how much longer can Julian even survive?
*EXCLUSIVE* footage of #Assange in prison van after extradition hearing pic.twitter.com/sm3MnK7ud3
— Ruptly (@Ruptly) October 21, 2019
‘I can’t think properly’: Assange disoriented as court rejects delay for extradition proceedings’, 21 Oct, 2019, RT.com
“With his supporters rallying outside the court building, Julian Assange showed signs of fatigue in a bid to delay extradition proceedings scheduled for next year. The London court ruled against him."
Fatigue??? He's barely able to speak!
Cleanly shaven and dressed in a navy suit, Assange appeared before Westminster Magistrates Court on Monday to seek the postponement of an extradition hearing scheduled for February.
His lawyer argued that the US government had attempted to kidnap and cause harm to his client, and that he would need more time to compile evidence for the case.
Although Assange raised his fist to supporters in the public gallery, the imprisoned journalist did not appear to be in good form. The WikiLeaks founder reportedly struggled to say his own name and date of birth, and held back tears as he told the court that he couldn’t “think properly.”
The court ultimately rejected the proposed delay. Outside the building, protesters chanted slogans and held up a giant banner reading “Don’t extradite Assange.”
In a video published by Ruptly, activists can be seen trying to surround a police van believed to be carrying Assange. Officers at the scene rushed to move protesters away from the vehicle.” (I can’t find an embeddable version at Ruptly.)
On Oct. 19, 2019, Oscar Grenfell had reported at wsws.org that the push is on for the Australian government to defend Assange, and some MPs certainly are defending him, but this was the response by the head of the government:
“Prime Minister Scott Morrison responded this week by blandly declaring that Assange must “face the music” in the US. Senior government ministers have previously maligned Assange, repeating the lies concocted by the US intelligence agencies to discredit him.”
Laura Tiernen’s first-hand report of the delay today, Oct. 22, 2019, wsws.org is a horror story, and hard to read without committing Thought Crimes to the judge and every single person who has helped in his persecution, and likely death.
“Standing in the dock—a room enclosed by reinforced glass panels—Assange mentally paused and appeared to stumble as Judge Vanessa Baraitser asked him to state his name and date of birth.
Baraitser’s vindictiveness towards Assange was clear from the first moments of the hour-and-a-half-long case management hearing. She told Assange’s supporters watching silently in the public gallery that “those causing a disturbance … will be asked to leave.” WikiLeaks’ editor and veteran journalist Kristinn Hrafnsson, investigative journalist John Pilger and former Lord Mayor of London Ken Livingstone were among those seated.” [snip w/ arguments by QC’s for both the US and for Assange]
“Summers requested that Baraitser grant a three-month delay to the extradition hearing scheduled for February 25. He pointed to “extraordinary” revelations of illegal US interference against Assange’s legal rights. Legal action taken by Assange against a Spanish security company had exposed the US “actively intruding on privileged discussions” between Assange and his lawyers at the Ecuadorian embassy.
The US state was involved in the illegal theft of information from telephones and computers, “hooded men breaking into offices” and “plans to kidnap and harm Mr Assange.”
“To be blunt, we need more time,” he told the court. The “enormity” of the issues in the case required “evidence gathering that would test most lawyers.”
Summers explained that a delay was also needed due to conditions facing Assange at Belmarsh Prison. His client had no access to information, no phone contact with his US legal team and mail restrictions meant he had only received court documents from his lawyers one week before today’s hearing.
Responding on behalf of the US government, Lewis told Baraitser, “You shouldn’t be beguiled into accepting” the three-month delay argued by Assange’s lawyers. “It’s just a guesstimate.”
Summers appealed to Baraitser that the February date for a full extradition hearing “isn’t sustainable.” He repeatedly stated that Assange’s right to a fair and equitable trial was being placed in jeopardy.
Baraitser was unmoved, stating: “My intention is to adopt the timetable suggested by Mr Lewis.” While granting to the defence a two-month extension to gather further evidence, she ruled the full extradition hearing would proceed on February 25.
In a final vindictive move, Baraitser declared that next year’s week-long extradition hearing would take place at Woolwich Magistrates Court near Belmarsh Prison. There were audible gasps in the public gallery at Baraitser’s announcement. The venue near Belmarsh has a “public gallery” of just three seats, all but denying public scrutiny and allowing a biased media to selectively report and spread disinformation and lies.” [snip]
“As the hearing drew to an end, Baraitser to turned to Assange and asked him to rise. “Do you understand what has happened here today?”
Assange, who has endured months of solitary confinement and been cut off from daily access to outside information, replied after a long pause: “Do I understand? Not really.”
“Is there anything else you would like to say?” Baraitser asked.
“I don’t understand how this is equitable.” Assange replied, speaking softly and inaudibly at times. “This superpower had 10 years to prepare for this case. I can’t remember anything. I can’t access any of my written work. It’s very difficult to do anything with such limited resources against a superpower intent on [inaudible]… They have an unfair advantage dealing with documents. They [know] the interior of my life with my psychologist. They steal my children’s DNA. This is not equitable what is happening here.”
“I can’t think properly,” he concluded, fighting back tears and raising both hands to his head. “The conditions of your detainment are not the subject of this court,” Baraitser replied. These were the final words spoken before Assange was led from the dock, out of view of his supporters in the public gallery.”
Tiernan then finishes with quotes by Kristinn Hrafnsson and John Pilger concerning the grotesque illegality of the entire political prosecution and persecution of Julian Assange.
I’ll include a few Tweets in a comment as they embed here and at c99% differently.
(cross-posted from Café Babylon)
Comments
from the twittersphere:
Is it just me?
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
well, i'd entered five
tweets in the (my) first comment, as promised. try 'refresh' perhaps?
The problem must be on my end
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Try again?
May be you, gg. I see them all just fine.
i'd missed this earlier,
and just sent them to you by PM.
best,
wd
So Assange has to "face the music" eh?
"The music." What a pretty little description for the total massacre of the life and mind of a man who wanted us all to know exactly what our governments are doing to sabotage our world.
The governments of the US and Britain are so thoroughly awash in CIA generated corruptions that the attempt to label them as two of the world's "great Democracies" is beyond humorous.
And you can add Australia to that list.
"Without the right to offend, freedom of speech does not exist." Taslima Nasrin
It's the Five Eyes, buddy.
They more or less operate as one.
I don't want to hear anybody talking anymore about how Trump is a threat to our democracy. You can't be a threat to something that doesn't exist.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
oscar grenfell had
also included this in that section of his report:
cruel beyond belief
there will be nothing left of him.
i agree, my friend.
i've been playing various covers of this dylan song all morning; will julian's release only be by death/crossing to the other side? i do fear that it has been written, and will be so.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dpyhl85MYmU]
Craig Murray was also there
and has written about what he witnessed. I had a very difficult time reading it because the picture he painted was so horrific. Here is Murray's description of Julian Assange in court.
I cannot believe how cruel the American /British systems of "justice" are. It is obvious Assange is a political prisoner who has been subjected to severe torture and yet good people are helpless to stop it. Any person who has participated in this travesty is simply pure evil.
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
oh, thank you;
he'd alluded to how hard it would be to write it up in the first tweet i'd entered in the first comment.
more tears, more terror for julian. but factor in ecuador's lenin moreno, who sold julian to the UK belmarsh gitmo for an IMF loan and a memo-of-understanding with the pentagon.
how's that going for ya know, moreno? looks like the indigenous are kickin' your sorry ass! good!
I hate how helpless this makes me feel
which is one of the aims of this endeavour, of course. Apart from revenge, and terrifying anybody who contemplates doing the same thing.
What made them hold back from doing this for years and suddenly makes them able to do it now?
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
helpless, helpless,
yes. but why now? because raffael correa's hand-picked successor lenin moreno sold julian to the american empire and clients for a few pieces of silver. and on that day, he was dragged out of the ecuadorian embassy to 'face the music'.
thus: the stars were aligned in a perfect storm, if i may mix metaphors.
Yes, but
I assume that what's kept them from moving all this time is not the right of Ecuador to have sovereignty over its embassy, nor the economic or military power of Ecuador, which are insignificant compared to those of the Five Eyes, but rather some information Julian and Wikileaks were holding back to release in case of danger.
I can't believe that respect for Ecuador's sovereignty was holding back these fascists.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
you seem to talking about
the speculation that wikileaks/assange has a 'deadman's switch'. there was one time folks thought it had been by assange, with endless lines of inscrutable code, but it turned out not to be. but i hadn't been speaking of ecuador's military power, but the joint power of that nation coupled with the US military's.
it's still unclear as to bolsonaro's nation whether colombia is a formal nato member (to threaten VZ, & any other enemies of the capitalist hegemon) or just 'under nato's umbrella' or 'soon to be nato members', but i do remember it well.
but given the IMF loan that seems to have backfired in ecuador, as well as becoming an official client of amerika, i'd think that would have been plenty. i'd even include the many times that assange had been leaving sound traps in his rooms, as scaffolding was built to access his balcony, and ever increasing numbers of black SUVs were parked in front of his wing of the embassy, meaning to him: kidnap and get away vehicles.
All I can do for you, apparently, Mr. Assange,
is continue to tell the truth.
It's not enough.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
anyone believing the uk/us/aus are democracies
really need to learn what real democracy is.
the bush/clinton/zero/trump cabal can't get more
evil than this
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/
I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish
"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"
Heard from Margaret Kimberley
thank you, amigo,
for bringing a few different excerpts from ambassador murray's long outrage essay. he's included some of the austrialian MPs support as well (at least 'support' on scanning.
julian's mum adds:
but i think he's being chemically altered in gitmo prison hospital, as well.
I agree w/you as to being given drugs and god knows
I only wish we/they could do more
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/10/19/assa-o19.html
I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish
"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"
Heard from Margaret Kimberley
good on ya'
and grenfell had also added:
as iirc, craaig murray, but from carr's mouth to the gods' ears. but...i'm agnostic. time for a reprise of caitlin johnstone's 'why australia should (needs to repatriate?) repatriate julian assange' (or a title close to those). i'll hunt it down if i can, and bring it in a bit; it was fantastic.
from caitlin johnstone,
Why Bringing Assange Home Would Be The Best Possible Thing For Australia, june 8, 2018; she opens:
(@suigenerisjen is jen robinson)
More from Caity today
Caity Johnstone has published more today. It's a must read.
An excerpt:
Only Cowards And Sadists Support The Persecution Of Assange
There is much more.
ta, amigo,
and i'll bring a bit more, given it's a bit confusing what of craig murray's brilliant piece she'd quoted, tweets and whatnot:
now her link to 'every single bogus smear' did not seem to include those from edward snowden, glenn greenwald, naomi klein and several other 'fearless investigative journalists' at the Intercept, , and they piss me purple.
perhaps she'd included wikileaks being kicked out of the freedom of the press foundation, which was the anonymizing format for contributions to wikieaks, and other organizations. irrc, it was just after wikileaks had published CIA vault VI, and a bit of vault VII, which he's long surmised is the core reason they're after his ass more than before. i agree.
anyhoo, good on her; she's been a true warrior in defense of julian for the longest time.
Once upon a time, Tom Tomorrow and his “This Modern World” strip
— tamed and confined to toeing the anti-Trump line over at TOP for some years now — would have had something to say in defense of press freedom and true whistleblowers like Julian Assange.
So many people claim to be fighting fascism, but when confronted with fascist torture of a journalist by the authorities, out in the open like this in full view of the world, they cover their eyes and stop their ears.
At least Raúl Ilargi Meijer over at The Automatic Earth doesn’t mince words.
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2019/10/debt-rattle-october-22-2019/
whoosh; bless illargi.
and i couldn't agree more with his 'useless drips' metaphor. and since one of the things i love best about his automatic earth is the artwork he features, i'll bring the painting that accompanies today's prose cum exposé; so appropriate it is!
Eugène Delacroix Liberty Leading the People 1830
on edit: i saw an instagram on twitter of the 'X rebellionists' standing on the top of a train during rush hour traffic, trying to shut it down, and commuters throwing stuff at them, pulling them off the train. and guess what? it was a fricking electric train! nice job, drips.
Well, I am going to say it. Is he being drugged?
I am not interested in being scolded about the fact that I have no proof. I think I can state firmly that the means, motive, and opportunity is rock-solidly established. So while I have no proof I have a strong basis for posing this semi-rhetorical (inasmuch as I don't actually expect an answer) question.
Anyone who would like to scoff at the idea should offer proof that the authorities don't have the means, don't have any motive, or don't have any opportunity to drug him.
several of us on this
thread believe he is, including myownself, and some (?) months ago, some noteworthy friend of julian's said directly that he is/was being 'chemically treated', given what he/she'd during a (then) recent visit. cassandra fairbanks, perhaps? although cassandra (of the gateway pundit site) was rightly chastised for what she'd said was a film of him in side the prison, but the date stamp was waaaaay off, so...i dunno.
I think you are right on
They want him absolutely broken to show just what happens to anyone who dissents and the truly horrifying part is the absolute IDIOTS in this country who not only go along with this but celebrate it! I have friends that no doubt still believe that rape bullshit and no matter what I say or what information I try to provide, I know damned well they're still under that spell. I'm sure those friends are also swallowing whole that latest McCarthyite smears from their "abuela," HER, or as she should be labeled "IT," as well. Makes me so godamned angry. These are the same fucking people who will scream fascism out of the Rump a dump until they are hoarse but will NOT see that this country is fascist to its very core and pretty much ALWAYS has been!
Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur
snoopy may well have,
and i did finally dig up my kinda coverage of the question: 'Is Julian Assange being chemically tortured?', may 11, 2019
'Karen Kwiatowski is making that case at Off-Guardian, May 9.
I find that I just need to get this out of my head and leave it here. You may find that I’m a truly paranoid nutbar, but as the old saw goes: just cuz you're paranoid it don't mean that they really ain’t out to get ya! Nor does Kwiatowski offer ‘proof’ save from unnamed source(s): (some snippets):
[the lengthy New Yorker link]
as i said in the OP, i'd kept on hunting, and had run into comments under a piece at consortium news:
but her tweet was still there, and as addendum from wd:
Ha, IF you are a paranoid
Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur
i utterly agree that
willful ignorance is fr worse that stupidity, amiga. someone posited to me on the boards recently that so many of the best and brightest believe the basic tenets behind russ-gate. er...i think not. in fact, and not altogether OT:
when i posted a lot of what the journalists at the duran had to say about the expanding investigations of mueller and durham investigating the spooky origins of that rubbish a couple days ago, they'd noted on the video that they needed to speak with julian assange. i'd said they sure have missed their chance, now that he's no longer compos mentus in bellmarsh hospital. they had their chance, of course, long ago, but the amerikan DoJ wouldn't guarantee him safe passage.
and as i'd said, every single fucking one of them who contributed to his eternal imprisonment, likely death...cause some barbaric thought crimes to rise in me.
Just to confirm
nice snark,
amigo, and thanks for confirming. i'd been racking what's left of my brain trying to remember what bernhard at MoA had thought back in the day, and iirc, it was botulism poisoning from the restaurant. but BZ kept running thru my head, and when i'd looked it up, the scientific description was too much for me to grasp.
the named symptoms, though, seem somewhat related to the untrained.
but also, i did bingle for, and find this: REVEALED: Pentagon’s $70 Million Chemical & Biological Program at Porton Down in UK, March 28, 2018, Dilyana Gaytandzhieva, 21st century wire, FWIW she begins:
Drugs are probably just part of it.
exactly right,
see nils melzer's reports of the same, as well as clinical psychologist @LissaKJohnson in the tweet via mama assange:
on later edit: i found it:
In court #JulianAssange said “I can’t think properly”. That is what prolonged solitary confinement does. It attacks victims’ brains #Torture
do you know whose bright idea solitary confinement in amerika was? the quakers...so a prisoner could commune with god in silence.
(i'd researched the issue as (then) chelsea manning was being tortured at quantico by solitary and forced to stand at attention in her underwear for hours on end, with the lights always blaring. gawd's blood, what monsters do this sort of evil?
He is probably not far at this point from being dead.
See e.g. what happened to Slobodan Milosevic.
The ruling classes need an extra party to make the rest of us feel as if we participate in democracy. That's what the Democrats are for. They make the US more durable than the Soviet Union was.
What happened to Hare Krishna movement founder Srila Prabhupada…
http://www.iskcon-truth.com/poison/prabhupada-poisoned-overview.html
Very possibly the victim of poisoning by arsenic, mercury, or cadmium compounds added to his food and drink over an extended period.
yes, he seems close to death.
i'm not sure it's a parallel situation with milosevic, but as i remember it, he was posthumously found not guilty of war crimes after he died in the prison at the hague.
Bernie just pledged not to prosecute whistleblowers
wow, he has
'evolved'/s. he used to simply say that assange shouldn't be charged under the espionage act, and that must have been post-April 12, and many berniecrats apparently called him out on it. meh.
Assange is not a damn whistleblower
He is a journalist who has never had to offer a retraction unlike the current crop of stenographers who still can't get their facts straight.
Bernie has been very weak on what is happening to Assange. But Wally..that is not the point of this essay. Support your candidate, but know when to do so.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
it's likely that i
should have noted that to the 'fearless investigative journos' at the intercept, namely greenwald and snowden, assange is known as 'the bad whistleblower', and has been since kim dotcom's internet party confab at the aukland town hall years ago. stir in the hits by naomi klein, micah lee, and a few others...pffft on TI, pierre, and all of them can kiss my grits and worse.
i see ryan grim's name on the byline in the tweet, but can't even want to give the place a click to discover which other, and how many 'journalists' there penned this.
thanks, snoop.
i was about to ask him if he'd make sure julian is freed 'if he's elected', but it dinnae seem worth the effort. 42 comments or so, and his was the sole comment to drag in a D candidate for prez. vexing.
Manning is a "Whistleblower"
If Manning can't be so prosecuted, then Assange can't be prosecuted for conspiracy with her.
Wally please pay attention here
This essay is not about Bernie or Manning. It's about the persecution of Julian Assange. Period. It is impolite to derail essays like you are doing here and have in others. Please just stick as close to the topic of essays you enter. This is not the first time you have done it, but it is the first time I'm saying something about it. You aren't the only one who does this, but here it is very noticeable. You just doubled down... do you see that?
Again...
Support your candidate, but know when to do so.
ETA
This is not true. We might be told that it's the reason he's being prosecuted, but there are over 15 charges against him. The one about him helping Chelsea 'break' into the server is just for show to make people believe that he isn't being charged for publishing what he did. The grand jury does not need Chelsea's testimony because she already testified to what she did that got her courts martial. But putting her in jail for refusing to testify against Julian is just one more scare tactic meant to send people a threatening message. Don't publish our secrets or we will get you.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Um, what?
With apologies in advance for adding to this thread, may I point out that Chelsea Manning was *already* prosecuted and spent seven years in prison for it. How do you not know that?
Right now, she’s in jail again, for refusing to testify against Assange as the U.S. tries to obtain evidence for a conviction against him once he’s extradited. They already gave her immunity from further prosecution if she testifies. She won’t, so she sits in jail rather than do that. Your comment makes no sense whatsoever.
i'm glad that you did;
additionally, she's being fined one thousand amerikan dollars for every day she refuses to testify, due to her principled stand that grand juries are secret, therefore illegal (or should be). as is often said, 'a grand jury could indict a ham sandwich', as in: no defense attorneys are permitted behind those close doors.
Bernie owns this nonsense.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
You are not only doing yourself no good
There are times and there are places to try to persuade.
This is neither the time, nor the place.
Don't do this. Notice NOBODY gave you a click.
What does it take for you to do anything but talk about the greatness of Bernie?
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
Here we go again
Thank you for your concern about me not doing "my cause" any good.
I own what? Assange being prosecuted? Wow!
Yea, right now he's being prosecuted for extradition.
To face charges for what? Where? In conjuction with conspiring with whom?
Manning was granted clemency by Obama. Last I noticed, she is still appealing her conviction which can take years.
Really, pardon me for not shutting down a possibility, even remote as it may be, that an Attorney General along the lines of a Ramsey Clark is so appointed, could work wonders.
Sometimes this place feels waaaay too much like the other place.
.......................................
..........................
this is actually fascinating and quite kewl:
on edit: a sky news journalist, iirc.
time for me to shut down this machine.
i reckon i just gotta go with this jeff buckley cover of dylan's song, and ask once again:
will death be julian's final release? hard for me to think it's not so...
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49mGaGyxoF8]
pray for him if ya got 'em, can't say i'll pray to them who've put him here to repent, see the light. fuck 'em; they're on their own.
According to Consortium News
it should be possible to declare the case against Julian illegitimate because the U. S. government had eavesdropped on his defense preparations.
https://consortiumnews.com/2019/10/22/editorial-dont-railroad-julian-ass...
Lurking in the wings is Hillary, like some terrifying bat hanging by her feet in a cavern below the DNC. A bat with theropod instincts. -- Fred Reed https://tinyurl.com/vgvuhcl
yes, as a commenter
said, the tapes that amerika now owns recording meeting with his psychologists should have caused the case to be thrown out. it worked for daniel elsberg in 1971. but for julian, there are no legal 'niceties' at play, everything about his prosecution, persecution is political, which should have already mooted any possibility of assange's being extradited to amerika the beautiful.
thanks, laurel.
It was not a commenter who made the point,
Lurking in the wings is Hillary, like some terrifying bat hanging by her feet in a cavern below the DNC. A bat with theropod instincts. -- Fred Reed https://tinyurl.com/vgvuhcl
we may be talking past
one another, and yes the editorial mentioned assange saying that all his interviews with his shrink were taped, but from commeter:
Ronelle
October 22, 2019 at 14:22
plus everything julian owned but the book he carried on the way to the van to belmarsh prison was confiscated and given to the amerikan Injustice dept. at least that's how i read the editorial.
i did do some poking around to discover what
the additional 17 charges (under the espionage act) to assange's original indictment imply/charge, etc., and this is a compilation of things i'd found before ending up at the hill.
wikileaks.org has provided their response to the new charges, and provides a pdf of the additional charges. i'll include what's not in my compilation above:
some of you may remember which paper (the guardian?) gave out the password to some tranche of leaked info (strafor files?) that wikieaks hadn't intended to publish unredacted.
the other thing is the wording that amount to 'soliciting leaks for publication', and yes, wikileaks had done that. so what? apparently the DoJ believes that's a crime as well. but my guess is that given the fact that the Injustice dept. had offered both alleged leaker of the CIA vaults joshua adam schulte immunity to testify against julian....
as well as assange's avowed arch-enemy daniel dumb-shit borg, same deal...'solicting leaks' may be a big deal.
see, originally (iirc) they'd just been investigating schulte's laptop for porn...the the rest blossomed up.
now the indictment pdf filed may 23, 2019 is a mere 37 pages (aarrgh).
Yeah. I think this is the same thing Dick Cheney was charged
with for outing Valerie Plame.
"... that included the names of confidential sources, including people who risked their lives talking to the U.S. government.
“Assange thereby is alleged to have created grave and imminent risk to their lives and liberty,” Demers said.
Oh, that's right, DC did this plus he shot a man in the face and evaded police until he sobered up, and not a thing happened to him.
great satire;
thanks, i needed the chuckles. but the outing of valerie plame was a contest among the cast of players, wasn't it? richrd armitage via robert novak, scooter libby...and judith miller?
but score another one for general CIA david petraeus's (stand at attention and salute, please) 'pillow talk' with his lover. i've forgotten which classified nothings he'd whispered in her ear. he's still in prison, yes?
different stokes for different folks, and so on and so on and...
i'd read another report from wsws this morning on the sham at judge bairatser's magistrate court of injustice, and richard tyler has included a few more depressing and outrageous bits:
ah, well; that's enough. i should go work on the coup afoot in boliia against evo morales's election win for something more uplifting. another US color revolution seems to be brewing, not unlike he-crowns-himself-king juan guaido in VZ.
Thanks for the additional Info. It's important to shine a light
on this despicable situation.
welcome, and thank you
for the reminder of the cheney-whittington gambit, a variation on the fibonacci maneuver.
; )
This is excellent "poking around,"
Yes, I remember the allegation that Julian "encouraged" Chelsea, but as I recall, it was in response to a request that she had made of him. So it's not like he was actively spurring whistleblowers into action. As a publisher, they came to him. So the government is exaggerating, i.e., falsifying the truth.
Beautiful description of Wikileaks as "an intelligence agency of the people." Since the current political battle can be boiled down to a war between the establishment and the people, organizations like Wikileaks (and all investigative journalism) are on the front lines of this battle. So "the establishment vs. the people" can be accurately expressed as "lawlessness vs. the U.S. Constitution," or "MIC vs. democratic governance," or simply, a ruthless coup taking place right before our eyes. This concept needs to be shared widely with everyone we know. There is now so much evidence in support of it that I don't think the label "conspiracy theory" can fit.
However, it troubles me that this should be attributed to Trump, as many of us know that it began back in the 70s/80s with the Powell Memo and supply side economics, continued through the 90s with the demolition of the Democratic Party by Al From and Bill Clinton, culminating in the triumph of PNAC via 9/11. Trump may want to keep his secrets, but he doesn't seem to hate the idea of a free press. In fact, one of the platforms he ran on was the breaking up of Clinton's 1996 media monopoly, and he had a fine position paper on it which has mysteriously disappeared off the web. He complains about fake news, clumsily resorting to Twitter to communicate with the American people, and once upon a time he liked Wikileaks. I don't doubt that he's cooperating with the CIA-led effort to destroy Assange, but I do doubt that it can be called his effort. Maybe attributing it to Trump is just a shorthand way of saying, "the bad guys on top," or even "the accepted scapegoat." As long as people don't actually believe it started with Trump, because that assumption leaves us misinformed.
"Any territory in the world as subject to US law," is about as good a tip-off on the global (totalitarian) reach of this coup as any one could ask for. They aren't even trying to hide their true face from us, although I fear there is worse to come in that regard. That's why the sham trial, the sneering judge, the flippant disregard for what we used to call the rule of law.
As for the revelation of damaging information about real people, Julian was famous for his careful redacting of any such information ever getting out. He was meticulously responsible in that regard. Yes, I recall the it was the Guardian who let that stuff out, which is not surprising as the once-respectable Guardian is now a piece of shit wholly owned by the Deep State/CIA. Same for WaPo and NYTimes, but most of us know that. But yes they're laying the responsibility for it on Julian, which may very well have been the intention.
Lastly, I do believe that there is a bizarre little side-train to all this coup activity, particularly that which expresses itself through smear campaigns against Julian, Tulsi, Russia, Bernie, and even Trump -- and that is the fury of a woman scorned, a narcissist rejected, a Gollum denied his Precious. The Clintons have a lot of money, numerous high-powered connections, and some kind of dealings with the Epstein leftovers that make them even more dangerous. And on that note, I'd like to share a video that Tulsi sent out this morning --
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGBbaYeEUik]
Lurking in the wings is Hillary, like some terrifying bat hanging by her feet in a cavern below the DNC. A bat with theropod instincts. -- Fred Reed https://tinyurl.com/vgvuhcl
i admire your
understanding of what amerkia has become by bringing such a long historical narrative. i'd add sheldon wolin's positing in 2003: 'inverted totalitarianism', the wiki short hands in part:
, etc.
now i'm not able to speak to trump's liking for a freer media, as he campaigned on a lot of things he never did/portrayed. and of course i remember him tweeting his ♥ for wikileaks! nor can i speak to his being captured by the CIA borg as the power behind the throne, but i do think there have been several palace coups against boss tweet already, and there must be some reason he seems rather sanguine about it all. polling?
even (or maybe especially) given your last paragraph, i'll decline your offer to watch the video, albeit it you and others might dub what she says ad you've written as a 'coincidence theory', rather than a conspiracy theory. yes, tusli spoke truth to clinton (and good on her), and has won the hearts and minds of many, many alternative websites since. tulsi's gained so much praise, so many new followers that she could have paid for the amount of free advertising drone-assange-clinton gave her. sorry... but i do not trust her, nor any of the candidates (nor 'the squad'), given the disconnects between what they virtue-signal and how they vote.
and as it turns out re: bernie & whistleblowers? from RT.com:
thanks, laurel. p.s. n edit: nor do i want to further politicize this thread w/ another D candidate for prez, okay?