So I won't tell you what to do. But the bastards who support
HRC, who gave a speech as bad or worse than Trump to AIPAC,
deserve to be reminded for whom and for what they are voting.

period, let alone as an argument for why U.S. and other Western nations’ troops are invading and occupying their country.

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/11/22/headlines/poll_92_of_young_afghan...

Goes back to Pharoe.

Hell, Back to before him even ... back to the days before written history when homo sapiens were climbing out from underneath the glaciers and forming the first true agricultural society. 4 castes emerged - Priests', Warriors, Artisans, and Workers.

Which are still with us today. Perhaps in slightly differ forms - but still the one on top and in control use the same tactics to control the ones on the bottom.

Get the workers fighting among themselves so they don't see the shenanigans going on at the top to maintain the pyramid. Use those 2 classes in the middle to set up the game and enforce its rules. Rinse and repeat for 30,000 years.

Team USA Fuck Yeah!
Team Democrats Fuck Yeah!

Fuck Team Democrats, Yeah!

That way we can harass you, too, with our welcomes!

Thank's for posting it here. We all know what the problem is. We've been sold out, and the collective we can't or won't get its act together. Between the professional left and politicians, I don't know which is worse. The veal pen is alive a well.

Watched the whole thing- explains a lot about how the Dems became the party of "not the average guy/gal." And, it explains how we got HRC as the presumptive nominee. It is a sad commentary on the Dem. party.

here with one of the best interviewers around, Leonard Lopate on WNYC:

"How the Democrats Have Helped Wall Street, Not the Middle Class"

My only problem with Frank, and I've read What's The Matter With Kansas? and The Wrecking Ball, is that in a interview for Pity The Billionaire he was strangely a bit dismissive of OWS, and seemed to put more credence into the astro-turfed Tea Party douchebags, as a political movement. Otherwise I think his command of history and politics is right on. Wonder if like Bob Herbert and so many other journalists similarly he might have changed hs tune on OWS, to give it is proper and righteous due for utterly changing the conversation. Or as Herbert said, and I'm paraphrasing, it wasn't what Occupy has done for us it's that we didn't do more for Occupy.

You are right. Can't have endless war if you don't have endless enemies. Especially the ones that we created. From Al Quada in the 80's to the current ones in Syria to help us overthrow Assad. Including the same group of AQ we first created, then fought against during the Iraq war and now fighting alongside them in Syria. It a circular clusterfuck and it's not going to end until the last resource is raped from other people's lands.

I don't understand how people can't understand why the terrorists attacks countries. They have had their countries bombed and innocent civilians have been killed for decades. It's called blowback.
For some reason it's only called terrorism when people use suicide vests, planes or other types of bombs against us or the NATO countries that are bombing the countries in the Middle East, but it's called self defense when NATO countries use 500 lb bombs to kill them.
>

from the comments I read today on my local news website after the Brussels bombing, people here are afraid that ISIS is already in this country and the attacks are going to happen soon.
They were bitching about Obama letting in the refugees and don't realize that there's a two year vetting process before any of them are allowed in.
And they want the military to bomb them ‘back to the stone age’ no matter how many innocent civilians are killed.
Too many people have no idea that the US and its allies are the ones who are creating and funding the terrorists. Our Allie Saudi Arabia is one of the biggest financial supporter of the terrorists and the US doesn't not only tell them to stop funding them, it sells them weapons and jets. As well as other countries.
And Hillary's supporters don't give a shit that Bill made millions from giving speeches to those governments before Hillary's state department swooped in and sold them weapons and then those governments donated millions to their foundation. How that is legal or acceptable by our government is beyond me.

Yo sha, totally agree with your comment, and would like to take it to it's logical conclusion.

We are involved in War Markets. Thomas P. Barnett, in The Pentagon's New Map, a powerpoint presentation given to movers and shakers in government during the run up to the illegal invasion of Iraq, talks about how we are now financing our debt by exporting security. He literally highlighted these War Markets as both a military asset and funding stream for national debt.

He also talks of how the DoD's job is not to simply win wars, it's to "dream up the future of warfare and create the military to win it". "If you wanted to simply defend America, I could write that budget for $100B per year -- tomorrow (emphasis his).

Combine these two and I think you have a rather terrifying confluence.

Being brutally tortured and then murdered by being sodomiz d by a sword.
JFC! What type of person would laugh at this? And the woman who was interviewing her laughed too.
Sociopaths, IMO. And we can look forward to more of this if she's elected. And we are going to get Bill too.