Ziggy Changes Tune About American Empire

power to the people_0.jpg

This is significant.

"The main architect of Washington’s plan to rule the world has abandoned the scheme and called for the forging of ties with Russia and China. While Zbigniew Brzezinski’s article in The American Interest titled “Towards a Global Realignment” has largely been ignored by the media, it shows that powerful members of the policymaking establishment no longer believe that Washington will prevail in its quest to extent US hegemony across the Middle East and Asia."

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-broken-chessboard-brzezinski-gives-up-o...

This is one of the primary people advocating and planning for the post Cold War American Empire, an architect of the creation of Al Qaeda to fight the Russians in their ill advised war in Afghanistan in the 80's. Look up American Empire Scoundrel in the dictionary and you'll see his picture. Here's what he said back then:

“…The last decade of the twentieth century has witnessed a tectonic shift in world affairs. For the first time ever, a non-Eurasian power has emerged not only as a key arbiter of Eurasian power relations but also as the world’s paramount power. The defeat and collapse of the Soviet Union was the final step in the rapid ascendance of a Western Hemisphere power, the United States, as the sole and, indeed, the first truly global power.” (“The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives,” Zbigniew Brzezinski, Basic Books, 1997, p. xiii)"

Here's what he's saying now:

"As its era of global dominance ends, the United States needs to take the lead in realigning the global power architecture.

Five basic verities regarding the emerging redistribution of global political power and the violent political awakening in the Middle East are signaling the coming of a new global realignment.

The first of these verities is that the United States is still the world’s politically, economically, and militarily most powerful entity but, given complex geopolitical shifts in regional balances, it is no longer the globally imperial power. But neither is any other major power."

http://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/04/17/toward-a-global-realignm...

"As it's era of global dominance ends"

We've watched this happen in real time. From the Fall of the Wall to 9/11 to 15 Fucking years of war to now when Ziggy the Empire Man proclaims the end of the American Empire.

This requires analysis. I'll have to get back on that. But it's important. The changes are happening fast. What happens next appears to be a pivotal point in human history. Imagine that, here we are at a pivotal point in human history. This isn't the end of the English Empire. This is the American Empire, the one with over a 1000 military bases around the planet, special forces in nearly every country, the Empire waging war on the world right now, the Empire with the greatest military machine in the history of the world (except those Russian and Chinese weapons that are giving the American MIC and the Pentagon the shivers). This is America, the land of the free and home of the brave.

So how is this realignment going to happen? Ziggy has some suggestions but to him it's still all about power. The American Empire may not be The Shit but it can still be the Leader. So maybe we'll go from The Shit to The Leader. For We the Serfs it hardly matters, we'll still be Serfs. In reality this is a step closer to the New World Order. So in the end it could be worse than we've got now, and we've got it bad.

Our next new warmonger imperialist President is clearly on record to continue and safeguard the American Empire. The Neocons are still clinging to their quest for the New American Century. But the times they are a changing. Ziggy says so. I'd like to say this is hopeful but my instincts tell me otherwise. This train isn't going to be easily halted. As stated earlier, Russia and China have developed military weapons that rival and surpass those the daunted American military machine possesses. The ability to win a non nuclear war against either of them is now seriously in doubt. Here's Ziggy regarding what may come next.

"That era is now ending. While no state is likely in the near future to match America’s economic-financial superiority, new weapons systems could suddenly endow some countries with the means to commit suicide in a joint tit-for-tat embrace with the United States, or even to prevail. Without going into speculative detail, the sudden acquisition by some state of the capacity to render America militarily inferior would spell the end of America’s global role. The result would most probably be global chaos. And that is why it behooves the United States to fashion a policy in which at least one of the two potentially threatening states becomes a partner in the quest for regional and then wider global stability, and thus in containing the least predictable but potentially the most likely rival to overreach. Currently, the more likely to overreach is Russia, but in the longer run it could be China."

A global People's Revolution is needed at this point to stop this madness.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Big Al's picture

Empire. I've seen Brezinski say similar things in the past, it's not like he's suddenly come to this conclusion. The actions under the Obama admin, the shift to Asia, the antagonization of Russia, the probably escalation in Syria, all of it sure doesn't point to the Empire slowing down and points more toward more war and possible military conflict with China and/or Russia or both. Then there's the power of the military industrial complex.
What's he mean by "overreach"? Sounds like trying to play Russia against China. Watch the think tanks.

up
0 users have voted.
karl pearson's picture

China owns 30% of our foreign debt ($1.243 trillion out of $4.046 trillion). The remainder of the U.S. $19 trillion debt is owned by the U.S. citizens or the U.S. government. Ultimately, China wants its currency, the yuan, to replace the U.S. dollar as the new global currency. Also, China has become the largest world economy and in 2010 became the world's largest exporter. Here's an interesting quote from the article:

"The United States allowed China to become one of its biggest bankers because the American people enjoyed low consumer prices. Selling debt to China allows the U.S. economy to grow by funding federal government programs. It also keeps U.S. interest rates low. However, China's ownership of U.S. debt is shifting the economic balance of power in its favor."
https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-debt-to-china-how-much-does-it-own-3306355

up
0 users have voted.

will fail to mention that not only American consumers enjoyed low prices for goods, but American multinational corporations enjoyed slave labor wages and the resultant excellent sales margins. I admit, I haven't read the link yet and maybe they manage to get that very important point in there. The American consumer is not the only entity at fault, and I'd say not even really at fault. If we had not been so effectively brainwashed by a bunch of greedy sycophants who shill for ever lower wages, I think the American consumer might just rethink that enjoyment of low consumer prices. And of course now, the American consumer is caught in the ultimate trap - low enough wages they cant afford higher prices and so we keep the feedback loop going - more offshoring to get those goods ever cheaper, and not enough economic power to demand wages rise and prices with them.

up
0 users have voted.

Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur

Alligator Ed's picture

The vicious cycle that lizzyh7 recognizes is in part due to American's expectation that to obtain the goods they think they need, saving limited funds by spending less for cheaper imported goods is reasonable considering the wage stagnation compounded by inflation. High tariffs are a classic tool for protecting domestic economies. There are both positives and negatives to this approach. Disregarding the political consideration of voting for essentially an increase of individual's spending, in a "strapped" economy, for the moment. Problems arise. International economies are progressively becoming more interconnected. Any tariff decisions made unilaterally will undoubtedly trigger a round of compensatory tariff increases globally. Some countries, like China have some weapons with which to retaliate of which perhaps the most potent is cashing in their debt-holdings from the U.S. I don't know how far this gets them. But the reverse effect might be enormously negative from Chinese perspective: their product exports will fall considerably to the U.S., which accounts for probably half of their total exports.

up
0 users have voted.
karl pearson's picture

lizzyh7, I always thought one of the big reasons corporations moved was to destroy the unions in this country. TPTB were concerned with the wages and although not everyone was unionized, businesses had to pay a decent wage; otherwise, people would work where there was a union. Can't have people making a decent wage!

up
0 users have voted.

The original, fundamental goal of western oligarchs has always been to lower the quality of life (defined by capitalism as income) of the western (American first) 99%. Remember Bill Clinton saying that NAFTA was intended to normalize world wages by raising the wages of the Mexican worker? He was probably lying, but could have been absurdly naive. (In fact, 3rd world wages have raised - a little - but less than corporate profits have raised, which is all that matters)
Capitalism is not a simple a + b = c proposition, it is a complex equation that contains many variables, including variables that depend on mass psychology. Realizing that, one of the questions becomes how does the American consumer keep being profitable even though his income declines? The superficial answer is to lower production costa more than the unavoidable lowering of consumption. For America this means a shift to 3rd world production.
The problem is that the system can no longer be balanced. Capitalism raised profits by moving factories from America to Mexico and then China, but that created a new class of Mexican and Chinese oligarchs. Capitalism can make more money selling to the new Chinese wealthy than it spent creating them, but only by moving factories from China to Viet Nam, and now there's nowhere left to go. Enter automation - doesn't help enough. Enter qualitative easing and then negative interest loans and then the capitalist kangaroo courts.
It is true to say that capitalism has gotten out of balance because the capitalists have gotten too greedy, but the real question is whether capitalism has an internal contradiction - that the very definition of profit mandates that capitalism must eventually fail, it's just a queation of how fast.

up
0 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

Alligator Ed's picture

Two issues raised in this comment bear further comment:
1. Capitalism is inherently greedy, at least in the U.S. due to laws about the fiduciary duty of corporations to the shareholders--not the 99%--to make money for the corporation's owners. There is no concern in this so-called fiduciary sty, to take into account the public welfare. Either the definition of fiduciary needs to be broadened to include public welfare or that a corollary increase in federal regulations be enveloped, somewhat like indexing for inflation, but in this case, indexing for excess profit (however that is to be determine.

2. The idea that

Capitalism can make more money selling to the new Chinese wealthy...

is a short-term solution. This is just a delay until the Chinese billionaire class has amassed all the money they want to spend, and start to hoard the rest, while not contributing downstream to the Chinese 99%. In other words, selling to the Chinese billionaires just transfers or infects this malaise onto another economy.

up
0 users have voted.

think that a steeply progressive income tax can solve this problem. They are wrong; it just delays the inevitable. Eastern european socialists thought that while a monetary system was necessary they could solve the problem by removing the possibility of profit completely. They were wrong - without the possibility of profit society would not produce, even when the refusal to produce causes undeniable harm. Modern Monetary Theorists think that the problem can be circumvented by simply printing more money whenever the oligarchs horde. This essentially makes money imaginary - money which is not in circulation ceases to exist. (and if hoarded money is brought back into circulation I assume we can simply destroy it through consumption taxes and maintain a balance) I think it's worth a try.

up
0 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

When the 20th Century ended we were looking at the prospect of a cooperative world, including Russia and China with the US. That started to go away, naturally, with Bush and his Russophobes, especially when Putin took back the oil industry from the private citizens gifted by the very corrupt Yeltsin. The tension went full tilt immediately after Putin proposed an open trade zone, Euro style, to include the former Eastern block plus Russia's former Asian components (2004, irrc).
Well, there it was, the bête noire of neo-Cons and Brzezinski interventionists alike: A Eurasian Power able to compete with the US!
As to China, when the US invaded Iraq, China's new premier went on national TV to announce that the invasion was the opening shot in the war against China; thus the increase in defense spending he initiated. (This was in the Chinese English-language website, and I think also Asian Times (atimes.com) at the time.
Both Russian and China were looking for, eager for, a multi-polar world back before Bush was selected..
Here's Breezy seeing that the last hope for US hegemony lies in getting either R or C into our camp. This depends on them being impossibly stupid and irresponsible.

up
0 users have voted.

Orwell: Where's the omelette?

Meteor Man's picture

No siree Bob! I love this brilliant indight:

Without going into speculative detail, the sudden acquisition by some state of the capacity to render America militarily inferior would spell the end of America’s global role. The result would most probably be global chaos.

Because there ain't no global chaos going on anywhere in the vicinity of the third planet from the sun! It's aaaallllll hunky dory with Obama's steady hand at the till.

up
0 users have voted.

"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn

Roy Blakeley's picture

Clinton, Brzezinski, Kissinger, Nuland, etc. etc. are people endowed by fate, augmented with a certain amount of cunning, with power, but they are not morally, intellectually or emotionally equipped to wield power in any constructive way. They are, moreover, too stupid to realize their inadequacy. Humans, obviously, do not figure into international policy. We are insignificant in the great chess game, except as, in aggregate, consumers, workers or soldiers.

up
0 users have voted.

ability to ingratiate themselves to people in power. Once they themselves gain power, they are ruthless in pursuit of even more power.

Whenever someone mentions that Carter was a good president, mention Zbig - enough vileness right there to end any reasonable feeling that Carter was OK.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

But now international corporations - rather than the US - are trying to take over the world, with US political aid/unconstitutional 'trade deals' enabling totalitarian corporate power over each involved country's military and other resources which could be used to invade those not to be economically captured... and wasn't Mutual Assured Destruction already in effect with, at the least, Russia?

... A global People's Revolution is needed at this point to stop this madness.

And I couldn't agree with you more.

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

Wink's picture

So last century. The enemy these days are the Fortune 100, China Stock Exchange.

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

Roy Blakeley's picture

as well as the policeman of international capitalism. The US often acts in the interest of corporate power even though the actions may be detrimental to the US as a nation. If nations are not sufficiently capitalist (e.g. Venezuela) or if (as in the case of Russia) they have their own capitalists that are not subservient to the capitalists that run the US, then they are the enemy and they must be subverted or attacked.

up
0 users have voted.
Meteor Man's picture

If anyone can be called the intellectual godfather of neo-conservatism itis would be Francis Fukuyama. With Ziggy on board with the death knell of neo-conservatism, this is indeed a historical moment.

Imagine William F. Buckley coming back from the grave and announcing he was voting for Jill Stein.

For a brief digest of Fukuyama check out:

https://philosophynow.org/issues/106/The_End_of_History_and_the_Last_Man...

And

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/09/its-still-not-the-en...

And

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/jan/31/comment.usa

up
0 users have voted.

"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

Clinton is not a "liberal", neither in the classical nor the present political sense, she is a corruptocrat, neither thesis or antithesis. In this conversation she is irrelevant, except as an aberration, a bump in the road. The depth and duration of that aberration (slowing the progress of liberal democracy for a few years more than she already has or causing a global chaos that lasts for generations, or her comeuppance triggering the demise of the corruptocrat party and accelerating the ride of a liberal democratic movement) has to be determined, but Fukuyama's basic premise is not disproven.
In ten or fifty years we will see Hillary as not meaningfully different from Mao or Berlusconi.

up
0 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

Alligator Ed's picture

From the Philosophy now article:

But Fukuyama doesn’t ignore the importance of economics in the historical process, so he adds another pillar to his theory. Human progress through history can be explained in terms of ideas; but other advantages of liberal democracy are that it nurtures economic development, the rise of an educated middle class, and high levels of scientific and technological achievement. Fukuyama would perhaps say that countries such as Russia and China have not yet reformed their systems to incorporate both liberalism and capitalism because there is reluctance amongst the ruling elites to completely abandon communist ideals, although at the same time they do see the need to participate successfully in the global market. The problem for both Russia and China is the attractiveness of liberal ideals, which appear to go hand in hand with a free market economy.

There no longer exists in this country and many others no "liberal economies". What we have with our current Corruptocracy is something that Hegel never envisioned. Marx was fundamentally wrong about human nature, a topic for another day. Hegel was incorrect in the formulation of his dialectic, that there is some point at which an equilibrium of ideas will be achieved. This will never happen, because human civilization is never at a standstill. To assert a "permanent equilibrium" in human governance is just as credible as the claim in 1890 by the head of the U.S. Patent Office that everything which is going to be invented, has been invented.

The dialectic process tries to balance conflicting ideas (or systems) by achieving a synthesis, which is a reduction of stressors from the competing ideas. The first flaw in this conception is that there are only two choices to be synthesized, instead of the multitude which must be dealt with simultaneously.
Another flaw of Hegelian dialectic, even if we consider that are only two conflicting alternatives, is that once the conflict is synthesized (i.e., resolved) that at a point in time, humans run out of new alternatives in need of synthesis. Does anybody believe that this is going to happen? What Hegel, and by extension Fukuyama, fail to grasp is that there is no stability in human affairs. Situations may be "solved" through synthesis, but after an interval of uncertain duration, new challenges previously unforeseen arise. The triangulation, thesis-antithesis --> synthesis, will always be replaced. The formula is really old-synthesis-now-thesis is confronted by new thesis/antithesis.

up
0 users have voted.
Wink's picture

I'm no big Obama fan, but if he didn't bring home the troops he at least slowed the MIC's global expansion.

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

off China's territorial waters.

Obama has just gotten India to grant the US military the right to use Indian territory to stockpile arms and to use that country to refuel and service military aircraft.

Commentators, not in the pay of neoliberals and neocons, conclude the US is encircling China and preparing for war with China. How's that for a legacy?

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

Obama has committed $ 1,ooo,ooo,ooo,ooo to "modernizing" the US nuclear arsenal over the next 30 years. This makes lil George look like a peacenik!

up
0 users have voted.
Wink's picture

he spent the $Trillion on fixing potholes and water delivery systems, but spending it to upgrade 40 year old (or more) weapon systems prolly ain't a bad idea either. After all, it looks like all the young boys born the last 4, 5 years will be marching off to war.
Obama kept the Troops™ home when Betrayus et. al. wanted a whole bunch more in the Sandbox. Maybe one of the few positive things he accomplished. He gets my vote as the anti-war prez. Or at least the anti-expansion prez. The MIC will be glad to see him go, happy to salute Her Highness at her swearing in.

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

that would be helpful, is to change our nuclear weapons policy to include "no-first-use."

As Senator Dianne Feinstein wrote in an August 9 letter to the President: "To unambiguously state that we will never initiate nuclear war would reinforce an international norm that will help keep us safe and minimize the very real risk that a foreign power might someday misinterpret a benign rocket launch or a non-nuclear military action as a nuclear strike. Declaring a national no-first-use nuclear policy is an important step towards fulfilling the pledge you made in Prague in 2009 to 'to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.'"

Petition from PSR

up
0 users have voted.

native

Wink's picture

faults is talking out of both sides of his mouth. He had a yuuuge opportunity, after his 2012 re-election "mandate" (and I would have called it a mandate had he won by just one vote), to directly take on the Repubs with rhetoric if not policy. "You have fucked with this president long enough. The American people have spoken, and they don't much like what you asshats are shoveling... " Granted, Repubs still would have stalled Obama's agenda, not voting for one of his policies. But it would have set up 2014 and 2016 for Dems, putting Repubs on notice while showing America who the Dems are. Instead... well, instead he showed us all who the Dems are. [sigh]

up
0 users have voted.

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

Lookout's picture

The move is for global corporations to be the new world power...ruling over nations. It is time - "workers of the world unite!"
http://www.workers.org/

Endless this WAR! It will take a global effort to overcome the power elite.

Thanks for the info Al.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

This dovetails with some of the most aggressive globalization economist suddenly sounding like Occupy protesters. I think a couple of things are starting to get to the 'smarter' neocons and neolibs: Brexit, Saunders run, millennials unplugging from 'standard' media, the overwhelming price of war, an economy based on central banks dumping cash from helicopters, etc. Also, there may be some hidden things going on like the 'Masters of the Universe' are coming to realize that the elites really don't need them. But it may all be too late for everybody. The corporations will carve up the planet like mob bosses splitting up the streets of a city. Maybe the only hope we have is that Russia and China will refuse to play along. It's a weird world we live in.

up
0 users have voted.

Democrats, we tried to warn you. How is that guilt and shame working out?

He may willing enable evil, but he is not stupid. He also pays close attention, and to my mind does not engage in much wishful thinking. If he says we're hitting the limit of our empire, then we should pay serious attention.

up
0 users have voted.
Roy Blakeley's picture

but he is not wise. HRC is similar. In the long run everything they touch turns to excrement.

up
0 users have voted.

n/t

up
0 users have voted.

We don't have time for wars anymore.

up
0 users have voted.

Beware the bullshit factories.

Alligator Ed's picture

when he cited the "new and better weapons" that China and Russia will use to defeat us.

Russia will convince the Eurozone to cease it's anti-Russia policy because of the weariness of the European powers of centuries of endless wars (e.g., The Hundred Years War). The EU countries' eurozone is coming apart at the seams. They are tired of being the recipients of an endless flow of Arab refugees initiated by neo-Con stimulated war. This immigrant load plus the increasing terrorism threat accompanying it is a great financial burden to EU countries.

China has a wonderful weapon it has been developing over decades--their holdings of substantial U.S. debt. Unloading some of that debt can seriously hurt us without a shot being fired.

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

The thing about owning too much of somebody else's debt is that you can go down too.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

GEEE-TAAAAARRRRR!!!!

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXq5VvYAI1Q]

Sorry, I just had to.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Big Al's picture

I almost called Brezinski that but didn't want to desecrate the song.

up
0 users have voted.

Scary Monsters and Super Creeps.

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.