Norman Solomon speaks to the nice liberals with big egos

-- in, you guessed it! Commondreams.org! As usual, though, it's hard to tell whether or not he's talking them down or building them up. One thing remains clear: joining the Democratic Party is still a fool's errand, All the political class needs to do is say the magic words, "who are you going to vote for, Republicans?", and we will be blessed with four years of liberal quiet while the world goes to hell in a handbasket. Thus, much as I might be greatly sympathetic to most of Solomon's message (judging by word count), ultimately he argues for an approach that might convert the Democratic Party some time around the year 2050, when it won't matter.

Let's start with Solomon's headline:

Progressives Made Trump's Defeat Possible. Now It's Time to Challenge Biden and Other Corporate Democrats.

Uh, no. Donald Trump made Trump's defeat possible. The Trump campaign (key slogan: "Make Liberals Cry Again") was the worst possible campaign to pursue in an election run-up, seizing upon a trivial motive ("hey, let's troll the liberals") in a time in which all sorts of needs remained urgently unfulfilled across a very large cross-section of America. Do we really want to count on Republicans to self-destruct like Trump did?

Onward and upward! Solomon's subtitle:

Without a strong progressive program as a rudder, the Biden presidency will be awash in much the same old rhetorical froth and status-quo positions that have so often caused Democratic incumbents to founder, bringing on GOP electoral triumphs.

Yes of course, because this is what happened with Obama. The fact that the nice liberals with big egos need to be told this should make you wonder about Solomon's audience. Solomon suggests a remedy:

...it’s time to engage with the battle that must happen inside the Democratic Party.

That battle is over. The good guys lost. Ooh but the size of the Squad doubled! Yeah, that's eight instead of four, out of 435. Meanwhile, AOC said she might quit politics, as some centrist Democrats blame progressives for House losses, NYT says. No, Alexandria, none of those Wall Street shills likes you. Bernie Sanders has been pretending all along. They all want you gone. Stop clinging to the Democrats. Join the Movement for a People's Party.

Solomon argues:

The realpolitik rationales for the left to make nice with the incoming Democratic president are bogus.

Yet everyone follows them. Solomon still hasn't told his audience what he would do when the Biden administration utters the magic words, "so what are you going to do, vote for Republicans?"

Solomon then suggests his remedy as regards the Democrats:

And if they’re serving Wall Street instead of Main Street, we should show that we’re ready, willing and able to “primary” them.

And if we lose the primaries, then we endorse them? It's this Bernie Sanders approach, limiting dissent to primaries and then conceding to Wall Street candidates, that has made the Republicans into the party of populist dissent in small-town America. It didn't help much that, for instance (as Jeffrey St. Clair pointed out about two Senate races), "combined Amy McGrath and Jaime Harrison raised $199,004,686. They lost to Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham by a combined 35 points." The Democrats are never finished proving that they've got plenty of rich people's money to burn on candidacies that are politically pointless. In this regard the fact that the Republicans are a really bad party of populist dissent was, is, and will be of no consequence to small-town America, the small-town America which voted for Trump.

Big-city America is just fine with Democrats as such. They are fine with the Bicoastal Party of Rich People. For the big-city Democrats who matter, "I supported Bernie" or "I supported Joe" serves as a convenient alibi, and what really matters in life is that they own 3br 2ba houses worth $1.1 mil. each and that the homeless are a nuisance. But this is the curse of being a nice liberal with a big ego. You must wrestle, endlessly, with your own pretenses, because your audience wants those pretenses.

-- skipping --

Solomon then dares to criticize Biden, while others appeal fruitlessly:

Biden did not energize working-class voters as he lip-sunk populist tunes in unconvincing performances.

That's the kind of neoliberal approach that Bernie Sanders and so many of his supporters were warning about in 2016 and again this year.

My approach would be more blunt. My approach would be to say: "Bernie Sanders endorsed a neoliberal for President this year. Get it through your thick skulls, nice liberals with big egos."

Share
up
11 users have voted.

Comments

Cassiodorus's picture

Which of Joe Biden's past policy initiatives is your favorite:

1) The 1994 Crime Bill

2) Biden's long history of opposing abortion rights

3) The war against Iraq

4) The 2005 Bankruptcy Bill

(source)

up
11 users have voted.

'French theory is a product of US cultural imperialism." -- Gabriel Rockhill

edg's picture

@Cassiodorus

I'm not on board with taking life as a progressive value. But the many other atrocious Biden actions over the years leave me wondering why he's still considered a Democrat.

up
4 users have voted.
Anja Geitz's picture

Was never more apparent than when John Kasich decided to open up his pie hole yesterday and demonstrate exactly what is wrong with the DC Establishment and their colossal egos.

0B0244C8-A3B5-4B9C-8A3F-76F086EFA9AD.jpeg
~
B649774A-B239-4115-B9FE-D628722262B3.jpeg
up
15 users have voted.

There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier

snoopydawg's picture

Keeping it easy for rich people to declare bankruptcy while making it much harder for us to do it and impossible for student debt.

I think Trump threw the election. He didn't talk about bringing the troops home or not starting a new war. Not much about the economy or his tax cuts or on much of what he ran on last time. Lots of yadda yadda about Hunter Biden and not many knew what he was talking about.

But then Biden's big motto was saving the soul of the country and not much about policies.

up
7 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Voting is like driving with a toy steering wheel.

Cassiodorus's picture

@snoopydawg It really does appear to me that the Trump of 2016 would have applied more brainpower to getting re-elected than the Trump of 2020 applied. Maybe his brain is going.

up
5 users have voted.

'French theory is a product of US cultural imperialism." -- Gabriel Rockhill

@snoopydawg He didn't want to look like he threw it, nor does he want to look like he lost. Hence all the hullabaloo, which is also another chance to grift. But yeah, the Trump of 202 was low energy and basically ran a mainstream repub campaign (tax cuts for businesses, etc.) which is the opposite of what he did in 2020.....

My own conspiracy theory: Trump never wanted to win in 2016, never expected to win 2016. Then he won. Well, he couldn't not act the part, so he did, but by midterms as least, he was over it. So, he ramped up the heel act to at least have a little fun, the media and Dems bought it hook line and sinker and we were cruising along until an actual national emergency happened in the form of Croronavirus. At this point, Trump is pretty much checked out. What thin chance of him offering leadership ended a while before. Furthermore, it's reelection season and he definitely doesn't want to win. So he more or less runs a campaign JEB! or Rmoney could have run, albeit with a much toned down version of the Trump routine. I mean, he didn't even really have a nickname for Biden or Kamala! He lives for that stuff. That alone should tell you he didn't care at all.

As to what's been going on with the rhetoric and threats of lawsuits and all that, it's still all part of the act. I don't expect the media to get it at this point. No one expects anything to come of these things. But they allow Trump to look like he's still fighting, like he still wants it and he and his people get to dip their beaks yet again.

Sorry if I didn't explain this well, I'm a little groggy from pain meds this AM. But to me it's pretty simple. The next president is going to be saddled with Coronavirus, an economy that is almost guaranteed to tank, massive social unrest, etc., etc. I think the signs are pretty obvious that Trump didn't want the job when it wasn't this challenging. I see no evidence aside from his usual show that he wants to continue knowing what's coming (and I do not believe he is do daft as to have absolutely no idea at all that there's going to be a lot of work, and blame, coming for whoever is in the office.)

up
4 users have voted.

Idolizing a politician is like believing the stripper really likes you.

snoopydawg's picture

@Dr. John Carpenter

So he more or less runs a campaign JEB! or Rmoney could have run, albeit with a much toned down version of the Trump routine. I mean, he didn't even really have a nickname for Biden or Kamala! He lives for that stuff. That alone should tell you he didn't care at all.

Sleepy Joe? What was that supposed to mean? Did he mean dementia sleepy Joe or what? What a weak name to call an opponent. Where's Doopy, Sneezy and Grumpy? Couldn't they have run too?

Saagar has been livid that Trump has dumped the populist positions that he ran on in 2015. Gee can we say that Trump pulled a Bernie and threw the election to Biden? Sure we can.

up
3 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Voting is like driving with a toy steering wheel.