Telling her heinous to go "knit" is a definite no no. -g-
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/12/200pm-water-cooler-12282017.html
Me thinks her heinous still thinks it's her turn.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvvFjC2xsH4]
The Twitter thread:
The Vanity Fair Cave: “Vanity Fair sorry for suggesting Hillary Clinton ‘knit'” [BBC]. Vanity Fair is quite right to apologize. What Hillary Clinton ought to be doing is spattering the glass ceiling with the blood of faraway brown children. For shame, Vanity Fair! For shame!
UPDATE Quick thoughts on the Vanity Fair flap:
1) Vanity Fair should have backed up its new (woman) editor, Radhika Jones, instead of caving to a mob of soi-disant resistors inflamed by Clinton enforcers on social media. Here is a Clintonite enforcer in action:
Tom Watson
✔
@tomwatson
1. I have some serious advice for @radhikajones, the brand new editor of @vanityfair, who took over from the legendary Graydon Carter and stepped immediately into a major scandal over a stupid sexist video.
8:42 AM - Dec 27, 2017
366 366 Replies 574 574 Retweets 1,405 1,405 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
What Watson is doing, this time on the national stage, is just what Neera Tanden did a year ago when she got Matt Bruenig fired. If getting people fired for the views they express — I’m gonna say “modulo Nazis,” here — isn’t McCarthyism, I don’t know what is. I mean, come on. I guess there’s one thing liberals just aren’t liberal about, and that’s insulting royalty, eh?
2) It may be that one reason Clinton’s enforcers were so concerned to attack the video — which was, all things considered, rather gentle — was that so many of the participants in the video (one of whom, at least, was doxed) were young women; watching Clintonites fat-shaming one such women was a delicious irony. The idea that Clinton no longer appeals to young women would no doubt be deeply threatening to Clintonites and, apparently, needed to be dealt with at once, firmly.
3) I won’t go so far as to say “She’s running,” but Clinton is certainly maintaining an apparatus of media enforcement that would suggest she is. It also seems highly likely to me that Clinton has not even reached the “acceptance” stage in dealing with her loss in 2016, that the sycophants who surround her — whose livelihoods depend on her continued political prominence — are telling her that she could run again and win, and that she believes them. Of course, the split in the Democrat Party this would cause isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
4) You should really go poke through that thread if you want to get insight into the mindset of Clinton’s current, remaining supporters. It’s really hard for me to process this. It’s like watching one of those movies where humans turn into pod people. Which is a horrible trope, and now I’m dehumanizing (unless, of course, it’s all-too-human to turn into a pod person). Help!
5) Twitter failed technically — see the highlights — in serving the public that was hashing this issue out. You’d think that a conversation with “too many replies’ would be important to represent. Do better, Jack.
NOTE * I’ve seen the tweets, too slackish to find them. Read the thread, you’ll see plenty.
Comments
Thanks, ggersh
I read it from your comment in the other essay. The replies are hilarious, but so are the comments in the article.
Question: "How do you get anyone elected as President of the United States?" Answer: "Have them run against Hillary Clinton"
https://mobile.twitter.com/VanityFair/status/944613785171501056
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.
~Hannah Arendt
ahhhhhh haha good one.
@MrWebster
The Great UnBrainWashed.
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
rimshot n/t
the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.
Joke, Part II
Question: "How do you get the most unqualified president in a lifetime re-elected as President of the United States?" Answer: "Have him run against Hillary Clinton, again"
Capitalism has always been the rule of the people by the oligarchs. You only have two choices, eliminate them or restrict their power.
one word....that's all they needed
men don't knit? Who's being sexist?
There's at least one bloke
In Mrs B's knitting group. He's been over here several times.
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
sounds like a good
pickup joint,
Although that might be a tad sexist.
the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.
Rosie Grier did.
Idolizing a politician is like believing the stripper really likes you.
My father knitted on UK trains in the 1950s
It helped that his mother (who had a masters in botany) was insanely good at it.
We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg
One quibble
it's not pod people, it's the People's Temple.
On to Biden since 1973
Well, I understand it no
Well, I understand it no better now than I did yesterday on Twitter, but I'll actually watch the video now. Never saw it on Twitter, just a bunch of hateful Hillbots screaming "mysoginist!" and "ageist!".
I did begin following a couple people who were defending Vanity Fair and being called BerniBros, as well as one who was told "go drink bleach you sexist cunt" by upstanding Hillbots. Even though I didn't fully understand wtf was going on, I realized that someone hurt some Hillbot fee fees, so they must have told the truth about Her Heinous.
This is appropriate:
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/414372-steele-russiagate-trump-media/
Edit add: HAHAHAHAHA! Video is funny!
Obviously, Hillbots and humour don't mix
Peter Daouche was/is especially poutraged.
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
2 things u don't accuse Hillary doing: baking cookies & knitting
As I read about this, I remembered one of the most powerful act of the fight against AIDS (yes, I am an old dude): The AIDS Quilt.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrVzjJ2e4hU]
"Woman's work" was transformed into one of thee most powerful symbols of the AIDS epidemic. This attack on "knitting" seems in many ways absolutely sexist in demeaning the work of women who were forced into their roles and created out it, transformation and art.
"Woman's work" again on how women used their "traditional work" for transformation and help. I again vaguely remembered this and looked it up:
http://craftivism.com/blog/week-8-of-48-weeks-of-historical-craftivism-k...
What the fuck, on a roll now. Just did a search on Civil War and knitting.
http://worldturndupsidedown.blogspot.com/2016/01/easy-knitting-civil-war...
I am sure I can find more, but again, doesn't it seem the reaction to the Vanity Fair rely on demeaning "woman's work" and imply the only work worthy of them is "men's work". It kicks in the teeth the absolute glue it seems to me of how women held together society and family.
Maybe we could come with some resolutions for Killary,
1. I won't order any assassinations
2. I won't destabilize any foreign governments
Mary Bennett
Ha you got it. but that is Hillary's definition of feminism.
That was empowerment for women. And on the big world stage, women like her could like the men order the bombing and destruction of countries and revel in country leaders sodomized with a knife.
Isn't watching the Quilt being displayed chilling?
Your video is from 1987, the first time it was displayed on the National Mall when there were 2,000 quilts there. Watching as each panel is unfolded, lifted up, twirled and then placed in the square is breathtaking.
The full video of Common Threads: Stories From the Quilt can be watched here. The music in it is hauntingly perfect.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.
~Hannah Arendt
A little of on the side
Of course with HER, knitting a pantsuit would need a lot more skill.
THAT is so cool, Snode!
I'd love to see pics of the machine. Sounds so cool!
My grandma used to braid rugs and had these little metal guides to help braid the strips of old denim and my grandpa's old uniforms. The rug would eventuallytake over the living room, then she'd sell it and start another.
Thanks for reminding me of that, and would love an essay about the 100 or so year old knitting machine, with pictures.
Thanks
http://cskms.org/where-to-find-a-csm/ The one we're working on looks like the picture, but the old ones all kind of look alike. If you check out Amazon (sock knitting machine) they have modern ones for sale. The first link says to find an old machine and fix it up, but unless you KNOW what it's supposed to look like originally, you cant tell if all these unfamiliar parts are worn out, or even broken or missing parts. The lucky side is, it may just need heavy duty cleaning and oiling.
A cousin has it now and is trying to track down parts. There is this linkFascinating, but not cheap
Whoah! $1000 for a refurbished antique, or $1500 for brand new. Wow! Still fascinating. Maybe new ones are so expensive because they're circular? Thanks for the link.
@MrWebster
Well, how can they be expected to understand how sexist their reaction is when they're busy accusing others of being what they are themselves? You're not supposed to notice that part, silly wabbit!
There they are, juggling talking-points and in some cases possibly dozens of 'different poster identities' for peanuts a post - do you expect them to think about the sense of the playbook attacks they're using/mindlessly repeating because others have said them?
If they don't support the people who'd rather pay them nothing at all in working toward that goal of paying them nothing at all, what happens then? Some unAmerican democracy crap?
Damn Russian FB/Twitter BLM/puppy advertisers-in-government, always worrying about humanitarian crises the (biblical) Job creators cause through, and in, America in their noble quest for Total Control Over Everything, Even If It Kills Everything! You'd think they'd leave hell enough alone!
Be gentle with the Hillbots - they know not what they do, having been otherwise programed. Or hired by those (biblical) Job creators as part of the political puppet show.
(There's an Abby Martin video on there, too.)
http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/03/01/paid-govt-and-corporate-internet-t...
And this important statement was posted in one of the comments:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urglg3WimHA
(Wondering if the Bivings thing is still on the intertubz... I was sometimes reminded of this on DKos.)
http://naturalsociety.com/monsanto-and-others-caught-paying-internet-tro...
Old news to most here, of course, but that last bit of advice needs to be remembered. Not least because there were Monsanto biggies (among other corporate nasties) in The Mad Bomber's campaign.
They want us to believe that there is a much larger consensus among the public agreeing with their propaganda than there really is, to bring in the 'herd creatures' to the sty, to make those of us who are better aware feel isolated as we come under attack by what seems to be the many, to discourage dissent from the party line.
http://filmingcops.com/yes-there-are-paid-government-trolls-on-social-me...
Everybody's doing it, doing it, doing it - to us.
(The following lacks links to sources but doesn't sound out of line, so dunno.)
http://www.worldofbuzz.com/can-actually-paid-troll-social-media-pays-rm8...
(The following has a 5 minute Abby Martin video on this. Didn't watch the first posted, which may be the same one, but computer's a bit better right now, so watching this, since it loaded. And, in the comments, an almost 11 minute video of what appears to be a basic TED talk on Astroturf; just watched a bit, having trouble with videos on and off.)
http://yournewswire.com/cia-agents-hired-to-troll-alternative-media-comm...
And this following seems rather interesting, when read in full at source. Also would be interesting to hear what some of Those Here Who Know And Can Make Connections I May Never Have Even Heard Of (or potentially verify or not) think of this information.
Gee, I wonder what government/State Department might have had an interest in hiring people like this to help them in eliminating socialist government in other people's (oil-bearing) countries, where they kept getting voted in, whenever permitted presumably legitimate elections, since the elections apparently had to be rigged to get/keep them out?
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-how-to-hack-an-election/
Was that bit about the Trump campaign perhaps an early shot for this other leading presidential campaign which wasn't Trump? I wonder whose leading campaign that could possibly have been... and if he got a foundational booster-bonus over such statements?
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
Please, please, Hillary run again!
The Repugnants need you to completely destroy the Democratic Party.