The Morning
April 24, 2025

Good morning. The U.S. is urging Ukraine to take a deal that favors Russia. . . .

Ukraine’s concessions
Author Headshot
By German Lopez

Russia invaded Ukraine, but you wouldn’t know that from the peace negotiations. At every step, President Trump has pushed the victim to give ground, while the aggressor has given little of substance.

Yesterday brought the latest example. Vice President JD Vance laid out a peace proposal that sharply favors Russia, my colleagues David Sanger, Michael Shear and Mark Landler wrote. Ukraine would have to give up the territory that Russia took during the war as well as any chance to join NATO. Vance said the Trump administration would walk away if both sides didn’t accept its terms. The comments clearly targeted Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, who said this week that he would not preemptively cede Crimea, the region Russia invaded a decade ago.

Trump echoed Vance on social media. Zelensky “can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country,” Trump said.

This is now a familiar pattern in the American-led peace process: The administration frames its terms as demands for Russia and Ukraine, but only Ukraine has to give up something meaningful.

And if Ukraine refuses, the White House lashes out. After Trump took office, he demanded that Ukraine surrender its mineral wealth to the United States in exchange for continued support. After an Oval Office clash between Trump and Zelensky, the United States cut off Ukraine aid.

To make amends, Ukraine said it would accept a cease-fire if Russia did as well. Russia did not. Yet Trump didn’t punish Moscow; he rewarded it. He exempted Russia from his so-called reciprocal tariffs. Last week, the United States voted with Russia on a U.N. resolution about the war.

These are unusual circumstances. The United States is ostensibly Ukraine’s ally against Russia. Friends don’t typically demand more from friends than enemies in peace talks. Today’s newsletter will explain — with help from my colleagues who cover diplomacy, security, economics and international affairs — why the Trump administration takes this approach.

What Trump wants

Trump has two main goals when it comes to Ukraine.

First, he wants “to normalize the relationship with Russia,” David Sanger wrote. “If that means rewriting the history of Moscow’s illegal invasion, if it means dropping investigations of Russian war crimes or refusing to offer security guarantees that would keep Putin from finishing the job in Ukraine later, then Trump, in this assessment of his intentions, is willing to make that deal.”

Second, Trump wants to force European nations, not the United States, to handle problems in Europe. Trump criticizes NATO allies for spending little money on their militaries and, in his view, free-riding on U.S. security guarantees. By suggesting he won’t support Ukraine — or NATO — much longer, Trump is telling Europe that it should counter Russia on its own.

On both goals, Trump can claim some successes. The United States and Russia have discussed restoring embassy staffing. And Russia and Ukraine have signaled, for the first time, that they’re open to direct peace talks. Meanwhile, European leaders have promised to spend more on their militaries and weapons, including for Ukraine. “The new emphasis on arms production is evidence of a broader generational shift in Europe,” Lara Jakes and Bernhard Warner wrote.

Still, those wins are limited. The war in Ukraine persists. Fighting continued during Easter despite a truce. America’s relations with Russia remain strained; even U.S. companies that once benefited from Russian business are skeptical of going back, Anton Troianovski, Niraj Chokshi and Ivan Nechepurenko reported.

And a more independent Europe may not be good for America. The continent’s leaders could, for instance, use their independence to cozy up to China. Earlier this month, Spain’s prime minister met with China’s president to strengthen trade ties with Beijing, Liz Alderman wrote. All to say: Trump’s moves might not work as he hopes.

In the meantime, Ukraine suffers. So far this year, it has lost more territory than it has gained.

Related: At least nine people died in Russian airstrikes on Kyiv, Ukraine said.

President Blowhard has been, for the most part, his usual asshole self since getting back into the White House. The most significant exception has been with respect to Ukraine. Leaving aside the NYT fantasy of Ukraine having a good chance to expel the Russians from all the territory they've gained so far, this is evil fucking shit coming from the good old Times.

As always with Imperial propaganda, practical considerations are out of bounds. The only thing that matters is who is the good guy and who is the bad guy. They lie and say that Zelensky is a global hero while Putin is Putin.

How to be worse than the Orange Fart Cloud? Try to stop him from ending an idiotic war.