"Consider the source" has been a rebuttal of disdain for opinions arising from partisan sources. But "consider the facts" is something else. See this link. Judicial watch is a well-known conservative organization--true. But if were not for their freedom of information act (FOIA) law suits, plural, much of what we know about Hillary Clinton's emails would still be unknown today. The linked reference about State Department's retention of Benghazi-related Hillary emails contains facts, not opinions. Some may infer from this post that this is a smear against Hillary Clinton--facts are not smears. Bernie's campaign has repeatedly avoided negativity (i.e., ad hominem arguments) in favor of fact-based statements concerning his opponent (drat those fact-checkers!) Benghazi emails

My opinions of the related facts are that they provide evidence of collusion between the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Obama State Department to suppress facts of Clinton's culpability in the fairy tale she used to deflect guilt away from herself about the true nature of the Benghazi attack and its perpetrators.

Clinton denied repeated requests from Ambassador Stevens and his staff for more security prior to the events leading to his assassination (also revealed in previously withheld Clinton emails) and the fact that instead of taking action while the Libyan Embassy was still under siege, she went to sleep.