Respect is given; DWS and her authoritarian, hostile, aggressive, attitude, towards anyone who opposes her guarantees an angry response

Respect can only be given; DWS and her authoritarian, hostile, aggressive, attitude, towards anyone who opposes her guarantees an angry response......, for DWS and the DNC a definition of Respect:

re·spect
rəˈspekt/
noun
1. a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements.
"the director had a lot of respect for Douglas as an actor"
synonyms: esteem, regard, high opinion, admiration, reverence, deference, honor
"the respect due to a great artist"

Shouldn't someone with this track record be fired - not left in charge of anything, see below:

Incompetence-DWS-DNC--3.png

Tags: 
Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Ken in MN's picture

...it's not just for Republican'ts anymore...

up
0 users have voted.

I want my two dollars!

If she and her friends want to put their lunch hooks into wealth that can be had for selling out wage earners, and those who want to be wage earners, then she's probably succeeding on her terms. What are the Clintons in it for? War, NAFTA, overthrow of elected governments can all be renumerative to people who can make it worth an elected officials' while.

So maybe Debbie Wall Street is succeeding on what she was appointed to do. I think it's a mistake to think she and the rest of her ilk have any feelings to the hurt they are putting on the nation and its people.

Like Margaret Thatcher said: Poverty is behavioral not material. People like this don't think public service is anything but a means of enrichment.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

Hawkfish's picture

Tim Canova is mounting a primary challenge to DWS and I'm on his mailing list. It has been fun to get the low down on what she is doing. You can contribute here if you feel so moved. And frankly, I don't care if he is a raving lunatic as long as he keeps making her life miserable!

No member of the Washington establishment has done more to help big corporations gain influence and power within the Democratic National Committee than Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Not only has she repealed President Barack Obama’s ban on federal lobbyists donating to the DNC, but we’ve learned in the past week that she has recruited Republicans and anti-Obamacare lobbyists to be the official hosts and funders of the Democratic National Convention in July.

If you don’t believe us, read this damning quote from The Intercept, which broke this story wide open last week:

“In October 2015, DNC chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., reportedly huddled with dozens of lobbyists to plan the convention in Philadelphia, and provided the influence peddlers involved with a menu of offerings in exchange for donations. In February, news reports revealed that the DNC had quietly lifted the Obama-era ban on federal lobbyist donations to the party and convention committee.”

That means, bizarrely, that the very same people who want to undo the progress we’ve made over the last eight years — from reforming Wall Street to extending health insurance coverage — will have tremendous influence on the most important Democratic Party event of the year. Once again, our opponent has proven to be a poor steward of the Democratic Party and the progressive values we share. We must take action to stop this immediately.

Sign our petition to Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the Democratic National Committee demanding they return any money taken from Republicans, anti-Obamacare lobbyists, or big corporations to fund the Democratic National Convention.

Make no mistake about it, this was an intentional and calculated decision by Debbie Wasserman Schultz to both undo President Obama’s attempts to weed out corporate influence at the DNC, and to increase her own influence and power with wealthy elites.

These lobbyists and corporate donors, that our opponent has recruited to serve on “The Host Committee,” are both deeply involved in the planning and funding process of the convention, and are firmly opposed to just about everything the Democratic Party should stand for. Some have even donated to Republican candidates — like Chris Christie and to NRCC, which is the organization dedicated to keeping the House under GOP control.

How can we reasonably expect our party to stand alongside these people without losing sight of our values?

If you agree that we need to stand against big money and corporate influence at the DNC, then add your name to our petition demanding that Debbie Wasserman Schultz return every penny she’s collected from them to fund the convention.

We will prove in this campaign that we don’t need wealthy elites or corporate donors to win elections — and we don’t need them to fund the Democratic National Convention either. We can do better than elected leaders, like Wasserman Schultz, who are selling our party to the highest bidders regardless of the consequences.

In solidarity,

Team Canova

up
0 users have voted.

We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg

Lenzabi's picture

I signed that petition. DWS deserves nothing.

up
0 users have voted.

So long, and thanks for all the fish

reason we need to support Tim Canova who is running against her, every donation could put us a little closer to being rid of her!

up
0 users have voted.