The Real and Present Danger to America That Both Trump and Hillary Won't Talk About

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NA9p7Xx2kzo]

Climate Change or Anthropogenic Climate Disruption (AGD) poses the greatest danger to America's national security, and to life on earth as we know it, yet neither political candidate has paid it more than lip service.

Yet, as we spend Billions upon Trillions of dollars on wars in the Middle East (including, without limitation the "War on Terror") we spend a pittance preparing to ameliorate the danger (rising seas, extreme weather events, starvation, war, economic disruption, poisoned oceans and fresh water resources, etc.) and to eliminate the causes (fossil fuel emissions) of AGD. In fact we spend more money on wars to protect our access to fossil fuel resources in the Middle East than we do to address the real threat to all life on this planet, which is being caused by the emissions from burning those very same fossil fuels.

Sources:

US Defense Department lists climate change as urgent national security threat:
http://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/612710
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/7/pentagon-orders-commander...
http://time.com/4101903/climate-change-national-security/

To the military, climate change acts as a threat multiplier, exacerbating threats in already unstable regions of the world. Just as we act aggressively on information from the national security intelligence community, we must also act on the scientific evidence from our nation’s best climate scientists.

2016 US Military spending (roughly $600 Billion) versus Federal Gov't Spending on Climate Change ($20 Billion), a 30:1 ratio and probably an underestimate:
http://www.ips-dc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/CvsC-Report-1.pdf

US Subsidies for the Fossil Fuel Industry per year exceed $20 Billion:
http://www.ibtimes.com/us-fossil-fuel-subsidies-increase-dramatically-de...
https://www.treasury.gov/open/Documents/USA%20FFSR%20progress%20report%2...

Billions in Tax Deductions granted to fossil fuel polluters for cleaning up their oil spills:
http://www.ibtimes.com/us-fossil-fuel-subsidies-increase-dramatically-de...

[I]n the U.S., deductions for cleaning up oil spills allows companies to claim the cost as a standard business expense. This provision allowed British oil giant BP Plc to claim $9.9 billion in tax deductions in 2010 following the Deepwater Horizon accident in the Gulf of Mexico, where the company reportedly incurred over $32.2 billion in cleanup costs.

“In 2015, BP reached a final settlement with the US government and five state governments totalling $20.8 billion. However, only $5.5 billion of this is in the form of a non-tax-deductible penalty, and the remainder can be written off by BP,” the report said.

Cost of US Severe Weather events in 2015 exceeded $22.5 Billion:
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/events
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/overview

In 2015, there were 10 weather and climate disaster events with losses exceeding $1 billion each across the United States. These events included a drought event, 2 flooding events, 5 severe storm events, a wildfire event, and a winter storm event. Overall, these events resulted in the deaths of 155 people and had significant economic effects on the areas impacted. The 1980–2015 annual average is 5.2 events (CPI-adjusted); the annual average for the most recent 5 years (2011–2015) is 10.8 events (CPI-adjusted). [...]

In performing these disaster cost assessments these statistics were taken from a wide variety of sources and represent, to the best of our ability, the estimated total costs of these events -- that is, the costs in terms of dollars that would not have been incurred had the event not taken place. Insured and uninsured losses are included in damage estimates. Sources include the National Weather Service, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Agriculture, other U.S. government agencies, individual state emergency management agencies, state and regional climate centers, media reports, and insurance industry estimates.

Cost of War on Terror since 9/11/2001- $3.6 Trillion total as of today, or $240 Billion per year:
https://news.brown.edu/articles/2016/09/costsofwar2

World permanently passes 400 ppm of CO2 in atmosphere leading to irreversible consequences:
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/world-passes-400-ppm-threshold-perman...

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Steven D's picture

So, I am video blogging today, instead of the keyboard kind. But I have provided my sources and information imparted in the video, for those unable to access my YouTube Channel.

Steve

up
0 users have voted.

"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott

The Aspie Corner's picture

We had a good run.

up
0 users have voted.

Modern education is little more than toeing the line for the capitalist pigs.

Guerrilla Liberalism won't liberate the US or the world from the iron fist of capital.

Miami will be underwater.

up
0 users have voted.

"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." - Groucho

Our growing military involvement in the ME is clearly linked to controlling the fossil fuel that our society, and its military/industrial cancer rely on. It's a clear expression of the level of our commitment to a continuation of a profligate, consumption based economy and hegemonic control of fossil fuel energy resources world wide.

It's not about religion.
It's not about terrorism.
It's not about democracy.

It's about oil and power.

TPTB act as if they believe that more oil and power will somehow insulate them from the inevitable mass extinction event that comes with a warming planet.

Willfully ignorant fools, the lot of them.

up
0 users have voted.

“ …and when we destroy nature, we diminish our capacity to sense the divine,and understand who God is, and what our own potential is and duties are as human beings.- RFK jr. 8/26/2024

Don't kid yourself. Our brilliant leaders take climate change seriously and have devised a quick solution using Middle East conflicts. They're working feverishly toward implementing GNW, the ultimate quick-fix for global warming. GNW as in Global Nuclear War.

up
0 users have voted.
PriceRip's picture

          Everyone seems to have a pet project. If the discussion is not about their issue then, by damn, they will push to make it about their issue. So, "setting all issues aside for the moment" just has no place at the table.

          I am surprised by the number of people that think my high efficiency automobile is part of the solution. The damn thing still uses gasoline, for crying out loud! How can it be part of the solution‽ Everyone should know that the only solution is the complete cessation of fossil fuel extraction. So, while "cutting back" is going in the correct direction, incrementalism just isn't an acceptable approach.

          The sad truth is that no matter what I say there will be someone that will take my words to the extreme and go ballistic on how unrealistic I am. Every damn time.

up
0 users have voted.

where a negative world wide carbon footprint (including sequestration efforts) will be required to continue to enjoy an inhabitable planet for the foreseeable future.

That would require major changes in virtually all human carbon based energy consumption profiles, not just autos. Heat light & power, travel, work commutation, public transportation, agriculture, diet, international trade, you name it. If combustion is involved, it needs to stop.

Of course there will be great resistence to change of that order of magnitude, which makes my finding an optimistic outlook quite problematic.

up
0 users have voted.

“ …and when we destroy nature, we diminish our capacity to sense the divine,and understand who God is, and what our own potential is and duties are as human beings.- RFK jr. 8/26/2024

against the unstoppable feedback loop. Is that what "hope" was all about?

up
0 users have voted.

"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." - Groucho

problems facing the USA and the world: Climate change; maldistribution of wealth; the loss of workplace democracy; endless war and the accompanying suffering and death.

I learned here the other day that Obama said after he was elected that he would surprise a lot of people. He did. He clearly was not up to the job and did not try to leave the world a better place after his 8 years. He's leaving the world a worse place. Clearly, he was the wrong man for the job.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

tapu dali's picture

Yes, by turning HARD RIGHT as soon as he was elected, and laughing all the way to the bank.

Sleaze.

up
0 users have voted.

There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.

"why is he acting so strange? do you think he is one of them?" roky wants to know.

up
0 users have voted.
shaharazade's picture

up
0 users have voted.

a committee to see if indeed the Anthropocene has replaced the Holocene as a geologic era. The committee reported back, after more than a year of study, that Yes it does exist and humanity has had an impact that is measurable in geologic stratigraphy. One of the recommended markers is 1950 when open air nuclear weapons were exploded in the atmosphere as tests; another was the deposition of carbon based soot from several years earlier. The Union of Concerned Scientists believes that the recommendation will be adopted.

I think some of the resistance to recognition of climate change in the USA is that influential climate scientists and ecologists have often been identified as leftists. The proposed era name, Anthropocene, was coined by Soviet scientists in the 1960's and leading ecologists like Odum have been on the left end of the political spectrum.

The main resistance comes from those corporations that have money to lose if fossil fuels are phased out. I am hopeful that states will file lawsuits against big oil companies and big coal companies because it's been well documented that they knew the harm that they were causing and spent big bucks to sow doubt just like the tobacco companies did.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"