Clearly the UK Labour leader has gone round the bend.
Not just once, but twice, he's asked for evidence before dropping bombs and killing lots of people.
He first had the audacity of asking for proof on the spy poisoning.

Jeremy Corbyn wants to see "incontrovertible evidence" before blaming Russia for the poisoning of an ex-spy and his daughter in Salisbury.
The Labour leader said it was "clear" the nerve agent used was "very similar" to those made in Russia - and Moscow should be challenged about this - but "absolute" proof was still needed.

OK, sure, scientists at the Porton Down military research facility can't prove where the poison came from. Sure, Boris Johnson, Britain's foreign secretary, lied about it.
Sure, Ben Wallace, the security minister, has refused to share information with the leader of the opposition party.
But that doesn't mean Corbyn shouldn't simply trust that Russia is guilty.

As outrageous as that is, Corbyn took it one step further than that yesterday.

Jeremy Corbyn was lashed by MPs on his own side for 'turning a blind eye' to the use of chemical weapons tonight.
The Labour leader was jeered by the Commons as he claimed again Theresa May was being led by Donald Trump and the Syrian regime might not be to blame for the devastating chemical attack in Douma.
Mrs May was left rolling her eyes in response to Mr Corbyn.
...In his speech, Mr Corbyn described the chemical attack in Douma as 'horrific' but faced shouts of 'shame' from Tory MPs as he told the Commons: 'This statement serves as a reminder that the Prime Minister is accountable to this Parliament, not to the whims of the US President.
'We clearly need a War Powers Act in this country to transform a now broken convention into a legal obligation.
'Her predecessor came to this House to seek authority for military action in Libya and in Syria in 2015, and the House had a vote over Iraq in 2003.
'There is no more serious issue than the life and death matters of military action. It is right that Parliament has the power to support or stop the Government from taking planned military action.'

Shame is right. How dare he demand not just evidence, but public debate before killing countless civilians.
It's a good thing we know better than that in America.

The Daily Mail has rightly determined that asking for evidence is the exact same thing as being a "Kremlin stooge despises everything our troops stand for".

BBC has went and asked the question of: Has Jeremy Corbyn ever supported a war?

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has spent his life campaigning for peace and speaking out against military action.
He was one of the UK's leading campaigners against the 2003 Iraq war - and also voted against British involvement in military action in Afghanistan and Libya.
In fact, he has voted against every military action proposed by the UK government during his 35 years in Parliament

Not a single war? Not Iraq. Not Libya. Not Syria. How horrible.
No serious politician opposes war and the mass killing of civilians - for humanitarian reasons, of course. Because if we don't kill those civilians, something terrible might happen to them.

And then to top it off, Corbyn suggested that Britain should evolve beyond a hereditary monarchy.

Obviously the guy is insane.