Now that the Russia Hoax is behind us, this seems like a good time to shift into reality-based politics. It is the ideal way to understand why the elections will be steered down the same old cul de sacs, moving toward the same old outcomes with rampant misinformation and domestic propaganda littering the way. But eyes-wide-open politics can also reveal the occasional opportunity to nudge things in a different direction.

I consider Tulsi Gabbard to be a valuable candidate because she had direct physical experience of what US foreign policy looks like in action. She has a mindful and conscious way about her that is rare in politicians these days. I think she can honestly analyze how the American people have benefited from the widely scattered wars they are paying for. How their lives and their surroundings and their futures have been improved and enriched by the foreign chaos and death the US delivers to the world. How the steep increases in military spending have finally secured for the American People those human rights that have long been withheld from them — freedom from hunger, a complete and sustaining education, and the right to life; the right not to die from medical neglect. Those are the components of authentic Liberty

At the same time, I think it is pragmatic to keep an eye on the powerful cartel that has, for the past century, handpicked and groomed most of our Presidents, Secretaries of State, Secretaries of Defense, Secretaries of the Treasury, and Directors of the CIA.

The Council on Foreign Relations essentially runs this most lucrative part of the Federal Government. They build the transition teams, they populate the cabinet posts, they run the wars, and they design the policies of the future. For example, over the course of his campaign, Obama selected the ubiquitous Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR) as one of his top foreign policy advisors. Obama referred to Brzezinski as “somebody I have learned an immense amount from.” Presumably Brzezinski’s teachings included the world government he advocates.

For Treasury Secretary, Obama chose Timothy Geithner: Senior Fellow in International Economics at the CFR, Bilderberger, former head of the New York Federal Reserve, and former employee of both the IMF and Kissinger Associates. One doesn’t get more establishment than that! It is Geithner who would manage the bailout of Wall Street with taxpayer dollars. Assisting Geithner at Treasury in overseeing the auto industry bailout is fellow CFR member Stephen Rattner.

For Director of the National Economic Council — a U.S. government agency created by a Bill Clinton executive order — Obama selected Lawrence Summers (CFR, Bilderberger). Former Chief Economist at the World Bank, his last position was at the investment firm of D. E. Shaw & Co, where he earned $5.2 million in one year while working one day per week....

For Defense Secretary, Obama elected to continue with Bush pick Robert Gates (CFR, Bilderberger). During the Carter administration, Gates served as a special assistant to Zbigniew Brzezinski. In 2004, he co-chaired a CFR Task Force on Iran with Brzezinski.... Joining Gates in the Defense Department are fellow CFR members Michele Flournoy (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy), Jeh C. Johnson (Defense Department General Counsel), and Kathleen Hicks (Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans and Forces).

For Secretary of State, Obama chose Hillary Clinton, an attendee of the top-secret Bilderberger meetings. Hillary was not a CFR member, but husband Bill is. Her State Department was laden with CFR members, including James B. Steinberg (Deputy Secretary of State), William J. Burns (Under Secretary for Political Affairs), Susan Rice (U.S. Ambassador to the UN), Jacob J. Lew (Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources), Todd Stern (Special Envoy for Climate Change), and many others.

The Department of Homeland Security, which many Americans fear may turn our country into an Orwellian surveillance society, was conceived before 9/11 by a task force called the U.S. Commission on National Security, nine of whose 12 members belonged to the CFR. The administration of the department under Obama is particularly heavy with CFR members, including Janet Napolitano (Secretary), Jane Holl Lute (Deputy Secretary), Juliette Kayyem (Assistant Secretary, Office of Intergovernmental Programs), and Alan Bersin (Assistant Secretary, Office of International Affairs).

Thus the CFR continues to dominate our government’s key areas: finance, defense, foreign policy, and security. To this may be added various other Obama CFR appointees, such as Mona Sutphen (White House Deputy Chief of Staff), Paul Volcker (Chairman, Economic Recovery Advisory Board), Peter Cowhey, (Senior Counsel, Office of U.S. Trade Representative), and Eric Shinseki (Secretary of Veterans Affairs).

Every administration since Woodrow Wilson's looks just like this. The new administration in 2020 will look the same. More of the same.

The idea that Barack Obama became president from a “grass-roots” movement is illusory. American government policy continues to be largely dictated by the rich and the few. This is generally unknown to the public — not because it is a bizarre conspiracy theory, but because the same power elite who run our government, mega-banks, and multinational corporations also run the major media, as an inspection of the CFR membership roster would reveal.

.
What's interesting about this is that Tulsi Gabbard is one of those being groomed for an important role. So far, I've found two additional candidates similarly engaged: Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. All three of them are Members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

One more member of the CFR potentially running for President is Joe Biden. Many are encouraging his candidacy because of his foreign policy experience. He knows the drill inside and out. Here is Biden, in January 2018, briefing the Council on Foreign Relations about the Russia Hoax, while it was still a false flag operation. The CFR wants to know why the administration didn't tell the People they were under attack. As if. This particular word salad is a classic.
.

.

"Realistically, it is Bernie who stands the best chance for the Democratic nomination."

Is that realistic?

Bernie may have the best chance to get the highest vote in the Primaries. But that does not guarantee him the Democratic nomination. The Party has other plans. However, I do believe that the moment is ripe for an independent to swoop in without a party, and take the whole thing. There is a theory among some historians that we are at the endpoint of an 80 year political cycle. It's the third time in the nation's history that this cycle has repeated. At the end of an earlier cycle, the Whigs abruptly disappeared. The current pattern suggests that it's a time when new ideas can take hold. This calls for boldness, which has a certain genius and power of its own.