(1) There was only one reporter there. Otherwise, we may have not known about this meeting. So who tipped off the reporter to be at the airport when the meeting occurred?

(2) Could the meeting have involved more than just Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch? Could there have been another party (ies) involved via phone?

(3) Could this meeting have been about quashing the Clinton email investigation with a quid pro quo Supreme Court appointment after Her won?

Inquiring minds want to know because I believe that Loretta Lynch is the key to blowing this whole thing apart involving not only the Clintons, but perhaps even higher up. And yes, this is conspiracy theory, but in this case, there was something far more than meets the eye with this meeting.

The fact that Clinton's SS agents told Lynch's detail that Bill Clinton was coming onto her plane means nothing unless you believe that the SS was a knowing party to what was going to be discussed. Personally, I see the SS was just doing its job on both ends by simply coordinating their coverage of the two dignitaries that they were charged with protecting.

should have taken over the case. Bill knew that he should not have met with the attorney overseeing his wife's investigation. Couldn't he have been charged for obstruction or something? People thought that the FBI covered up Her's crimes before the meeting came to light, but after the IG report was released there is no doubt in my mind that they did.

-Lynch telling Comey to refer to the investigation as a matter.
-Changing Comey's wording in the report from "grossly negligent" to a lesser charge so that she -wouldn't be prosecuted.
-Comey giving Her's staff immunity and then not asking them any questions.
-Not putting Her under oath or recording the conversation or Comey himself asking the questions.
-Letting Cheryl Mills be Her's attorney when she was also involved as a person of interest in the investigation.
-And countless other crap that they did just to make sure she wasn't charged.

But even what Comey did say about her using the server should have been enough to bring charges against her. No one else would have gotten off for doing that.

Good job finding stuff, Amanda. Keep it up!

For two people who have spent their entire lives jerking around the legal system and the American public, wouldn’t you think they’d be better at it than they are?

There are many sayings for this, I like this one

"if it smells like shit looks like shit you better believe its shit"

and when it comes to the grifters no theory is a conspiracy

Lynch, for her part, has never been asked directly and under oath by Congress about the allegation in the document. But in a July 2016 testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, she swore, “I have not spoken to anyone on either the [Clinton] campaign or transition or any staff members affiliated with them.”

On Thursday, Grassley announced he wants to subpoena Lynch to testify before his committee about her role in the Clinton email probe. But he said he has to first convince the top Democrat on the panel, Dianne Feinstein, who seems disinclined to support issuing a subpoena. “The ranking member refused to agree to compel” Lynch to testify, Grassley said in a statement earlier in the week.

DiFi has refused to have one other person testify to congress about this, but I don't remember who it is. What's the matter, Di, why are you afraid of letting the truth come out? Afraid it will further derail Russia Gate?