Afghanistan War enters its 16th year

Fifteen years ago tonight U.S. Air Force B-1 and B-52 bombers attacked 31 targets in Afghanistan, described by then-President George W. Bush as “al-Qaeda terrorist training camps and military installations of the Taliban regime.”
And so began America's Longest War - by far - with no end in sight.

The following day, President Bush confidently predicted victory.

"We know that slowly but surely the Taliban is crumbling," Bush said.

Ten days later, Vice President Cheney and General Tommy Franks displayed confidence to the point of arrogance.

“For the first time in our history,” Vice President Dick Cheney remarked on October 18, 2001, “we will probably suffer more casualties here at home in America than will our troops overseas.” General Tommy Franks, the head of U.S. Central Command, said early on that the war was not about “occupying major strategic terrain,” and therefore offered “the easiest exit strategy we’ve had in years.”

In the summer of 2004, President Bush declared "Mission Accomplished" in Afghanistan.

(CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday claimed victory in the war on terrorism in Afghanistan and announced what he called five new initiatives to strengthen the links between that country and the United States...
"Coalition forces, including many brave Afghans, have brought America, Afghanistan and the world its first victory in the war on terror," the president said. "Afghanistan is no longer a terrorist factory sending thousands of killers into the world."
A short while later in the Afghan capital city of Kabul, NATO forces came under fire Tuesday when at least one rocket exploded outside their headquarters. One soldier suffered non-lifethreatening injuries, officials said.

Despite the war being won in 2004, the killing went on and got worse.
In 2008, Presidential-candidate Barak Obama predicted victory in Afghanistan.

We will end this war in Iraq. We will bring our troops home. We will finish the job -- we will finish the job against Al Qaida in Afghanistan.

Four years later, President Obama vowed again to "finish the job" in Afghanistan.
At the end of 2014, Obama made his own "Mission Accomplished" moment, while expanding the combat role of our troops there.
refugees.PNG

Despite all this promises of victory, despite all this public confidence, way back in 2012 NATO predicted that we would lose and the Taliban would prevail.

A secret US military report says the Taliban, heavily backed by Pakistan, are confident they can win the Afghanistan conflict, and that they are gaining popular support at the expense of the Kabul government.
The report, The State of the Taliban 2012, is the latest of a series drawn up by a US special operations taskforce on the basis of interrogations with 4,000 suspected Taliban and al-Qaida detainees.
Its conclusions, that the Taliban's strength and morale are largely intact despite the Nato military surge, and that significant numbers of Afghan government soldiers are defecting to them, are in stark contrast to Nato's far more bullish official line, that the insurgent movement has been severely damaged and demoralised....
The authors, American researchers attached to special forces, conclude that the weakness and venality of the government in Kabul is an increasing source of strength for the insurgents. "In the last year, there has been unprecedented interest, even from [Afghan government] members, in joining the insurgent cause. Afghan civilians frequently prefer Taliban governance over [the Afghan government], usually as a result of government corruption, ethnic bias and lack of connection with local religious and tribal leaders.

Like most things Afghanistan, Americans didn't notice that NATO predicted our eventual loss, nor would Americans have remembered if they had noticed.
Either way, Washington has kept up the game of make-believe, that everything is under control.

In July, Obama announced that the United States will leave 8,400 troops in Afghanistan—up from the 5,500 he originally called for. In the countryside, the Taliban is more powerful than ever.

A decade and a half later, the Taliban is back in force. It commands large parts of the countryside, and threatens major urban areas. Kunduz, in the north, has been going back and forth between the Taliban and the Afghan National Army. Just this week, the Taliban forces took the center of the city, only to be ejected a day later. In Helmand Province in the south, home of the US Surge, the Taliban threatens the provincial capital of Lashkar Gah. It already holds six of the fourteen districts of Helmand — Baghran, Dishu, Musa Qala, Nawa, Now Zad and Khanashin). The rest of the district is almost entirely dominated by the Taliban. Just north of Helmand, the Taliban threaten the provincial capital of Uruzgan — Tarin Kot. Much of southern Afghanistan, in other words, is in the craw of the Taliban.

“The Taliban now controls more territory than at any time since 2001,” the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction said in a January report.
Earlier this week, the first American military member killed in that country fighting ISIS.
Just like last year, thousands are fleeing Kunduz, as the Taliban overrun parts of the city.

The toll of Afghanis is staggering.

As of August 2016, the U.S. war in Afghanistan has resulted in the deaths of 104,000 people, 31,000 of which were Afghan civilians, according to Brown University’s Watson Institute of International and Public Affairs in Rhode Island...
In January 2012, a video surfaced of two U.S. Marines in full combat gear urinating on Taliban corpses. In February of the same year, two U.S. troops were killed as hundreds of Afghans violently protested the burning of religious materials by the American military. While Obama issued an apology and promised “to avoid any recurrence,” the Taliban called for attacks on Northern Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) bases and military personnel.
Less than a month later, an American soldier left a combat outpost in the early morning hours for a town known to be sympathetic to the Taliban, and opened fire on several families, killing 16 people—nine of which were children.

That's not to say some people haven't made out well from this war, specifically drug lords.un-data-opium-production-afghanistan.PNG

Opium poppy cultivation levels in Afghanistan this year are the highest on record, said the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, adding that efforts to eradicate the crop have fallen flat.
“Unfortunately, preliminary results suggest that illicit cultivation has increased well above 200,000 hectares (494,000 acres),” UNODC Executive Director Yury Fedotov said on Wednesday., according to the text of a speech prepared for an international conference on Afghanistan in Brussels, Reuters reported.
“The production of opiates is expected to follow the same upward trend,” while eradication efforts have dropped to “close to zero,” Fedotov said.

Afghanistan is the largest narcostate in history.
Besides the drug lords, two other criminal elements have benefited from our occupation - war lords and politicians.

American taxpayers have spent more than $100 billion rebuilding Afghanistan, creating schools, hospitals and roads while making millionaires out of a rogue's gallery of warlords, gangsters and corrupt officials.
A total of $114 billion, which does not include even more spent on the military effort to oust the Taliban and stabilize the impoverished country, has been appropriated since 2002. While it has likely improved conditions in the country, corrupt builders, security providers, mercenaries and even local bankers have all taken their cuts - and gotten rich in the process.

Until we admit our failures, this war will never end.
But before we can do that we must acknowledge that we are still at war in Afghanistan.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Citizen Of Earth's picture

Saw this article yesterday
15 Years Later the Taliban Is Back in Power in Afghanistan, and More Radical Than Ever
http://www.alternet.org/world/taliban-back-power

So glad that smartest people are spending us into financial oblivion to make things worse.

Fuck Bush, Fuck Obomba, and preemptively Fuck the Next President who will undoubtedly continue the madness.

up
0 users have voted.

Donnie The #ShitHole Douchebag. Fake Friend to the Working Class. Real Asshole.

do not know we are in a war, do not know we are losing it, and have no idea why we were ever in it to begin with.
If we re-institute the draft, people will start paying attention .
As long as the employment outlook remains so hopeless for poor young people, the military does have an appeal.

up
0 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

Although the USA does not acknowledge their rule, the Taliban controls more of Afghanistan today than in 2001.

We can leave now or 10 years from now, with the same result. At a meeting with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon Jan. 28, 2009, President Obama asked, "What is the end game?" in Afghanistan, and was told, "Frankly, we don't have one," according to a report by NBC News Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski.

On average, it costs $1.2 million a year to deploy one American halfway around the world in Afghanistan.

up
0 users have voted.

"We've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty."

Lily O Lady's picture

forward to.

up
0 users have voted.

"The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?" ~Orwell, "1984"

Big Al's picture

Some have called Afghanistan a giant "land based aircraft carrier". Check where it's at on the map. Right next to Iran, China, and right below Russia and the "Stans"/Caspian Sea area, extremely valuable area for oil and oil pipelines. No way were they ever giving up Afghanistan when they've got Iran, Russia and China in the crosshairs.

Map_of_Central_Asia.png

With Afghanistan, it's "location, location, location".

up
0 users have voted.
Azazello's picture

they never intend to leave. I'm tired of their god damn wars. I'm tired of having troops too. If we had enough decent jobs in this country, nobody would want to be a "troop."

up
0 users have voted.

We wanted decent healthcare, a living wage and free college.
The Democrats gave us Biden and war instead.

Afghanistan is landlocked. Bulky supply items like vehicles and fuel have to be shipped to Pakistan (a frenemy at best) then trucked over the Khyber Pass. Convoys have been attacked by the Taliban, and trucking contractors pay protection money to get through. In other words, we pay the truckers and a percentage goes to the enemy.

Afghanistan will never be a great place to base U.S. forces. If that's the Pentagon plan, then we need better generals.

up
0 users have voted.

"We've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty."

up
0 users have voted.

In fact, location IS the first order of war bidness.

up
0 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

These three wars first began in 1839 and ended in 1842, next began in 1878 and lasted into 1880, and then finally in 1919 were the British able to get their way relatively cheaply and quickly through the agency of air power. Actual time at war: seven years, give or take.

Clearly, victory in Afghanistan isn't the goal of the current US war there. This surprises me, since the Pentagon assayed the recoverable mineral wealth for that Stone Age nation as being worth at least $1 TRILLION WITH A T dollars, a valuation recognized by the United Nations. This only explains why the US retains forces in Afghanistan, and doesn't at all address why a fight for victory isn't waged.

The only possible rationale to explain this is that it would take almost that much to conquer and pacify the nation to allow development - and no one is willing to foot such costs for such a small return on investment. This is indicated in two separate deals falling apart. China is backing away from a copper mining arrangement, and India is halting an iron ore development due to the uncertainties of working in such an unsettled and lawless region - and they both have plenty of capital thanks to the US in particular.

What would the hard rock miners of the American West say about that?

edited to fix a link

up
0 users have voted.

Vowing To Oppose Everything Trump Attempts.

The rule of thumb for counterinsurgency is to scale the force requirements to the population rather than the size of the insurgent army. You need 20-25 soldiers for every thousand civilians. Probably more if they are scattered over a wide area the size of Texas. Even that level of commitment does not guarantee victory because you also need a legitimate national government, which Afghanistan currently lacks.

The arithmetic goes like this. 33 million Afghan population means at least 660,000 troops. That's equal to the total active-duty strength of the U.S. Army. It would be a huge logistical challenge to sustain such a force deployed in a landlocked country halfway around the world.

up
0 users have voted.

"We've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty."

I don't trust the corporatists to stick us with that bill so they can access that profit opportunity. I'm amazed that they haven't yet pushed for a major increase in the US military effort there to secure such vast wealth for the well-connected few.

up
0 users have voted.

Vowing To Oppose Everything Trump Attempts.

EdMass's picture

Not anymore. Entropy.

If it wasn't for Big Al and Alenjo back on ToP I probably wouldn't be here. Am glad they're here. It helps to know one is not alone.

I do appreciate you and your work.

STOP THE WAR

Peace and love

up
0 users have voted.

Prof: Nancy! I’m going to Greece!
Nancy: And swim the English Channel?
Prof: No. No. To ancient Greece where burning Sapho stood beside the wine dark sea. Wa de do da! Nancy, I’ve invented a time machine!

Firesign Theater

Stop the War!

Bollox Ref's picture

And we moderns mock the silly English, French, Burgundians and others fighting over inheritance law.

up
0 users have voted.

Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.

that have no memory of how this war started because they were too young.

up
0 users have voted.
Bollox Ref's picture

years after the death of Edward III.

up
0 users have voted.

Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.

Not Henry Kissinger's picture

At last it's old enough to drive itself!

Let's just give them the keys and have done with it.

up
0 users have voted.

The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?

to hearing about the vast sums of money being spent on war. It's easy to forget just how much money that is.

$1billion is one thousand millions of dollars. A million dollars is a lot of money, and that's a lot of millions. $100 billion is one hundred thousand millions of dollars. That is far too much money to have spent on a war that has accomplished next to nothing, and has killed far too many people already. With no end in sight.

up
0 users have voted.

native

Lenzabi's picture

No victory needed when the war-zone helps develop and sell weapons right? The psychos and sociopaths in the MIC just want to milk Afghanistan's long war as a cash cow.

Our psycho/sociopath politicians are all on board especially those whose districts house the makers of the weapons made by the MIC.

PNAC wanted a way to get us in a war that would "reinvigorate" the economy,,,,but it was done so for the few whoare the MIC/Politicians, all the rest of us get the short end.

up
0 users have voted.

So long, and thanks for all the fish

lotlizard's picture

Peace would just mean losing that tremendous advantage for the country’s arms industry.

up
0 users have voted.