The tale of the tarmac OR the accidental coinkydink at Sky Harbor: Bubba and Lying Loretta

Submitted by Alligator Ed on Mon, 07/02/2018 - 10:40pm

Okay. What happens to the news-sated political junkies on Friday when the typical hide-it-in-plain- sight news dump occurs? It stays buried. Unless some intrepid soul digs deep into the ~~slime~~, er news to find juicy morsels. I prefer my morsels closer to the surface but, hey, you get it where you find it.

Grandkids? Golf? Brexit? Bullshit. Like his spouse, Wild Bill wouldn't know the truth unless it hit him in the puss--oops, bad word choice--face. The OIG report contains, deep within its bowels some fun stuff to read. If you like to read and have extra time with which you know not what to do, read from page 202 to 213 in the DOJ OIG June 2018 report.

This accidental meeting was as accidental as Bill Clinton's blow job by Monica "Devil with the Blue Dress" Lewinsky.

[page 203] Former President Clinton said that he recalled walking toward Lynch’s plane with his Chief of Staff, and that Lynch and her staff were “getting off the airplane.” He said that he greeted Lynch, who was on the plane, and Lynch stated, “[L]ook it’s a 100 degrees out there, come up and we’ll talk about our grandkids.” ...

The Deputy Chief of Staff said that she had “zero knowledge” that former President Clinton was there before she saw him approach the plane. She stated, “And if I had knowledge, I would not have been in that van. I would’ve...stayed on the plane and got everybody off.... No heads up or anything.” The Senior Counselor said she asked everyone in the van if they knew that former President Clinton was going to be there, and they all said no. The OPA Supervisor[Office of Public Affairs*] said that he later learned that former President Clinton’s Secret Service detail had contacted Lynch’s FBI security detail and let them know that the former President wanted to meet with Lynch.

*Heretofore, all of Bubba's intimate meetings with members of the opposite gender have taken place in private.

So now we have another wooden stake with which to drive into the heart of the Vampire (if he has one). Oh what a lovely bonfire this may yet turn out to be. There are lots of hidden treasures in the report but that might entail too much work for me. Some of you more ambitious communitarians may wish to dig deeper.

My spy took an intimate photo of Wild Bill and Lyin' Loretta in her plane.

Yes, the hole in dam is growing ever larger, the leaks ever stronger, indictments ever closer--or am I too optimistic?

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmQq6yLe2ww&frags=pl%2Cwn]

Tags:

Bubba

Lynch

tarmac

Vote

Comments

Submitted by Linda Wood on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 12:01am

Torture is not only illegal,

but information gained under torture is inadmissible in court, so I've always felt the Cheney/Bush people tortured terror suspects because they didn't want them to testify in court or to be prosecuted. Hence, we're not seeing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a courtroom. He was tortured X number of times.

Because I see things this way, every time I see Mueller or any other Deep State operative goof up an investigation or tamper with evidence or create an obvious conflict of interest, or even make it appear the investigation is being run by very partisan agents, and especially when that goof up is publicized all over the place, I feel like they're doing it on purpose.

Obviously Bill's meeting with Lynch was reported on by someone who was present. Did Bill tell Lynch what he wanted her to do? No doubt. Did she agree to do it? Probably. But what may also be happening is the typical Mueller-esque device of goofing up an investigation so that nothing can actually be adjudicated.

Submitted by Alligator Ed on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 12:14am

There are several witnesses to the tarmac meeting

@Linda Wood Amanda Renteria, who was denied entrance into Lynch's plane but will testify, when forced to, that this meeting was no fluke. Others include press officer for Lynch, Secret Service guards for Bubba, and Lynch's security.

Too bad, Loretta. You won't be getting a Supreme Court seat--but you might get bashed by a judicial gavel on your head.

Submitted by snoopydawg on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 1:05am

I've been copying this part of the IG report

and it's amazing that anyone would believe the two of them. I'll just post some of it unless people want me to post the longer version.

Bill Clinton's testimony

Asked about news reports that he purposely delayed his takeoff to speak to Lynch, former President Clinton stated:

"It’s absolutely not true. I literally didn’t know she was there until somebody told me she was there. And we looked out the window and it was really close and all of her staff was unloading, so I thought she’s about to get off and I’ll just go shake hands with her when she gets off. I don’t want her to think I’m afraid to shake hands with her because she’s the Attorney General."

He said that he discussed with his Chief of Staff whether he should say hello to Lynch, and that they debated whether he should do it because of “all the hoopla” in the campaign. He stated, “I just wanted to say hello to her and I thought it would look really crazy if we were living in [a] world [where] I couldn’t shake hands with the Attorney General you know when she was right there.”

Former President Clinton said that he did not consider that meeting with Lynch might impact the investigation into his wife’s use of a private email server. He stated, “Well what I didn’t want to do is to look like I was having some big huddle-up session with her you know.... [B]ecause it was a paranoid time, but...I knew what I believed to be the truth of that whole thing. It was after all my server and the FBI knew it was there and the Secret Service approved it coming in and she just used what was mine.” As a result, he said that he never thought the investigation “amounted to much frankly so I didn’t probably take it as seriously as maybe I might have in this unusual period[.]”

This is from his testimony to the IG

Former President Clinton also said that he was a little surprised by the criticism after his tarmac meeting with Lynch. He stated:

"[T]he mainstream media wasn’t as bad on that as they were on a lot of things, I thought, I think the ones that were criticizing me, I thought you know, I don’t know whether I’m more offended that they think I’m crooked or that they think I’m stupid. I’ve got an idea, I’ll do all these things they accuse me of doing in broad daylight in an airport in Phoenix when the whole world can see it in front of an Air Force One crew and I believe one of her security guards. It was an interesting proposition, but no we did not"

Or you just thought that you would get away with meeting with the person who was overseeing the investigation into your wife's mishandling classified information and letting her private email server get hacked. At least twice.

—

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

Submitted by Dr. John Carpenter on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 9:33am

Slick is so transparent.

@snoopydawg Want to remove any doubts Slick did what he's being accused of? If he makes the indignant, slightly hurt, "how dare people accuse me of this thing all signs point to me having done!" statement, there's almost a 100% certainty the accusations are true.

and it's amazing that anyone would believe the two of them. I'll just post some of it unless people want me to post the longer version.

Bill Clinton's testimony

Asked about news reports that he purposely delayed his takeoff to speak to Lynch, former President Clinton stated:

"It’s absolutely not true. I literally didn’t know she was there until somebody told me she was there. And we looked out the window and it was really close and all of her staff was unloading, so I thought she’s about to get off and I’ll just go shake hands with her when she gets off. I don’t want her to think I’m afraid to shake hands with her because she’s the Attorney General."

He said that he discussed with his Chief of Staff whether he should say hello to Lynch, and that they debated whether he should do it because of “all the hoopla” in the campaign. He stated, “I just wanted to say hello to her and I thought it would look really crazy if we were living in [a] world [where] I couldn’t shake hands with the Attorney General you know when she was right there.”

Former President Clinton said that he did not consider that meeting with Lynch might impact the investigation into his wife’s use of a private email server. He stated, “Well what I didn’t want to do is to look like I was having some big huddle-up session with her you know.... [B]ecause it was a paranoid time, but...I knew what I believed to be the truth of that whole thing. It was after all my server and the FBI knew it was there and the Secret Service approved it coming in and she just used what was mine.” As a result, he said that he never thought the investigation “amounted to much frankly so I didn’t probably take it as seriously as maybe I might have in this unusual period[.]”

This is from his testimony to the IG

Former President Clinton also said that he was a little surprised by the criticism after his tarmac meeting with Lynch. He stated:

"[T]he mainstream media wasn’t as bad on that as they were on a lot of things, I thought, I think the ones that were criticizing me, I thought you know, I don’t know whether I’m more offended that they think I’m crooked or that they think I’m stupid. I’ve got an idea, I’ll do all these things they accuse me of doing in broad daylight in an airport in Phoenix when the whole world can see it in front of an Air Force One crew and I believe one of her security guards. It was an interesting proposition, but no we did not"

Or you just thought that you would get away with meeting with the person who was overseeing the investigation into your wife's mishandling classified information and letting her private email server get hacked. At least twice.

—

Idolizing a politician is like believing the stripper really likes you.

Submitted by wendy davis on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 10:49am

fixed it.

@snoopydawg

"It was an interesting proposition she made me, but no we did not have sex."

and it's amazing that anyone would believe the two of them. I'll just post some of it unless people want me to post the longer version.

Bill Clinton's testimony

Asked about news reports that he purposely delayed his takeoff to speak to Lynch, former President Clinton stated:

"It’s absolutely not true. I literally didn’t know she was there until somebody told me she was there. And we looked out the window and it was really close and all of her staff was unloading, so I thought she’s about to get off and I’ll just go shake hands with her when she gets off. I don’t want her to think I’m afraid to shake hands with her because she’s the Attorney General."

He said that he discussed with his Chief of Staff whether he should say hello to Lynch, and that they debated whether he should do it because of “all the hoopla” in the campaign. He stated, “I just wanted to say hello to her and I thought it would look really crazy if we were living in [a] world [where] I couldn’t shake hands with the Attorney General you know when she was right there.”

Former President Clinton said that he did not consider that meeting with Lynch might impact the investigation into his wife’s use of a private email server. He stated, “Well what I didn’t want to do is to look like I was having some big huddle-up session with her you know.... [B]ecause it was a paranoid time, but...I knew what I believed to be the truth of that whole thing. It was after all my server and the FBI knew it was there and the Secret Service approved it coming in and she just used what was mine.” As a result, he said that he never thought the investigation “amounted to much frankly so I didn’t probably take it as seriously as maybe I might have in this unusual period[.]”

This is from his testimony to the IG

Former President Clinton also said that he was a little surprised by the criticism after his tarmac meeting with Lynch. He stated:

"[T]he mainstream media wasn’t as bad on that as they were on a lot of things, I thought, I think the ones that were criticizing me, I thought you know, I don’t know whether I’m more offended that they think I’m crooked or that they think I’m stupid. I’ve got an idea, I’ll do all these things they accuse me of doing in broad daylight in an airport in Phoenix when the whole world can see it in front of an Air Force One crew and I believe one of her security guards. It was an interesting proposition, but no we did not"

Or you just thought that you would get away with meeting with the person who was overseeing the investigation into your wife's mishandling classified information and letting her private email server get hacked. At least twice.

Submitted by gulfgal98 on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 12:57pm

Excellent comment here and below

@snoopydawg @snoopydawg Thank you for the links.

I have long felt that Lynch is the key to linking Obama to all of this. Will they go down? I doubt it because the powers behind them are far too powerful to let that happen.

However, there is more than enough in the first two IG reports (on McCabe and Comey) already released to finger Lynch for numerous misdeeds. I believe that I read somewhere that there will be an IG report addressing Lynch coming out in the future. Aunt Loretta is already looking to be in mucho agua caliente.

and it's amazing that anyone would believe the two of them. I'll just post some of it unless people want me to post the longer version.

Bill Clinton's testimony

Asked about news reports that he purposely delayed his takeoff to speak to Lynch, former President Clinton stated:

"It’s absolutely not true. I literally didn’t know she was there until somebody told me she was there. And we looked out the window and it was really close and all of her staff was unloading, so I thought she’s about to get off and I’ll just go shake hands with her when she gets off. I don’t want her to think I’m afraid to shake hands with her because she’s the Attorney General."

He said that he discussed with his Chief of Staff whether he should say hello to Lynch, and that they debated whether he should do it because of “all the hoopla” in the campaign. He stated, “I just wanted to say hello to her and I thought it would look really crazy if we were living in [a] world [where] I couldn’t shake hands with the Attorney General you know when she was right there.”

Former President Clinton said that he did not consider that meeting with Lynch might impact the investigation into his wife’s use of a private email server. He stated, “Well what I didn’t want to do is to look like I was having some big huddle-up session with her you know.... [B]ecause it was a paranoid time, but...I knew what I believed to be the truth of that whole thing. It was after all my server and the FBI knew it was there and the Secret Service approved it coming in and she just used what was mine.” As a result, he said that he never thought the investigation “amounted to much frankly so I didn’t probably take it as seriously as maybe I might have in this unusual period[.]”

This is from his testimony to the IG

Former President Clinton also said that he was a little surprised by the criticism after his tarmac meeting with Lynch. He stated:

"[T]he mainstream media wasn’t as bad on that as they were on a lot of things, I thought, I think the ones that were criticizing me, I thought you know, I don’t know whether I’m more offended that they think I’m crooked or that they think I’m stupid. I’ve got an idea, I’ll do all these things they accuse me of doing in broad daylight in an airport in Phoenix when the whole world can see it in front of an Air Force One crew and I believe one of her security guards. It was an interesting proposition, but no we did not"

Or you just thought that you would get away with meeting with the person who was overseeing the investigation into your wife's mishandling classified information and letting her private email server get hacked. At least twice.

—

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

Submitted by lizzyh7 on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 3:59pm

It's quite obviously a good thing

@snoopydawg this guy was disbarred. I'm not a lawyer but to say he "didn't want it to look" like it did shows extreme incompetence, especially with all the "hoopla" going on. But of course, they thought they'd get away with it. What a weasel.

and it's amazing that anyone would believe the two of them. I'll just post some of it unless people want me to post the longer version.

Bill Clinton's testimony

Asked about news reports that he purposely delayed his takeoff to speak to Lynch, former President Clinton stated:

"It’s absolutely not true. I literally didn’t know she was there until somebody told me she was there. And we looked out the window and it was really close and all of her staff was unloading, so I thought she’s about to get off and I’ll just go shake hands with her when she gets off. I don’t want her to think I’m afraid to shake hands with her because she’s the Attorney General."

He said that he discussed with his Chief of Staff whether he should say hello to Lynch, and that they debated whether he should do it because of “all the hoopla” in the campaign. He stated, “I just wanted to say hello to her and I thought it would look really crazy if we were living in [a] world [where] I couldn’t shake hands with the Attorney General you know when she was right there.”

Former President Clinton said that he did not consider that meeting with Lynch might impact the investigation into his wife’s use of a private email server. He stated, “Well what I didn’t want to do is to look like I was having some big huddle-up session with her you know.... [B]ecause it was a paranoid time, but...I knew what I believed to be the truth of that whole thing. It was after all my server and the FBI knew it was there and the Secret Service approved it coming in and she just used what was mine.” As a result, he said that he never thought the investigation “amounted to much frankly so I didn’t probably take it as seriously as maybe I might have in this unusual period[.]”

This is from his testimony to the IG

Former President Clinton also said that he was a little surprised by the criticism after his tarmac meeting with Lynch. He stated:

"[T]he mainstream media wasn’t as bad on that as they were on a lot of things, I thought, I think the ones that were criticizing me, I thought you know, I don’t know whether I’m more offended that they think I’m crooked or that they think I’m stupid. I’ve got an idea, I’ll do all these things they accuse me of doing in broad daylight in an airport in Phoenix when the whole world can see it in front of an Air Force One crew and I believe one of her security guards. It was an interesting proposition, but no we did not"

Or you just thought that you would get away with meeting with the person who was overseeing the investigation into your wife's mishandling classified information and letting her private email server get hacked. At least twice.

—

Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur

Submitted by snoopydawg on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 2:54am

I posted this in Amanda's essay on this

Why this didn't get more attention when it was written is baffling. The Post accused Lynch of interfering with the FBI investigation into Hillary's private email server and right then she should have been charged and had to suspend her campaign. How high did that go? What did Obama know and when did he find out about it?

Grassley, DiFi, Graham and Whitehouse letter to Loretta Lynch

On May 24, 2017, The Washington Post reported that in early March 2016 the FBI had received "what was described as a Russian intelligence document" that "cited a supposed email describing how then-Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch had privately assured someone in the Clinton campaign that the email investigation would not push too deeply into the matter."4 More specifically, the Russian intelligence document reportedly "referred to an email supposedly written by the then-chair ofthe Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and sent to Leonard Benardo, an official with the Open Society Foundations."5 According to the article: "[i]n the supposed email, Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in private communication with a senior Clinton campaign staffer named Amanda Renteria during the campaign. The document indicated Lynch had told Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far ...."

But wait, is there more? I can't verify this website, but the information came from the recent congressional hearings into the IG report into the FBI's investigation into Her's private email server. However the information came from unverified sources so there's that to consider.

Here's One Unverified File the Feds Won't Leak: About Loretta Lynch

The FBI had little problem leaking “unverified" dirt from Russian sources on Donald Trump and his campaign aides – and even basing FISA wiretaps on it. But according to the Justice Department’s inspector general, the bureau is refusing to allow even members of Congress with top security clearance to see intercepted material alleging political interference by President Obama’s attorney general, Loretta Lynch.

That material – which has been outlined in press reports – consists of unverified accounts intercepted from putative Russian sources in which the head of the Democratic National Committee allegedly implicates the Hillary Clinton campaign and Lynch in a secret deal to fix the Clinton email investigation.

Read the rest of the article for further clarification on this. But taking this along with what Amanda wrote, I'm still thinking that the investigation stunk to high heaven. The truth is that Hillary did nothing to protect classified information from being hacked which the FBI has said it was. Twice at least.

Loretta has never been questioned under oath about this juicy news. Mueller gave lots of people on Hillary's staff immunity and then never questioned them about anything. One prosecutor said that one of the reasons for giving people immunity is to then ask them questions to get to the bigger fish. That Mueller never did that shows me that his investigation was bogus from the get go. But hopefully Huber will eventually get to ask Mueller about this.

Amanda's essay

—

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

Submitted by Alligator Ed on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 2:06am

Well stated, snoopy--believe those rats? Not ever.

@snoopydawg The only truthful thing Bubba ever said was that he was a "horny dog".

Can't wait for Horowitz's exciting next installment. We'll see what gets buried within it.

Why this didn't get more attention when it was written is baffling. The Post accused Lynch of interfering with the FBI investigation into Hillary's private email server and right then she should have been charged and had to suspend her campaign. How high did that go? What did Obama know and when did he find out about it?

Grassley, DiFi, Graham and Whitehouse letter to Loretta Lynch

On May 24, 2017, The Washington Post reported that in early March 2016 the FBI had received "what was described as a Russian intelligence document" that "cited a supposed email describing how then-Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch had privately assured someone in the Clinton campaign that the email investigation would not push too deeply into the matter."4 More specifically, the Russian intelligence document reportedly "referred to an email supposedly written by the then-chair ofthe Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and sent to Leonard Benardo, an official with the Open Society Foundations."5 According to the article: "[i]n the supposed email, Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in private communication with a senior Clinton campaign staffer named Amanda Renteria during the campaign. The document indicated Lynch had told Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far ...."

But wait, is there more? I can't verify this website, but the information came from the recent congressional hearings into the IG report into the FBI's investigation into Her's private email server. However the information came from unverified sources so there's that to consider.

Here's One Unverified File the Feds Won't Leak: About Loretta Lynch

The FBI had little problem leaking “unverified" dirt from Russian sources on Donald Trump and his campaign aides – and even basing FISA wiretaps on it. But according to the Justice Department’s inspector general, the bureau is refusing to allow even members of Congress with top security clearance to see intercepted material alleging political interference by President Obama’s attorney general, Loretta Lynch.

That material – which has been outlined in press reports – consists of unverified accounts intercepted from putative Russian sources in which the head of the Democratic National Committee allegedly implicates the Hillary Clinton campaign and Lynch in a secret deal to fix the Clinton email investigation.

Read the rest of the article for further clarification on this. But taking this along with what Amanda wrote, I'm still thinking that the investigation stunk to high heaven. The truth is that Hillary did nothing to protect classified information from being hacked which the FBI has said it was. Twice at least.

Loretta has never been questioned under oath about this juicy news. Mueller gave lots of people on Hillary's staff immunity and then never questioned them about anything. One prosecutor said that one of the reasons for giving people immunity is to then ask them questions to get to the bigger fish. That Mueller never did that shows me that his investigation was bogus from the get go. But hopefully Huber will eventually get to ask Mueller about this.

Amanda's essay

Submitted by The Voice In th... on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 1:03pm

What I don't understand is -

@snoopydawg why Trump's AG is not prosecuting this. At the very least to get the heat off of himself.

Is sessions incompetent? Or just waiting until closer to Fall? Like slow news August?

Why this didn't get more attention when it was written is baffling. The Post accused Lynch of interfering with the FBI investigation into Hillary's private email server and right then she should have been charged and had to suspend her campaign. How high did that go? What did Obama know and when did he find out about it?

Grassley, DiFi, Graham and Whitehouse letter to Loretta Lynch

On May 24, 2017, The Washington Post reported that in early March 2016 the FBI had received "what was described as a Russian intelligence document" that "cited a supposed email describing how then-Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch had privately assured someone in the Clinton campaign that the email investigation would not push too deeply into the matter."4 More specifically, the Russian intelligence document reportedly "referred to an email supposedly written by the then-chair ofthe Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and sent to Leonard Benardo, an official with the Open Society Foundations."5 According to the article: "[i]n the supposed email, Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in private communication with a senior Clinton campaign staffer named Amanda Renteria during the campaign. The document indicated Lynch had told Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far ...."

But wait, is there more? I can't verify this website, but the information came from the recent congressional hearings into the IG report into the FBI's investigation into Her's private email server. However the information came from unverified sources so there's that to consider.

Here's One Unverified File the Feds Won't Leak: About Loretta Lynch

The FBI had little problem leaking “unverified" dirt from Russian sources on Donald Trump and his campaign aides – and even basing FISA wiretaps on it. But according to the Justice Department’s inspector general, the bureau is refusing to allow even members of Congress with top security clearance to see intercepted material alleging political interference by President Obama’s attorney general, Loretta Lynch.

That material – which has been outlined in press reports – consists of unverified accounts intercepted from putative Russian sources in which the head of the Democratic National Committee allegedly implicates the Hillary Clinton campaign and Lynch in a secret deal to fix the Clinton email investigation.

Read the rest of the article for further clarification on this. But taking this along with what Amanda wrote, I'm still thinking that the investigation stunk to high heaven. The truth is that Hillary did nothing to protect classified information from being hacked which the FBI has said it was. Twice at least.

Loretta has never been questioned under oath about this juicy news. Mueller gave lots of people on Hillary's staff immunity and then never questioned them about anything. One prosecutor said that one of the reasons for giving people immunity is to then ask them questions to get to the bigger fish. That Mueller never did that shows me that his investigation was bogus from the get go. But hopefully Huber will eventually get to ask Mueller about this.

Amanda's essay

—

I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.

Submitted by snoopydawg on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 4:38pm

Sessions chose Huber and Horowitz to investigate this

@The Voice In the Wilderness

instead of calling for a special council which I thought would have been the best way to handle it.
Remember Jonathan Turley from the Olbermann days? Here's his take on this.

Turley: Sessions’ Appointing Utah Federal Prosecutor Much Better for Trump than 2nd Special Counsel

Professor Jonathan Turley, a top national legal expert on government investigations, commented on Thursday about Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ decision to bring in U.S. Attorney John Huber. Turley called it “brilliant”to combine all the powers of the U.S. Department of Justice’s inspector general with a prosecutor who can bring charges, seek indictments, and get results for President Trump far more quickly than a second special counsel.

Unfortunately he has only talked about this on Breitbart, but I can't fault him for talking to the few sites that will listen to him. The main stream media are staying as far away from this as they can. It's interesting that just as the IG report was released the media started talking about children immigrants who had been being separated from their parents for 6 weeks without anyone mentioning it. Ahh, the way the elites are protected by the media.

—

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

Submitted by Song of the lark on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 7:25am

Nothing to see here.

In fact it's the past. It doesn't exist anymore.

Submitted by jorogo on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 8:00am

I get what slick Willy did there,

and confess to having done it myself. It’s all optics. It only takes the appearance of interference to provoke chaos and thus, cast doubt onto proceedings.

My neighbors down the road have a bad habit of locking their hound in a cage for hours when they get home, thus creating a barking (or whatever sound hounds make) annoyance for me, and for others who prefer to suffer silently, but without actually violating any law or ordinance. Fed up, I took a walk and just stood in the road in front of their house.

They reacted as anticipated, freaked out and called the Sheriff. After my “discussion” with the deputy, and determining that nobody broke any law, the upshot optic was that I was a curious observer, and they were unnecessarily reactionary, paranoid, insensitive to disturbing the neighborhood, and stupidly announcing their comings and goings through their “security” dog’s barking patterns. “I’ll go back and let them know that” was his parting comment. The resulting sudden and long-lasting quiet in the neighborhood has been stunning. They conceded their regular process.

All this required nothing more than my presence and a plausable narrative, lies unnecessary. And I’m just an amateur in this field. Slick Willy only had to be there to sow chaos; to lie or commit any conflict of interest was a totally unnecessary risk, and he sure as shit knows that.

—

"If I sit silently, I have sinned." - Mossadegh

Submitted by Alligator Ed on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 8:09am

It was more than "just being there"

@jorogo

Submitted by Snode on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 8:23am

I used to wonder why Obama

was reluctant to prosecute Bush2's administration for criminal actions. It's hard to investigate crimes when you are part of the criminal process. No wonder dems are so into bipartisanship. Clintons are a whole level above criminal. Every thing they say is a lie.

Submitted by snoopydawg on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 5:30pm

Abed Awan stole office equipment and got away with it

DEM CHIEF OF STAFF TRIED TO EXPOSE SUSPECTED THEFT RING ON CAPITOL HILL, WAS MET WITH RESISTANCE
A top aide to Democrat Rep. Yvette Clarke told Capitol Hill investigators she believed the New York congresswoman’s chief of staff, Shelley Davis, was working with IT aide Abid Awan to steal equipment from the congressional office.

Rep. Yvette Clarke’s deputy chief of staff came into the office on a Saturday in December 2015 and caught the New York Democrat’s part-time IT aide, Abid Awan, rummaging through the congresswoman’s work area with new iPods and other equipment strewn around the room, according to a House document and interviews with Hill staff.

Wendy Anderson told Abid to get out of the office, the document said. She told Capitol Hill investigators that she soon suspected Clarke’s chief of staff, Shelley Davis, was working with Abid on a theft scheme, multiple House staffers with knowledge of the situation told The Daily Caller News Foundation. They also said that Anderson pushed for Abid’s firing.

But Clarke did not fire Abid until six months after the congresswoman formally acknowledged that $120,000 in equipment was missing, records show — not until after House investigators independently announced a review that would potentially catch financial discrepancies. Even then, Anderson told investigators she believed another top staffer in Clarke’s office was subverting their efforts, a House staffer with knowledge of the investigation said.

What happened with that investigation? Or did it even happen? The Awans were busy doing all kinds of nefarious things during the time they got to have access to many congress members. Anyone else who did half the crap they did would have been arrested immediately and charged for it. This is getting curiouser and curiouser.

—

Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.

Submitted by lotlizard on Tue, 07/03/2018 - 11:25pm