Error message

Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 20 of /home/caucusni/public_html/includes/file.phar.inc).

Open Thread - 08-14-26 - "Party" Like There's No Tomorrow

I used to be a Democrat, for much of my life.

Although I voted for him twice, my schism with the Democratic Party began with Clinton.

I had high hopes when I voted for Obama the first time, but I became jaded very early on, beginning with his cabinet picks. I voted green for his second term.

Biden was the last straw. I was done with the Democrats. I voted Green for Biden's first term and left the Presidents box unchecked for his second term.

Now I'm a nomad, noncommittal to any party or politician, drifting with the sands of true independence.

Democratic Socialists of America

Since most of us here would have probably identified with the Democratic Party at some time or another, or maybe still do identify with the Party, we probably should discuss The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).

I find it very interesting how quickly the organization has ascended in the Democratic Party. Wasn't it, at one time, considered almost impossible to change a Party from the inside?

The DSA was formed in 1982, and according to former organizer Jake Altman:

When I joined in 2013, it was much more social democratic. It was very old, very white. In 2015 in Boston, it was a few older men and I who were the core of the old DSA chapter," Altman explained. "It is night and day between DSA in even 2015 and now. It went from this, like you say, pretty moderate social-political group to a cultural juggernaut that it is today.

By 2014, a group called the Left Caucus was formed that advanced a lot of extreme views.

There were debates at the time about how much Leninism do we want to let into DSA. And these people, they eroded any resistance and any core of anti-communism that remained within DSA. Anti-communism became forbidden, right? This is a big evil thing, to be an anti-communist.

And you can’t hold this view without running all the old people who experienced the 20th century out of the organization. And I think that had to have been part of the calculus, that they didn’t want any internal resistance," he said. "And so there were instances where people were — I think efforts were made to silence people who dissented.

I can speak from personal experience that if you dissent, there will be efforts to silence you. They use mob tactics, basically," he said. "So if you speak out, they will coordinate and a bunch of people will jump on you and denounce you, smear you behind your back, do whatever it takes to try to discredit you if you speak out against them.

Source

If Altman is right, how did this happen so quickly?

Is this movement for real, or, is it astroturf? And by "movement" I mean this latest iteration of the DSA.

The DSA Platform

Working Class Democracy

In a nutshell:

Economy and Labor

  • Establish public and democratic ownership of major industries and large corporations.
  • Enact a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay alongside expanded labor and union protections.
  • Implement heavy taxation on wealthy individuals and major corporations.

Healthcare, Education, and Housing

  • Implement a single-payer "Medicare for All" government-guaranteed healthcare system.
  • Provide tuition-free public education through college and secure complete student debt cancellation.
  • Expand social housing, guarantee housing as a human right, and institute nationwide rent controls.

Government and Constitutional Overhaul

  • Draft a new U.S. Constitution to fundamentally reshape the federal government.
  • Abolish the U.S. Senate, the Electoral College, the presidency, and the Supreme Court as they currently exist.
  • Replace executive and judicial branches with leadership chosen by and subordinate to an expanded House of Representatives in a multi-party system.
  • Permit all permanent U.S. residents to vote and enact full public financing for all elections.

Criminal Justice and Immigration

  • Demilitarize police departments, eliminate qualified immunity, and pursue a long-term goal of abolishing prisons and policing.
  • Abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), end detentions and deportations, and provide broad amnesty with a path to citizenship.
  • Foreign Policy

    • Reduce military spending drastically, close overseas military bases, and end economic sanctions on nations including Cuba, Iran, and Venezuela.
    • End U.S. military aid to Israel.

What a radical remaking of America. How would they make all of that work? They want to draft a new Constitution? How so?

What About This Guy?

Hasan Piker

He campaigns with Democrats/DSA.

He's divided Democrats.

Is he for real, or, is he astroturf?

My cynical side's first question would be, "Whom does he work for"?

Here's some of the provocative things he has said (notice in the comments how easily he gets under some people's skin):

-
-

Maybe you agree with him, maybe you don't, but there's no doubt he's provocative. Could his purpose be to split the Democratic Party to facilitate the rise of the DSA, or maybe to just split the Democrats in general? Is his rhetoric designed to provoke violence? Is he just a self promoter using bombastic language to gain notoriety?

My conclusion?

I'm not a fan, of either.

In My Humble Opinion:

  • If this version of the DSA actually someday becomes the majority Party and tries to implement their platform it would mean secession and the dissolution of the United States.
  • Hasan Piker is most likely an operative.
  • This all could easily get out of control and become a convenient excuse for a heavy hand.
Share
up
9 users have voted.

Comments

I was apprehensive about giving my conclusion because I don't want my opinion to become site policy.

I'd like this to be an open discussion on a matter that we may disagree on, so please don't hesitate to express yourself if your opinion differs. Besides, open discussion is the essence of c99.

This burgeoning, relatively new Party has potential for some serious ramifications. I'm interested in what you have to say about it.

So, in your opinion, what's this stuff all about?

up
7 users have voted.
QMS's picture

.

Interesting how the DSA platform closely mirrors the open discussion
we had yesterday in our Farm Coast Voices for Democracy group.
Although DSA was never mentioned, I was tempted to bring it up.
It is pretty obvious to me reform is needed in the DNC.

Thanks for the OT.

up
7 users have voted.

Zionism is a social disease

@QMS
it looks like the DNC is going to get reformed whether it likes it or not. The old guard is panicking at the thought of losing power and the purse strings. The youth have awakened and are pushing back hard. The Party is in crisis mode.

The question is, in my mind anyway, is this surge by the DSA organic or is it being engineered?

The publicity the DSA is getting is giving the Republicans ample messaging opportunity to scare their voters back into the booth, while many of the Democrat's old guard are threatening to jump ship and leave the Party.

These are manifestations of a failing empire and a potential power vacuum that may arise.

up
7 users have voted.
QMS's picture

@JtC
.

and separate the trumpeters from the ranks?
Internal divisions could split both parties into
effective splinters. Something more representative
of various interests, at least better than what we have.

up
6 users have voted.

Zionism is a social disease

@QMS

Perhaps the RNC could take a cue from DSA and separate the trumpeters from the ranks?

Trump himself is separating the Republican wheat from the chaff because of his policies and perceived betrayals to his MAGA base. The Republicans are as divided as the Democrats are.

2026 and 2028 ought to be interesting election cycles.

up
5 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

“In Marx’s view, socialism would thus constitute a far more pluralistic order than the one we have now.” – Terry Eagleton

The example below is meant to provide one possibility among many of how the human imagination can be applied to the problem of focusing upon what we might actually achieve.

Political thinking in the US is stuck at the high-school level; it’s full of conformity and cliques. Historically, from the Federalist Papers onward, it can be shown that the Federal system in the US is a system to make it easier for established power to gain the public’s consent while at the same time any general public will that might form in the US is continually thwarted. So none of the conformity is of any consequence and the cliques decide things. Today, voting does not appear to matter because you vote to choose among two, and only two, preselected candidates as regards who will enact decisions which have already been made. In the US, then, you are generally denied the opportunity to be responsible for your politics. You do not vote your politics, nor (for the most part) is anything you want on the ballot.

My proposal, on the other hand, will stand in opposition to conformity in political thought. The kernel of it is this: each of us should form her or his own political party, and for the individual political parties to merge according to what their creators think needs to happen. The notion, here, is to promote the idea that one’s political opinion should be what one wants it to be. The heavy lifting of this proposal could happen in conferences at festivals; people would organize politically according to their preferences there. We might, for instance, form a Peace on Earth Party, or a Medicare for All Party, or a Let’s Not Burn Everything to a Crisp Party, or a Make Sure Everyone Has a Place to Stay and can See a Doctor If They Need to Party. Readers are invited here to insert their own preferences. The kernel of this proposal is expressed by the name of the political party “Your Party” in the UK, though at some point it appears that the Your Party partisans decided, like everyone else, that “omigod we can’t let ordinary people decide on their own because that would be chaos.” This proposal invites the chaos. Could we do worse than what we’re doing now?

The argument that “nobody votes third party” will not stop my proposal. The individual parties might choose the status quo, though at some later point the sense of desperation of those pushing the status quo will catch up with such a choice. And we might observe that damned few people vote for, or even follow, their own self-interest within the status quo. Instead, the system fabricates everyone’s ideas of self-interest. The end result is universal irresponsibility, plainly evident in war and genocide.

“Form your own political party” will be the position of “try however lamely to stop blaming the establishment parties for what you yourself are doing.” At the very least my proposal will, if only minimally changing voter habits, set up a system of dual power.

form_3.jpg

up
6 users have voted.

"The US empire’s downfall comes at a time of late stage capitalism when more than 99 percent of the public are effectively disenfranchised while factions of reactionary billionaires vie for control." -- Conor Gallagher

@Cassiodorus
"form your own political party". I'm done with conformity and cliques. I'm done with being told what to think. I'm done with the fake and rigged system.

Too many people, though, are disinclined, either by laziness or apathy, to do their due diligence in forming their own opinions. So, they take the easy way out and rely on the contemporary zeitgeist do their thinking in proxy. That's a big problem that was recognized early on in the concept of democracy by the ancient Greeks.

Your proposal is interesting. I see it as a way to put power back in the hands of the people rather than a party or parties that serve their own interests or the interests of the hands that feed them money. That portends rethinking of "The Way".

We are in one of those pivotal times in history when big changes happen and this one may be the biggest. The old paradigm will not relinquish power easily, it will thrash about and lash out until it is exhausted, and then, it will be the time of new ideas.

We are now in the stage of dreaming those new ideas.

Interesting times, my friend. Keep on thinking free.

up
8 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

Got out weed eating early cause it is hot as hell. Still got drenched with sweat, but cooled down and changed now.

I've lost all my faith in politics. The purpose seems to be to make you think you have a voice when you don't. Both parties are rigged. DSA has issues also. Chas said yesterday one of the candidates wants to get rid of Thanksgiving? Of all our issues and problems we need to address....endless wars, crumbling infrastructure, exploding debt, and so on are the issues we need to address. I'm not holding my breath.

So color me doubtful that we can vote our way out of the mess the oligarchs who own our government have created.

In a post constitutional nation there is no law. Back to the wild west.

Thanks for another thought provoking OT!

up
7 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

@Lookout
we are in accordance.

I think the DSA candidate that wanted to get rid of Thanksgiving was defeated in the primary.

I'm a constitutionalist. Capitalism worked well in the 50s through the 70s until Reagan began loosening regulations that taxed the richest at a much higher level than at the present. Add to that our factories were closed here and reopened in other countries for lower wages and a larger bottom line for the corporations. Those high taxes on the wealthy and a solid manufacturing base created the middle class. The middle class that is now being decimated by the shifting of the tax burden onto the middle class themselves. And the loss of jobs.

If the nation reverted back to adhering to the Constitution, and brought back a higher tax on the wealthy, closed all of the military bases around the world and minded our own business, and brought manufacturing back to the US, things may change for the better. Maybe.

But big corporate and big money is entrenched, so I agree we probably wont be able to vote our way out of this mess.

Economic collapse may be our best bet, with all the pain and suffering that entails. We may have to go through that hell to get to a better place.

up
7 users have voted.

It stemmed from a commissioner's court session. The chair of the county Democrat Party made a public complaint about the election chief refusing to approve a single democrat applicant to work at the voting booths or to monitor the vote count. It was claimed this violates our election code and the chief needs to comply at the general election or be fired. The whole discussion was postponed for more input and a vote next month. The Republican judge went out of his way to be insulting, crudely expressing that the Democrat would only be satisfied if a rope was taken from the judges truck and used to hang the chief. I hope to inform the Dem chairwoman about how to file a Judicial Conduct Commission and get the smart ass judge taken to task. A staunch Republican mover and shaker pal asked me to join in on a complaint. Republican loyalty is cracking?
I spoke with a Democratic party operative who is walking away from activism due to her disdain of the party's stance on DEI, trans issues, and open borders. There would be no Democratic party in the county had not she and her husband organized it. Democrat loyalty is cracking?
Hasan is suspicious to me. Not genuine, but a genuine embedded operative.
Multiple parties and coalitions have failed in several countries in Europe, and it is the system keeping Bibi in office and out of prison.
I have no ideas, and dislike the ideas and systems in place. We need something new and different.

up
7 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

@on the cusp
of the cracks in our political system and how well the divide and conquer tactics work.

I agree about Hasan Pike being an operative, but for whom?

It's pathetic when politicians do what ever is necessary to keep themselves in power and to keep themselves out of jail. That seems to be happening in several places around the world.

Thanks for the on the ground input, my dear.

up
6 users have voted.
usefewersyllables's picture

@JtC

For the (Uni)Party, of course.

“There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always— do not forget this, Winston— always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless.

If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face— forever. ”

Orwell had it exactly right. The Piker is still alive simply to give them a mechanism with which to identify where to start the stamping. Won't be long, now.

up
6 users have voted.

Twice bitten, permanently shy.

@usefewersyllables
my thinking exactly.

Does it matter if the boot is from a left foot or a right foot?

If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face— forever.

Nah. Either way, it's still a boot on your face.

up
6 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

It's so bizarre to hear the "conservative" commentators on other podcasts not getting it. They denounce Trump as if their denunciations were news to the world. Yes of course Trump's agenda is to destroy America and blame the woke people. Yes of course the rest of the Establishment is on board with this agenda -- why do you think they keep him in power even though it's obvious to all that from the outset his only friend in the world was himself? Yes of course the global working class hates Trump and the main reason the US stays in business -- for now -- is because the cost to the capitalists would be too high were they merely to fold up the US tent and ship all they really know and love off to New Zealand or somewhere like that. Yes of course it will happen anyway because the nastiest withdrawals will eventually happen after some future summer -- like the one we're experiencing now -- burns the rest of the US to the ground and fills the US public's lungs with the resultant soot as climate change schedules Earth's complete incineration for a few years down the road. Yeah the big news is that this stuff has to be explained to people in the US.

Somewhere in this video below -- it doesn't matter if you look it up or not -- Chas Freeman is complaining about those kooky DSA people. Yeah, they're the kooky ones, Chas.

up
5 users have voted.

"The US empire’s downfall comes at a time of late stage capitalism when more than 99 percent of the public are effectively disenfranchised while factions of reactionary billionaires vie for control." -- Conor Gallagher

@Cassiodorus
and a righteous rant to boot.

I have to ask why, and to what end?

Yes of course Trump's agenda is to destroy America and blame the woke people. Yes of course the rest of the Establishment is on board with this agenda -- why do you think they keep him in power even though it's obvious to all that from the outset his only friend in the world was himself?

up
6 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

@JtC spent four years -- from the beginning of 2021 to the end of 2024 -- believing ardently in that vanguard of Republican legislation, the least accessible President, Joe Biden, in American history. Add on top of that two years, and put in two more under Trump, of obsession with Project Ukraine: "Hey, we'll lose a war, throw away 1.7 million Ukrainian men while consolidating Putin's control over Russia, and sell it as a victory -- yeah, that'll work!" Remember that they made it more important than the financial rescue of the victims of climate change: think, for instance, of the Ukraine attachment to the bill bailing out the city of Lahaina on Maui after fires burned it to the ground.

Our government exists to make rich people richer. I'm sure it was especially so after Obama bailed out the banks. Riley and Brenner:

Under political capitalism, raw political power, rather than productive investment, is the key determinant of the rate of return. This new form of accumulation is associated with a series of novel mechanisms of ‘politically constituted rip-off’. These include an escalating series of tax breaks, the privatization of public assets at bargain-basement prices, quantitative easing plus ultra-low interest rates, to promote stock-market speculation—and, crucially, massive state spending aimed directly at private industry, with trickledown effects for the broader population: Bush’s Prescription Drug legislation, Obama’s Affordable Care Act, Trump’s CARES Act, Biden’s American Rescue Plan, the Infrastructure and CHIPS Acts and the Inflation Reduction Act. All these mechanisms of surplus extraction are openly and obviously political. They allow for returns, not on the basis of investment in plant, equipment, labour and inputs to produce use values, but rather on the basis of investments in politics.

And, thanks to our two-party system, our "elections" select for people whose idea of moral consistency is a narcissistic obsession with money, power, and war, the triad Emmanuel Todd identifies as the capstones of "nihilism."

up
6 users have voted.

"The US empire’s downfall comes at a time of late stage capitalism when more than 99 percent of the public are effectively disenfranchised while factions of reactionary billionaires vie for control." -- Conor Gallagher

QMS's picture

@Cassiodorus
.
of the Iranian people. More reality based than ours.

up
6 users have voted.

Zionism is a social disease

usefewersyllables's picture

the dem facet of the uniparty even more than the rethug facet. I was raised a yellow-dog dem, by hard-core Objectivist parents who hated the rethugs with the blinding heat of a thousand suns- back in those halcyon days when the dems actually might still have stood for anything. But, as with others, the cracks began with Clinton, and the fracture became permanent when they revealed themselves to be nothing like a loyal opposition. "Feckless" is not a strong enough word: they are utter fucking frauds, the lot of them.

I've voted Green since the second Obama run, and have no plans to vote for any Uniparty moron at any level, if I bother to vote at all. And if Trump has his way, and I suspect he will, that'll be the end of Colorado's universal vote-by mail, and that'll put the icing on that cake for this reporter. Enough.

up
6 users have voted.

Twice bitten, permanently shy.

QMS's picture

@usefewersyllables
.
when it comes to party politics.
No balls within the walls, just compliance.
Who makes the rules? Lobbyists. Stick with
the constitution and have congress only meet
once a year (early December) and make the
elected officials exist with their constituents
for the remainder of their terms.
Might learn something?

up
4 users have voted.

Zionism is a social disease

@usefewersyllables
voting for either major party just digs our hole deeper. It's all fake and rigged. All of it.

up
4 users have voted.

@usefewersyllables @usefewersyllables ended my parents routine of making regular campaign contributions to Dems. They would afterwards vote for the occasional Repub at the local and state level.
If a Green is on the ballot and I am in the mood to thumb my nose at uniparty candidates, I will vote Green. It demonstrates the value and use of my vote.
Occasionally, a Libertarian might come up with an interesting idea. However, Rand Paul believes the only way to save Social Security is to raise the age to collect benefits should be 70. The average life span for men is 78, and 79 for women. Pay in 60 years, receive benefits for 8 years. Dems have no plan at all.

up
6 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

usefewersyllables's picture

@usefewersyllables

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/leak-democratic-org-anti-extremism

up
5 users have voted.

Twice bitten, permanently shy.

@usefewersyllables Cuba must be influencing the DSA. Srsly. I wonder if cutting off funds to Israel, closing all foreign military bases, and free college education is toxic to the center left democrats? Just asking for a friend.
Israel stands to gain the most from the destruction of the DSA movement.

up
5 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

enhydra lutris's picture

morning and have to get back to it, with no real time to think about all this, but I do know one thing:
In innumerable meetings throughout the years, other earlier avatars of thet Piker dude have materialized with similar or parallel ideas and rhetoric and, in every case the verdict was immediate; cop, feeb, spook, provocateur, or equivalent.

Changing the Dems from within has already been done, AOC and her cadre did it, remember.

The DSA platform is clearly written to be very attractive to various cadres of idealists but pretty damn impossible to bring to fruition and to keep running. I mean, really? I've also heard that before:

be well and have a good one

up
5 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

@enhydra lutris
yes I remember those infiltrators well. I also followed Hoffman and Ruben back in the day, Piker reminds me of them as well. That kind of agitprop was common back then, I'm sure you're very aware of that.

Yes, I also remember that AOC and her cadre changed the Dems, but not to the extent of this newer crop.

It boggles my mind that they think they could possibly pull this off. That's why I'm very suspicious of this whole thing.

Love that rendition of Big Rock Candy Mountain.

Muchas gracias, mi hermano.

up
5 users have voted.
enhydra lutris's picture

@JtC @JtC

for him at all. had a public argument with him over the appropriate tactics to use at the Oakland CA Stop The Draft Week and luckily for the participants, his asshole idea was voted down. He really was a cynical little shit perfectly willing to con lots of well meaning innocents into a "peaceful" event and provoking a police riot in order to get them radicalized by of getting the living shit beaten out of them No respect for the SOB at all.

be well and have a good one

up
5 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

@enhydra lutris
ever written anything about the...ahem...times, back then?

up
4 users have voted.
enhydra lutris's picture

@JtC @JtC

be well and have a good one

up
2 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --