@QMS who supported Yoon doing now? What's going on in the streets after the impeachment?

sounds like the weak tea of the DNC -
better messaging will solve their problems.
In other words, do not take blame or responsibility,
do not chart a new course. Just leave the tainted brand
name behind. What delusional world do they inhabit?

He who cannot describe the problem will never find the solution to that problem.
-- Confucius

诈欺

@soryang

...would be a starting point for South Korea for Lee's approach to both relations with the US and North Korea.

The simple minded US approach which essentially boils down to the neo-con like "you wit us or agin us" views this as very negative. Yet, South Koreans generally, including Lee and the democrats, are partial to the US. This is going to continue unless the US gets too heavy handed. Having an alliance should be cause for stability not disputes, resentments and instability. Honestly, the US leadership just doesn't get that because of South Korea's affinity for both US and Chinese cultures, they are a useful weathervane for conduct of Northeast Asian policy. It is primarily the US Indo-Pacific Command which overestimates US power, and certain lobbies in the National Security orbit that resent liberal inclinations in South Korea which try to carve out a new or different course, in the tradition of Kim Dae-jung, and Roh Moo-hyun and Moon Jae-in, referred to as the Sunshine Policy. Lee is in this Sunshine policy tradition which is liberal rather than "leftist" or "communist," as it is labeled by the neo-con US establishment. It's common sense really, it's called diplomacy, even though even this is an oversimplification. North Korea historically speaking isn't a "foreign country" from a Southern nationalist perspective. The US made it so, and the US and Japan want to keep it that way, permanently.

I think that Lee would like to create a more stable status quo with North Korea. Yoon did everything he could to undermine former President Moon's accomplishments in this respect. Particularly, he undermined the Sept 19 Military Agreement, which governed military activities in and around the the DMZ and Nothern Limit Lines (NLL) in the East and West Seas. This agreement precluded military exercises in those areas proximate to NLL on both sides, so to limit the opportunity for military confrontations to arise. Also, flight restrictions, fixed wing and helos were implemented north and south of the DMZ for the same reason. The US resented all of this, and their proxy Yoon, did all he could to violate the agreement and in effect dismantle it. Moon and the democrats even passed a law barring propaganda leaflets going across the DMZ. The 9.19.2018 MA resulted in reduction of heavy arms in the DMZ and cessation of loudspeaker propaganda. Yoon undermined all of this leading to various national security lapses and scares, with worsening military tensions with North Korea, including a series of propaganda and trash balloon incidents, and drone violations of the DMZ by both sides.

The neo-cons in the US deliberately crashed and burned the negotiations with Kim Jong-eun focused on denuclearization. Trump went along with this. As a result, Kim turned to Russia. So Trump walked away not only from negotiations with North Korea, but also the South Korean initiatives, which Lee would be inclined to follow. As a result, North Korea basically cut off the improving relations with South Korea, shut down emerging, cultural, social and economic contacts, with the South and turned to Russia.

So Lee's moves I think would involve curtailing military activities in the buffer zones established by the 9.19.2018 MA, pulling back the scale of US and South Korean exercises, perhaps going largely to a desktop model, and perhaps even reducing bilateral military contacts with Japan. These moves could be made to put North South relations on a more stable foundation, in spite of North Korean indifference or intransigence. There would definitely be resistance from the UNC, USFK, Washington, etc. The idea here is that South Korea has to take some initiatives with regard to its national security because the US and the Yoon supporters on the right are a poor judge of what is good for South Korea, and Northeast Asia generally. The polarization of the region into the old cold war orientation needs to be walked back.

I think on the economic side, some sort of South Korea, Japan, China understandings will be established if possible, despite the almost pathological US anti-China drive. I'm not sure how much the trilateral partnership will be walked back, but the military relationships will be deemphasized with an attempt to reestablish some sort of South Korea national interest in the direction of sovereignty rather than being merely the obsequious puppet of US and Japanese interests.

My knowledge about this topic concerning the Sunshine Policy, and the September 19, 2018 Agreement, Moon's rapproachement with North Korea, and how it was deliberately undermined and rolled back during the Yoon administration comes almost exclusively from South Korean media sources rather than any western English language sources, which I have rarely if ever seen. I would anticipate measures from Lee to roll back the presence of US strategic assets such as B-2s, B-52s, nuclear submarines, fleet ballistic missile submarines, and live fire military in the buffer zones established in 2018 in negotiations with the North, whether by Moon or Trump reached at Singapore. There is a more remote possibility of the South and North agreeing again to negotiate cultural exchange and communication initiatives such as those reached during the Spring is Coming thaw in relations in 2018. This because of the North's distrust of both the changes in policies by the US and South Korea since that time.