Text of March 22 email from Bernie Sanders.
Preface by HAW: I am posting this because I thought many or all of you would be as interested as I was in the information that it contains; and I know that some of you do not receive all of Sanders' emails. The only editorial comments that I will make about Sanders email are: (1) bolding the parts of Sanders' letter that I found especially informative; (2) remarking that I am not as optimistic as Sanders about what can be accomplished today by demonstrations and the like because 2019 world is very different from early 1960s world; and (3) proving some general background about Chicago, for those who may not know, as follows:
In the early Sixties, Chicago was, as it now is, the unofficial capitol of the Cook County Democratic political machine and was run by the then patriarch of the Daley family, Mayor Richard J. Daley. His children, one of whom was Obama's Chief of Staff for a time, seem to have succeeded to their father's mantle, such as it was. (I have always wondered whether the Chief of Staff position was a quid pro quo of some kind. Reportedly, when Obama first asked Rahm to be chief of staff, Rahm was reluctant because Rahm had been looking forward to positioning himself to run for Mayor of Chicago, supposedly his dream job. How better to convince him to become chief of staff than to get the Daley family on board? But that prior sentence is only my speculation.)
A civil rights activist has been quoted as saying that it was far more dangerous in the 1960s for civil rights protestors in Chicago than it was for civil rights protestors in the South. Whether or not that is true, I cannot say. I can only say that a journalist claimed a civil rights activist said that.
A bit later in the late Sixties, Chicago would host the infamous 1968 Democratic convention. The figurative buck for the chant, "The Whole World is Watching" and all it meant and implied, stopped with Democrat Daley. (I am guessing, the Democratic officials responsible for that Democratic did not attempt to intervene with Daly. If so, I would award part of the buck to them.
Of course, 1968 was also the year the world lost the incomparable economic and social justice giant, Democratic Socialist, Martin Luther King, Jr., as well as the man credited with keeping Indianapolis non-violent with his extemporaneous eulogy of Dr. King the night of King's death. Democrat Robert F. Kennedy. (RFK, then on his way to give a campaign speech in Indianapolis that night did not learn that King had died until RFK stepped off the plane in Indianapolis. Some members of his audience who were at the venue awaitng RFK's arrival were unaware of King's death until RFK began his eulogy. Still, they listened quietly.
As we all now know, RFK was also the first Attorney General of the U.S. to prosecute white against black violence with a dogged vengeance, as well as "warring" against Cosa Nostra and championing migrant workers, then led by Cesar Chavez, to whose movement RFK brought attention. Now, for the email.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Henry,
As some of you may know, I spent four years in Chicago in the early sixties as a student at the University of Chicago.
I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again. Those four years in Chicago were an extraordinary time for me and very much shaped my worldview and what I wanted to do with my life.
I should also say that while the University of Chicago was and is one of the great higher education institutions in this country, the truth is that I learned a lot more off campus than I did in classrooms.
As someone who came from a working class family, Chicago provided me, for the first time in my life, the opportunity to put two and two together in understanding how the real world worked. To understand what power was about in this country and who the people were who had that power. To learn a little bit about the causation of wars; to learn about racism and poverty and other social ills.
My years in Chicago gave me the opportunity to become involved in the civil rights movement, in the labor movement, in the peace movement and in electoral politics – experiences that significantly shaped my life.
As a student at the University of Chicago, I became involved with a civil rights organization called the Congress on Racial Equality, CORE, one of the leading civil rights groups of that period.
Now, some of you may not know this, but in the early 1960s, the University of Chicago owned segregated housing.
Being audacious young people, black and white, our chapter of CORE wanted to expose that unjust housing system. And so our CORE chapter sent white couples and black couples into the university-owned housing to pretend to look for an apartment. And you can guess what happened.
When the black couples showed up, there were just no apartments available. But a few hours later, when one of our white couples went in, somehow, mysteriously, they would have their choice of apartments.
After documenting this clear pattern of racial discrimination, the students in CORE demanded the university desegregate its housing. When they refused, we staged one of the first ever civil rights sit-ins in the North, forcing the university to acknowledge the situation and to consider serious policy changes.
While what we were doing here in Chicago at the time was significant, it came nowhere close to what young people our age were doing in the South in groups like SNCC, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. We were protesting – but they were putting their lives on the line, and some were getting killed.
In 1963 I, along with a busload of other students, took a 600-mile ride from Chicago to Washington, D.C. for what remains in my mind as an unforgettable day. We went to the nation’s capital to participate in the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, led by the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. – one of the great leaders in American history. I had the honor of being there to hear him deliver his now-famous “I Have A Dream” speech, and that was a day I have never forgotten.
That same year, we knew we had more to do in Chicago.
It had been nine years since the Brown vs Board of Education decision, but the school officials in Chicago had still refused to meaningfully desegregate the city’s public schools. Black schools were overcrowded and underfunded, with many students forced to share chairs and desks. Meanwhile, a report at the time found over 380 white classrooms were completely empty.
But instead of putting black children in those empty classrooms, the school officials decided to put old trailers on the black school grounds. We called them “Willis Wagons,” after the Chicago school superintendent of that time, Benjamin Willis.
These trailers were a monstrosity. Students would boil in the heat, and freeze in the cold. They were infested with rats. They were an insult and a disgrace – and the community fought back.
One day, many of us went to the spot where they planned to put the trailers. We were corralled by a police line and told not to cross that line.
Well, some of us did. And, of course, we were arrested and thrown into paddy wagons. We spent that night in jail, until we were bailed out the next morning by the NAACP.
The reason I tell you all of this is because my activities in Chicago taught me a very important lesson.
Whether it is the struggle against racism, or sexism, or homophobia, or corporate greed, or environmental devastation, or war and militarism or religious bigotry – real change never takes place from the top on down. It always takes place from the bottom on up when people, at the grassroots level, stand up and fight back. That's a lesson I learned in Chicago, and a lesson I've never forgotten.
Have we made progress in civil rights in this country since the early 1960s? No question about it. Do we still have a very long way to go to end the institutional racism which permeates almost every aspect of our society? Absolutely.
We have, in recent years, seen a major spike in hate crimes – against blacks, and Muslims, and Jews, and Latinos and other minorities.
And, over the last number of years, we have seen a terrible level of police violence against unarmed people of color – people killed by the police who should be alive today.
We know that African Americans are twice as likely to be arrested, and almost four times as likely to experience physical force in an encounter with the police.
Today, black men are sentenced to 19 percent more jail time for committing the exact same crime as white men, and African Americans are jailed at more than 5 times the rate of whites.
All of this and more is why we are finally going to bring about real criminal justice reform in this country. We are going to end the international embarrassment of having more people in jail than any other country on earth. Instead of spending $80 billion a year on jails and incarceration, we are going to invest in jobs and education for our young people. No more private prisons and detention centers. No more profiteering from locking people up. No more "war on drugs." No more keeping people in jail because they're too poor to afford cash bail.
And by the way, when we talk about criminal justice reform, we're going to change a system in which tens of thousands of Americans every year get criminal records for possessing marijuana, but not one major Wall Street executive went to jail for destroying our economy in 2008 as a result of their greed, recklessness and illegal behavior. No. They didn't go to jail. They got a trillion-dollar bailout.
Our campaign is about fundamentally ending the disparity of wealth and power in this country. But as we do that, we must speak out against the disparity within the disparity.
Today, the average black family has one-tenth the wealth of the average white family.
Today, the infant mortality rate in black communities is more than double the rate for white communities, and the death rates from cancer and almost every other disease is far higher for blacks. Black women are three and a half times more likely to die from pregnancy than white women.
Today, Flint, Michigan is still without new pipes for clean water, and there are 3,000 other Flint, Michigans across the country – neighborhoods with lead rates that were double those of Flint during the height of its crisis.
Today, redlining prevents black-owned businesses from getting loans, and predatory lending results in higher interest rates in the African American community.
Whether it is a broken criminal justice system, or massive disparities in the availability of financial services, or health disparities, or environmental disparities, or educational disparities – our job is to create a nation in which all people are treated equally. That is what we must do, and that is what we will do.
Brothers and sisters: we have an enormous amount of work in front of us and the path forward will not be easy.
But if we stand together believing in justice and human dignity, the truth is that there is nothing we cannot accomplish.
Let us go forward together.
In solidarity,
Bernie Sanders
Comments
I do applaud him.
Bernie's ethics, or morals, have always been in the right place, and no doubt will continue to be in the right place. There's a reason 20,000 people show up for his rallies, even now.
I've been getting texts from his campaign the last few weeks, asking me to contribute toward the aspiring goal of one million unique donors before the FCC filing deadline. It saddens me to realize that in 2015, I would have responded immediately -- but today, I hit "delete."
Why?
Not because I've lost faith in Bernie's vision. But after the DNC effectively stole almost $800, offered $27 at a time, from me that I couldn't afford, I simply can't vote for anyone running as a capital-D Democrat. If he's allowed to win the primary, which I highly doubt, and ultimately wins the general, They are going to eat him alive.
Which absolutely sucks. But it's where I'm at.
(Sorry if this harshes anyone's mellow; I'm all for voting for Bernie if that's your thing. As a constituent, I know of his core decency).
I see this email as claiming his creds with poc and
the left, no more and no less. I signed up for a recurring donation of $10.00 month, no more and no less. If we want money out of politics, we have to donate until and if public funding can be put into place. However, I'm not stupid, and I don't trust that the Obamabots and Pelosi won't steal the whole damn thing again.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
Agree.
Which honestly, Bernie doesn't need to do. He gains cred by what he stands for. But I think this is what happens when you hire seasoned operatives and work within the system.
We do need to support public funding; I feel we've already proven it can work with Bernie 1.0. Disappointed he's not using this to run as an independent.
On one point, I beg to differ.
For this 2016 Bernie donor, the reasons he very much does need to buff his cred revolve around his failure to confront the misappropriation of contributions intended for his campaign, the primary delegate hanky pinky and, most disturbing of all, his full throated endorsement of HRC, a despicable person that does not have a socialist bone in her body. Collectively these undigested bits of beef leave enough doubt about Bernie’s inability to stick to the principals he seems to have lived by in the company of establishment Democrats. He may yet win my vote again, but I’m unlikely to risk having my donations end up in the hands of any Democratic insiders, like creepy Joe Biden.
“ …and when we destroy nature, we diminish our capacity to sense the divine,and understand who God is, and what our own potential is and duties are as human beings.- RFK jr. 8/26/2024
Good point.
Last time he ran, he got a lot of specious criticism about
racism and sexism from Dembots, when his cred in both those areas, IMO, far exceeded Hillary's.* And one of the things to which the specious pointed was that he did not mention racial injustice and sexism at all or enough. I can understand his trying to address that this go round. ba
*As just one example: Some time after the Charleston Church Massacre on June 17, 2015, Hillary did what she does best, droned on about it as though she had personally written and signed both the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, in her early days, Hillary had supported Goldwater, who opposed, among other things, Martin Luther King Day. Worse, as First Lady of Arkansas, helped her husband lead Arkansas's month-long annual celebration of the treasonous, racist, slavery-loving Confederacy. We all know that was not Sander's background, from his college days on, if not earlier.
Before Hillary "courageously" spoke out against racism in 2015, while hoping the Southern states would prove her "firewall wall" against Sanders in the primary, however, Sanders had emailed his earliest donors, imploring them to donate to the fund that the Church had set up.
To put that into perspective, Hillary, then had above 95% name recognition in the US, nationwide. I don't remember Sanders nationwide figure at that time, but it was low--and mass media did its best to keep it that way. And Bernie was obviously not going to be the candidate to which the DNC and its biggest donors funned campaign donations. Moreover, Bernie had announced for President formally on May 26, barely three weeks before the massacre. And the shoddy DNC had followed his announcement immediately with an email trying to raise money for the DNC off Bernie's announcement. IOW, Bernie made a huge personal sacrifice, while Hillary only bloviated, as is his wont and hers, respectively.
Also, Hillary was born an upper middle WASP, and only went up from there, while Bernie was born an impecunious member of a minority whose family members had recently been gassed by Nazis. Yet, it wasn't #Hillarysowhite.
Anyway.....I can't blame him for being truthful about his lifelong cred in this area. And the email revealed to me a number of things that I'd not known about Chicago and the University of Chicago at that time. Additionally, it settled for me whether or not Bernie was in D.C. for the March for Jobs and Freedom. So, I enjoyed reading this email more than I have some of his other fundraising emailes.
Thank you for your candor.
Taking a position that might not be the most popular in a particular forum is not the easiest way to post. But, usually, it is evidence of integrity.
Time and again, we voters have been presented with difficult choices.
1. Vote for evil, whether greater or lesser; or
2. Vote for someone with not a prayer of winning, perhaps not a prayer of even making it onto the ballot; or
3. Don't vote.
And, yes, that sucks.
However, the options of honest politicians (as politicians go, of course) mirror those of voters, especially at the Presidential level: Run as a Democrat or a Republican or spend extreme amounts of time, money and ingenuity on basics like name recognition, media coverage and ballot access, plus the usual drains on the time and efforts of candidates, KNOWING ALL THE WHILE THAT YOU WILL CERTAINLY LOSE. Had Sanders run as a Green or an independent in 2916, we would have seen the biggest GOTV efforts by both Republicans and Democrats that this country has seen in a long time. Ditto, media complicity.
I'm not trying to change anyone's mind, one way or the other. I am just trying my best to present various kinds of considerations. And one of those considerations is that one of few ways Sanders (and his views) get any respect at all is how many people donate to him and how much he can raise (which says a lot about this country and its politicians and their accompliced media).
Re: Flint
Wait, they're still without safe water?
[VIDEO:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1F3pImyGAY]
Isn't this "personal" for Her and Dear Chelsea?
*barf*
I was going to post several videos about that; and I still
may. (I cut the links from the bottom of this OP and saved them in Drafts.)
However, the quality of the water has improved and millions of dollars of state and federal money has been spent and continues to be spent. I don't know if Hillary had anything to do with that, but, according to public information, improvement has occurred.
Nonetheless, many Flint residents have no confidence in the representations being made to them about the water--and who can blame them. Moreover, many problems still exist, including those that are not the fault of the batch of
high crimes criminalsFlint and Michigan politicians who knew the problem but let it continue, such as lead in pipes in various homes and even just lead solders.Well, he's definitely sticking to the script.
Didn't see anything about the 99 percent. Didn't see anything about Universal Health Care. No mention of ending the war. In fact, not a goddamn thing I supported him for the first time.
Just a lot of stuff sourced right from the SPLC, AIPAC, and ADL. And we all know how much I trust them these days.
So, ya know... I'll pass, thanks. Good luck with your campaign, Bernie, but I don't think I'll be giving you... ANYTHING.
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
"paddy wagon"
Why does he hate us Irish so?
I'm glad he is running. I don't expect him to win, but just to be able to slam Obamacare as a give-a-way to Insurance is good enough for me. I just wish he followed MLK a bit more and included our racist foreign policy as something that needs to change.
FWIW, if anything, Bernie, like Muhammed Ali, applied for
conscientious objector status during the Vietnam "Era." (Don't you just love the euphemistic names they used to come up with for unconsitutional, wars? Now, we don't bother.)
Mickt, I have no idea why my post about seeking
conscientious objector status got posted to you. I probably meant to post it on a different thread entirely, had too many windows and tabs open and messed up. I'm sorry.
The way I see it at this point
Anyone whose got a problem with Bernie....has got a problem.
The way I see it, anyone American who has no problem
at all with any US politician has at least one problem. So you and I have different opinions about that--and you know what they say about opinions.
However, having a problem with Bernie (or any other politician) does not mean that Bernie is a bad person or a bad politician. To the contrary, in my book, Bernie is more decent, more altruistically-motivated and more trustworthy than than 99.9% of the politicians in D.C., which doesn't mean he is perfect or that I have no problems whatever with him. It means only that he is a human being doing his best to accomplish as much as he can for people as purely as he can, while being forced to work within a very corrupt and closed system.
On a personal level, it may also mean that I have tried hard since 2008, to give up my need to pretend candidates I support (or have supported in the past) are perfect. Whether it's show business, politics, sports or whatever, we seem to need to create idols out humans and then worship our creations as though they are actually as perfect as we created them.