Located at 367 W 1600 S, Salt Lake City UT 84115.

This is a Mormon Church front organization.

Nice try, but you've failed completely.

I'm rejecting and giving just derision to those who would impose their self righteous morality on the rest of us.

I oppose attempts to criminalize thought.

The Catholic Church has a nearly 2,000 year tradition of the exploitation of children for sexual gratification. Stretching back long before the invention of the printing press, the copy machine or the VHS tape. Of course, the Catholic Church is not the only of the 'Holies' to abuse children.
Throughout history the 'Holy' have held special self appointed privileges. Primarily the self given right to exploit all manner of fellow humans in all manner of ways, for their self fulfillment.

Historically, children have been in greater danger of exploitation for sexual gratification from organized religion than from some dirty pictures someone drew.

I'd leave my child alone with a friend who I knew had Playboys under their mattress.
I'd NEVER leave my child alone with a Priest or any religious leader.

not at all. I was simply posing a question for you.

You link goes to a Mormon Church front group.

first you'd have to come up with a commonly accepted definition of what pornography is. As far as I know, no one has ever done that yet.

And "I know it when I see it" doesn't cut it.

I talk about this topic a lot, so there are shortcuts and keywords that stand in for larger ideas. You understand this issue and the topic as well as I do, perhaps better.

Thank you for such a rewarding response.

A couple of assumptions here: It is understood there is an unacceptable level of subjectivity in this discussion because "community standards" is one of the counter-parties. So, everyone concerned is evolving (except the constitution, which was flash frozen into a popsicle of 18th-century plutocracy when was written — and then neglected by the People. What that means is the Constitution does not have the authority of generational sovereignty. Instead, People are bent to the tyranny of dead men's laws and debts and stingy rights — all without the consent of our generation.

The fossilized Constitution became the perfect tool for corporations and the Deep State to whip men with, break them if necessary, and go rogue with their state or the People's dime. But an entrenched Constitution is a lousy tool for conscious and social evolution. It holds the People back from self-development, from their realization of human rights, and it has robbed them of control over their Nation. When a generation does not ratify the nation's operating system during their own time, they become less empowered and eventually they forget how to govern themselves. Think of all the ruined lives in prison in the US. That should have never happened. When you see that life has become criminalized, you know there is something very wrong with the laws of the land. In the 21st century, each new generation is more crippled than the one before it. They will earn less and produce less, which means the elders cannot be supported and will suffer. This is the downward cycle that kills all civilizations it touches.

That's the starting point for this.

Back to porn — the key issue here is a transaction. The First Amendment doesn't protect the rights of the buyer, it protects the rights of the seller. It doesn't protect the listener, it protects the speaker. It has always protected the publishers of fake news, it has never protected the consumers of fake news. It doesn't touch on social damage done by the law. The people just have to suck that up. This was not the intention of the Amendment, which was written during the Age of Enlightenment. It was a time when the young were having new and exciting ideas about the changing the world — potent ideas about politics and religion. They knew that they couldn't openly discuss and publish their radical ideas, because back in the olden days, the church or the king could have them put in prison or put them to death. That was their inspiration for the First Amendment.

Because Americans did not cultivate and renew their constitution, like all other countries do across the arc of time, the First Amendment became distorted and was twisted into a cattle prod by the plutocrats who run the American plantation. The First Amendment is now the ideal sanctuary for self-sabotage like Citizen's United. And the People are so proud of their right to "free speech." The First Amendment allows their government and news media to lie right in the people's faces about matters of vital interest to them. The First Amendment is directly responsible for the People's profound cluelessness about the the world they inhabit. It is responsible for their helplessness and impotence against their leaders. No nation is envious of the free speech of the US. The world doesn't want the First or the Second Amendments. They want Human Rights and the US Constitution confers not a single one upon the People.

One third of the elementary school children in the Silicon Valley area are homeless today. Seventeen million American children will miss one or more meals today and go to bed painfully hungry because they live in a household that has no money to buy food. These are widely recognized human rights violations, that are committed by a wealthy government against its people. So, the People have their free speech and they have their handguns. But they don't seem to have the basic neurology to think about and understand their predicament and disgrace.

Edward Snowden said, "A right that is not demanded is a right that is forfeited to the state." Here you have a portrait of the American people, ruled by old, easily twisted laws, written in the distant past by men long dead.

The author of this essay was not talking about porn. She was fixated entirely on physical sexual assault against children. In her mind, she conflates producing porn with sexual assault — and she rails against the First Amendment, as if there were a causal relationship there. I eliminate the consumption of porn from her argument because the First Amendment does not apply to consumers. I remove child porn from the equation, as well, for the same reason: It does not apply.

The argument, then, is: The First Amendment protects people who produce legal porn, which results in sexual assaults on children."

Her framing is the problem. However, we are not clear on who the enemy is: The First Amendment? The porn producer? Or the porn consumer, who is the only one that is not protected by the law. (Hence the need for the 43rd Amendment to address the pressing issues: Freedom of thought and mind expansion.)

In my opinion, of course.

Pluto

Still, the day of the state being able to read your brain activity, from a distance, without your consent or knowledge, is fast approaching, if not already here on some scale.

Though I guess it is consensual, since you have to sign up for it.

Yeah, that's a good, respectable foundation on science.

Same ones I'm sure the State of Utah turned to, because as we all know the Mormon church is a highly respected scientific body that has no influence whatsoever on Utah's politics.

See, not only do I know how to open a link, I also know about this fun thing called google.

You left out Obama and Libtards.
I'm sure you can do better.

your conduct is way over the top. Snoopydawg said nothing in her comment to warrant this reply. What's up with that?

I didn't ask why you have that username, I asked why you felt that you needed to post this essay here.
Read my comment again and leave off the insult if you reply to me again.
I have no idea what the hell your comment has to do with what I wrote.
As I stated I don't see anyone defending porn and I certainly didn't.
And when the caged free speech zones were first used, people did have a problem with them.
And they still are having a problem with how our first amendment right is being violated at the DAPL protests. Have you read the essays about this?
I want to know why you thought that the people on this site needed an education in porn.
So if you feel the need to draw me a picture about my question feel free to do so.
I haven't read elsewhere where there has been an attempt to dumb down the population 'engaged' with porn.

So once again, Why did you feel the need to post this essay about porn here?