide. People who don't want to discuss their actions usually have a good reason for their reticence. But, Trump!

UPDATE This article makes the same point I do but far more eloquently. It's from Current Affairs magazine by Nathan Robinson and the title is The Democrats Are Making A Suicidal Mistake. He basically discusses how Hillary's previous practice when caught out in a lie is to lie even more brazenly and cites her Bosnia sniper story as one example of how when she was called out, she simply responded with more and greater fabrications. Which is how she is responding even as we speak about the Inspector General's report:

But it’s quite clear that Clinton will never, ever do this. Even now that the State Department’s Inspector General has released a report explaining in detail why Clinton’s claims about her emails are false, she has responded by doubling down with even more implausible statements.

This does not augur well for the remainder of the campaign. It means that Hillary Clinton has what might be termed a “trust death spiral.” She begins by having the public think she is untrustworthy. Then, in response to accusations that she is untrustworthy, she says things that make her sound even more untrustworthy. Because there’s no point at which she’ll simply break free and come clean, things can only ever get worse for Hillary Clinton. If you point out that her positions have changed (making her somewhat untrustworthy), she responds by insisting that they haven’t changed (making her even more untrustworthy). If a report says she is misrepresenting the situation with her email, she will then misrepresent the report itself.

This is a problem not just because it decreases public trust; it also treats voters like they must be incredibly stupid. It’s brazenly insulting to people’s intelligence to simply deny that a report says what it says. And because people are more intelligent than that, they don’t like it when you try to pull tricks like this.