that produce arms. We don't have to start as many wars this way.

in my house.
What are we doing?
Why are we doing it?
Is this the best use of our treasure?

This is just a tip of the iceberg of the suffering and death America has causedpeople around the world.

Gaza: The Last Picture

Shujayea: Massacre at Dawn

... Netanyahu says, “Not enough”.
And Ms Clinton, should (likely when) she become President, will probably go along with that.
Does that make you happy?

Unfortunately, it's not 'probably'; she already has promised far more.

(If possible, please read in full at source.)

https://theintercept.com/2015/09/09/hillary-clinton-goes-militaristic-ha...

Hillary Clinton Goes to Militaristic, Hawkish Think Tank, Gives Militaristic, Hawkish Speech
Glenn Greenwald

Sep. 9 2015

... She vowed that in dealing with Iran, she will be tougher and more aggressive than Reagan was with the Soviet Union: “You remember President Reagan’s line about the Soviets: Trust but verify? My approach will be distrust and verify.” She also explicitly threatened Iran with war if they fail to comply: “I will not hesitate to take military action if Iran attempts to obtain a nuclear weapon, and I will set up my successor to be able to credibly make the same pledge.” She even depicted the Iran Deal as making a future war with Iran easier and more powerful:

Should it become necessary in the future having exhausted peaceful alternatives to turn to military force, we will have preserved and in some cases enhanced our capacity to act. And because we have proven our commitment to diplomacy first, the world will more likely join us.

As for Israel itself, Clinton eagerly promised to shower it with a long, expensive, and dangerous list of gifts. Here’s just a part of what that country can expect from the second President Clinton:

I will deepen America’s unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security, including our long standing tradition of guaranteeing Israel’s qualitative military edge. I’ll increase support for Israeli rocket and missile defenses and for intelligence sharing. I’ll sell Israel the most sophisticated fire aircraft ever developed. The F-35. We’ll work together to develop and implement better tunnel detection technology to prevent arms smuggling and kidnapping as well as the strongest possible missile defense system for Northern Israel, which has been subjected to Hezbollah’s attacks for years.

She promised she “will sustain a robust military presence in the [Persian Gulf] region, especially our air and naval forces.” She vowed to “increase security cooperation with our Gulf allies” — by which she means the despotic regimes in Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others. She swore she will crack down even further on Hezbollah: “It’s time to eliminate the false distinction that some still make between the supposed political and military wings. If you’re part of Hezbollah, you’re part of a terrorist organization, plain and simple.”

Then she took the ultimate pledge: “I would not support this agreement for one second if I thought it put Israel in greater danger.” So even if the deal would benefit the U.S., she would not support it “for one second” if it “put Israel in greater danger.” That’s an unusually blunt vow to subordinate the interests of the U.S. to that foreign nation.

But when it comes to gifts to Israel, that’s not all! Echoing the vow of several GOP candidates to call Netanyahu right away after being elected, Clinton promised: “I would invite the Israeli prime minister to the White House during my first month in office to talk about all of these issues and to set us on a course of close, frequent consultation right from the start, because we both rely on each other for support as partners, allies and friends.” She then addressed “the people of Israel,” telling them: “Let me say, you’ll never have to question whether we’re with you. The United States will always be with you.” For good measure, she heaped praise on “my friend Chuck Schumer,” who has led the battle to defeat the Iran Deal, gushing about what an “excellent leader in the Senate” he will make. What’s a little warmongering among friends? ...

Spreading paranoia about Putin or whoever, when the elephant in the room is Netanyahu.

Israel is not a member of the nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty and refuses to become one.

It is entirely prohibited by the Symington Amendment to give any kind of foreign aid to any state that has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 was amended by the Symington Amendment (Section 669 of the FAA) in 1976. It banned U.S. economic, and military assistance, and export credits to countries that deliver or receive, acquire or transfer nuclear enrichment technology when they do not comply with IAEA regulations and inspections. This provision, as amended, is now contained in Section 101 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA).

It seems our traitor government has completely overlooked legislation which is not beneficial to their benefactors. The benefactors most obviously being the israeli/jewish subverters of the nation. At least the manipulators have gotten one thing right, they no longer deny the DOCUMENTED FACT that israel is a nuclear capable country, not peaceful either. Since it is so obvious that it is absolutely never mentioned, what are we to make of this? What control of our own politicians do the citizens of the United States not possess that the israeli and American jewish subverters do possess?

credit for content to (edited): https://nationalconscience.wordpress.com/2013/08/11/the-illegality-of-fo...

Peace
FN

Think, we're defending a country that has nukes. Remind me why we need to support them again? (rhetorical question)
Israel's Worst Kept Secret