Republicans rejecting science: It's what they do

Nico Lang has an essay at the LA Times: Being transgender isn’t a mental illness. What’s sick is a society that treats it that way

Attacking Obama, Kansas state Sen. Steve Fitzgerald:

You’re either male or you’re female, and it’s not changeable. It’s reality. Inability to deal with that reality, or to recognize that reality, is disoriented, and can be disoriented to the point of insanity.

Tennessee House Rep. Susan Lynn:

[N]o one should be forced to entertain another's mental disorder, and it is not healthy for the individual with the disorder.

Tennessee state Sen. Janice Bowling, in a letter to AG Herbert Slattery:

[The federal government is] accommodating students with gender identity disorder at the expense of the mentally healthy enrollment.

Bowling's letter was cosigned by 13 state senators and 20 House representatives.

The idea that being transgender is a mental illness is a common one among Republican lawmakers — and has served as potent ammunition in pushing anti-transgender bathroom bills across the country.

It is also completely untrue and based on outdated, inaccurate science. Medical opinion on the LGBT community has shifted dramatically in the last few decades, and continuing to treat transgender people as a suspect, afflicted population is the real threat to public health.

--Lang

Although homosexuality was declassified as a mental illness by the American Psychiatric Assn. in 1973, the medical community’s progress on trans issues was much slower. Until 2012, transgender people were classified as having “gender identity disorder."

But the APA amended that classification four years ago. It’s now known as “gender dysphoria."

This change to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders was intended to show that being transgender is not a disease but a human variation—more like being left-handed than schizophrenic.

--Beth Schwartzapfel, Mother Jones

The APA’s Jack Drescher further stated that the goal of the switch was to end the medical practice of pathologizing transgender people, simply because their existence made others “uncomfortable.”

A 2008 research team from Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research argued that gender dysphoria is a product of biology — specifically development in the womb.

It is possible that a decrease in testosterone levels in the brain during development might result in incomplete masculinization of the brain in male to female transsexuals [sic], resulting in a more feminized brain and a female gender identity.

Researchers in Spain further found that the brains of trans men and those assigned male at birth are nearly identical.

Clearly, science and psychology have come a long way from the old Freudian-based notions of gender identity as a product of childhood trauma.

That hasn’t stopped right-wing advocacy groups like the American College of Pediatricians ACP from comparing gender reassignment to genital mutilation. The ACP has further advised that school administrators “reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex.”

--Lang

Bear in mind, the ACP is a political lobbying organization, and not a legitimate medical group. As ThinkProgress’ Zach Ford explains, “Its name is designed to be mistaken for the American Academy of Pediatrics, which is a national organization with some 60,000 members.”

Conservative groups opposed to trans rights aren’t going away. Unless they are challenged, their views will continue to underwrite bigotry in the name of science — supported by a public that might not know the difference.

The continued pathologizing of transgender people continues to make it easier to legally discriminate against them. Over 30 European countries still have laws on the books that require the forced sterilization of trans people in order to apply for gender-affirming legal documentation. These states include Italy, France, Germany, and the U.K.

Being transgender isn’t a mental illness. What’s truly sick is a society that continues to treat them that way.

--Lang

My own point of view is that I was never more sane than when I admitted to myself that I needed to reject my assigned gender in order to continue any personal growth as a human being.

I was sick...but I'm much better now.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

featheredsprite's picture

unless that person desires an intimate relationship where people need to know a lot about each other.

And it sure as hell isn't the business of government!

up
0 users have voted.

Life is strong. I'm weak, but Life is strong.

It's not just 'mental', it's physical. About 1 in 1000 babies are born with both sex organs or at least prominent displays of both. About 1 in 100 do not have 'typical' displays of sex organs. About 1 in 1666 have neither XX or XY chromosomes. That doesn't even get into brain chemistry or other things that cause differing sexual identity.

up
0 users have voted.

Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?

Wouldn't this be more accurate to say that conservatives reject science? It wouldn't matter the political affiliation?
I am personally aware of people who identify as "liberal" who are just as stuck on the whole binary gender expression of "You’re either male or you’re female, and it’s not changeable" as the Republicans (which has lead to some pretty terse discussions). In my experience they are rather devout religion followers who are all about social justice.

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.
Centaurea's picture

The Repubs are the ones who can make political hay of it. Democratic politicians, who maintain an image of themselves as social liberals, can't easily throw LGBT issues under the bus nowadays, at least not overtly (although certainly they have done so in the past, as with DOMA in the '90s.)

I am still surprised at how many of my contemporaries (I'm in my early 60s) whom I've thought of as progressive and "evolved" have a hard time wrapping their minds around the concept of gender fluidity; and more generally, the notion that things that were previously considered as being rigidly defined -- such as gender and sexuality -- may not be so at all.

Edited to add: Robyn, this comment was meant as a reply to your response to Essus. Somehow it ended up as a comment to your original post, instead.

up
0 users have voted.

"Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep."
~Rumi

"If you want revolution, be it."
~Caitlin Johnstone

Bollox Ref's picture

We'd all be better off.

up
0 users have voted.

Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.