If Julian Assange wants to win the hearts and minds of the far Right Wing, Inquiitr shows us how he'd do it:

Wikileaks Says They Have 1,700 Emails Proving Hillary Clinton Knew About U.S. Military Weapons Shipments To Al Qaeda and ISIS

Wikileaks head Julian Assange says he has proof that Hillary Clinton lied under oath while giving a public testimony following the 2013 Benghazi terrorist attack. Assange says Wikileaks has 1,700 emails proving Clinton’s statements that she was not involved or aware of any sale of weapons to Syrian “rebels” were a lie. In fact, Assange notes that the former Secretary of State was fully aware of the United States’ involvement in arming rebels in Libya in a bid to help them overtake Qaddafi. Ultimately, it is alleged that those same weapons then made their way to the Islamic State in Syria.

snip

The National Review points out that Wikileaks seems to be honing in on statements made by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton following the 2013 Benghazi terrorist attack. In a public testimony, Secretary Clinton claimed that she had no knowledge of weapons transfers to Libya, Turkey or Syria in the months leading up to the terrorist attack. Clinton said “I don’t have any information on that” when pressed about her personal knowledge of the weapons transfers.“

It was Senator Rand Paul that asked Clinton the damning question when he pointed out that there were news reports of ships leaving Libya and asked Clinton if she was aware of these transfers. He specifically asked if she or the United States had been involved in "any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya." In response to the question, Clinton tried to deflect by saying, "nobody has ever raised that with me." However, upon further pressing, Senator Paul asked if Clinton personally knew of any such transfers which she personally denied.

Clinton was under oath for this exchange.

LONG RT INTERVIEW WITH ASSANGE

Let's sum up what we've seen in the past few weeks:

*The FBI, of course, said no biggie about having told something OTHER THAN the truth on her server and emails to them because she didn't have criminal intent (a standard not required by the applicable laws).

*We have not yet heard from Judge Sullivan about whether Clinton will be deposed by Judicial Watch on why she used a personal server, and whom, if anyone, recommended she do so.

*No word yet from IRS about referrals on Clinton Foundation or from FBI on the referral about whether Clinton lied under oath about her email/server during the Bengazi hearing.

*DOS this week said no biggie that there appears to be evidence they hadn't seen before they issued their January 2016 Inspector General report on whether there was an Pay to Play. (Here's the pdf of that report if anyone want to sift through it: https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-16-01.pdf). The report begins:

What OIG Found
S/ES is responsible for coordinating searches for FOIA requests
for records held by the Office of the Secretary. When a FOIA
request of that nature is received by the Department, the Office
of Information Programs and Services (IPS) within the Bureau of
Administration notifies S/ES. S/ES reports its findings to IPS,
which then communicates with the FOIA requester.

OIG’s past and current work demonstrates that Department
leadership has not played a meaningful role in overseeing or
reviewing the quality of FOIA responses. The searches performed
by S/ES do not consistently meet statutory and regulatory
requirements for completeness and rarely meet requirements for
timeliness. S/ES currently searches Department email accounts
only if a FOIA request mentions emails or asks for “all records,” or
if S/ES is requested to do so during the course of litigation.
However, FOIA and Department guidance require searching email
accounts when relevant records are likely maintained in these
accounts. In addition, although FOIA requires agencies to respond
to requests within 20 working days, some requests involving the
Office of the Secretary have taken more than 500 days to process.
These delays are due, in part, to the Department’s insufficient
provision of personnel to IPS to handle its caseload.

These problems are compounded by the fact that S/ES FOIA
responses are sometimes inaccurate. Officials in IPS and attorneys
for the Department identified instances in which S/ES reported that
records did not exist, even though it was later revealed that such
records did exist. Procedural weaknesses in S/ES FOIA processes
appear to be contributing to these deficiencies. For example, S/ES
management is not monitoring search results for accuracy, and IPS
has limited ability to conduct oversight. S/ES also lacks written
policies and procedures for responding to FOIA requests. Finally,
staff in S/ES and other components in the Office of the Secretary
have not taken training offered by IPS to better understand their
FOIA responsibilities.

If there's another IG report, I haven't found it. One can search here: https://oig.state.gov/find-a-report