For starters, there's this...

Obama Endorses Hillary, Immediately Meets With Attorney General Loretta Lynch

In order for Clinton to carry Obama's torch, she has to stay out of prison. In order to do that, she has to avoid prosecution.

And so there is no doubt about the implications of Obama's meeting with AG Loretta Lynch meeting, there was also this today...

White House calls FBI probe into Clinton's classified emails a 'criminal investigation' – to glee of Republicans – on the same day Obama endorses her

• Within an hour of Barack Obama's endorsement of Hillary Clinton, his spokesman acknowledged that she faces a 'criminal investigation'
• The misstep sent Republicans cackling to reporters
• Clinton faces the possibility of prosecution for housing classified documents on a private email server
• She used the homebrew setup for all her emails – including sensitive government matters – when she was secretary of state
• White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that the endorsement wouldn't be interpreted inside the FBI as a signal to let her off the hook>

Not convinced yet?

Well, 3 days ago, Monday, June 6th, the FBI officially revealed that it is not only a "Criminal Investigation," but of far more grave and compelling import, it is also a Counterintelligence Assessment --- please read those two words again.

FBI requests permission for secret declaration in Hillary e-mail FOIA case

The DoJ acknowledges here that the FBI is conducting a law-enforcement action as well as a counterintelligence assessment.

Do you know that means? Still not convinced?

Well, if you want to understand the full gravity of this "Counterintelligence Assessment," here's a little background from someone who would know.

JUST HOW BAD ARE THE HILLARY ‘SAP’ COMPROMISE’S ?

WHAT ALL AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON’S ALLEGED SAP COMPROMISE–

• MAJ. ED COET, USA (RET)
  [COURTESY: CAPT Les Horn, USN (Ret)]
  Retired US Army Intelligence Officer.
  Chief Human Intelligence Branch for
  US European Command in Stuttgart, Germany.
  Designated Program Manager for Special Access Program (SAP).

NOTE: Emphasis NOT added by me --- and there is significantly more meat to this piece than I can quote (i.e., see the seven itemized MUST READ bullet points), so please do click the link above and read the entire post. But, here's the money quote...

[snip]

As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse then electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP. Compromise of a SAP not only could — but without doubt would — cause serious damage to our national security. If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise.

If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a DELIBERATE COVER UP –- so grave is this security violation.

If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could gets away with something like this in our system of government.

[snip]

Did Maj. Ed Coet convince you? No?

Okay, well, here's one last piece that will make it clear why no one can, should, or will ignore what Hillary has done:

• Intel Vets Urge Fast Report on Clinton’s Emails

  A group of U.S. intelligence veterans is calling on President Obama to expedite the FBI review of former Secretary of State Clinton’s alleged email security violations so the public can assess this issue in timely fashion.

MEMORANDUM FOR: The President

FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

SUBJECT: Those “Damn Emails” – “Really a Concern”

Again, it really would behoove you to read the entire piece to get the big picture, but here's a rather juicy tid bit:

[snip]

You might give some thought, Mr. President, to a potentially messy side of this. What is already known about NSA’s collect-it-all electronic practices over the past several years strongly suggests that NSA, and perhaps the FBI, already know chapter and verse. It is virtually certain they know what was in Secretary Clinton’s emails – including the ones she thought she had deleted. It is likely that they have also been able to determine which foreign intelligence agencies and other hackers were able to access the emails.

One ignores this at one’s peril. Secretary Clinton’s security violations can have impact not only on whether she becomes your successor, but also on whether she would, in that case, be beholden to those who know what lies hidden from the rest of us – perhaps even from you.

Intelligence professionals (in contrast to the occasional political functionary) take the compromise of classified information with utmost seriousness. More important: this is for us a quintessentially nonpartisan issue. It has to do, first and foremost, with the national security of the United States.

(emphasis added)

[snip]

And if you are still not convinced, let me spell it out for you in no uncertain terms:

Do the math.....