My Reply to Bernie When He Said Hillary Will Appt. Justices to Overturn Citizens United
Submitted by Steven D on Tue, 11/08/2016 - 3:07pm
Bernie tweeted that Hillary will appoint justices to the Supreme Court who will overturn Citizens United, the case that allowed Billionaires and Corporations to spend any amount they wanted buy our election. My reply tweet:
@BernieSanders @TheWayWithAnoa @RealTimBlack @SilERabbit My response re: your optimism that Hillary will keep any of her promises to you: pic.twitter.com/J38zwXVa25
— Steven Searls (@StevenDBT) November 8, 2016
Comments
Sure.
Now that she's milked them for all she can. Oh wait. 2020 calls.
Hypocrite.
Regardless of the path in life I chose, I realize it's always forward, never straight.
And then after that?
Oh, but we tried so hard to make it happen, but you know, RUSSIApublicans. And we can't just disarm when there's the 2024 election on the horizon, can we.
Lock her up! n/t
"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."
You should ask them if they saw the Great Pumpkin this year and
ask what they hope Santa brings them for Christmas?
EDIT: I didn't make any sense. Decided maybe I should.
I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks
Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa
Hillary is either pay to play or she isn't. Which is it?
Bernie played and she will pay....one way or another. Bernie don't back down.
I hope the same for Warren also.
You see the thing is
Hillary has to be the one who gets paid in cash (preferably in large undocumented amounts) before she will play ball, or any other game you wish. Bernie and Warren just paid with the wrong coin, so they got played by Hill, again.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
This hasn't played out yet, you are trying to predict the future
I'm not saying we are going to collect. I'm saying we are going for fight until we do and your defeatism is only useful to the oligarchy which Clinton is a member. If we never collect, it won't be because we didn't fight.
I'm not a defeatist
Clearly you haven't read many of my posts, though I have my doubts about how effective changing the Dem party from within will work out. I also believe, however, that Bernie and Lizzie will get very little return on their endorsement of Hillary.
But as for fighting Hillary and her agenda, I will always be standing up against whatever her corporatist masters demand we submit to, even as I get sicker and sicker each passing year.
I look at the NoDAPL protestors as my heroes right now. They aren't trying to collect anything from phony Hillary - they are demanding and fighting and laying their bodies and lives on the line for the sake of the planet. And they are ebing a damn sight more effective in my opinion than calls for Obama to do something, as all he did was ask the Dakota Access Pipeline folks to "voluntarily" suspend their operations, a request they knew they could safely ignore.
On the other hand we are starting to here of Banks considering pulling their funding from the pipeline project today, and that has nothing to do with what any Dem has done.
Nothing will change the Dems from within in my opinion. We have to change them (or whatever replaces them) from the outside in. Just my opinion.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
Hear! Hear! Steven D Well said.
Thanks shaharazade
Maybe tempers are running a bit too high tonite. I intended this post to provide some comedic relief, not start a flame war about who is defeatist or not.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
Steven I have read most of your posts on c99p and
I didn't refer to you as a defeatist. I wrote "your defeatism" which you have displayed.
I'm not done fighting for Bernie until he is done fighting for the 99ers.
In the interest of not making this more than
it needs to be, I will leave it at we agree to disagree.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
He's fighting for Hillary now.
He's gone over to the dark side.
I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.
"If we never collect, it won't be because we didn't fight"
Don't do that, don't make it our fault for not "fighting" hard enough. We are up against a very well entrenched system, and it's going to take a lot more than just getting rid of a few bad apples here. Do not lay that on people out here. Defeatist? My God, Steven writes almost every day arguing against our "Democrats" selling out and he put his time and money and health on the line into trying to "hold her accountable" in Philly, I think you should get that name calling thing out of your system.
Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur
Thanks so much
That means a lot to me.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
You are very welcome
and I get that we all shouldn't just give up, but that attitude is the wrong one. After Bernie and all the crap spewed about naivety, unrealistic, wanting "free shit", blah, blah, blah I'll be damned if someone gets to blame us for this mess.
Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur
I never said anything was anyones fault. I said we fight and
we continue to fight. I never blamed anyone for anything.
Please quote me if I'm mistaken.
Ooooooommmmmm
Deep breaths. Better now? Where you been? We at c99 are activists, many of us old farts have been activists for decades . We are sometimes defeated but never defeatist. We get to be pissed off coz we worked our butts off for Bernie. Me? I'm gonna drink too much wine tonight. Others might throw stuff at the wall, but I'm not a thrower. And tomorrow and in the weeks that follow, we'll come here to commiserate, share info and great music, point out places where our experience and talents might make a difference. In short, we'll do what we always do: fight.
Bernie is done
He has relinquished his integrity with his shenanigans of the past few months. He is nothing more than a distraction at this point. I have great respect for the man, but his time is over. He had an opportunity and he let his fellow-travelers down. There is no coming back from that. Just look at the anemic crowds for his pro-hillary self-debasement tour. We have moved on. He's, of course, welcome to join the pack, but his voice has no authority any longer. It's sad that one would choose to spend their final days that way. I remember when those of full lives were more brave and selfless.
Good to see you here orestes
If you've been here awhile I guess I missed you. This site is growing fast. Anyway I always really liked what you had to say at dkos. I agree with your assessment of Bernie. I respect his giving voice to the movement but his time is done. Time to 'move on' (speaking of useless orgs.) from the veal pen politics of the Democratic Clinton Machine. It's pure evil with no redeeming value regardless of the fear of other they pump out. Extort the Vote. Once we win hold their feet to the fire is just as insane as voting for them in the first place.
Hi there shaharazade
the feeling is mutual. I have popped in on occasion, but not regularly. Spent more time getting myself back in shape after breaking an ankle and surgery. I left dkis with everyone else, when it really went off the deep end. They're downright delusional. The desperation with which they cling to their spin is quite sad. Glad to have come across you again. I always respected your opinion and thoughts. Peace.
Which is it?
That is good
I thought she promised a constitutional amendment cough cough, got heat exhaustion, can't remember though was that private or public?
I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish
"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"
Heard from Margaret Kimberley
Interesting new Poll of post voters may shape story
A Reuters/IPSOS poll of people that have voted finds that about 3/4 of the people want a strong leader who will stand up to the rich and powerful. They think the game is rigged.
I think it should be come very clear to anyone not swimming in Clinton Kool-Aid that the path to 2020 means standing up to the rich and the powerful.
2020 starts tomorrow, 11/9/2016: She wants to get relected (assuming she's elected) she's going to need to play Bernie-Ball.
If she doesn't, she's a one termer, and if the FBI gets its way a half termer. (Fine by me, I'll take President Kane, yes, he's third to last choice, but that's better than second to last)
I can only hope that smarter heads than hers will convince her to go hard left. I don't believe she will, but then I don't think she'll get reelected. Someone needs to knock it into her head that you only get 1 Trump to run against. Anyone else would have crushed her, and will crush her in 2020 unless she radically changes course.
____________________________________________________________________________
"I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it. "
-Niccolo Machiavelli
"Sorry Hillary"
-TheJerry
She's never "gone" anywhere
Go read her 1993 "politics of meaning" speech. This is what she has been trying to accomplish for 25 years.
We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg
She only knows one way to play the game
If 2008 didn't show us that, this year sure did.
What was it that Mook said in the Podesta emails? Oh yes, just take the money and worry about the fallout of it coming from foreign agents and governments later.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
There was a poll briefly mentioned on MSM TV that 82%
of the electorate thought this campaign was "disgusting".
Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.
I find that discouraging...
I cannot even conceive of how 18% of the country thought this election was OK, normal, good, average or any other non-pejorative term.
Do those 18% work in the Media or in DC?
____________________________________________________________________________
"I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it. "
-Niccolo Machiavelli
"Sorry Hillary"
-TheJerry
Seasonal workers
for Correct the Record.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
It is a good reponse
I literally got nauseous filling out my ballot. It was disgusting on all levels local state and national. Some good ballot measures here in Oregon that did not make me queasy. What a farce.
I'm just up I-5 in WA.
The Democrats failed to even run candidates against either of my state reps or senator. And one of my reps is fucking Ed Orcutt. You'd think he might be vulnerable with the crazy shit he says. From his Wikipedia entry:
The battle will continue.
Hillary can appoint who ever she likes. The senate has to confirm them. I have already seen what is coming. In between campaign stops for Hillary Bernie stopped by standing rock and called out the president and both candidates for being amoral enough to turn a blind eye to what was going on. Hillary had a choice then, she waffled and totally lost the Indian vote. Here in Washington even one of our electoral college, a member of the Puyallup Nation, is saying it will be worth the fine to not cast his electoral vote for her after her squirrely bs non answer. This is what Hillary has to look forward to. Going to be a long 4 years for her if that's the case.
Bernie is going to ride her like a 3-2 count in the bottom
of the 9th.
He will foul off as many as he needs until he gets on.
The defeatism at c99p won't stop him and won't help anyone but the oligarchy.
Oh I hope so
But I still voted for Jill just in case.
We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg
I'm 11 minutes away from voting Jill.
Well I salute you for that
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
If you're going to insult c99 because of your opinion of me
At least have the decency and the guts to say so as you did in your direct post to me up thread.
As I explained above in my response here, I'm not a defeatist regardless of whatever you think you know about me. Bernie has a role to play, but I personally believe he lost a lot of power when he endorsed her before the nomination vote. But maybe you prefer name calling and ad hominem attacks to honest discussion of what the most effective way to proceed with opposing the status quo should be.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
You have to apologize for nothing. Nothing.
Defeatist? Horse shit. You are one of the stalwarts of c99%.
"Just call me Hillbilly Dem(exit)."
-H/T to Wavey Davey
I agree Hillbilly that is why i wrote this in an essay
here is the essay
for the record I did not call Steven a defeatist and I don't believe he is. I believe that our only hope for positively influencing policy for the 99ers is Bernie and I believe we will be able to at minimum protect what we have for the next 4 years (i.e Not privatizing SS) thanks to his efforts and we may get a victory out of it.
Defeatism at c99p?
I don't see it.
All I see are people saying the democratic party is beyond redemption if we wait for them.
What's wrong with that?
Regardless of the path in life I chose, I realize it's always forward, never straight.
Your the one
whose a defeatist along with Bernie. Bernie didn't even stay in the game when he knew it was rigged. Actually after reading the Podesta e-mails I think from the very beginning he was in it to bring the balking sheep back into the Democratic fold. I don't care about his intentions they matter not. I do not hate him and I'm not bashing him but at this point to think that Bernie or any so called progressive Democratic pol is going to fight the oligarchy is absurd. Stop saying we're defeatist's because we don't buy the bs. fear and loathing emanating from the 'inevitable' Democratic propaganda machine. The Russians did it? Yeah right. Read the Mad bomber's campaign e-mails. Then tell me again what a defeatist I am. You might need some deprogramming and to stop being a fanboy of any pol. This is not a baseball game so try thinking for yourself.
Pfffffft! The time for that old man has past. We're on our
own. I wouldn't believe a word out of his mouth if Jesus Christ, Buddha, Queztalcoatl, and Zeus were standing right next to him with one hand on their heart and the other on a Bible, a Tripitaka, an Aztec scroll, and a copy of the Theogony.
I just got home from voting for Stein. We need a third party. We MUST have a third party. The left, the REAL left, has four years to get its shit together and come up with a plan and possibly a better candidate than Stein. WTF has that woman ever done that makes people so upset (besides the Hillbots)? People keep telling me she's 'crazy'. When I try to discuss her with them they just get this smirk on their faces and walk away. It's a miracle she made it on the Nebraska ballot by petition. (The primary was won by Sanders.) But if we stick with Stein, we need to get her more exposure and counter whatever crazy stories are out there about her. And we need to build up the environmental movement, something the Clinton creature's benefactor's will fight tooth and nail.
It's going to be a long, hard 4 years. But we need to work OUTSIDE of this thing the Democratic Party has become. And if anyone thinks it's impossible, I bet if Abraham Lincoln were here he'd tell them otherwise.
EDIT: Took an 's' off the word heart. I doubt anyone or anything has more than one so I fixed it.
I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks
Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa
I voted for her, but it was just a protest.
If the Greens want to be serious they have to get an experienced politician to jump parties and join them.
It's not amateur night and that's why Trump will lose.
I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.
It'll be interesting to see how well the Green Party does.
Maybe we'll have to come up with a whole new party, new platform, new players, new candidates.
All I know is the Democratic Party is deader than the proverbial doo doo. At least it is to me.
I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks
Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa
dakrle...
insults are not a good way to make friends around here, capisce?
Please refrain from pointing fingers.
In training?
Maybe he running for the 2020 GOP nomination in which case it would be good practice.--
And who is going to bring the case to the Supreme Court
In his imaginary mind that gets CU overturned?
Besides doesn't it take a constitutional amendment to overturn it? Yes I can see all those governors on the Koch payroll voting for it or any member of congress.
I can't decide if Bernie is unaware of what needs to happen or is blowing smoke.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.
~Hannah Arendt
No, a Constitutional amendment is not necessary
The Court could reverse it's position, but it would shock the hell out of me if they did, based on all the prior case law in which they have treated corporations as "persons" with the same rights as human beings under the Constitution. Little known fact: First significant Supreme Court case in which the the 14th amendment was considered involved a Railroad company (the Tech industry titans of their day). Over time, the courts used a series of cases using the 14th amendment to justify favoring the rights of corporations over people.
Look it up.
https://www.brennancenter.org/blog/hobby-lobby-argument
http://www.alternet.org/10-supreme-court-rulings-turned-corporations-people
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
And IF she does anything at all about
Citizens United, I'm betting it sure in hell won't be before 2020 and her re-election campaign. This is how she "won" this time, she's not going to stop her own gravy train to victory.
Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur
WHy
to Her and Her sycophants, she'd be a fool not to take advantage of CU, even though she claims she is opposed to it. Them Clinton ethics are quite special.
Why would she even
want to overturn CU. She as well as all the corporate Dem. pols on every level and their sponsor's have reaped the benefits bestowed on them by CU. Meanwhile I just read a wikileak Podesta e-mail wherein The Mad Bomber's crew was discussing how to enable Republican types to be appointed to the Supreme Kangaroo court. So much for waving around the supreme court as a reason to vote for Democrat's. She won't wait till 2020 she will immediately tell us all this is a 'victory for compromise'.
She won this time by sheer fear of The Hairball and his pig ignorant hateful violent supporters. Not to mention the wall to wall hysteria of the so called left media propaganda. I feel sorry for all the people of good spirit who believe this crap is our only option. Worse are those who say she is kind, compassionate and a friend to women and children. That delusion is a level I cannot comprehend and yet many of my friends, neighbors and family are so deluded they believe this shit. She won this time by the powers that be extorting the vote.
Yeah. I just found out today
my old mentor, my work buddy and "dad" like figure, a very smart man, very highly cynical, is a Hillbot. God, I sort of suspected it, but I'm still just sad. I told him I voted Stein, that I would never vote for Shillary and that I am horrified by the whole thing. He asked why not Johnson, as if any Libertarian would get my vote. I vented a bit but didn't even get into details, recommended some books as examples of what I mean, and got no reply. I'm sure he's probably one of those who think voting Green is loony. Well, right back at him - just who in reality is the loon? Maybe I made a dent but I doubt it. Damn. He mentioned SCOTUS, as if she'll nominate a true "liberal". Like hell she will.
Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur
Another big secret. The Supreme Court NEVER said that
corporations were people. It was a notation appended in the headnote by a court clerk in the case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 1886 118 U.S. 394 (1886).
***
SNIPPET FROM CONSUMERIST ARTICLE
How Corporations Got The Same Rights As People (But Don’t Ever Go To Jail)
Sometimes, landmark case law springs from the most unlikely of sources. In this case, the issue was over whether or not the state of California had the power to tax the railroad for their fencing (the railroad paid taxes on other property, like rails and train cars).
The Court unanimously held that the state was improperly assessing taxes on the railroad, but in the long history of corporate personhood, that part — and the rest of the case — doesn’t matter at all. Instead, the case is remembered for a headnote appended to it by the court reporter, in which the Court’s Chief Justice, Morrison Waite, said he and the other justices believed that the protections of the Fourteenth Amendment of course applied to corporations as well as to individuals:
“The Court does not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution which forbids a state to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws applies to these corporations. We are all of opinion that it does.”
Although that note is not part of any official opinion, concurrence, or dissent, it is part of the official court record and was reaffirmed in later cases. Corporate persons have since been granted equal protection under the law, which forms the foundation for granting a number of other rights.
https://consumerist.com/2014/09/12/how-corporations-got-the-same-rights-...
END OF SNIPPET FROM CONSUMERIST ARTICLE
***
It's all smoke and mirrors. Every damn last bit of it.
I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks
Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa
Bernie was a lot more compelling...
before he ran up the white flag and became a born-again Hillary shill. Anyone who can say, with a straight face, "I served with [Hillary] in the United States Senate and know her as a fierce advocate for the rights of children... Hillary Clinton will make an outstanding president and I am proud to stand with her here today" is not someone I consider worth paying too much attention to.
Speaking of tweets, I loved this one I saw today from Jill Stein, in which she quoted another enemy of the status quo from an earlier era:
I suppose history will judge to what extent Bernie was "really in earnest" in his advocacy of a government that serves the interests of the many instead of the privileged few.
inactive account
Great reply Steve! I have
Great reply Steve! I have voted Green already, so much for the Dems eh?
So long, and thanks for all the fish
She might... maybe.
Since this election has proved you can:
1. Coordinate with media without repercussions.
2. Blatantly peddle influence without repercussions.
3. Threaten those that deviate from the party line with criminal charges.
4. Completely rig an election without consequences.
Citizen United is a bit... redundant. SURE, let's put some "Limits" on what can people who aren't Clinton Supporters can spend...
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xobY1Wx6Kls]
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
Highly unlikely
See my discussion of this up thread in this comment.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
Oh, It won't happen...
But it'd be a great weapon to use against the left.
"See! Hillary IS on your side. Look at all the influence she got out of politics! That's what YOU stand for." (While quietly cementing the alliance between corporate media and government.)
Course, I just am thinking, "What would I do if I actually cared about the left's votes, and was an amoral sociopath."
We already know Hillary doesn't care.
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
"We already know Hillary doesn't care [about us]."
Truer words and all that.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
It also means that one can break electioneering laws
In 4 states without any repercussions.
Even the candidate can go to a polling place and not face any changes of interfering with the election.
And the Clintons have the guts to blame Russia without offering any proof?
http://www.independentsentinel.com/bill-hillary-break-electioneering-law...
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.
~Hannah Arendt
If I was an amoral sociopath...
There's a nice little fix for that.
Elections are now under the purview of the DHS.
Which will subcontract the polling places out to private industry.
Therefore, anything that happens with regards to elections is on private property.
Therefore, anything that happens is not protected by the constitution, because of already set precedent.
That solves all the problems in one fell swoop.
Some days I'm really glad I'm not evil. (But I should probably stop giving em ideas, or broadcasting their wet dreams...)
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
Hey! detroitmechworks
great to read you again. I missed you. Hope you stick around now that the mad election is over and the real trouble starts.
Not sure. Just stopping in...
Been enjoying my life immensely.
Politics has been so toxic, I just didn't need it in my life.
Now that it's over, I can maybe get back into the pool a bit.
Thanks though!
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
Well said, Steven!
If Merrick Garland is any indication, I don't look for a progressive SCOTUS no matter who wins unless Jill pulls it out.
As for defeatists, I laugh at people who call me something I'm not.
I followed you on Twitter. Follow me back!
Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.
Will do
What is your twitter handle?
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
Never mind
I found it.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
Fixed my sig line to make it a little more prominent!
Thanks, Steven!
Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.
Just announced on TYT that Hillary has Won Guam.
And as Guam goes so goes...
Wait, where is Guam again?
(Edited to change one to won. Apparently my plan is already working.)
Edited again to add. "oops wrong thread, lol!"
"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me
Overturning C.U. won't mean shit now anyway.
The corruption was neck high well before C.U., that only gave it state legitimization. It''s like, "oh, let's go back to the way it used to be". It used to be fucked up too. We simply have got to aim much higher to change or replace this political system. So again, Bernie comes up with a lukewarm idea to keep people from focusing on real change.
Amen Big Al.