News Dump Tuesday: Orwellian Propaganda Edition

We need to be protected from the Truth

In the true Orwellian fashion now typifying 2016, a bill to implement the U.S.’ very own de facto Ministry of Truth has been quietly introduced in Congress — its lack of fanfare appropriate given the bill’s equally subtle language. As with any legislation attempting to dodge the public spotlight, however, the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act of 2016 marks a further curtailment of press freedom and another avenue to stultify avenues of accurate information.
Introduced by Congressmen Adam Kinzinger and Ted Lieu, H.R. 5181 seeks a “whole-government approach without the bureaucratic restrictions” to counter “foreign disinformation and manipulation,” which they believe threaten the world’s “security and stability.”
“As Russia continues to spew its disinformation and false narratives, they undermine the United States and its interests in places like Ukraine, while also breeding further instability in these countries,” Kinzinger explained in a statement. “The United States has a role in countering these destabilizing acts of propaganda, which is why I’m proud to introduce [the aforementioned bill]. This important legislation develops a comprehensive U.S. strategy to counter disinformation campaigns through interagency cooperation and on-the-ground partnerships with outside organizations that have experience in countering foreign propaganda.”
Make no mistake — this legislation isn’t proposing some team of noble fact-finders, chiseling away to free the truth from the façades of various foreign governmental narratives for the betterment of American and allied populations. If passed, this legislation will allow cumbrously pro-‘American’ propaganda to infiltrate cable, online, and mainstream news organizations wherever the government deems necessary.

As President I will commit war crimes

In her self-declared “major” foreign policy speech on June 2, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton indirectly admitted that the U.S. government’s drone killings of family members of suspected militants, namely Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, if intentional, was a war crime.
Clinton blasted Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump for saying “he would order our military to carry out torture and the murder of civilians who are related to suspected terrorists — even though those are war crimes.”
Yet, while she served as secretary of state, Clinton’s own U.S. government administration may have overseen the very atrocity that she accidentally acknowledged is a war crime.
Hundreds of civilians, many of whom were innocent family members of suspected militants, have been killed in U.S. drone strikes in Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia and more. If any of these killings were intentional, they were war crimes.

Who needs Trump to start a trade war with China when we have Obama

The US has given the go-ahead for the country’s largest steel producer to seek a ban on imports from Chinese rivals, in the first known case in which trade sanctions could be used in retaliation for alleged China government-backed hacking of commercial secrets.
The move comes ahead of a meeting of senior US and Chinese officials in Beijing next week. It highlights the increasingly aggressive tactics the US steel industry is using to fight back against the flood of cheap Chinese steel that has hit global markets in recent years, as well as the growing international concerns about industrial overcapacity in China.
Depending on the outcome the development could eventually result in the next president authorising a blanket ban on imports of Chinese steel in retaliation for the alleged hacking.

The worst possible scenario for Fallujah

New reports emerging today reveal that the Shi’ite militias involved in the offensive against the overwhelmingly Sunni city “detained” the fleeing civilians by the hundreds, hauling them off to the militia-run sections of the Mazraa Army Base, where they are held incommunicado.
In keeping with the militias’ track record in previous “liberation” of Sunni territory, the detainees who have been freed, which are a small minority of the overall number of captives, showed signs of severe torture, and at least four died of their injuries already.
Those released say they were reportedly tortured by militia members asking them if they were ISIS members, before ultimately being released. Anbar Provincial MP Sheikh Raja al-Issawi criticized the move, and pushed for a government investigation of the matter.
That’s unlikely to happen, as the government is so deeply beholden to the militias, and indeed so many of the militias’ top leaders are also politically powerful figures, that they really are above the law in Iraq.

Killing children is OK after all

The Saudi-led coalition fighting Houthi rebels in Yemen has been removed from a UN blacklist of states and groups that violate children's rights in conflict.
Saudi Arabia protested after the UN released a report saying the coalition was responsible for 60% of the child deaths and injuries in Yemen last year.

Hard to believe I'm reading this

Yemen: The parties to over a year of civil war in Yemen have agreed to release all child prisoners they are holding, U.N. envoy to peace talks in Kuwait Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed said on his official Twitter account Monday. “The unconditional release of children was agreed, and the mechanics of the release of detainees in the coming days was addressed,” Cheikh Ahmed wrote....
It is not clear how many child prisoners are being held, but Yemeni political sources say that the Houthis and the government submitted in late May a list of almost 7,000 names of prisoners they say are being held by the other side.

2020 milestone

Still, millionaires currently control 47 percent of the world's wealth, and will control 52 percent by 2020, according to the report. And the richest of the rich will gain the most, especially in the U.S. Those worth more than $20 million in the U.S. will control 29 percent of the country's wealth by 2020, up from 24 percent in 2015 and 20 percent in 2010, according to the report.

Those worth less than $1 million will see their share of wealth shrink to 29 percent of the total, from 34 percent in 2015 and 40 percent in 2010.

The trend will likely accelerate in the next five years, as the largest wealth gains are expected to go to those at the very top of the top. U.S. households worth $20 million or more will see their wealth growth by more than 7.6 percent over the next five years, according to the report. Those in the U.S. worth $1 million to $20 million will see there wealth grow 5.7 percent, while those worth less than $1 million will see their wealth grow 1.2 percent.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

darkmatter's picture

Isn't a bit of restriction on China's ability to flood the world market with cheap and architecturally dangerous steel not necessarily bad?

Isn't San Francisco paying a heavy price for relying on cheap Chinese steel in its shambolic new Bay Area Bridge?

http://www.wired.com/2015/06/mystery-brand-new-bay-bridges-corroded-steel/

Perhaps I'm missing something. Thanks for the news items, though. C99 is quickly turning into a very capable aggregator, thanks to the efforts of you and others.

up
0 users have voted.
blazinAZ's picture

The temptation is to stick our heads in the sand, go about our business, keep shopping.

But we need to know what is being done in our names, and someday, I hope, there will be more than a handful of us crying out "No more war!" "No more torture!" I want the military machine to starve from a lack of funding and support.

How often do we hear (for example, in the "bathroom bills"), it's all about "protecting" children? But for some reason (hint: racism, imperialism), those children far away, who are Arab or indigenous or African -- their lives don't matter, their futures don't count.

I eagerly await the (self-)destruction of this empire.

Thank you, gjohnsit, for keeping us informed.

blaze

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice in America, but it is the fight for justice that sustains you.
--Amiri Baraka

Ya think?

U.S. investigators are trying to determine whether Goldman Sachs broke the law when it didn’t sound an alarm about a suspicious transaction in Malaysia, people familiar with the investigation said. At issue is $3 billion Goldman raised via a bond issue for Malaysian state investment fund 1Malaysia Development Bhd., or 1MDB. Days after Goldman sent the proceeds into a Swiss bank account controlled by the fund, half of the money disappeared offshore, with some later ending up in the prime minister’s bank account, according to people familiar with the matter and bank-transfer information viewed by The Wall Street Journal. The cash was supposed to fund a major real-estate project in the nation’s capital that was intended to boost the country’s economy.
up
0 users have voted.

Another massive bailout sometime in the future

Consider the persistent non-solution to the zombie-like status of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac known as “recap and release.” The plan is to return the two mortgage-finance giants to their pre-financial-crisis status as privately owned but “government-sponsored” enterprises. That is to say, to recreate the private-gain, public-risk conflict that helped sink them in the first place. Their income would recapitalize the entities, rather than be funneled to the treasury, as is currently the case. Then they could exit the regulatory control known as “conservatorship” that has constrained them since 2008 — and resume bundling home loans and selling them, as if it had never been necessary to bail them out to the tune of $187 billion in the first place.

Congress last year effectively barred recap and release, at least for the next two years. Coupled with the Obama administration’s firm opposition, you’d think that would put a stake through its heart. But “no” is not an acceptable answer for the handful of Wall Street hedge funds that scooped up Fannie and Freddie’s beaten-down common stock for pennies a share after the bailout — and would realize a massive windfall if the government suddenly decided to let shareholders have access to company profits again.

With megabillions on the line, the hedge funds have been arguing high-mindedly that their true concerns are property rights and the rule of law; they have also made common cause with certain low-income-housing advocates who see a resurrected Fan-Fred as a potential source of funds for their programs. Left unexplained, because it’s inexplicable, is how the hedge funds’ arguments square with the fact that there wouldn’t even be a pair of corporate carcasses to fight over but for the massive infusion of taxpayer dollars and the public risk that represented.

The latest iteration of recap and release is a hedge-fund-backed bill sponsored by Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.), which would set Fannie and Freddie, unreformed, loose on the marketplace again and do so under terms wildly favorable to the hedge funds.

up
0 users have voted.
Ken in MN's picture

...to her generous campaign benefactors, via her Economic Czar William Jefferson Clinton, with the voter demographic that supported her far more than any other bearing the cost...

up
0 users have voted.

I want my two dollars!

edg's picture

Will all the people of color that damned BernieBros as racist pigs for wondering why they were supporting Clinton remember that they were warned about her when her actions decimate them? Somehow, I think not.

up
0 users have voted.
WindDancer13's picture

Two things to note:

1. In the last couple of weeks, at least 6 super delegates have come out for Sanders. the latest announced her support about an hour before the AP decree. While not a massive number (yet), the timing is curious. With everyone saying "the math," why would these people risk the ire of the Clinton machine? The cynical answer would be that they are trying to boost their own re-electability by showing voters that they were on the "right" side.

2. While there has been a lot of talk about the super delegates, everyone has not paid any attention to the fact that at this point, there are 85 Uncommitted delegates coming from the state primaries and caucuses. That is a good chunk of people who would surely offset a lot of HRC's super delegates along with the number of still unpledged SDs.

The tatest endorsement and a graph showing the uncommitted state delegates can be found in this article: North Carolina superdelegate endorses Sanders

Is it significant that this latest endorsement comes from North Carolina?

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass

WindDancer13's picture

Maybe we can seal this thing up and dump it in the ocean...Sorry, Ocean!

Campaign Announces Clinton Has Entered Incubation Period After Securing Nomination

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass

Haikukitty's picture

What do you think will come out after the incubation period?

Godzilla? Shelob?

up
0 users have voted.
WindDancer13's picture

[video:https://youtu.be/F2cLmbCyzhE]

Hmmm, might explain why she wants to open the files about UFOs...

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass

Haikukitty's picture

up
0 users have voted.
WindDancer13's picture

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass

Ken in MN's picture

body-snatchers.jpg

up
0 users have voted.

I want my two dollars!

WindDancer13's picture

"We are suing the media for complicity."

[video:https://youtu.be/_IAJ5fAm3Cs]

That is the last line in this video. A longer version can be seen at Institute for American Democracy and Election Integrity

Part of their summary from the meeting that took place the day of the video:

Concern has been expressed that the exit polls of the Democratic Primaries for this year, when compared to electronic voting machine totals, seem to show a pattern that might suggest that the electronic vote totals in about ten states may have been shifted from apparently votes from Sanders to Clinton.. In contrast to other nations, exit polls used currently by the Federal Government to assess election fraud in other countries are adjusted continuously on election day to match electronic voting machine totals, rather than to determine whether the electronic vote is accurate. Edison Research which has done all the prior exit polls in this primary has refused to release the raw data, as it has routinely refused since 2004. A lawsuit is being submitted in Ohio about the refusal of both the Media Consortium and Edison Research to release the raw data which would show much more accurately who people really voted for.

up
0 users have voted.

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass