CIAs: George H.W. Bush Exposed As Serial Groper
.
The Bush Crime family has plundered and subverted (and dominated) our Country (and violently) for many, many decades now, going back to the era of Oligarch-point man Prescott Bush (the father of George H. W. Bush).
George H. W. Bush, also known as "Bush Sr." and "Poppy" and "the Elder", has long been revealed as a key CIA BlackOps ringleader, War Criminal & profiteer, and DEEP STATE operative of many criminal events in US History by multiple private investigators (naturally ignored, of course, by the corrupt Mainstream Press and the Washington DC Beltway Elites -- which protects all of the evil Bushes).
And now Bush has even also been revealed to be a serial groper and exploiter of unsuspecting women as well.
---
And this is the low life that the NFL always wheels out and forces in our faces at every Super Bowl to perform the Coin flip (while we're all supposed to applaud).
---
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uYqgLTYyGE width:640 height:480]
---
The Entitled Untouchable Elites in this Country can get away with anything (Murder, Rape, War Crimes, Treason, Human Torture, Coup D'Etat, etc.).
---
They always have, and they always will ... in the so-called Land of the "Free".
---
Comments
BUSH Sr. Behind Kennedy Assassination
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dzc9zG5Rj34 width:480 height:320]
----
The Tyrants ...
@FreeSociety
Thanks, that video was very interesting! I watched the rest of the series in sections and at the end found the URL for the full video, if anyone's interested.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbT8C2IAzvE
The title of this following put me off, but the guy sounds very reasonable and mentioned some interesting points.
Poppy Bush grins when speaking of 'a deluded gunman killing President Kennedy' at the funeral. (Bush-2, when videoed as being first told of the first 9/11 strike, had the look of a little kid wondering how much trouble he'd be in, if his action in dipping into the cookie jar was discovered. This must run in the family...)
The 'other George Bush', who said that wasn't him, was hired by the CIA at a low-level position (file clerk) just for a few months, over the period that George Bush couldn't recall where he was during the Kennedy assassination, and then let go.
There's a picture of someone who looks like Poppy Bush near the Texas Schoolbook Library where the assassination took place.
Apparently Kennedy also planned to abolish the Federal Reserve and keep British and American private banksters from trashing the economy. A lot of The Psychopaths That Be would have wanted him disposed of...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wap7YX1OeUs
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
Generations of BUSH Tyranny
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sp4h39qJKqU]
They should have been executed.
Modern education is little more than toeing the line for the capitalist pigs.
Guerrilla Liberalism won't liberate the US or the world from the iron fist of capital.
He Was Just Looking Forward Instead of Looking Back...
better to get a good political deal from adversity than to ensure that adversity goes away.
“Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.” ~ Sun Tzu
C'Mon Over Baby Whole Lot Of Groping Going On
If he fucker can't be shamed and outed
for CIA murders and treason, then at the very least we can out him as a perv.
It is a low bar, historical footnote, but it is something.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
As they say, all the gov’t ever got on Al Capone was tax evasion
As for Trump, there’s still a hope that his candidness about elites, the media, and the Deep State, his tendency to express contradictory positions from day to day, his erratic behavior or at least the appearance thereof, etc. will be sugar in the governmental gas tank, causing the motor of empire to seize up.
Day to day?
Try moment to moment. He can't maintain a particular stance while answering one question, much less maintain it from day to day.
Trump's Historic Take Down of Jeb Bush
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDdrhvhsMXM]
Historically childish.
Defending Trump against Bush is like defending Dahmer against Bundy. They're both child killer psychopaths.
Think again ...
1. The JEB video is satire - humor (not supposed to be taken so seriously).
2. The Bush Crime Family was never "taken down" at all. Not for 9 whole decades, until 2016 when Jeb (the heir apparent) was routed and finally crushed.
3. Trying to conflate Trump with the criminal Bush family is stunningly ignorant. Sounds exactly like something Hillary Clinton would do...
This is The Bush Crime record here (above), and there is even a lot more on them as well.
---
Regardless of whatever mistakes Trump has or will make: Since when did Trump ever illegally overthrow a Regime? or Perpetrate Violent Crimes directly against the American people?
There is no comparison at all here.
Trump, to his credit, has stopped the policy of "Regime Change" in Syria and stopped the CIA's weapons sales to ISIS groups (in Syria), and he has rejected the Neocon dreams of Cold War II War activities against Russia. Just why do you think the DEEP STATE so transparently hates Trump? (hint: he's not one of them)
And if Trump is also ever assassinated, don't be surprised if history proves the Bush Crime family fingerprints once again are involved on that one as well.
Indeed. When one sticks to the facts, there’s no comparison. n/t
Ted Rall: Dubya at Heaven’s gate (if G~d were a Democrat)
— via Jackpine Radicals
Does Rall support Trump now too?
What is this cartoon saying, in your view? You tell me. n/t
don't see that.
seems a straight shot at those "dems" who will forgive anything as long the perp trashes trump.
not pro-trump at all. did I miss the point?
this is how you do the twist!
tina turner co- writer
Are you denying that Trump is now a war criminal
Oh and yes, Trump is continuing the effort to
I'm surprised there are this many Trump supporters on this blog. Fuck that, Trump is just another one of them to me.
Trump is AWASH in the BLOOD of Raqqa
Well done, America, you’ve crushed Daesh. Now what?
how diplomatic
IMPEACH
@eyo
Kinda makes me wonder if this extermination procedure involves destruction of evidence/witnesses as to who exactly may have funded/trained/armed/brought in any/all of them? Or of any members of any American/European mercenary/special forces possibly embedded with them, who might perhaps, rat them out when, like other vets, not getting even promised medical care and other benefits? Considering the way things tend to work in corporate/billionaire/military-run 'politics' and 'policy' these days...
Edit: so the US military has all of these secret bases in Africa, while well-equipped terrorists go from Africa to help terrorists in Syria fight the government forces and depose Assad, as the US PTB desire?
And even the known US-backed terrorists are failing do that, so now they want to exterminate them all?
I'll bet that there are people here who know something about this...
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
No: Very Different
Trump was never the designer of 9/11 and all the Middle-East "Regime Change" policies. He has just inherited a mess not of his own making, and is surrounded by Generals who tell him everyday ... more War!.
Tillerson is going to be gone soon, so what he says is irrelevant. In fact, Trump did stop the CIA weapons to ISIS groups in Syria program (something Hillary Clinton would have accelerated), and yes he has backed off the idea of no-fly zone and any Military Troop presence in Syria. In other words, the favored DEEP STATE policy (Regime Change) has been rejected.
The Generals wanted a 50,000 troop escalation in Afghanistan, and Trump said no to them. He threw them a bone and gave them just a small increase. I agree this is still not good -- but lord knows what Hillary Clinton would have agreed to (she also wanted direct War with Russia). Yemen is his worst mistake. My prediction is that Trump will eventually learn that his Military Generals do lie and he will stop listening to them and start pushing back even more.
Trump wants to rebuild America, not the Middle East. He is not part of the DEEP STATE cabal. It may take him some time to figure it all out and buck his Military Generals ... but he is the first President that we've had in recent memory that actually has an Independent streak.
We will see. In any case, there is no comparison whatsoever with the decades long treachery and treason of the Bush Crime Family (which I documented above).
I agree with you here,
and I agree with Big Al and with eyo that he is doing part of what the deep state requires and part of what their enemies within the American military require. On these 2 points I agree with you completely because it means a lot and it really matters that,
and your question,
These 2 points mean a lot. I don't know whether he's an idiot or a savant of some kind, or an opportunist who's taking bribes in some form or another depending on who's in his office on what particular day. But he's definitely behaving as if he knows his life will end if he totally exposes and destroys the deep state, and also that he will totally destroy the deep state's client ISIS.
For what it's worth, I think this is what FDR knew too, that his life would end if he acted to bring the fascist power in our government to justice. His behavior wasn't that different. He allowed the fascists in our government and in U.S. industry to go scott free, but he totally annihilated the civilian population of Germany as well as allowing the decimation of German military forces, EXCEPT FOR THE ONES ALLEN DULLES PROTECTED AND ALLOWED TO ESCAPE. I know I'm opening a can of worms in saying that. But maybe it's time.
Really?
FDR did suppress the fascist political movement in the US after the US was involved in the war. He had a 1st amendment problem until then. There were certainly powerful American businessmen doing business with the Nazis including after the outbreak of WWII. They stopped for the most part when the US entered. I have no idea whether Prescott Bush and the DuPonts had Nazi sympathies or simply knew a good business opportunity when they saw one.
I'm sure there were fascists in the US government leading up to the war. I suspect there were more communists.
Some awful people who believed the US should be the dominant power in the world achieved positions of prominence during the war. They hated FDR and he knew they hated him. But they did their jobs effectively. I suspect FDR thought he could control them after the war. Maybe he could have.
The terror bombing of German cities was Winston Churchill's idea. US B-17s were designed with what was expected to be enough armor and armament to penetrate to targets without fighter escort to deliver bombs precisely on industry critical to the war effort. It was a major miscalculation on many levels. The Americans joined the British in the widespread destruction of German cities. When long range fighters became available the US returned in part to its original objective of precision bombing. It's hard to do over cloudy, windy skies from 20,000 feet. The entire British/US strategic bombing campaign in Europe and Asia meets my definition of a war crime.
As for decimating German armies, that was the point. Even so, you might give thought to the lengths German officers went to have their troops assigned to the western front where they could surrender to the Americans and British.
At the end of the war the US and USSR engaged in a competition to round up German scientists and engineers. To keep the record straight Harry Truman was president at the time.
Near the end of the war De Gaulle asked FDR to supply merchant ships to transport French forces to reoccupy Indochina. FDR mentioned the request to Stalin who asked "Are there?" FDR shook his head and sadly said he had to tell De Gaulle none were available.Stalin is said to have smiled slightly. He knew very well that US yards were producing ships that would never be needed in the war. De Gaulle got logistical support from Truman. It was Truman who allowed American imperialists to define the US response to the post war world. They rose in his administration.
You might want to compare the treatment of German civilians in the Anglo American portion of occupied Germany with the treatment under the USSR.
The US has turned into an empire. FDR didn't even want to support the reestablishment of the British and French empires.
I appreciate what you are saying here,
but FDR licensed certain U.S. corporations to be exempt from the Trading With the Enemy Act for the duration of WWII. Chase Bank, Standard Oil and others financed, fueled and maintained the German war effort for the duration of the war and their executives went scott free. Without this industrial and banking effort there would have been no German war machine in the first place and no war involving the U.S. nor anyone else. This is the subject of Charles Higham's, Trading With the Enemy.
Congress held hearings on this subject during the War, but no action was taken against these traitors. This information is available, it was not secret during the War, and yet to this day it is unfathomable to the American people, mostly because FDR was worshiped by most Americans.