Ripped from the headlines?
Dems near decision on superdelegates
Yup a "near decision".
A year before the 2020 presidential campaign begins kicking into high gear, Democrats are still squabbling over what to do about superdelegates.
Issuing my thanks to sandernista1812 who has expertly whacked the hornet's nest at TOP with a handsome old lovingly carved Hickory Stick. This beautiful piece of artwork displays all the bits and pieces of that most hated of thing at TOP, the Truth as supported by Facts.
Should you care to also feel the spread of the warm glow by venturing over to the other side of The Wall, here is your destination:
It wasn’t a political night. I was watching hockey. My beloved Pittsburgh Penguins were ahead 2-0 and on their way to taking a 3-1 lead in the Stanley Cup Finals. And then, during a major sporting event, I heard a beep and saw a scroll at the bottom of the screen for BREAKING NEWS!
Debbie Wasserman Schultz "accidentally" told the truth about the purpose of Super-delegates in the Democracy Party -- and it has very little to do with promoting grassroot democracy -- just the opposite actually.
Super-delegates exist to control and diminish grassroot democracy, from ever threatening the Party elite's tenuous hold on power.
According to
theguardian
A string of polls over the past two weeks show that the once-independent Vermont senator is tied or in the lead in the two early primary states, Iowa and New Hampshire, and all of a sudden, in striking distance of Hillary Clinton nationally.
(My bolding)
...
