AIPAC goes to war on American progressives

Back in 2018 AIPAC thought that “We must keep the support for Israel bipartisan,” he said. “This is a strategic asset for Israel’s security, and your work here today is more important today than ever before.” Of course that was the center-left Labour Party, and Israel politics is far right-wing now.
By 2022 AIPAC was spending $28.5 targeting progressives almost exclusively.

Based on recent developments, their façade of bi-partisanship has long worn thin. Now their mission is to vote out any progressive Democrats who might question Israeli policy, even if it means supporting anti-Democratic forces in America. Last March, AIPAC issued a statement defending their dirty endorsements, essentially saying they’ll accept support for anyone who offers unqualified support of Israel, apparently even if they have conspired to overthrow the U.S. Government.

Going into 2024 AIPAC has stopped pretending being bipartisan. Even just calling for a ceasefire will get you primaried. Even the Congressional Black Caucus isn't safe, even from other Democrats.

More centrist CBC members and their political allies have been involved in combatting progressive gains in the Democratic Party. In June 2021, Jeffries, along with Reps. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., and Terri Sewell, D-Ala., another recipient of AIPAC cash, launched Team Blue PAC to protect Democratic members facing primary challenges from their left. And last June, Democratic operatives closely aligned with CBC leaders launched a new dark-money group to fend off primary challengers.
...AIPAC’s attacks on Black progressives are not new. The group funneled money from GOP donors to back the more centrist Brown’s successful House campaigns against Ohio progressive Nina Turner. And the group spent $4 million to try to thwart Lee’s insurgent 2022 campaign.
AIPAC’s strategy fits into a larger trend of Republicans and Democrats teaming up to defeat progressive candidates critical of U.S. support to Israel. Republican donors poured last-minute cash into former New York Rep. Eliot Engel’s reelection campaign in the face of Bowman’s insurgent 2018 challenge. Pennsylvania billionaire Jeffrey Yass, a major GOP donor and funder of the Israeli think tank leading the rightward lurch in the country’s judiciary, also funded a PAC run by Democrats and dedicated to challenging progressives in Democratic primaries.

AIPAC is pouring so much money into American elections that they are threatening to upend any last traces of actual democracy, but the Democratic Party leadership is so craven and/or greedy that they refuse to denounce the group. Meanwhile, AIPAC doesn't spend a dime on GOP primaries.

It’s ultimately toxic for the party leadership to tacitly welcome a group currently endorsing a Republican who compared Democrats to Nazis.
Share
up
16 users have voted.

Comments

Cassiodorus's picture

But look at how HARD Bernie Sanders is virtue-signaling while he denies calls for a cease-fire!

Oh and as for AIPAC, this from Simplicius:

Israel's Economy Set to Shrink 11% as Hamas War Escalates: JPMorgan

Looks like they'll be leaning on the US even more heavily than usual for the foreseeable future.

up
7 users have voted.

"the Democratic Party is not 'left'." -- Sabrina Salvati

but looking at their web page and reading up above I see nothing there not to like. AIPAC seems to advocate for Israel, similar to the way we have pro choice and pro gun groups, both of whom work across party lines to advocate for representatives who support their cause.

I'd hardly call the illiberal left Progressives, I'd more likely call them extremists, I mean at least radicals have some sort of agenda. Ever since the enlightenment people like the illiberal left have been around. Authoritarian extremists often bigoted and racist, supporting lawlessness and corruption, no thanks.

America is a liberal Democracy, too bad.

up
0 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

@ban nock One's status within this oligarchy is relative to the amount of surplus cash one has available to spend upon political contributions. Once again, Riley and Brenner:

Under political capitalism, raw political power, rather than productive investment, is the key determinant of the rate of return. This new form of accumulation is associated with a series of novel mechanisms of ‘politically constituted rip-off’. These include an escalating series of tax breaks, the privatization of public assets at bargain-basement prices, quantitative easing plus ultra-low interest rates, to promote stock-market speculation—and, crucially, massive state spending aimed directly at private industry, with trickledown effects for the broader population: Bush’s Prescription Drug legislation, Obama’s Affordable Care Act, Trump’s cares Act, Biden’s American Rescue Plan, the Infrastructure and chips Acts and the Inflation Reduction Act. All these mechanisms of surplus extraction are openly and obviously political. They allow for returns, not on the basis of investment in plant, equipment, labour and inputs to produce use values, but rather on the basis of investments in politics.

up
10 users have voted.

"the Democratic Party is not 'left'." -- Sabrina Salvati

TheOtherMaven's picture

@ban nock

If it were a Russia-supporting group pouring that amount of money into US elections, you would be screaming bloody blue murder. Why aren't you?

Israel is a foreign country, NOT a US state or overseas territory (though it can sometimes be hard to tell the difference the way US politicians cringe and fawn at the mere mention of it).

up
18 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

snoopydawg's picture

@TheOtherMaven

Yep you nailed that hypocrisy to the tree! And you’re spot on.

up
9 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Pricknick's picture

@ban nock you're dense.

up
12 users have voted.

Regardless of the path in life I chose, I realize it's always forward, never straight.

@ban nock

I'd never heard of AIPAC before

Then you haven't paid much attention to politics then.

up
12 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@ban nock

of this nonsense?

I'd hardly call the illiberal left Progressives, I'd more likely call them extremists, I mean at least radicals have some sort of agenda. Ever since the enlightenment people like the illiberal left have been around. Authoritarian extremists often bigoted and racist, supporting lawlessness and corruption, no thanks.

.

I’m also sure that you will ignore this comment and others like you usually do. You seem to like dumping crap in our essays and then scurry off. Can’t imagine what kick you get out of doing it.

up
12 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

snoopydawg's picture

@snoopydawg

with trolls everywhere and that is the trolls only post their comment and they skeedadle away after taking their dump in the comments and then scurry away without addressing the comments made to them. Is there a troll school that teaches them that method?

up
8 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

@snoopydawg .

Is there a troll school that teaches them that method?

I find it impossible to believe otherwise. As a free speech purist, I don't mind seeing this kind of shit -- it provides clues as to what they are cooking up at their "school."

Been onto this particular internet voice for a good long while,

up
8 users have voted.

I cried when I wrote this song. Sue me if I play too long.

@snoopydawg the Republicans operate it in several southern state campuses. It started in the late 90's to control the internet using Young Republicans.

up
1 user has voted.

@snoopydawg I don't spend much time here I have to admit. I also can't argue with the non fact based. I mean someone tells me to go watch some vid by some nutter it just gets an eye roll.

If I were ever to respond to comments people would advocate for banning. That's what illiberal people do to people they don't agree with.

up
0 users have voted.
Clinton Alden's picture

@ban nock Wow, just wow. That is some deep ass bullshit you got going on there. I might have been in the wilderness for the past couple of years from this site, but that is one of the most ignorant things I've ever read here. Wacko

up
7 users have voted.

Formerly, RantingRooster

@Clinton Alden Love your profile. At least you know yourself.

up
0 users have voted.

@ban nock you better read my Usual Suspects series from 2005.

https://penspages.wordpress.com/2016/03/30/the-usual-suspects-pt-1-richa...

up
1 user has voted.
dystopian's picture

Good post GJ, Thanks!

Hey, I don't know anything about this... but lemme tell y'all how it is... 5 min. expert here.

I don't know anything about this Israeli influence over American politics, but sounds good to me.

/s

up
7 users have voted.

We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better.
both - Albert Einstein

lotlizard's picture

One doesn’t have to be Jewish or an insider oneself to find that kind of news roundup and overview useful.

https://jewishinsider.com

Also, at the other end of the spectrum:
The website Jewschool. Years ago it published a lot of good writing by progressive Jews, but now there is rarely anything new. The original crew behind it seems to have gone away. Did they give up, totally dismayed and discouraged by developments in Israel and the U.S. Jewish community? If so, who can blame them?

up
6 users have voted.
orlbucfan's picture

campaign contributions are just a fancy cover for bribes. AIPAC has been a corrupting influence for decades. My area elected Maxwell Frost to the House. It wasn't even a contest; it was a wipeout. Let AIPAC try to stop him from being re-elected. Won't happen. Rec'd!!

up
7 users have voted.

Inner and Outer Space: the Final Frontiers.