News worth watching?
Over the last couple of years I became aware that there were no broadcast news programs that reflected my views. They had all become corporate voices in the way of Faux Fraudcasting. So I began a search for more reliable sources of information. I now watch several news programs on YouTube. Here's some information about five channels I've been watching.
Many shows I watch are on the RT network, including Thom Hartmann's The Big Picture (minus the rumble), Lee Camp's Redacted tonight, Ed Shultz and so on. I always thought RT was the end of smaRT, but much to my surprise RT is Russia Today. So I realized I need to do some homework about my new media outlets. Most of them are fairly new. I guess every news outlet has its bias. I think it is important to understand what the slant is so you can filter information properly. Here's some of the things I learned. I've included a direct website for those of you who prefer not to stick your head in the Google (YouTube) algorithms.
RT (Russia Today)
watch here:
https://www.rt.com/
or here:
https://www.youtube.com/user/RussiaToday
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)
RT America is a TV channel that is based in Washington, D.C. RT America is part of the RT network, which is a global multilingual television news network that is based in Moscow, Russia. RT is an autonomous non-profit organization.
RT director Svetlana Mironyuk stated: "Unfortunately, at the level of mass consciousness in the West, Russia is associated with three words: communism, snow and poverty," and added "we would like to present a more complete picture of life in our country." It is registered as an autonomous nonprofit organization funded by the federal budget of Russia through the Federal Agency on Press and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation.
Mikhail Seslavinsky, in charge of the Federal Agency on Press and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation asserted in 2005 that "Russia Today will come as an independent company". Under Russian Law RT is a fully independent organisation.
Journalist Danny Schechter (who has appeared as a guest on RT) has stated that having been part of the launch staff at CNN, he saw RT as another "channel of young people who are inexperienced, but very enthusiastic about what they are doing." Shortly after the channel was launched, James Painter wrote that RT and similar news channels such as France 24 and TeleSUR saw themselves as "counter-hegemonic", offering a differing vision and news content from that of Western media like the CNN and the BBC.
According to RT, the network's feed is carried by 22 satellites and over 230 operators, which provides a distribution reach to about 700 million households in more than 100 countries, and that RT America is available to 85 million households throughout the United States.
Reliable figures for RT's worldwide audience are not available. In the United States, RT typically pays cable and satellite services to carry its channel in subscriber packages. In 2011, RT was the second most-watched foreign news channel in the United States (after BBC World News), and the number one foreign network in five major U.S. urban areas in 2012. It also rates well among younger Americans under 35 and among inner city areas.
In 2013, RT became the first television news channel to reach 1 billion views on YouTube. In 2014 its main (English) channel was reported have 1.4 million subscribers.
Russian studies professor Stephen F. Cohen stated in 2012 that RT does a lot of stories that "reflect badly" on the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and much of Western Europe and that they are "particularly aggrieved by American sermonizing abroad." Citing that RT compares stories about Russia allowing mass protests of the 2011–2012 Russian election protests with those of U.S. authorities nationwide arresting members of the Occupy movement. Cohen states that despite the pro-Kremlin slant, "any intelligent viewer can sort this out. I doubt that many idiots find their way to RT." RT also have proliferated stories such as the police brutality in the US, the crack cocaine usage of Toronto mayor Rob Ford, and the poverty among people of Arab descent in Western Europe.
RT is one of several international channels that have challenged the United States media, which previously dominated global news coverage. In 2010 Walter Isaacson, Chairman of the U.S. Government's Broadcasting Board of Governors (which runs Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia), called for more money to invest into the programs because, "We can't allow ourselves to be out-communicated by our enemies," mentioning specifically Russia Today, Iran's Press TV and China's China Central Television (CCTV) in the next sentence. … In 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that the United States was "losing the information war" abroad to foreign channels like RT, Al Jazeera and China Central Television and that they are supplanting the Voice of America.
Seems there is an information war. Look over this Time magazine piece that spins the RT station as tin hat UFO nuts:
http://time.com/rt-putin/
Then consider this story (also from wiki) which makes RT's journalism sound better than our MSM.
On March 4, 2014, Breaking The Set host Abby Martin (whose show is produced by RT America), speaking directly to her viewing audience during the show's closing statement, said that even though she works for RT, she is against Russia's intervention in Ukraine. She said that "what Russia did is wrong", as she is against intervention by any nation into other countries' affairs. Later, Martin asserted that RT still supports her despite her differences of opinion with the Russian government. RTs press office suggested that Martin would be sent to Crimea and responded to accusations of propaganda, stating "the charges of propaganda tend to pop up every time a news outlet, particularly RT, dares to show the side of events that does not fit the mainstream narrative, regardless of the realities on the ground. This happened in Georgia, this is happening in Ukraine".
Glenn Greenwald claimed that American media elites love to mock Russian media, especially RT, as being a source of shameless pro-Putin propaganda, where free expression is strictly barred. Agreeing the "network has a strong pro-Russian bias", he suggested that Martin's action "remarkably demonstrated what 'journalistic independence' means".
My favorite news show (which has replaced the PBS News hour in our household) is Democracy Now!
watch here:
http://www.democracynow.org/
or here:
https://www.youtube.com/user/democracynow
From their website:
For true democracy to work, people need easy access to independent, diverse sources of news and information. But the last two decades have seen unprecedented corporate media consolidation. The U.S. media was already fairly homogeneous in the early 1980s: some fifty media conglomerates dominated all media outlets, including television, radio, newspapers, magazines, music, publishing and film. In the year 2000, just six corporations dominated the U.S. Media. In addition, corporate media outlets in the U.S. are legally responsible to their shareholders to maximize profits.
Democracy Now! is funded entirely through contributions from listeners, viewers, and foundations. We do not accept advertisers, corporate underwriting, or government funding. This allows us to maintain our independence.
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Now!
Democracy Now! is an hour-long American TV, radio and internet news program hosted by journalists Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez. The show, which airs live each weekday at 08:00 ET, is broadcast on the internet and by nearly 1,400 radio and television stations worldwide.
The program combines news reporting, interviews, investigative journalism and political commentary with an eye toward documenting social movements, struggles for justice and the effects of American foreign policy. While described as progressive by fans as well as critics, the show's executive producer rejects that label, calling the program a global newscast that has "people speaking for themselves."
Democracy Now Productions, the independent nonprofit organization which produces Democracy Now!, is funded entirely through contributions from listeners, viewers, and foundations and does not accept advertisers, corporate underwriting or government funding.
Another outlet that I've been watching has a similar model to Democracy Now! No government nor corporate money, all contributions - The Real News Network.
Watch here:
http://therealnews.com/t2/
or here:
https://www.youtube.com/user/TheRealNews
From a skimpy wiki article:
The Real News (TRNN) is a nonprofit, viewer-supported daily video-news and documentary service. TRNN launched in 2007 by Paul Jay, who serves as the network's CEO and senior editor. TRNN describes itself as a news source "focused on providing independent and uncompromising journalism."
The Real News Network uses internet broadcasting, but it has contracts with satellite and cable television channels which it intends to use for broadcast once it reaches its sustainability goal. It is available on Roku. The Real News has offices in Baltimore and Toronto.
The Real News Network works with the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) at University of Massachusetts Amherst to produce interviews and debates.
From their website mission statement:
"The question we settle in an election is not whether elites shall rule, but which elite shall rule," said conservative pundit George Will on ABC's This Week.
That's why we need daily television news that reports with ordinary people’s interests in mind. The Real News is such a network; it’s the missing link in the global media landscape.
The Real News Network (TRNN) is a non-profit, viewer-supported daily video-news and documentary service. We don’t accept advertising, and we don’t accept government or corporate funding. TRNN is sustained by viewer donations and earned revenue.
Since 2007, we have produced more than 7,000 stories that have been viewed more than 100 million times. The next phase of development is the move to television. We will compete with cable news for an audience in the millions.
I've been enjoying their news broadcasts. They streamed all four days of Nader's Breaking Through Power meeting.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=therealnews+breaking+throug...
And many interviews from the People's Summit.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=therealnews+the+people%27s+...
Another of my favorite stations is teleSUR.
Watch here:
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/index.html
or here:
https://www.youtube.com/user/telesurenglish
From:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeleSUR
La Nueva Televisora del Sur (teleSUR, English: The New Television Station of the South) is multi-state funded, pan–Latin American terrestrial and satellite television network sponsored by the governments of Venezuela, Cuba, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Uruguay, and Bolivia that is headquartered in Caracas, Venezuela. TeleSUR was launched with the objective of providing information to promote the integration of Latin America.
The founder of teleSUR was Aram Aharonian, a journalist and scholar who left Uruguay due to right-wing pressure. Aharonian stated that the idea of teleSUR was "to see ourselves as we truly were", stating that he sought more diversity in the media.
The proposed alternative Latin American television network that would become teleSUR took shape on January 24, 2005, as part of the projects approved in a council of ministers of the Venezuelan government. According to The Boston Globe, Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez, whom they described as a "media savvy, forward-thinking propagandist," was able to fund 70% of teleSUR's functions while also providing broadcasting facilities, with other leftist governments supporting the network as well, advertising it "as a Latin socialist answer to CNN." teleSUR began broadcasting on a limited, four-hour schedule on July 24, 2005, on the 222nd birthday of Latin American leader Simón Bolívar. The network began full-time broadcasts on October 31, 2005.
teleSUR is available free-to-air via satellite to Latin America, the United States, Western Europe, and Northern Africa. The network's availability through cable television has been very limited in Latin America because of the network's editorial approach to several events and governments in the region; the station manager in 2007, Aram Arahonian said in an interview that "cable owners do not provide us with any access [...] it's not frequent, but it has affected us in the large countries.[citation needed]
The availability of the channel via terrestrial television is very limited in the vast majority of South American countries. The only countries in the region that receive all of teleSUR's broadcasts via terrestrial television are Venezuela and Ecuador, whose governments are sponsors of the channel. teleSUR is currently available via Digital Terrestrial Television in Argentina, as part of the Government-sponsored channel line-up which includes several other public service, educational, music, sports, and news channels.As part of the U.S. media coverage of the 2014 Venezuela protests and after his interview with Christiane Amanpour for CNN, President Nicolas Maduro announced on March 8 that on July 24, coinciding with Simón Bolívar Day, teleSUR would launch in English, French and Portuguese. In July 2014, an English teleSUR website was launched. A 24-hour broadcast channel started in July 2015.
More media wars. Like RT, teleSUR is attacked by the US establishment which doesn't want other (non-capitalists) view points. Many of their journalist have been attacked and arrested (see wiki article above for details).
According to Christopher Walker of the US government-funded National Endowment for Democracy, in the Journal of Democracy, TeleSUR is described as Venezuela's "authoritarian media outlet" that has the ability to take advantage of both domestic and foreign media due to the censorship under regimes in native countries and the openness of democratic nations to which it broadcasts.
According to teleSUR, a few hours after their founding, Richard Lugar, then chairman of the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, began a "game of warnings and threats" against the new channel. Three days before teleSUR began broadcasting 24 hour programs, the United States House of Representatives included an amendment to Resolution 2601 introduced by Connie Mack IV, a Republican from Florida's 14th congressional district, which tentatively authorized "to fund activities which support political parties, the rule of law, civil society, an independent media, and otherwise promote democratic, accountable governance in Venezuela." The Venezuelan government replied to the U.S. reaction through its ambassador in Washington, D.C., Bernardo Álvarez saying that "in Venezuela there are 48 channels of free access to anyone with a television set and a small antenna. Only two of them belong to the government. You can also receive more than 120 channels from four continents." The chairman of the US Broadcasting Board of Governors, which runs Voice of America broadcasts in Latin America, Walter Isaacson said that the US could not be "out-communicated" by what he called enemies such as Telesur.
I like The Young Turks. It's refreshing to hear news commentators calling out folks for being "fucking idiots".
watch here:
https://www.tytnetwork.com/
or here:
https://www.youtube.com/user/TheYoungTurks
From
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Young_Turks
The Young Turks (TYT) is an American political commentary web series hosted by Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian. Its stance is liberal/progressive/left-wing. It began as a radio program in 2002 on Sirius Satellite Radio and later on Air America, before airing in 2005 on YouTube and later on Roku and Hulu.
It has also spawned a multi-channel network of associated web series known as the TYT Network.
Issues that the show focuses on include the influence of money in politics, drug policy, social security, the privatization of public services, climate change, the influence of religion, abortion and reproductive rights, and sexual morality.According to The Guardian The Young Turks is the first daily streaming online talk show, having started in that format in 2006. During the 2008 elections, the show developed close ties to Brave New Films. During the 2008 elections, the show developed close ties to Brave New Films.
(Another excellent collection of news videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/bravenewfilms )
The Young Turks claims to be "the world's largest online news show" based on the TYT main channel's YouTube views. On 20 April 2013 The Young Turks announced that their YouTube channel had received over 1 billion video views. On July 14, 2014, TYT announced that the TYT Network had hit 2 billion video views. YouTube video views for the TYT Network stood at a total of 2 billion as of July 2014. Their YouTube channel averaged 750,000 views a day in April 2012, and by November 2014 over 1,400,000 views a day. The Independent described it as "the most-watched online news show in the world."
From:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Young_Turks TYT is now broadcast exclusively on YouTube.
Although many would think journalists should report news, not make news, The Young Turks promotes Uygur's political action committee, known as "Wolf PAC." Its declared goal is to reduce the role of money in the political process.[29][30] Cenk Uygur started it as a response to the Citizens United ruling, with the ultimate goal being to amend the Constitution again to limit the amount of money that any one person or organization can give to any one politician. As of this writing, Vermont, California, Illinois, New Jersey, and Rhode Island are all on the board for the convention
.
So in summary. There are alternate quality news offerings. We have three US outlets that are funded by listeners and consumers: Democracy Now!, The Real News, and The Young Turks. Although each has a slant, they make an effort to bring us a non-corporate view of the world. Other news sources are funded by other countries that promote their perspective. RT (Russia Today) is an independent source funded by the Russian government. TeleSUR is funded by several progressive South American countries and gives us stories which you will not see on US television. Next time I'll delve into some other foreign stations we can watch.
What TV media do you find reliable?
Comments
It got a little too long
to cover Al Jazeera, France 24, and DW. I'll revisit these at a later date unless fans of those stations want to chime in below.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Strange How Russia Today...
Is so much like the "Voice of America" broadcasts we used to aim behind the Iron Curtain...
My how times have changed...
I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."
~John F. Kennedy~
Economic: -9.13, Social: -7.28,
or maybe stayed the same...
old cold war.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/06/10/the-new-cold-war/
“The world war that reached its brutal end in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was fought among the wealthiest and most powerful of nations. Their civilizations had given the world great cities and magnificent art. Their thinkers had advanced ideas of justice and harmony and truth. And yet the war grew out of the same base instinct for domination or conquest that had caused conflicts among the simplest tribes, an old pattern amplified by new capabilities and without new constraints.”
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
What has changed...
Is that so much of our "Local Hometown Media" has been consolidated into "Big Media Corp" without hardly any local reporters covering news...
If it doesn't get caught in the "Big Media Sewer Pipe" it's not news...
Makes the chore of propaganda delivery very easy...
Russia Today and others seem to pick up many of the breaking news stories on a much lower level...
Especially the less than pleasant portrayal of life in the US...
I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."
~John F. Kennedy~
Economic: -9.13, Social: -7.28,
my ideal news
wouldn't have to follow my "beliefs" or my politics, I'd just want it to give me the facts. Facts so I can then make up my own damn mind instead of having it pandered to or brow beaten. Just the facts.
Was almost interviewed by Hartmann but the traffic along I5 was so loud we couldn't hear each other. We were protesting outside a military base in support of Lt. Watada.
"Love One Another" ~ George Harrison
Just the facts maam
I guess the problem is one person's fact is another's lie. Everything is filtered through our personal lens. I think it is a fact that our corporate media distorts, distracts, and misleads. So we're a nation of the misinformed.
On another note, your kayaking picture looked like a beautiful place. Glad you had a good trip!
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Choosing facts is where it gets sticky
Even if we can agree on what facts are, there is still an editorial choice as to which facts are important. The MSM are masters of this: most of what they report is factual, but the choices contain the agenda.
Lying in public is often dangerous. There is a novel I enjoy that I'm too embarrassed to name, but it involves a lot of palace intrigue and such. At one point the heroine accuses a major figure of lying, and the King's reply is if so, then that character must be desperate, but other evidence suggests that he is not, so the heroine must be lying/desperate.
Then there is the GOP nominee, who gets away with this because he is speaking a particular kind of truth to his base. In other words, he occasionally mentions facts that the msm likes to ignore, so he rest of his gibberish is overlooked by his supporters.
We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg
Great list. May I suggest
you ask JtC to add the sites to the left side-bar of alternative media?
And by all means cover France24, DW, and the other site you mentioned to your list - and maybe left side-bar recommendations.
The US, as Pluto has repeatedly pointed out, is living in a media propaganda bubble. The only way out of that is to read/watch non-US sources. Sure, they all have an "agenda," but that's what critical thinking is for.
And, oh, check out Iran's PressTV. One more voice to add to the mix.
Thanks for your efforts, Lookout.
Only connect. - E.M. Forster
Thanks dr
I'll look forward to checking out Iran's presstv - a new source to me. Yes the propaganda bubblespeak has been a effective tool to keep people in the dark. Time to shine a light!
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
hey, mimi, media lady!
Jump in here please with some suggestions and links for Lookout's list. You know more online news sources than anyone I've ever run across, and we USians need your expertise to help us break out of the US propaganda bubble.
Only connect. - E.M. Forster
Hi dancingrabbit, I am no media lady, just
an older single mom lost in the huge US of A needing a job to survive way back... Some Germans seemed to think, even though I had no clue about "news media and journalism", that my other useless education would help me to do whatever they wanted me to do. So, I did it and I ended up in a news outlet and a wire service as "helping hand".
I had written a longer comment this morning, but lost the darn thing. I don't have much to say. I am a lazy person, so if news coverage is short and to the point, I like it. If three people chat over some thing that resembles a "political item" I am ... well ... easily fatigued and switch over to something else. I also hate to search for so many different sites on the web, and I am not inclined, to get organized with all the things I sometimes bookmark, download etc (always procrastinate that) and just RELY ON YOU GUYS to do the dirty work for me. /ducking. I am joking ...
I got into news watching like the virgin Mary got her child, somehow I never understood how it happened. .. It was always too much for me. The more unhappy I became about certain "political features", the less I wanted to deal with it and the more addicted I became reading that site which you all want to forget. I am still mad I got that entangled there for a couple of years.
Now, I read or watch here in the US in my location a bit of DW, a bit of France24, Al Jazeera and a bit of RT. I do not watch anymore CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC or MSNBC since Olberman left. I can't quite understand even the flip-flops lately by a couple of people I didn't expecte they would do. I cut off that cable package I think a long time ago, but don't remember exactly when.
Though I was working for a German TV studio in DC, my work was not in news production, my work was organizing the mess the crew left behind after they finished producing, ie archiving their stuff. Another part was searching in our tape archives (for original footage), which consisted of material from 1985 to today, that was the material our camera crews had shot over the years and all the pool feed material we collected on tapes. My frigging work was to figure out, if the dates scribbled on the tape cassettes were written in in English format or in German format or if it had something at all on it (which mostly it hadn't) and to find out where some lazy fools threw the tapes on the shelves in the basement and then somehow play the clear-voyante and look through the unlabled tape to find this very specific szene when Papa Bush said something somehwere in not exactly sure which location to Papa Grrbi or some such. I developed a six sense staring at tape cassettes that were unlabelled and just "know" what was on there...
If you think the Germans are orderly ... think again. One day my son helped me doing that stuff for two days and he was just horrified what my work was all about ....he took his backpack and disappeared for greener pastures.
So, I never did online research for a news item, the correspondents wanted to talk about and the producer needed to cut the news pieces. I strictly dealt with tape material. Usually you don't have more than four to six hours to produce a news clip and basically there is a lot of time pressure if you really have to search for something and can't find it. In our studio the online research work was done by the producers and correspondents and occasional interns (from Germany working for free) themselves.
So, just to say, I am not a news lady. But I watched some professional news ladies, almost all our bureau chiefs and senior producers were female and the correspondents were half half. Also, the correspondents are there for not longer than three years with occasional extensions for another two years. As the bureau chief positions in the US and in Russia studios are the most important, they often let the people who were in Moscow then work in DC and vice versa. Which lead to a more propaganda resistant news reporting. Usually they looked through the propaganda on both sides. And other than curse words in the morning conferences they didn't let out what they thought.
I was never quite sure, in how far some news I saw on US TV were propaganda or not. Since I worked with visual material, I sometimes judge news outlets by the visuals they use, how they cut their video material and even what kind of visuals they use as "fillers" in between the news pieces.
I like the mantra "less is more" a lot and tend to be more impressed by the words not spoken than the ones that are. It's good to be aware of what is not said or not written and by whom. I am more a person who is attracted to still waters that run deep. Noises are not my favorites.
And in the end I feel that news watching is a huge distraction from other forms of educating yourself. It also is addictive when it comes to blog conversations and can cause easily depressions (which I consider a dangerous by-product of following the news).
So, I like this site here the better, the more links it puts on the left hand site for news outlets that others follow and like. For simple reasons of convenience I would add the main stream media outlets of DW, France 24, BBC and the Guardian and RT.
I am not addicted to political comedian figures. Sometimes I watch them a little and have my laughs, but then in the end, they often make me sad, because it shows that in the US you can say some things on TV only if you joke about them.
Otherwise I read some German newspaper, the ones I remember from the seventies to be good. And I don't care what other people say about them. I also can't stand people telling other people what to read and what not to read. There are some new publication out there, I don't like, they report the same way as US mainstream media would. And somehow everything gets more similar. Internationalism in news reporting is as interconnected as everything else.
I like documentaries made by France24, DW, Al Jazzeera,and many US documentaries on PBS. It's a shame that I didn't watch them consistently in the past. But I still haven't given up to organize my retirement so that I will catch up on all I missed in the past.
Somehow I don't trust many online sites and can't make up my mind about them. I also have difficulties to understand "intelligent snark". So I really have nothing to contribute. I am always not hundred percent sure what to think about some websites that are news related.
https://www.euronews.com/live
I appreciate the media you post
I notice we have similar interests.
Thanks for your thoughtful reply.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
I was just chatting ...
I listen to Democracy Now, The Real News, Check into Truthdig, which includes stories from Common Dreams, I go to France24, DW, some German print media. I always feel I don't read enough magazines like Harpers or The Atlantic. I also don't read NYT and WP, which is pretty bad, But I just don't have the nerves for it. Sometimes I like to know if a site is a one man / woman operation. or not I read a couple of those, but then they stick to more or less one category of stories. I like documentaries from Africa and Asia and I miss Al Jazeera. Then I get so much stuff in my inbox that I can't quite make sense of. I can't well judge anything that has to do with "intelligence" and "military". Some people post links from sites I have never heard of and I am at a loss, how they found those sites, and how they know it's a quality site or not. I am very nosy and often just want to know what people do for a living. I can't understand how many folks can follow the news that closely and broadly and still have a day time job to do that has nothing to do with that sort of work. So, I consider all of you just trojan horses, working secretly for the NSA and CIA and pretending to be gullible nice guys and gals. /s
https://www.euronews.com/live
Al Jazeera
is still available online through its website and now on youtube.
http://www.aljazeera.com/
https://www.youtube.com/user/aljazeeraenglish
Thanks for your comments mimi!
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Try this link
I just discovered this source of English news outlets all at one site.
http://www.newsanewtv.com/
I'll delve into these in more detail at another time. There is plenty to explore.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Thanks for the great links!
Didn't realize there were so many good choices.
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. William Shakespeare
I wish we could develop a channel
that would feature the best pieces of the day. Glad you liked the links!
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Instead of a channel, perhaps we could
join up in a Media Group - get our own right-side bar link - and have a daily compilation of newsworthy/interesting links for people to check out. It would also provide a place to put all the non-US propaganda links for c99peeps to browse.
mimi dropped another Hedges/Flowers On Contact link in this morning's Open Thread - where I fear few will see it - and such a Daily-ish Roundup with such links would be just the place for people to look for such things, as well as creating a library of Oldies-but-Goodies or Enduring Videos.
I suggest this because the word "channel" immediately made me think of copyright issues. Also, sites like/need the traffic themselves.
Finally, a group effort would spread the "work" around.
Just a suggestion. Would like to hear others' ideas.
Only connect. - E.M. Forster
I mentioned something to JtC..
along these lines. As I've thought about it maybe we could list the reasonable sources and or topics and let various folk provide links (to avoid copyright issues) like Joe does at the end of the EB. Perhaps as a sidebar like the current links section?
Sure would be nice to have many eyes reviewing and posting relevant clips.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
bookmarked
thanks for this. i'm a bit of a newshound but have pretty much given up on television and more recently, DK. i like to be informed. my partner doesn't seem to understand how i can spend so much time on the computer. it takes time to read full length articles and occasionally delve into the comments section to get general sense of people's thoughts and feelings. i go beyond just the top headlines. i also enjoy science, technology and important health news. taking up some of your suggested online news sourced will involve even more time on the computer. oh, well.
Digital TV
or a connection let's you watch from your TV. We use a little netbook hooked to the tv to stream. There's also Amazon fire, a google gizmo, and roku? that provide streaming on your TV.
I put stuff on and sweep or cook or wash clothes. Most news is talking heads anyway.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Great Thread
Thanks to commenters and to Lookout for getting this going!
Thanks a lot
I've been searching for news that is really news. I took off my toolbar all the so called news sites including the Guardian And WaPo. You have made it easier for all of us to find better sources then the media propaganda circus to get some news.
I think Joe's EB
has the best news summary I've found. I hope you find some of these links useful Shaz!
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
I made myself a list with the sites that appear most often
in the EB. Then I am always surprised when Joe posts something from different sites and wonder how he can read so much.
I will find my system to read material more inclusively. One day.... i am not ready yet for it.
https://www.euronews.com/live