I found it incomplete in typical ways but an interesting read all the same. Make of it what you will.
http://www.npr.org/2016/11/12/501848636/7-reasons-donald-trump-won-the-p...
In my opinion, they did a pretty good job of comparing the 4 main candidates for president. The author doesn't seemed biased in any direction, but it will be interesting to hear your opinions. I posted it to my Facebook page.
The article was in a tweet from OurRevolution. The tweet was upsetting because the graphic they included cut out Jill Stein. So I linked to it planning to be pissed. Instead, I was pleasantly surprised.
I couldn't watch the whole debate. It only took about 10 minutes before I was hurling curses at both candidates, so it was either turn the TV off or break it.
I think I made the right decision.
On one side you had the status quo candidate, smirking, arrogant, and completely oblivious and indifferent to the suffering of the working class.
It's become an article of faith among Democrats that the demographic trend will give them semi-permanent majority in Washington, and that the day will arrive soon.
Dr. Jill Stein, Presidential candidate of the Green Party of the United States, was interviewed by commentator Chris Wallace on Fox News September 4, 2016.
Stein did not back down an inch, and got her points across. [video:URL]:
Sections Below:
NEW SECTION Registration Switching
NEVADA
Hey at least the DOJ has our back - NOT!
There have been many saying that this email thing isn't really a very big deal.
At first, I agreed. While I thought it was an indicator that she had stuff to hide, from an election standpoint I didn't think it would be a significant issue in the General.
But more and more has come out which has caused me to re-evaluate this position.
Hillary doesn't need those Sanders voters. Or so I've been told.
