When You Refuse To Prosecute War Criminals

I admit that I screamed in rage the day President Obama decided to move on and not look back, that was me done with hope and change.

Our Government had systematically removed peoples basic human rights by:

  • Extraordinary rendition
  • Torture
  • The denial of Habeas Corpus
  • Imprisonment without trial.

By refusing to

  • Investigate properly.
  • Bring the criminals to trial.
  • Atone for our nations crimes.

You [Democratic Party and Republican Party] guaranteed that our government would do it all over again, ignoring such crimes as these to my mind is the same of condoning them.

Guess what:

Donald Trump has used his first TV interview as president to say he believes torture “absolutely” works and that the US should “fight fire with fire.”
Speaking to ABC News, Trump said he would defer to the defence secretary, James Mattis, and CIA director, Mike Pompeo, to determine what can and cannot be done legally to combat the spread of terrorism.
But asked about the efficacy of tactics such as waterboarding, Trump said: “absolutely I feel it works.”

I don't care what others have to say in the article, this is the President and the Commander in Chief of the United States of America saying it and that is more than enough.

Mark Fallon, who was the deputy chief of Guantánamo’s Bush-era investigative taskforce for military tribunals, said: “It does appear like a subterfuge to enact more brutal methods because that was what candidate Trump campaigned on during the election.”

Fallon warned that the field manual’s appendix M, which allows extended “separation” of a detainee from other captives, represented a “slippery slope that could bring back torture”.

Words matter and some will take them as a green light to go ahead.

Many in the rest of the world we take them as an intent regardless of what people like John McCain have to say.

Our government did it before, none of those responsible for previous war crimes were held accountable and our shiny new leader thinks it's all fine and dandy. This is what happens when you think that your nation is above International Law, this is what happens when you believe that your nation is "Exceptional" and above reproach.

Torture is not the only crimes against humanity we have ignored recently:

  • Pre-emptive war
  • Summary judgement and execution without trial by drone with scant regard for the sovereignty of nations.
  • Roll-back/Regime change when it suits us.
  • Bombing of Hospitals

This is the behaviour of an an Imperial Power no matter how hard some pretend that we are not. Our corporations asset strip and pollute the planet and when they are prevented from doing so we impose sanctions and destabilize governments and when those are not enough, we go to war.

When we ignore our war crimes and the millions of victims, abused, displaced and so many dead, we guaranteed that we would do it all over again. Oh and before Democrats get oh so holy and wrap themselves in sackcloth and sprinkle themselves with ashes, your party helped/enabled this to continue.

Words matter, no matter how few and President Trump has proved himself of not being suitable for the role dog-catcher, let alone President.

It didn't take long.

Sadly he is our President.

Fuck him.

Tags: 
Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

the way for Trump to do the same and worse. It wasn't W Bush, it was B Obama.

This is not to say that Trump will somehow embrace international law like the Geneva Conventions, he might but few expect it. Perhaps the rest of the world will try to force it on him. He is widely disliked and derided.

From his talk, it looks like Trump will continue the policy since Reagan of fomenting wars of aggression. We can only hope that the status of the USA has fallen so low that other nations will condemn actions along these lines. I think this is what it has come to: Hoping other countries will force the American ruling circles to conform to international norms.

There's no reasonable grounds to feel hopeful.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

@duckpin @duckpin
Along with Henry Kissinger.

up
0 users have voted.

@LaFeminista I agree that they should have their day in court, convicted and imprisoned. How about if the USA were to recognize the World Court and have them stand trial in The Hague.

They must be held accountable, in my view.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

@duckpin

up
0 users have voted.

@LaFeminista Indeed you have & it's much appreciated.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

LeChienHarry's picture

@duckpin war criminal? Do we have to be members of the International Court in the Hague to be tried under the Geneva Conventions which we signed on to?

Oh yes we should be members of the International Court but were afraid from the get go that our soldiers (and, ahem, leaders) could be tried and sentenced by the same rules as those who are already members. Our way or the highway.

up
0 users have voted.

You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again you did not know. ~ William Wiberforce

If you can donate, please! POP Money is available for bank-to-bank transfers. Email JtC to make a monthly donation.

ggersh's picture

is no different than what Hitler, Stalin did, only with Hitler the method was concentration camps, with Stalin it was sending them to Siberia, what makes our leaders feel exceptional in doing it is we do it with bombs.

Cheney, dubya, clinton, obama the chickenshit leaders should all be in jail.

up
0 users have voted.

I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish

"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"

Heard from Margaret Kimberley

@ggersh @ggersh Americans.

up
0 users have voted.
riverlover's picture

@ggersh
and now it comes home. It was not enough to cause mayhem elsewhere, now it comes inward.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

ggersh's picture

@riverlover the militarized police sadly leading the way.

For when you don't prosecute war criminals, you become one yourself.

up
0 users have voted.

I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish

"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"

Heard from Margaret Kimberley

Here is a list of Grave Breaches of the Geneva Convention as adopted by the ICC in 2001:

1 Willful killing, or causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health
2 Torture or inhumane treatment
3 Unlawful wanton destruction or appropriation of property
4 Forcing a prisoner of war to serve in the forces of a hostile power
5 Depriving a prisoner of war of a fair trial
6 Unlawful deportation, confinement or transfer
7 Taking hostages

It seems like the US scores really well on this test earning a A+ on items 1,2,3,5, and 6. By not prosecuting war crimes we cannot claim the moral high ground. This lays waste to the concept that we should be the world's police. The role of any police force is to enforce the law. Since we are signatories to the Geneva Convention we clearly have no intention of abiding by international law.

up
0 users have voted.

Capitalism has always been the rule of the people by the oligarchs. You only have two choices, eliminate them or restrict their power.

Lookout's picture

I think T-rump is the perfect figurehead for this corrupt corporate oligarchy. He is what our country has become. Plan on all out war with the environment, poor people, immigrants, etc.

I wish T-rump and all the congress critters had to be tortured before any prisoner could be.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

@Lookout we have been heading for a long time now

up
0 users have voted.

@Lookout Trump is the plugged in the wall big screen version of America and that's what most people willingly watch and accept.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

blazinAZ's picture

we are doomed to repeat it.

This country has always been imperialist, colonizing, and genocide-attempting. From the very beginning, Europeans treated the native peoples as less-than-human, as disposable, as obstacles to their Manifest Destiny. Lying, cheating, stealing, torturing, murdering were all part of the playbook and remain to this day.

In order to prop up the doomed capitalist system, the Atlantic slave trade kidnapped people and brought them here to work. This country was built by enslaved African people, who have rarely benefited financially from their labor and whose descendants are still the victims of oppressive government policies (voter suppression, housing redlining, discrimination of all kinds).

By any definition, the U.S. is a rogue country, ignoring international law and conventions of decency, trying to impose the will of the oligarchs on people and nations around the globe, all in pursuit of more and more wealth for fewer and fewer people.

The only reason that U.S. residents mostly don't know this and don't care is that the propaganda machine, including the public education system, is incredibly effective, and the popular culture machine has figured out how to distract.

What did the Kardashians do today? or Justin Bieber?

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice in America, but it is the fight for justice that sustains you.
--Amiri Baraka

@blazinAZ own family, you can feel the shock and outrage, the truth is often like that.

up
0 users have voted.
blazinAZ's picture

@LaFeminista

I only get to say it here or with a very few friends and loved ones where I live. My family of origin are mostly neoliberal Hillary voters who didn't even bother to go their local women's parade, let alone do any actual protesting. According to them, I "wasted" my vote on Stein.

I'm grateful everyday for the radicals I meet and talk with here at C-99.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice in America, but it is the fight for justice that sustains you.
--Amiri Baraka

"To put the torture behind us is, inevitably, to put it in front of us."

It's no fun being right all the time, when one is normally predicting really bad things.

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.

@UntimelyRippd make it so damn easy.

Wink

up
0 users have voted.

@LaFeminista you don't even get the satisfaction of believing you were especially clever.

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.

Strife Delivery's picture

War crimes are like white-collar crimes...

They only matter if you are on the losing side.

If you have money, power, or win, those things are forgotten*.

Who is going to bring us forward on the charges of war crimes? Who in the world will dare? Our allies? China? Russia? Our own citizens even? Nah.

Victors do not get punishment because they are in charge of who does get punishment. So if America slaughters innocent civilians, they were "collateral damage". If a Middle Eastern country slaughters innocent civilians, it is a crime against humanity and must be stopped.

up
0 users have voted.
dervish's picture

@Strife Delivery that the only remaining lesson from Nuernberg apparently, is don't lose a war. Everything else is shot.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

dervish's picture

@Strife Delivery that the only remaining lesson from Nuernberg apparently, is don't lose a war. Everything else is shot.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

is a time-honored tradition of our government, leading to the rampage of war and oppression we continue today.

Standing, second from the right, is Averell Harriman, present at the Yalta Conference in 1945 as a Nazi industrialist, a Soviet industrialist, and survivor to become U.S. Sec. of Commerce, Governor of New York, Democratic Party enforcer, and very wealthy 94-year-old:

http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/c...

… Friedrich Flick was the major co-owner of the German Steel Trust with Fritz Thyssen, Thyssen’s long-time collaborator and occasional competitor. In preparation for the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg, the U.S. government said that Flick was “ one of leading financiers and industrialists who from 1932 contributed large sums to the Nazi Party … member of `Circle of Friends’ of Himmler who contributed large sums to the SS. ”

Flick, like Thyssen, financed the Nazis to maintain their private armies called Schutzstaffel (S.S. or Black Shirts) and Sturmabteilung (S.A., storm troops or Brown Shirts).

The Flick-Harriman partnership was directly supervised by Prescott Bush, President Bush’s father, and by George Walker, President Bush’s grandfather.

The Harriman-Walker Union Banking Corp. arrangements for the German Steel Trust had made them bankers for Flick and his vast operations in Germany by no later than 1926.

The Harriman Fifteen Corporation (George Walker, president, Prescott Bush and Averell Harriman, sole directors) held a substantial stake in the Silesian Holding Co. at the time of the merger with Brown Brothers, Jan. 1, 1931. This holding correlated to Averell Harriman’s chairmanship of the Consolidated Silesian Steel Corporation, the American group owning one-third of a complex of steel-making, coal-mining and zinc-mining activities in Germany and Poland, in which Friedrich Flick owned two-thirds.

The Nuremberg prosecutor characterized Flick as follows:

“ Proprietor and head of a large group of industrial enterprises (coal and iron mines, steel producing and fabricating plants) … `Wehrwirtschaftsfuhrer’, 1938 [title awarded to prominent industrialists for merit in armaments drive–`Military Economy Leader’]…. ”

For this buildup of the Hitler war machine with coal, steel and arms production, using slave laborers, the Nazi Flick was condemned to seven years in prison at the Nuremberg trials; he served three years. With friends in New York and London, however, Flick lived into the 1970s and died a billionaire.

On March 19, 1934, Prescott Bush–then director of the German Steel Trust’s Union Banking Corporation–initiated an alert to the absent Averell Harriman about a problem which had developed in the Flick partnership. Bush sent Harriman a clipping from the New York Times of that day, which reported that the Polish government was fighting back against American and German stockholders who controlled “ Poland’s largest industrial unit, the Upper Silesian Coal and Steel Company…. ”

The Times article continued: “ The company has long been accused of mismanagement, excessive borrowing, fictitious bookkeeping and gambling in securities. Warrants were issued in December for several directors accused of tax evasions. They were German citizens and they fled. They were replaced by Poles. Herr Flick, regarding this as an attempt to make the company’s board entirely Polish, retaliated by restricting credits until the new Polish directors were unable to pay the workmen regularly. ”

The Times noted that the company’s mines and mills “ employ 25,000 men and account for 45 percent of Poland’s total steel output and 12 percent of her coal production. Two-thirds of the company’s stock is owned by Friedrich Flick, a leading German steel industrialist, and the remainder is owned by interests in the United States. ”

In view of the fact that a great deal of Polish output was being exported to Hitler Germany under depression conditions, the Polish government thought that Prescott Bush, Harriman and their Nazi partners should at least pay full taxes on their Polish holdings. The U.S. and Nazi owners responded with a lockout. The letter to Harriman in Washington reported a cable from their European representative: “ Have undertaken new steps London Berlin … please establish friendly relations with Polish Ambassador [in Washington]. ”

A 1935 Harriman Fifteen Corporation memo from George Walker announced an agreement had been made “ in Berlin ” to sell an 8,000 block of their shares in Consolidated Silesian Steel. But the dispute with Poland did not deter the Bush family from continuing its partnership with Flick.

Nazi tanks and bombs “ settled ” this dispute in September, 1939 with the invasion of Poland, beginning World War II. The Nazi army had been equipped by Flick, Harriman, Walker and Bush, with materials essentially stolen from Poland.

There were probably few people at the time who could appreciate the irony, that when the Soviets also attacked and invaded Poland from the East, their vehicles were fueled by oil pumped from Baku wells revived by the Harriman/Walker/Bush enterprise.

up
0 users have voted.
LeChienHarry's picture

@Linda Wood Am at the Nuremberg Trials and the constant thread thwarting Roosevelt and others against the Nazis was our man in Bern, Allen Dulles. Talk about double dealing.

Your quotes fill in another part of the plot(s). I wonder if the Bush/Harriman group are mentioned in this book.

It was about money (the Dulles Brothers were lawyers for international industrialists, and in this case, German) and power (Dulles was explicitly told not to make separate peace with known Nazis like Wolffe, but he did anyway. Eventually Dulles saw to it that Wolffe and others were gotten out of the trials and to safe harbours in other countries including the US.

He believed only these same industrialists could rebuild Germany, as they were the only ones in his thinking who could. He also saw the upper echelons as people of distinction, not unlike he saw himself. Bearing, uniforms, money, good cigars, and scotch all were part of the picture he painted of himself and the Nazis he held common cause with.

Dulles received direct information from Poland about the exterminations, and was visited by wealthy and well educated businessmen who documented the extent of the the camps, but buried the information and prevented Roosevelt from knowing about what was going on for quite awhile.

Eleanor Roosevelt didn't trust Dulles from the beginning, but her husband felt they needed a "spy" who knew the ropes. Bad mistake which reverberated for years.

up
0 users have voted.

You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again you did not know. ~ William Wiberforce

If you can donate, please! POP Money is available for bank-to-bank transfers. Email JtC to make a monthly donation.

@LeChienHarry I'm so glad you are reading Talbot's book on Dulles. I wish he had started his account of Dulles' life before the war, before WWII. It would have made it clear that the Dulles brothers were attorneys for U.S. as well as other corporations that built, fueled, financed and sustained Hitler's military industrial production, not only from the beginning, but for the duration of WWII, in clear in violation of U.S. law. Of course, not only were they not prosecuted, they became the ultimate power in our government.

My impression of the totality of Allen Dulles' work is that he and his clients, and the corporate traitors who sustained them, were Fascists. They constituted the industrial power of the Fascist movement. Their motives in producing Hitler were to replace the Soviet system with Fascism. They were the power behind Stalin as well, but they saw the Soviet labor force, and the whole labor movement increasing its strength within the democracies, as the most serious threat to totalitarian capitalism. That is what they sought to destroy, democracy and organized labor. And that is what the CIA, the brainchild of Allen Dulles, acts to destroy today.

up
0 users have voted.
Big Al's picture

Which means only one thing, Donald Trump is fake too.

up
0 users have voted.
Big Al's picture

It's an international war crime to torture, so to suggest as President that it's something that should be done, indicates a psychopathic war criminal that should be removed immediately. He's disqualified himself for office.

up
0 users have voted.

@Big Al be necessary due it being obvious, then again its not prevented previous Presidents from terrorizing the rest of the world.

up
0 users have voted.
LeChienHarry's picture

@Big Al

up
0 users have voted.

You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again you did not know. ~ William Wiberforce

If you can donate, please! POP Money is available for bank-to-bank transfers. Email JtC to make a monthly donation.

for this mess because when you fail to prosecute crimes of torture you are legalizing it.
There were many people that pointed it out when Obama was just signing an executive order saying we won't torture people under his administration, all while the fawning praise for it was sickening and the argument that the next President can ignore it while writing a very different one was ignored.
Not to mention that torture continued anyway it just wasn't called that by the US but things like indefinite detention and actions like forced feeding of prisoners rectally is torture under international law, but we ignore that anyway in a bunch of ways as described in this essay.

This is from today's DN...

AMY GOODMAN: So that’s the House minority leader, Nancy Pelosi. Vince Warren, should the Obama administration—should President Obama have gone after Bush administration officials involved with torture, actually had people tried, as CCR has tried to do over and over again? Would that have sent a stronger message?

VINCENT WARREN: It would have sent a much stronger message. And yes, President Obama absolutely should have done that. And there is some controversy around the question of should we be pursuing criminal prosecution for high-level Bush officials. But this is an example—one of the things we were saying at the time is that if we just do these things by executive order, if we just do these things by sort of a consensus-based discussion in a particular administration, it doesn’t deter future administrations from bringing torture back. And so that’s what we’re seeing.

Had President Obama sought to hold high-level Bush officials accountable, we would probably—or we might be in a different situation, at least that there would be a broader consensus that what was happening was wrong. And the question was—would be: What role did each individual have in it? It would make a stronger case to push back against President Trump. It’s similar to what we were—what Center for Constitutional Rights has done in the Supreme Court just recently. We had a case earlier in January where we were challenging Bush-level officials for rounding up Muslims in New York right after 9/11. The idea there is that if we can’t rely on the federal government to hold its own lawbreakers accountable, then it really falls to civil society groups, like the Brennan Center and CCR, to try to hold them accountable through any legal means that we can.
https://www.democracynow.org/2017/1/26/in_first_tv_interview_president_t...

up
0 users have voted.
LeChienHarry's picture

in the US? If it is still suspended, we are in so much trouble.

up
0 users have voted.

You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again you did not know. ~ William Wiberforce

If you can donate, please! POP Money is available for bank-to-bank transfers. Email JtC to make a monthly donation.

@LeChienHarry

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-suspension-of-habeas-corpus-in-america/...

up
0 users have voted.

@LaFeminista From your link:

... The law concerns any person designated by the administration as “a member of Al-Qaeda or the Taliban, and who takes part in hostile action against the United States”, but also anyone who “substantially supports these organisations”. This formula enables an extensive and flexible use of the law. For example, it would enable the government to lash out at any civil defence organisations who seek to protect the constitutional rights of US citizens who have been designated by the executive as enemies of the USA. ...

Since the US government/PTB-lackies have been substantially supporting such terrorist groups, aren't they subject to this and also unprotected by Constitutional rights under these claims?

Although the whole point of establishing a democracy would be pointless if anyone happening to be holding public office actually was to be permitted the capacity to simply pass illegal law in order to make the illegal/unconstitutional 'legal'/'Constitutional'. It ain't possible to actually just pull a 'Simon Says' to make human/citizen rights/democracy/Constitutional law magically 'go away' unless The People are conned into swallowing it

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

Song of the lark's picture

I think I will find a small row boat and head out to sea for the next few years.

up
0 users have voted.